Theme: Civilization

  • IS NATO IMPERIAL OR FEDERAL? Remind me again how long the Czech people resisted

    IS NATO IMPERIAL OR FEDERAL?
    Remind me again how long the Czech people resisted the Germans, then the Hungarians, then the Russians, then the soviets? For a time the country ceased to exist. In 1968 it only took the soviets seven days. And how would the people resist them today? Or resist anyone else for that matter? And so, what is the ‘price’ for the privilege of the sovereignty the Czech people have today? And what is the social, economic, political, and strategic value of EU and NATO participation vs those who lack it?

    While you are correct that the Enemy rides on the postwar institutions, that does not mean the the postwar institutions are flawed, or that there is a superior alternative, other than an a compulsory EU military and the higher taxes to pay for it, it only means we have not (yet) ended the capacity of the enemy to undermine our people and our governments (which is our organization’s mission.)

    The global anglosphere, and the continental germanosphere would much prefer not having to carry the burden of ‘poor europe’ but, and France would love to contain Germany as the dominant power over the continent, just as would Russia. So an EU military with USA levels of funding and participation, would radically benefit the USA and the Anglosphere whose only concerns are naval and air, and have nothing to do with land wars. The problem is the total EU military spending at 200 billion is 1/4 of the US spend of 800 billion, despite the EU population being 510 million versus the US only 425 million, and the EU gdp of 19.x Trillion almost equal to the US’s 20.x Trillion. So why is europe riding on american people when the postwar agreement was for the purpose of rebuilding europe into a peer again? Only to have it be the child that stays at home and pays no rent?

    So, fight the right enemy. Federation and the cost of federation is the only possible means of both retaining identity, sovereignty, and self determination within the limits tolerable by other members of the federation – which usually means defection to aide a foreigh power, or engaging in trade with foreign powers at the expense of members of the federation.
    After all that is the value of federation: shared defense, shared trade policy, shared insurance against disaster and crisis, and credit capacity to insure all the above.

    I want our people to live in safety and prosperity, and to end the second abrahamic destruction fo europe and if necessary contain it forever as the indians, russians, and chinese seek to do. That does not include however throwing babies out with the bathwater because of internl failures that can be corrected more easily than the entirety of the system can be replaced if lost.

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 01:01:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744162423618072577

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744148044642181613

  • There is very little to criticize in European kings. Doing so requires extraordi

    There is very little to criticize in European kings. Doing so requires extraordinary ignorance of comparative civilization. Monarchy is the most common form of government in history, and all else is the exception. With European traditional law bing our secondary religion, our law constraining kings more than all elsewhere combined for reasons I’ve explained at length. Enlightenment propaganda was just that. Thos countries still retaining monarchy are in better condition than those not.

    Reply addressees: @siberiancattt @dr_duchesne @AEemus


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-07 21:44:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744112917304295424

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744069328629293113

  • Germany is on the way to demographic death and so is Russia

    Germany is on the way to demographic death and so is Russia.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-07 18:13:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744059587056009585

    Reply addressees: @coady_colinson @dr_duchesne

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744051965162619321

  • RT @Indian_Bronson: Islam is simply an ill-fitting bridle for Iranic peoples. In

    RT @Indian_Bronson: Islam is simply an ill-fitting bridle for Iranic peoples.
    In some uneducated regions and tougher times, it provided st…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-07 12:54:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743979440659370015

  • RT @UltraDane: 97% of human accomplishment ever recorded took place in this area

    RT @UltraDane: 97% of human accomplishment ever recorded took place in this area

    RT @UltraDane: 97% of human accomplishment ever recorded took place in this area. https://t.co/4YI1YtBw6t


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-07 03:24:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743835995496149009

  • Good Argument supporting that the Scandinavian Hypothesis was a propaganda const

    Good Argument supporting that the Scandinavian Hypothesis was a propaganda construction given the archeological evidence in slavic lands. Not new a new idea, but stated well with some updated information.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytEVMq7YWR4


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-07 03:24:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743835885299232921

  • Good Argument supporting that the Scandinavian Hypothesis was a propaganda const

    Good Argument supporting that the Scandinavian Hypothesis was a propaganda construction given the archeological evidence in slavic lands. Not new a new idea, but stated well with some updated information.
    https://t.co/xz5jbQXS8g


