Our myths split north of the black sea. The western (eventually odin), and eastern (eventually vedic). Then crossed over (shared) again south of the black sea (greek,anatolian, semitic, persian). But the differences remain the same. Authoritarian semitic, I don’t know how to cast persian except ‘like chinese’ as wisdom literature, the indic/vedic, and then the ‘rational’ germanic, roman, greek. So the spectrum of empirical to authoritarian to supernatural works eastward. I don’t know why other than to assume it’s a demographic necessity since we know the anatolians were working on religion as we understand it 8000bc. Even before the british isles were … 3000bc. So it s likely that the henge culture was informed of the anatolian culture. at least by story if not by experience. I assume that the semitic (fertile crescent) peoples had longer to work with the anatolian religion, and so that the persians (east) and the anatolians (west) and the greeks (far west), and the romans (farthest west), were all less affected given the distance. Unfortunately the fertile crescent meant food and that meant underclasses, and that mean authoritarianism. Hunters don’t need that stuff. 😉
Theme: Civilization
-
UNDERSTANDING OUR VARIED MYTHOS Our myths split north of the black sea. The west
UNDERSTANDING OUR VARIED MYTHOS
Our myths split north of the black sea.
The western (eventually odin), and eastern (eventually vedic).
Then crossed over (shared) again south of the black sea (greek,anatolian, semitic, persian).
But the differences remain the same. Authoritarian semitic, I don’t know how to cast persian except ‘like chinese’ as wisdom literature, the indic/vedic, and then the ‘rational’ germanic, roman, greek. So the spectrum of empirical to authoritarian to supernatural works eastward. I don’t know why other than to assume it’s a demographic necessity since we know the anatolians were working on religion as we understand it 8000bc. Even before the british isles were … 3000bc. So it s likely that the henge culture was informed of the anatolian culture. at least by story if not by experience.
I assume that the semitic (fertile crescent) peoples had longer to work with the anatolian religion, and so that the persians (east) and the anatolians (west) and the greeks (far west), and the romans (farthest west), were all less affected given the distance.
Unfortunately the fertile crescent meant food and that meant underclasses, and that mean authoritarianism.
Hunters don’t need that stuff. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 17:24:00 UTC
-
“The only way to defeat intolerance (of civilisation, meritocracy, commons) is b
—“The only way to defeat intolerance (of civilisation, meritocracy, commons) is by being even more intolerant of deceit and non-reciprocal costs.”—
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 13:53:00 UTC
-
Intellectual capital is over. The globalist era is ending. The only competitive
Intellectual capital is over. The globalist era is ending. The only competitive advantages any population has are (a) demographic (b) normative and institutional, and (c) territorial. That’s it.
We cannot compete with the numbers. We don’t have them. We gave those numbers away. So the only thing we can do is protect our assets (a) demographic, (b) normative and institutional, and (c) territorial.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 13:47:00 UTC
-
1) Geographic escape of the regression to the mean. 2) Duration of planning and
1) Geographic escape of the regression to the mean.
2) Duration of planning and voluntary organization required to preserve cooperation (see also inuit peoples and amerindians)
3) Utility of people in scarcity vs disutility of others in density,
4) Geographic (horizontal) range of trade (information transfer) on the eurasian continent.
5) Temperate gradients that can only be defeated by tools, vs disease and tribal gradients that are defeated by reproduction and early maturity.
6) Negative pressure on the less able (shorter term) in winter climes. I mean, winters are the best agents of darwin.
7) The difference between central management of irrigation and therefore centralization of capital (fertile crescent, indus river, yellow river), and the lack of such need (or utility) in both europe and the plain and the black and caspian seas. (Our farmland is bigger and better and more distributed meaning capital and defense had to be distributed).
8) Combining the european wheel, with the anatolian bronze, with the steppe horse, and therefore freeing man from his bodily limits and creating a civilization that mastered ‘ooda loops’ (maneuver, markets) at every level.
9) Hence we are rarey first, but we are always fastest, because there is no faster way to adapt a society to constant change than ‘markets in everything’ adjudicated by the common law of tort (property).
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 11:52:00 UTC
-
“…French…”—Lukas Rosenbaum How do you explain that france is degenerating
—“…French…”—Lukas Rosenbaum
How do you explain that france is degenerating fastest, that france has repeatedly tried to move the capital to french territory, that france failed to adopt protestantism, that france could not defend herself during the medieval era, that france originated the counter-enligthenment, that france was too weak to defend herself after revolution and napoleonic era, that napoleonic france ended the european era of private states and created financialized total war, and that france contributed almost nothing to civilization afterward? France is the most authoritarian country in europe and only vaguely less harmful than russia. Although… the french-russian cultural alliance has been long standing for those authoritarian reasons.
How do you explain the fact that every french colony is a disaster and every english colony is not? Authoritarianism.
The vulnerability of anglo civ is a common vulnerability of all naval empires which bias to excessive liberalism, just as land empires bias toward corruption, just as diasporic peoples bias toward parasitism. We still operate as if we are a naval empire making the same mistakes as did the Athenians by fighting the spartans (germany) when the problem as always has been the phoenicians.
Declining Authoritarianism and declining trust: Nordics (including english), Germanics, eastern europeans, Italians, French, Russians, Ashkenazis.
There is a reason that the germans and english use the most truthful, honest, and conciliatory language in negotiation, of all the world the french use the most dishonest and threatening language in negotiations. (look it up.)
The french heartland might be german, but the cancer upon europe that is paris is distinctly effeminate (byzantine).
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 11:13:00 UTC
-
Their Poetry, Our Arguments
The Chinese use Riddles like we use Aphorisms. The difference is due to the high context low precision of their rather primitive language. Their poetry, our arguments.
-
Their Poetry, Our Arguments
The Chinese use Riddles like we use Aphorisms. The difference is due to the high context low precision of their rather primitive language. Their poetry, our arguments.
-
End (((Their))) Influence
Russia has chosen Orthodoxy to end (((their))) influence – because they never succeeded in developing the militia order – and therefore, never rule of law. As a member of northern european civilization, I prefer to end (((their))) influence with the militia order, rule of law, and a religion of man, nature, and history. Because of the fervency of the protestant members of the church, this can only be done by persisting the church in some form, by retaining it’s assets, but expanding it’s myths, the oath, and the feast, back into the ‘grove’ where failures of diligence in the garden are immediate and obvious.
-
End (((Their))) Influence
Russia has chosen Orthodoxy to end (((their))) influence – because they never succeeded in developing the militia order – and therefore, never rule of law. As a member of northern european civilization, I prefer to end (((their))) influence with the militia order, rule of law, and a religion of man, nature, and history. Because of the fervency of the protestant members of the church, this can only be done by persisting the church in some form, by retaining it’s assets, but expanding it’s myths, the oath, and the feast, back into the ‘grove’ where failures of diligence in the garden are immediate and obvious.