Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43632705_10156696892367264_419925770

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43632705_10156696892367264_419925770

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/43632705_10156696892367264_4199257707905024000_o_10156696892362264.jpg ICE AGES DETERMINED THE RACES

    This is my current understanding of the races since ‘caucasian’ doesn’t appear to match the data.

    The mixture of early indo europeans and europeans happens in the caucuses, but the indo-european expansion is cultural and technological, while preserving markers of the original peoples of both european and west asian origins. (I am still getting my arms around this. but we had a too simplistic view of evolution of the races. yes, there are africans (old), coastal peoples (middle), and eurasian peoples(new), but old, middle, and new peoples all continued to evolve in place, and to shift quite a bit in response to the ice age.)William L. Benge🤔Oct 10, 2018, 10:14 AMAndrew TaylorVargpostingOct 10, 2018, 12:13 PMDenizcan DedeProto Uralic urheimat is in a bit more north-east I think. Their main haplogroup N shows it.Oct 11, 2018, 2:33 PMCurt Doolittleit’s quite a bit further northeast, as far as I know in that inlet directly north of india.Oct 11, 2018, 3:33 PMICE AGES DETERMINED THE RACES

    This is my current understanding of the races since ‘caucasian’ doesn’t appear to match the data.

    The mixture of early indo europeans and europeans happens in the caucuses, but the indo-european expansion is cultural and technological, while preserving markers of the original peoples of both european and west asian origins. (I am still getting my arms around this. but we had a too simplistic view of evolution of the races. yes, there are africans (old), coastal peoples (middle), and eurasian peoples(new), but old, middle, and new peoples all continued to evolve in place, and to shift quite a bit in response to the ice age.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 10:13:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/43632705_10156696892367264_41992577

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/43632705_10156696892367264_41992577

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/43632705_10156696892367264_4199257707905024000_o_10156696892362264.jpg ICE AGES DETERMINED THE RACES

    This is my current understanding of the races since ‘caucasian’ doesn’t appear to match the data.

    The mixture of early indo europeans and europeans happens in the caucuses, but the indo-european expansion is cultural and technological, while preserving markers of the original peoples of both european and west asian origins. (I am still getting my arms around this. but we had a too simplistic view of evolution of the races. yes, there are africans (old), coastal peoples (middle), and eurasian peoples(new), but old, middle, and new peoples all continued to evolve in place, and to shift quite a bit in response to the ice age.)William L. Benge🤔Oct 10, 2018 10:14amAndrew Taylor@[131153990848190:274:Vargposting]Oct 10, 2018 12:13pmNick Capponlol how do u have ice age Europeans and proto-indo-europeans on the same map at the same time ?Oct 11, 2018 7:36amCurt DoolittleThat’s what Simon was objecting to.

    The author is using PIE for Ancestral West Asians under the assumption (which I don’t know is correct or not) that the resulting IE language was west asian rather than european.

    if he used proto caucasians or proto-iranians that is probably correct.

    The reason I like this is that it shows the origin groups: afro asiatics (semites), west asian caucasians (iranic), Turkic, and Mongolian, as well as europeans.

    And that the mesopotamians are afro-asiatics, and that (strangely) whatever groups occupied ancient mesopotamia are lost.

    This is a more ‘frightening’ illustration of history.

    again. genocide of ‘soft’ people is the norm.Oct 11, 2018 11:44amDenizcan DedeProto Uralic urheimat is in a bit more north-east I think. Their main haplogroup N shows it.Oct 11, 2018 2:33pmCurt Doolittleit’s quite a bit further northeast, as far as I know in that inlet directly north of india.Oct 11, 2018 3:33pmICE AGES DETERMINED THE RACES

    This is my current understanding of the races since ‘caucasian’ doesn’t appear to match the data.

    The mixture of early indo europeans and europeans happens in the caucuses, but the indo-european expansion is cultural and technological, while preserving markers of the original peoples of both european and west asian origins. (I am still getting my arms around this. but we had a too simplistic view of evolution of the races. yes, there are africans (old), coastal peoples (middle), and eurasian peoples(new), but old, middle, and new peoples all continued to evolve in place, and to shift quite a bit in response to the ice age.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 10:13:00 UTC

  • THE CURRENT DYSGENIA 1. Colonialism was a profound if not most profound good sin

    THE CURRENT DYSGENIA

    1. Colonialism was a profound if not most profound good since the invention of farming – we dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, disease, hard labor, child mortality, early death, suffering, tyranny, and subjectivity to the vicissitudes of nature. Our failure was only in having the european civil wars and leaving our project incomplete.

    2. Slavery was universal and whites were more frequently the subject of it (by muslims) than perpetrators of it. Whites are not malaria-immune but many blacks are. Whites have higher (hotter) metabolisms, and blacks don’t. Whites had to be taken from the criminal class. Africans were captured by other africans as prisoners of war in order to attempt to unify west african empires (which would have happened).