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-07 03:24:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743835885177585666

  • It’s more like moscow was a minor part of kiev’s history. Kiev was the capital o

    It’s more like moscow was a minor part of kiev’s history. Kiev was the capital of the Rus. Mongols invaded. Because Kiev was not able to regain it’s influence. Moscovy was able to recover and kick out the mongols. And just kept expanding. Ukraine is a ‘borderland’ (which is what it means), and was always under someone else’s military control whether poland, lithuania, austria, or finally russia. They are tired of being someone else’s toy. πŸ˜‰

    Reply addressees: @toodarkmark


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-06 17:01:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743679239801466880

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743676756718977189

  • (Definitions) –Q: Curt: Please explain the difference between ‘Western’ Europea

    (Definitions)
    –Q: Curt: Please explain the difference between ‘Western’ European, ‘European’, ‘Western European’ and ‘Northern European’ (etc.)?–

    TLDR; European narrow continental civ vs western broad including americas, australia, new zealand civ.

    In academic discourse, the terms are often used in relation to civilization, but have slightly distinct meanings:

    1) Western – Broader(broadest) ethnic, cultural, and philosophical designation not defined strictly by ethnicity or geography.
    – Encompasses political ideas, cultural norms, and intellectual traditions that emerged in Europe but are not limited to Europe geographically.
    – Includes Europe itself but also societies strongly influenced by European colonialism and migration, such as the Americas and Australia.
    – Emphasizes shared heritage of Greco-Roman, Christian, liberal democratic and Enlightenment values rather than a specific ethnic subset of the european identity.

    2) European – Refers specifically to the nations and peoples of the European continent. May also include offshoot societies founded principally by European colonization, such as the Americas.
    – Principally an ethnic and geographic term referring to European heritage and place of origin.

    3) Western European – Refers to the countries in the western part of Europe, often including:
    – The UK, France, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Netherlands, Belgium, etc.
    – Characterized by Romance and Germanic language groups.
    – Heavily influenced by both Protestant and Catholic branches of Christianity.
    – Represents the Latin/Romanized areas of Western Christendom.

    4) Northern European – Refers to countries in the northern part of Europe, including:
    – The Nordic nations – Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Iceland, amd may include Germany, Netherlands, UK, Ireland.
    – Historically shaped by Norse and Germanic cultures.
    – Protestant Christianity and Lutheranism had significant influence.

    Latin (Southern) Europe – Refers to the southern region influenced by ancient Rome and the Catholic church.
    – Defined as including: Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, Romania, with influence extending into Wallonia, Switzerland, and other regions.
    – It represents the Latinate branch of Western Christianity and European culture, as contrasted with Germanic, Slavic, and Nordic Europe. The term emphasizes the shared Romance language and religious heritage of the region.

    Eastern European – Refers to the broad region east of Germany/Austria, including the countries of the eastern region of Europe:
    – It contains distinct sub-cultures defined by religion, empires, and Slavic vs Baltic languages. But overall represents a coherent historical/geographic Eastern European civilization.
    – The Slavic language group: Russia, Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Belarus.
    – The Baltic states: Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia.
    Hungary, Romania, Moldova.
    – Albania and Greece are sometimes included though distinct linguistically.
    Key subgroups within Eastern Europe:
    – Central Europe – Czechia, Slovakia, Hungary, Poland, Slovenia. Catholic Christian and Germanic/Austrian influenced.
    – The Balkans – Croatia, Serbia, Bulgaria, Greece, Albania. Historically part of the Ottoman Empire.
    – Slavic East – Russia, Belarus, Ukraine. Orthodox Christian. Heavily influenced by Russian culture and Soviet communism.
    – Baltics – Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia. Protestant historically but spent time under Soviet control.
    (Note that while eastern europe consist of baltic and slavic branches of europeans and their languages, and traditionally we have included the baltics in the slavic branch, the culture has almost entirely converted to the western european model.)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-06 14:51:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743646576545841152

  • Research has been done. It’s aristotle and everyone else isn’t even close. If yo

    Research has been done. It’s aristotle and everyone else isn’t even close. If you account prophets then it’s jesus. And no they aren’t the same thing.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-04 03:10:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742745282436067346

    Reply addressees: @philosophytweet

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742712403035341297