Theme: Civilization

  • THANK YOU MR PRESIDENT!!! Restore The World Balance of Powers and Remove The Tre

    THANK YOU MR PRESIDENT!!! Restore The World Balance of Powers and Remove The Treat of Malicious Expansion of a hostile civilization and an ideology that is hostile to the evolution of knowledge, prosperity, and mankind.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-10 16:41:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027958059849658368

    Reply addressees: @realDonaldTrump @POTUS

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025847254660403201


    IN REPLY TO:

    @realDonaldTrump

    Iran, and it’s economy, is going very bad, and fast! I will meet, or not meet, it doesn’t matter – it is up to them!

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025847254660403201

  • —-”Is Marxism the opiate of the envious?”—- 1. Marxism (Boasianism, Marxism, Fre

    —-”Is Marxism the opiate of the envious?”—-

    1. Marxism (Boasianism, Marxism, Freudianism, Frankfurt School) consists of a **pseudoscientific** revolt against aristocratic european civilization’s sovereignty, reason, markets, and meritocracy, and is merely a restatement of the Jewish, Christian, and Islamic **supernatural** REVOLT against the great aristocratic civilizations of the ancient world – this time with a false promise of prosperity in search for power, just as in the ancient world, a false promise of life after death or paradise in search for power.

    2. Postmodernism is a **pseudo-rational** restatement of the Marxist (Boasian, Marxist, Freudian, Frankfurt School) REVOLT against reason markets, meritocracy and eugenics that result from that merit. This time abandoning both the supernatural, the pseudoscientific, and merely engaging in gossip, rallying, shaming, ridicule, disapproval, in the pursuit of power to resist meritocracy (eugenics)

    3. So whether Semitic Abrahamic **Supernatural** Religion, Marxist **pseudoscientific** reformation of abrahamic religion, or Postmodern pseudo-rational justification is used, the same argumentative **sophisms **of **justificationary Pilpul**, and **critical Critique **are used to circumvent reason, appeal to intuition.

    4. Why? We are, because of our genetics, and the intuitions that result from our genetics, of differing interpersonal, social, sexual, economic, political, and military market value. This market value is generally categorized as ‘class’. We do, because of genetics, physically possess physical brain and physical chemical intuitions that reflect our class and our genders. And just as the female reproductive strategy (herds) evolved to persist her genes regardless of the merit of her offspring, and men evolved to persist their genes (packs) by the merit of himself and his male kin, classes evolved to express either the feminine dysgenic or male eugenic group strategies. Our differences in moral intuitions are the result of these axis: gender cognitive bias, and class cognitive bias, and the degree of group neoteny that evolved in our relative geographies.

    5. So to some degree just as religion is an opiate of the lower classes, philosophy provides an opiate of the middle classes, and pseudoscience the upper middle classes – the upper classes need no opiate other than the rewards of their market position (desirability). Why? we want hope or promise of raising our interpersonal, social, sexual, economic, political, and military market value. Because after all – that is what drives reproduction, and what drives all our behavior.

    6. The underclasses are not oppressed. They are just six times as bad for the polity as every good person is good for it. Markets cannot lie. They contain lottery effects. And the lottery effect provides us with the incentives (hope) just as religion, philosophy, and pseudoscience provide us with hope. Hope that we will obtain the benefits of being of higher market value than we are. In other words: status rules us.

    7. The duration of a Democracy is determined by the time it takes to redistribute, and spend down a windfall, from war, conquest, technical innovation, or accident of nature. We are rapidly running out of the industrial (petroleum) windfall, just as Athens ran out of it’s silver mine.

    8. A mixed economy ruled by an authoritarian, an oligarchy, or a ‘party’ – differing only in scale – is the only survivable, with fascism necessary in war, and the luxury of social democracy possible under windfalls.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-10 10:57:00 UTC

  • Revolution: If They Win It Is Your Fault and Mine.

      Our predecessors were optimistically tolerant of the leftist agenda to destroy western civilization, its history, its institutions of natural law, its meritocracy, its aristocracy, its norms, traditions, unique family structure, and unique values of truth, science, and law. The only reason this is possible is because our grandparents, parents, and we, ourselves, have not, until 2001, ended our tolerance of the war against our people and our civilization. There is only one solution – we pay the high price of correction now, versus the low price of continuous correction in the past. Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.

