Theme: Civilization

  • NO. WE MAKE NO APOLOGIES FOR DISRUPTION OF YOUR STATUS QUO’S —‘talents’ being

    NO. WE MAKE NO APOLOGIES FOR DISRUPTION OF YOUR STATUS QUO’S

    —‘talents’ being the will to take others property, land and commit genocide?”— Kool Akiem

    (Regarding: “europeans have inherited a genetic advantage in the distribution of their talents, just as have the ashkenazi and the east asians. The difference is only that we developed truth independent of its effect on the dominance hierarchy and no one else did.”)

    REPLY

    Talents meaning personality traits including intelligence, and in particular verbal intelligence, but even more so on general pedomorphcih and neotonic prolongation of traits.

    I am terribly proud of dragging humanity out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, hard labor, child mortality, early death, suffering and disease even if they resisted us all the way, and succeeded in defeating us by the great lies of the Abrahamic Dark Age. And even if they are resisting us today in the beginning of the second abrahamic (pseudoscientific) dark age by exactly the same means.

    I am terribly proud of replacing the undomesticated animal, and domesticating the human animals that remain.

    You are not kin, friend, productive cooperator, political cooperator, or military cooperator and I would prefer to continue speciating and leaving peoples like you behind as we have done so for millennia.

    If we cannot cooperate on ends, that is fine, as long as we can cooperate on means. If we cannot cooperate on means, then you are either unimportant, a competitor for resources, a parasite, or an enemy.

    There is no family of man except in the mind of parasites.

    I mean, the greatest murderers in the world are the islamists (500M dead, and the Socialist/Communists 100M dead) yet we have dragged mankind out of ignorance in the ancient and modern world, with the only interruption being the abrahamic dark age imposed upon europe by eastern emperors followed by muslim pirates and raiders.

    I mean, we destroyed south american civilizations nearly by accident. In the modern world we ahve tried desperately to turn primitive semi domesticated animals into fully human participants in the market order. And had the british not fallen to immoral influence under Disraeli, they might have completed the task by administration rather than leaving it to americans to force others to do at the point of high powered weapons. The muslims destroyed every major civilization in the ancient world, and the soviets cost eastern europe two hundred years. The east and southeast asians killed so many of their own people that only the muslims and the great plagues compare.

    Your anxiety is that you have very low sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, and as such you rail against a world you are unfit for. It is understandable that you should rail against a sexual,s ocial, economic, political and military order that forces you to confront your low market value to others. However, It is in the interests of all mankind past and present that if you lack sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, that you disappear from the gene pool so that you do not force others to pay the cost of your inadequacy.

    We all fear being left behind. I wish I was tall enough to play basketball – I would have greater access to better women. I wish often that I had ordinary intelligence rather than the extremes – it would make life more pleasant. I wish that I had been born in a prior generation of my family when it was much wealthier than others, rather than in a generation equal to others.

    But I compete. I win. I make a place where I can create value.

    I don’t rail against the world to justify my lack of ability, character, and fortitude.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-14 12:28:00 UTC

