The reason indians east asians produce the vast majority of ocean waste (plastics) is that here are more people in the “Dirty World” than in the rest of the world combined. So when I tell you that there is only one problem in the world and it is the population of that region, that is why. Apr 23, 2018 10:26am
Theme: Civilization
-
Libertarian ethics derive from hebrew diasporic pastoralist ethics (those than c
Libertarian ethics derive from hebrew diasporic pastoralist ethics (those than can run away) whereas western sovereign ethics derive from western indo european agrarian militia ethics (those that remain present) – which is a difference between the short term temporal and longer term intertemporal. which is why libertarian ethics lare limited to volition, not like western,inclusive of reciprocity. In other words, under western indo european ethics you warranty your words and deeds, whereas hebrew ethics are designed to be irreciprocal, and without warranty on purpose – as is stated in jewish law. Otherwise, if you don’t follow ethics of warranty, and instead if you follow jewish ethics, then there is no prohibition on creating and profiting from moral hazard (parasitism). And so if they follow irreciprocal ethics a group can specialize in profiting from moral hazard (parasitism), like lending usurious money to poor people, engaging in the slave trade, blackmail, slumlording and tax collection. Whereas moral peoples specialize in the lower returns on warrantable and reciprocal goods that do not create incentive to retaliate (kill). WHich is why jews in Europe had such a problem, (and had population bottlenecks). A low trust immoral parasitic population hosted by a high trust moral productive population will always lead to accumulated grievances and explosive retaliation. But, none of us can look i the mirror at our ancestors and recognize them for their criminality – although westerners since Burke certainly have done so. Most other civilizations lack the intellectual honesty to look in the mirror at their ancestors and understand that their punishments were earned. In the case of the west our adoption of christianity demilitarized and fragmented europe to the point where it was the viking invasions that restored the western ethos, and the reintroduction of greek thought that lead to it’s return to it’s traditional vector after the damage of the abrahamic dark ages.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-23 15:26:00 UTC
-
The roman empire consisted of the The Roman (western mediterranean), and rome’s
The roman empire consisted of the The Roman (western mediterranean), and rome’s conquest of the Greek Empire (Aegean), Greek-Conquered Egypt, and Anatolia, Roman conquered Syria, Palestine, and north africa.
The greek (eastern empire) survived, but the west was lost to jewish internal insurrection and germanian external conquest, and the rest incrementally lost to judaism v3, the muslim conquests, which destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world.
So the eastern empire was roman in name the same way the holy roman empire was roman (neither was).
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-23 15:06:00 UTC
-
England started the industrial revolution with crucible steel. America supplied
England started the industrial revolution with crucible steel. America supplied cheap labor to european inventions just like china is supplying cheap labor to western inventions. The second scientific and technological revolution happened in post-prussian germany in the later 1800’s and was truncated by the war, with the russians (equipment and tools) and americans (scientists) the primary beneficiaries of the german revolution.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-23 12:40:00 UTC
-
The reason indians east asians produce the vast majority of ocean waste (plastic
The reason indians east asians produce the vast majority of ocean waste (plastics) is that here are more people in the “Dirty World” than in the rest of the world combined. So when I tell you that there is only one problem in the world and it is the population of that region, that is why.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-23 10:26:00 UTC
-
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 21:35:00 UTC
-
Rousseau and Foucault were “Sexual Deviants” and french culture anti-masculine f
Rousseau and Foucault were “Sexual Deviants” and french culture anti-masculine for historic anti-german reasons. Their philosophical bias, the pre-christian venus cult, the revolution’s revolt against white men in church and state, have created a conformist, feminine, hostile, anti-western civilization – at least in paris and in the intelligentsia. Meanwhile the population remains largely german in intuition. The british less so , the nordics less so, the germans less so the poles less so, and the russians least of all.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 08:49:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/31117943_10156303476507264_66892718