  • Revolution: If They Win It Is Your Fault and Mine.

      Our predecessors were optimistically tolerant of the leftist agenda to destroy western civilization, its history, its institutions of natural law, its meritocracy, its aristocracy, its norms, traditions, unique family structure, and unique values of truth, science, and law. The only reason this is possible is because our grandparents, parents, and we, ourselves, have not, until 2001, ended our tolerance of the war against our people and our civilization. There is only one solution – we pay the high price of correction now, versus the low price of continuous correction in the past. Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.

  • Sorry, that’s not quite right. English had maintained Anglo Saxon (germanic < Co

    Sorry, that’s not quite right. English had maintained Anglo Saxon (germanic < Corded Ware < Yamna(Kurgan)) law that evolved significantly during manorialism, such that the relation between the ruler (sovereign), and the freeman (sovereign) was purely contractual – and that his “rights as an Englishman” (his sovereignty) as they were later expressed, were consistent regardless of territory.

    This is how all militial cultures must operate, whether agrarian (militia), pastoral (raiders), or seafaring (pirates). It’s not a choice. Unlike the agrarian river valleys, where production is concentrated, returns are high, armies are affordable, the europeans could not produce other than mlitial armies until trade had evolved sufficient for state formation – approximately the time of Napoleon – meaning it took from the late roman period to the Napoleonic period to restore the economy of europe.

    The english extended their practice of common (traditional germanic) law to their broader understanding of the world, and in doing so produced empiricism, and the anglo empirical revolution.

    The REST OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT was a counter-revolution AGAINST this empirical, legal, contractual, individualism, while at the same time, the middle class (thanks to the Viking trade first, the Hansa trade second, then the atlantic trade third) attempted to sought to take power from the landed aristocracy now that trade was as important or more so than agrarian production – and given that international relations were now nearly as important as internal relations. Once this was possible, both the upper (aristocratic, landed, military) class and the emergent middle class (burghers so to speak), attempted successfully to liberate the 50% of dead capital in europe that was in the hands of the church.

    So no. The english had it right, and the rest of the world has been fighting against the empirical model, being dragged into science, markets, and technology one war at a time.

    One must choose between rule of law, and rule by discretion.

    We make this false claim that the argument is between capitalism and socialism both of which are alien ideas to european civilization, which has always been one of markets – precisely because individualism in the west is 3500 years old.

    We invented the combination of militia, contract, truth, duty, sovereignty. And it is the very and only reason for our more rapid rates of evolution in the ancient world and in the modern world.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-09 14:14:00 UTC

  • the first authors were. germany just had more opportunity

    the first authors were. germany just had more opportunity.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-08 17:33:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027246335685210112

    Reply addressees: @Simonow_ @Hispanogoyim

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027245682623754240


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027245682623754240

  • The french created social democracy. The germans created personal duty to the co

    The french created social democracy. The germans created personal duty to the commons. Marx was anything but german.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-08 17:29:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027245431141621761

    Reply addressees: @Simonow_ @Hispanogoyim

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027243306126901249


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027243306126901249

  • Sorry. The anglo-saxons were right. The Scandinavians were right. The Hansa were

    Sorry. The anglo-saxons were right. The Scandinavians were right. The Hansa were right. The protestants were right. The Prussians were right.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-08 16:35:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027231865361575936

    Reply addressees: @Simonow_ @Hispanogoyim

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027230056375042049


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027230056375042049

  • The scandinavians and germans succeeded where the Franks failed, by creating man

    The scandinavians and germans succeeded where the Franks failed, by creating manorialism, the Hansa, trade routes, and restoring germanic law, restoring literacy, ending church corruption, and liberating the dead capital in the church. Sorry. Economic history tells us w/o lies.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-08 16:33:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027231360891666433

    Reply addressees: @Simonow_ @Hispanogoyim

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027229910841151488


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027229910841151488

  • The germans were right. Every time. And the Latin(catholic) states were wrong

    The germans were right. Every time. And the Latin(catholic) states were wrong.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-08 16:13:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027226280692015104

    Reply addressees: @Simonow_ @Hispanogoyim

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027204172662353920


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027204172662353920