  • No. We Make No Apologies For Disruption Of Your Status Quo’s

    —‘talents’ being the will to take others property, land and commit genocide?”— Kool Akiem (Regarding: “europeans have inherited a genetic advantage in the distribution of their talents, just as have the ashkenazi and the east asians. The difference is only that we developed truth independent of its effect on the dominance hierarchy and no one else did.”) REPLY Talents meaning personality traits including intelligence, and in particular verbal intelligence, but even more so on general pedomorphcih and neotonic prolongation of traits. I am terribly proud of dragging humanity out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, hard labor, child mortality, early death, suffering and disease even if they resisted us all the way, and succeeded in defeating us by the great lies of the Abrahamic Dark Age. And even if they are resisting us today in the beginning of the second abrahamic (pseudoscientific) dark age by exactly the same means. I am terribly proud of replacing the undomesticated animal, and domesticating the human animals that remain. You are not kin, friend, productive cooperator, political cooperator, or military cooperator and I would prefer to continue speciating and leaving peoples like you behind as we have done so for millennia. If we cannot cooperate on ends, that is fine, as long as we can cooperate on means. If we cannot cooperate on means, then you are either unimportant, a competitor for resources, a parasite, or an enemy. There is no family of man except in the mind of parasites. I mean, the greatest murderers in the world are the islamists (500M dead, and the Socialist/Communists 100M dead) yet we have dragged mankind out of ignorance in the ancient and modern world, with the only interruption being the abrahamic dark age imposed upon europe by eastern emperors followed by muslim pirates and raiders. I mean, we destroyed south american civilizations nearly by accident. In the modern world we ahve tried desperately to turn primitive semi domesticated animals into fully human participants in the market order. And had the british not fallen to immoral influence under Disraeli, they might have completed the task by administration rather than leaving it to americans to force others to do at the point of high powered weapons. The muslims destroyed every major civilization in the ancient world, and the soviets cost eastern europe two hundred years. The east and southeast asians killed so many of their own people that only the muslims and the great plagues compare. Your anxiety is that you have very low sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, and as such you rail against a world you are unfit for. It is understandable that you should rail against a sexual,s ocial, economic, political and military order that forces you to confront your low market value to others. However, It is in the interests of all mankind past and present that if you lack sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, that you disappear from the gene pool so that you do not force others to pay the cost of your inadequacy. We all fear being left behind. I wish I was tall enough to play basketball – I would have greater access to better women. I wish often that I had ordinary intelligence rather than the extremes – it would make life more pleasant. I wish that I had been born in a prior generation of my family when it was much wealthier than others, rather than in a generation equal to others. But I compete. I win. I make a place where I can create value. I don’t rail against the world to justify my lack of ability, character, and fortitude.   Cheers
  • What we can learn from Economics, Weber, Pareto, Fukuyama, Macdonald and myself,

    What we can learn from Economics, Weber, Pareto, Fukuyama, Macdonald and myself, is that without explaining the competition we live under we merely justify (make excuses) and moralize. When in fact all groups compete by genetic, normative, institutional, and cultural means.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 23:35:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973704246402088960

    Reply addressees: @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973703310032211968


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit Where we differ is that I have explained precisely how it was done, where MacDonald (admittedly) merely suggested it was genetic, I’ve addressed how it is both genetic, cultural, and a particular verbal technology this time using pseudoscience rather than theology or pilpul.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973703310032211968


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit Where we differ is that I have explained precisely how it was done, where MacDonald (admittedly) merely suggested it was genetic, I’ve addressed how it is both genetic, cultural, and a particular verbal technology this time using pseudoscience rather than theology or pilpul.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973703310032211968

  • And the principle value of that work has been to understand our own strategy and

    And the principle value of that work has been to understand our own strategy and the strategies of all other peoples, so that we can protect ourselves from future Astrologies, Numerologies, theologies, rationalisms, and pseudosciences. And by the same means used in science.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 23:33:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973703750379622400

    Reply addressees: @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973703310032211968


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit Where we differ is that I have explained precisely how it was done, where MacDonald (admittedly) merely suggested it was genetic, I’ve addressed how it is both genetic, cultural, and a particular verbal technology this time using pseudoscience rather than theology or pilpul.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973703310032211968


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit Where we differ is that I have explained precisely how it was done, where MacDonald (admittedly) merely suggested it was genetic, I’ve addressed how it is both genetic, cultural, and a particular verbal technology this time using pseudoscience rather than theology or pilpul.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973703310032211968

  • Where we differ is that I have explained precisely how it was done, where MacDon

    Where we differ is that I have explained precisely how it was done, where MacDonald (admittedly) merely suggested it was genetic, I’ve addressed how it is both genetic, cultural, and a particular verbal technology this time using pseudoscience rather than theology or pilpul.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 23:32:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973703310032211968

    Reply addressees: @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973702810016665600