    This meant that the warm weather colonies most able to produce high value goods (particularly sugar) with Africans, and therefore (a) had more survivors, (b) spread the genes of previously constrained peoples to new territories, (c) forcibly modernized both cultures, civilizations and Genes. And it was not ‘known’ that enslaved primitives were capable of civilized behavior at the time. It was only in the 19th century after the industrial revolution that we found that citizens were more profitable than serfs, were more profitable than slaves.

    3. Creating middle classes by resource exploitation, and selling manufactured (value added) goods to developing peoples was the only means possible of dragging the vast body of dirty, ignorant, superstitious, violent, poor, disease ridden, un-domesticated human animals out of of their condition, and reforming their societies incrementally until they themselves could create a middle class civilization capable of self governance without threat to more advanced civilizations.

    I don’t ignore anything. I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to expose and educate the ignorant, unable, sophomoric, and willingly deceptive. 😉 lol

    4. We treat people as they deserve to be treated, and forcibly domesticate them as we have forcibly domesticated them for 3500 years.

    5. Humans are just another mammal whos dominance hierarchy can be taken over, reproduction controlled through criminal punishment, reproductive suppression, and taxation, leaving only those capable of middle class participation existing.

    This is why the west is rich and the rest of the world is poor: domestication of man.

    6. Meaning, that we have, as have east asians, practiced organized eugenics (self domestication) for thousands of years. A process that was Reversed unfortunately by the industrial revolution, which has led to the current dysgenia.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 08:26:00 UTC

  • THE ABRAHAMIC DARK AGES ARE SOMETHING WE SURVIVED. I don’t make mistakes. It’s m

    https://www.facebook.com/curt…/posts/1015669432299226NO, THE ABRAHAMIC DARK AGES ARE SOMETHING WE SURVIVED.

    I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to not make the mistakes others have made, no matter how frequent.

    No, the abrahamic dark ages destroyed all the great civilizations of the ancient world.

    Yes, it was the combination of plague and raids that weakened the roman empire.

    Yes it was the byzantine conquest of the west, and violent imposition of christianity that prevented the west’s restoration.

    Yes, islam destroyed all the mediterranean trade routes which vastly reduced trade. But Islam could not cross the sahara well, could not displace hinduism in india, the chinese would have none of it as they still will not, and by the time the muslims made it into europe by the eastern route they had so exhausted the capital of all the great civilizations and reduced them to dysgenia and ignorance that they could not adapt to and compete with modernity.

    The abrahamic dark ages destroyed every one of the great civilizations – all of them. We were just lucky in europe to SURVIVE THEM thanks to the north’s revolt against the corruption and nepotism of the church, and a reserve of northern peoples late to forcible conversion.

    We are currently in the second abrahamic dark age, and the second counter-reveolution against western civilization: Rousseau > Kant > Marx/Freud/Boas/Cantor/Adorno > the french postmodernists and feminists. This abrahamic dark age is just using pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and outright denialism to accomplish in the modern world (manufacturing of ignorance, spreading a cult of economic and political promise, forcing immigration and displacement) that were practiced in the ancient world using sophomoric supernaturalism.

    (

    I answered colonialism in another post:

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156694322992264

    )

    I don’t expect other peoples to thank us for dragging them kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, and the vicissitudes of nature, but then I don’t expect them to lie to me and cast our forcible lifting of them from semi animal state in to modernity – whether I in the greco-roman world or this anglo-germanic one.

    We had, at least until Burke, hoped the rest of mankind was able to join the aristocracy but they have not. And the 20th century was an interesting but failed experiment. This is why authoritarian governments are returning now that the USA as the inheritor of the british empire can no longer pay them for their conformity to the anglo empire.

    We return to nation states, nationalism, national socialism, and managerial government. The rest of the people of the world are insufficiently developed to operate by rule of law of reciprocity (natural law). They need their falsehoods.

    Just as you need yours.

    Cheers.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 19:47:00 UTC

  • GOOD MAPS OF EVOLUTION OF EUROPA AND WEST ASIA

    GOOD MAPS OF EVOLUTION OF EUROPA AND WEST ASIA

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 19:27:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1049743121385426944

