Theme: Civilization

  • There is absolutely no evidence of integration anywhere on earth and never has b

    There is absolutely no evidence of integration anywhere on earth and never has been, even in the USA whites still associate by european ancestry. Islamists and jews never integrate anywhere. Why, if the Levant failed over and over again “Will this time be different?” IT WON’T


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 20:26:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975830849374621697

    Reply addressees: @TOQJoyce

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975743644140474370


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975743644140474370

  • RT @jordanbpeterson: Unhappy identity-politics alt-righters: “The Western World

    RT @jordanbpeterson: Unhappy identity-politics alt-righters: “The Western World wasn’t always markedly tribal, but it sure is now, owing to…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 12:03:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975704431382712325

  • How Russians Misunderstand American Civilization

    Dima, You (as most Russians) misunderstand the constitution, because Russians (somewhat like Germans) run their civilization by religion, philosophy and literature, and anglos run and always have run their society by rule of law of reciprocity. Hence anglo fascination with empiricism, french with pseudo-moral literature, germans with rationalism (philosophy), and Russians with Literature. The jews also use law but it is poly ethical, where anglos use universally ethical. The reason being is that russians have yet to develop a substianial commerical middle class that exports the ethics of reciprocity and truthful speech to the rest of the society through participation in the commercial economy. This is all well understood in the research. There is a very good reason that the stock market is dominant in America, the Bond market in London, heavy industry in germany, and military production in russia. RISK FOLLOWS TRUST AND RUSSIANS DON’T HAVE ANY Now, I am a Russophile, and a resident of Ukraine. But I am also a political economist (I study institutions). Russian corruption is absurdly pervasive. And Russian mistrust as well understood as Chinese deception. I would rather be a citizen of russia, run a business in america, labor in germany, and be educated in England. That is because each of us does something better than the other. The only problem in this world that prevents the Circumpolar People (all of us) from Uniting is that russian foreign policy is correct, but russian expansion not. American foreign policy is incorrect, and american expansion not. If our people are to have a future it is by the incremental withdrawal of american empire from world affairs, and the unification of german technology and russian labor and resources. America is lost to our people. The truth is russia and the Intermarium are our only hope. But that hope cannot come until russia matures into a fully diversified commercial economy and russians develop the trust in others that results from it.
  • HOW RUSSIANS MISUNDERSTAND AMERICAN CIVILIZATION Dima, You (as most Russians) mi

    HOW RUSSIANS MISUNDERSTAND AMERICAN CIVILIZATION

    Dima,

    You (as most Russians) misunderstand the constitution, because Russians (somewhat like Germans) run their civilization by religion, philosophy and literature, and anglos run and always have run their society by rule of law of reciprocity.

    Hence anglo fascination with empiricism, french with pseudo-moral literature, germans with rationalism (philosophy), and Russians with Literature. The jews also use law but it is poly ethical, where anglos use universally ethical.

    The reason being is that russians have yet to develop a substianial commerical middle class that exports the ethics of reciprocity and truthful speech to the rest of the society through participation in the commercial economy.

    This is all well understood in the research.

    There is a very good reason that the stock market is dominant in America, the Bond market in London, heavy industry in germany, and military production in russia.

    RISK FOLLOWS TRUST AND RUSSIANS DON’T HAVE ANY

    Now, I am a Russophile, and a resident of Ukraine. But I am also a political economist (I study institutions). Russian corruption is absurdly pervasive. And Russian mistrust as well understood as Chinese deception.

    I would rather be a citizen of russia, run a business in america, labor in germany, and be educated in England. That is because each of us does something better than the other.

    The only problem in this world that prevents the Circumpolar People (all of us) from Uniting is that russian foreign policy is correct, but russian expansion not. American foreign policy is incorrect, and american expansion not. If our people are to have a future it is by the incremental withdrawal of american empire from world affairs, and the unification of german technology and russian labor and resources.