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/31117943_10156303476507264_6689271865413730304_n_10156303476502264.jpg Jaimz BeelWas watching some videos yesterday about the spread of the ancient Magyar DNA from present day Syria (and then supposedly later mixed with Uralic) — something like that.Apr 21, 2018 9:24pmDawid WellaFascinating how the great splittings all happened in areas suitable for agricultureApr 22, 2018 2:30am
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-21 20:28:00 UTC
-
Paternalism (Aryanism) Will Help You Love People Again
PATERNALISM (ARYANISM) WILL HELP YOU LOVE PEOPLE AGAIN —“The more I learn, and ‘see’ what I learn in people and in the world, I can feel arising in me a tendency to just see most other people as non self aware, selfish actors who simply act (almost deterministically) according to their incentives, within the scope that they can understand…. which usually isn’t very large. On one hand this gives a certain amount of peace, but on the other is the temptation to simply feel atomised and a bit apathetic. Is it possible to love people and love the world despite losing so many illusions about them? And if so, how would you suggest cultivating more of that emotional state?”—Rob McMullan Well, this is what I hope ‘the precious few’ achieve: the understanding that propertarianism is as revolutionary as was empiricism, and that it’s not that we CAN’t have relatively free will but that we DON’T have relatively free will, because we are just negotiating machines on behalf of our genes using incentives. So, where you say ‘pathetic’ I”ll use the term “dehumanizing” which is how the christian world reacted against the findings of science, and in particular heliocentrism and darwinism. But once you ‘adapt’ to your new understanding, you will love people like I do, and like generals love their soldiers, like kings love their people, and mothers love their children. The miracle of it all is that IT WORKS. I mean, we actually manage to evolve and live together and drag ourselves into godhood despite being nearly automatons in doing so. It’s wondrous!!! I found I had an amazing sense of power (mindfulness), and i suspect otehrs do too. the problem is you can’t go around and change the world with the knowledge all that easily. It’s got to ‘grow’ in influence. Hence why I”m so concerned not with people agreeing, but with using force to impose the law, from which they will learn by environmental pressure and incentives rather than exposition and understanding. Once you return to being an Aryan, and seeing mankind as children and us as gods, you will just love them. It’s the christian falsehood of equality that deprives you of the option of paternalism and love for fellow man.
-
Paternalism (Aryanism) Will Help You Love People Again
PATERNALISM (ARYANISM) WILL HELP YOU LOVE PEOPLE AGAIN —“The more I learn, and ‘see’ what I learn in people and in the world, I can feel arising in me a tendency to just see most other people as non self aware, selfish actors who simply act (almost deterministically) according to their incentives, within the scope that they can understand…. which usually isn’t very large. On one hand this gives a certain amount of peace, but on the other is the temptation to simply feel atomised and a bit apathetic. Is it possible to love people and love the world despite losing so many illusions about them? And if so, how would you suggest cultivating more of that emotional state?”—Rob McMullan Well, this is what I hope ‘the precious few’ achieve: the understanding that propertarianism is as revolutionary as was empiricism, and that it’s not that we CAN’t have relatively free will but that we DON’T have relatively free will, because we are just negotiating machines on behalf of our genes using incentives. So, where you say ‘pathetic’ I”ll use the term “dehumanizing” which is how the christian world reacted against the findings of science, and in particular heliocentrism and darwinism. But once you ‘adapt’ to your new understanding, you will love people like I do, and like generals love their soldiers, like kings love their people, and mothers love their children. The miracle of it all is that IT WORKS. I mean, we actually manage to evolve and live together and drag ourselves into godhood despite being nearly automatons in doing so. It’s wondrous!!! I found I had an amazing sense of power (mindfulness), and i suspect otehrs do too. the problem is you can’t go around and change the world with the knowledge all that easily. It’s got to ‘grow’ in influence. Hence why I”m so concerned not with people agreeing, but with using force to impose the law, from which they will learn by environmental pressure and incentives rather than exposition and understanding. Once you return to being an Aryan, and seeing mankind as children and us as gods, you will just love them. It’s the christian falsehood of equality that deprives you of the option of paternalism and love for fellow man.