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit The only reason the Jewish “counter enlightenment’ matters more than the previous (all of which have led to conflicts) is that we are exiting it now, and have been since sometime around 1990 – and we have been locally influenced whereas previous events have been at arms length.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973702810016665600


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit The only reason the Jewish “counter enlightenment’ matters more than the previous (all of which have led to conflicts) is that we are exiting it now, and have been since sometime around 1990 – and we have been locally influenced whereas previous events have been at arms length.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973702810016665600

  • The only reason the Jewish “counter enlightenment’ matters more than the previou

    The only reason the Jewish “counter enlightenment’ matters more than the previous (all of which have led to conflicts) is that we are exiting it now, and have been since sometime around 1990 – and we have been locally influenced whereas previous events have been at arms length.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 23:30:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973702810016665600

    Reply addressees: @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973702103100248064


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas I was unaware of Macdonald until 2012 and came to precisely the same conclusions. The only difference was that I was trying to understand western group evolutionary strategy, and why it was unarticulated in a canon other than our common law. Fukuyama partly satisfies it. @TOOEdit

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973702103100248064


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas I was unaware of Macdonald until 2012 and came to precisely the same conclusions. The only difference was that I was trying to understand western group evolutionary strategy, and why it was unarticulated in a canon other than our common law. Fukuyama partly satisfies it. @TOOEdit

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973702103100248064

  • I was unaware of Macdonald until 2012 and came to precisely the same conclusions

    I was unaware of Macdonald until 2012 and came to precisely the same conclusions. The only difference was that I was trying to understand western group evolutionary strategy, and why it was unarticulated in a canon other than our common law. Fukuyama partly satisfies it. @TOOEdit


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 23:27:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973702103100248064

    Reply addressees: @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973701230169067522


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas Most of the time I’ve torn apart the author so heavily by the first 1500 words that continuation is pointless. In this case just the first three sentences are … less than amateurish. Macdonad’s only weakness was in specializing in one stategy rather than comparative strategies

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973701230169067522


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @LibertyBrekfast @nathancofnas Most of the time I’ve torn apart the author so heavily by the first 1500 words that continuation is pointless. In this case just the first three sentences are … less than amateurish. Macdonad’s only weakness was in specializing in one stategy rather than comparative strategies

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/973701230169067522

  • And now that I think of it, Kissinger’s book probably makes two points (one of w

    And now that I think of it, Kissinger’s book probably makes two points (one of which I’ve stated here), and is probably the most thoughtful work other than Fukuyama’s.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 19:27:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973641609165377537

    Reply addressees: @Sonshi_com

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973629656606928896


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973629656606928896

  • @jordanbpeterson The answer to ‘Why do we Westerners (and particularly anglos) l

    @jordanbpeterson The answer to ‘Why do we Westerners (and particularly anglos) l

    @jordanbpeterson The answer to ‘Why do we Westerners (and particularly anglos) live in a high trust civilization?’ #jordanbpeterson https://t.co/G5JLIpwimV


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-13 15:03:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973575247562706944

  • Our Only Asset Is Time. Poverty Didn’t Evolve. Wealth Did.

    Poverty didn’t evolve, wealth and money evolved. Poverty is merely a relative assessment of one’s ability to consume. Hence why indigenous peoples commit suicide in droves once aware of their relative condition. That relative condition is poverty. However, it can only be known to be poverty once one is aware of a relative condition. Prosperity (wealth) evolved from the division of labor. Money of some kind (commodities) is necessary to remove frictions to the coincidence of wants in a division of labor. Prices are necessary to allow planning, complex production of multi-part products and services, credit, and debt. Non-Commodity Money is necessary to reduce frictions to the coincidence of wants, that limits the expansion of trade. ****Our only asset is time. We are not wealthier than cavemen. We have simply made all goods, services, and information cheaper, through the division of knowledge and labor using the information system we call money and prices. This is the most important lesson of economics. All understanding of wealth exists in this one paragraph.****