    America is lost to our people. The truth is russia and the Intermarium are our only hope. But that hope cannot come until russia matures into a fully diversified commercial economy and russians develop the trust in others that results from it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 08:44:00 UTC

  • How Russians Misunderstand American Civilization

    Dima, You (as most Russians) misunderstand the constitution, because Russians (somewhat like Germans) run their civilization by religion, philosophy and literature, and anglos run and always have run their society by rule of law of reciprocity. Hence anglo fascination with empiricism, french with pseudo-moral literature, germans with rationalism (philosophy), and Russians with Literature. The jews also use law but it is poly ethical, where anglos use universally ethical. The reason being is that russians have yet to develop a substianial commerical middle class that exports the ethics of reciprocity and truthful speech to the rest of the society through participation in the commercial economy. This is all well understood in the research. There is a very good reason that the stock market is dominant in America, the Bond market in London, heavy industry in germany, and military production in russia. RISK FOLLOWS TRUST AND RUSSIANS DON’T HAVE ANY Now, I am a Russophile, and a resident of Ukraine. But I am also a political economist (I study institutions). Russian corruption is absurdly pervasive. And Russian mistrust as well understood as Chinese deception. I would rather be a citizen of russia, run a business in america, labor in germany, and be educated in England. That is because each of us does something better than the other. The only problem in this world that prevents the Circumpolar People (all of us) from Uniting is that russian foreign policy is correct, but russian expansion not. American foreign policy is incorrect, and american expansion not. If our people are to have a future it is by the incremental withdrawal of american empire from world affairs, and the unification of german technology and russian labor and resources. America is lost to our people. The truth is russia and the Intermarium are our only hope. But that hope cannot come until russia matures into a fully diversified commercial economy and russians develop the trust in others that results from it.
  • Cultural Specialization Requires National Specialization

    To Jonathan Haidt via twitter: 1) Question. Wealth has allowed us to explore our individual differences, pursue individual preferences, and all but eliminate the dependence upon family. So why is it not deterministic that we will develop demand for separate states to further ends that we can now afford? 2) So, why isn’t it the next evolutionary consequence, to preferentially ‘speciate’ so that we produce commons that suit our desires? Why is ANY monopoly a good? The only monopoly good I know of is scientific (operational) truth. 3) Why does a monopoly continental government provide better technological, economic, political, and normative results than multiple regional or local governments that specialize to produce commons preferential to members and undesirable by other peoples? 4) Why aren’t we all conducting the natural evolutionary research program and therefore why isn’t this specialization in wants rather than monopoly desirable? Isn’t the answer to return to the reason for european rapid advancement: specialization?
  • CULTURAL SPECIALIZATION REQUIRES NATIONAL SPECIALIZATION To Jonathan Haidt via t

    CULTURAL SPECIALIZATION REQUIRES NATIONAL SPECIALIZATION

    To Jonathan Haidt via twitter:

    1) Question. Wealth has allowed us to explore our individual differences, pursue individual preferences, and all but eliminate the dependence upon family. So why is it not deterministic that we will develop demand for separate states to further ends that we can now afford?

    2) So, why isn’t it the next evolutionary consequence, to preferentially ‘speciate’ so that we produce commons that suit our desires? Why is ANY monopoly a good? The only monopoly good I know of is scientific (operational) truth.

    3) Why does a monopoly continental government provide better technological, economic, political, and normative results than multiple regional or local governments that specialize to produce commons preferential to members and undesirable by other peoples?

    4) Why aren’t we all conducting the natural evolutionary research program and therefore why isn’t this specialization in wants rather than monopoly desirable? Isn’t the answer to return to the reason for european rapid advancement: specialization?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 08:06:00 UTC

  • Cultural Specialization Requires National Specialization

    To Jonathan Haidt via twitter: 1) Question. Wealth has allowed us to explore our individual differences, pursue individual preferences, and all but eliminate the dependence upon family. So why is it not deterministic that we will develop demand for separate states to further ends that we can now afford? 2) So, why isn’t it the next evolutionary consequence, to preferentially ‘speciate’ so that we produce commons that suit our desires? Why is ANY monopoly a good? The only monopoly good I know of is scientific (operational) truth. 3) Why does a monopoly continental government provide better technological, economic, political, and normative results than multiple regional or local governments that specialize to produce commons preferential to members and undesirable by other peoples? 4) Why aren’t we all conducting the natural evolutionary research program and therefore why isn’t this specialization in wants rather than monopoly desirable? Isn’t the answer to return to the reason for european rapid advancement: specialization?
  • GROUP STRATEGIES: All groups demonstrate group competitive strategies. All group

    GROUP STRATEGIES: All groups demonstrate group competitive strategies. All groups share developmental, demographic,and geographic advantages, institutionalize and exploit them. CONSPIRACY OF COMMON INTEREST is not the same as CONSPIRACY OF INTENT — but the OUTCOME is the SAME.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-19 02:12:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975555569150029831

  • We dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, povert

    We dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, and the vicissitudes of nature by that one rule. And they destroyed it. Never assume you understand the big things. They did.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-18 21:39:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975486875451392000

    Reply addressees: @Communism_Kills

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975483633782882311


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/975483633782882311