  • No, The Byzantines Weren’t Roman

    October 9th, 2018 12:17 PM NO THE BYZANTINES WEREN’T ROMAN AND THE EASTERN ROMAN EMPIRE HAD LITTLE IF NOTHING TO DO WITH ROME OR EUROPE.CHRISTIANITY IS JEWISH, SYRIAN, AND GRECO-ANATOLIAN Ethnically, culturally, organizationally, they were Anatolians and the greek aristocracy (european conquerors) of the athenians and spartans lost. We treat old europe (southeast europe) as european (atlantic+scandinavian + germanic+ celtic+ italic ) but this is just a convention. The balkans were old europe (anatolians), and remain anatolians (I haplogroup), and were not european, or roman, merely a ROMAN CONQUEST of the western Greek Empire. The holy roman empire was neither holy nor roman. The byzantine empire was neither european or roman, but anatolian/syrian. The balkans and greece today are still Anatolian and Muslim, and poor, and low trust, and corrupt. The boot of italy is still ethnically anatolian (greek), and that is why italy consists of two countries: germanic north and greek south. There are no Itals any more than there are Etrus, or Hellenes. There never were romans in Constantinople. There were merely greeks, balkans, anatolians, and syrians that held onto the roman name the way the germans held onto the roman name, and the church held onto the roman name: for status. Roman Empire was, as all european peoples, a religion of the Hearth and Land (“Heathen”). The jews, syrians, and greco-anatolians manufactured this false religion, and imposed it upon the european peoples in order to destroy the aristocratic recovery of rome after the invasion and the plague – a plague given to the west via byzantium. 1 – INDO EUROPEAN EXPANSION BEGINS THE GREAT SHIFT 2 – MESOPOTAMIAN EMPIRES EVOLVE SUMER->ACADIAN->ASSYRIAN (AND LATER ->BABYLONIAN) which appear to have been a locally originating subrace, and Sumerian neither semitic nor indo-european.) 2 – HITTITES(EUROPEANS) AND EGYPTIANS EXHAUST EACH OTHER FIGHTING OVER THE TRADE ROUTES. 3 – ASSYRIANS(MESOPOTAMIANS) CONQUER HITTITES (AND LEVANT/ANATOLIA) 4 – THE SEA PEOPLES (EUROPEANS) RAID AND DEFEAT ALL OLD WORLD CIVS EXCEPT EGYPT BY COLLAPSING WORLD TRADE (but egypt never recovers). 5 – ELAM(West Asians)->PERSIANS(EASTERN INDO EUROPEANS) ESTABLISH THE ACHAEMENID EMPIRE AND THREATEN GREECE 6 – GREEKS CONQUER ANATOLIA TO PERSIA TO EGYPT. (Macedon) (“Greece” is not the peninsula alone but the peninsula and the lands around the aegean, including the peloponnese, islands, and western anatolian coast. 7 – ROMANS CONQUER GREEKS. (Rome) 8 – GREEKS RE-CONQUER ROMANS (Bosphorus-Constantinople) by imposing middle eastern cults and religio-administrative rule in the Persian and Egyptian model. 9 – SELJUKS CONQUER ARABS, THEN EVENTUALLY GREEKS (Bosphorus -> Balkans and enter old europe) 10 – GERMANICS (Europeans) CONQUER SELJUKS, ARABS – THE NEW WORLD, AND ASIA 11 – JEWS AND MUSLIMS STAGE THE SECOND RECONQUEST OF EUROPA: MARXISM-SOCIALISM-POSTMODERNISM-FEMINISM AS AN INTELLECTUAL VANGUARD, WITH MUSLIMS PRACTICING RAIDING, TERRORISM, AND IMMIGRATION TO THE POINT OF FAILURE. THAT’S HISTORY. THATS HISTORY IN A NUTSHELL.

  • No, The Byzantines Weren’t Roman

    October 9th, 2018 12:17 PM NO THE BYZANTINES WEREN’T ROMAN AND THE EASTERN ROMAN EMPIRE HAD LITTLE IF NOTHING TO DO WITH ROME OR EUROPE.CHRISTIANITY IS JEWISH, SYRIAN, AND GRECO-ANATOLIAN Ethnically, culturally, organizationally, they were Anatolians and the greek aristocracy (european conquerors) of the athenians and spartans lost. We treat old europe (southeast europe) as european (atlantic+scandinavian + germanic+ celtic+ italic ) but this is just a convention. The balkans were old europe (anatolians), and remain anatolians (I haplogroup), and were not european, or roman, merely a ROMAN CONQUEST of the western Greek Empire. The holy roman empire was neither holy nor roman. The byzantine empire was neither european or roman, but anatolian/syrian. The balkans and greece today are still Anatolian and Muslim, and poor, and low trust, and corrupt. The boot of italy is still ethnically anatolian (greek), and that is why italy consists of two countries: germanic north and greek south. There are no Itals any more than there are Etrus, or Hellenes. There never were romans in Constantinople. There were merely greeks, balkans, anatolians, and syrians that held onto the roman name the way the germans held onto the roman name, and the church held onto the roman name: for status. Roman Empire was, as all european peoples, a religion of the Hearth and Land (“Heathen”). The jews, syrians, and greco-anatolians manufactured this false religion, and imposed it upon the european peoples in order to destroy the aristocratic recovery of rome after the invasion and the plague – a plague given to the west via byzantium. 1 – INDO EUROPEAN EXPANSION BEGINS THE GREAT SHIFT 2 – MESOPOTAMIAN EMPIRES EVOLVE SUMER->ACADIAN->ASSYRIAN (AND LATER ->BABYLONIAN) which appear to have been a locally originating subrace, and Sumerian neither semitic nor indo-european.) 2 – HITTITES(EUROPEANS) AND EGYPTIANS EXHAUST EACH OTHER FIGHTING OVER THE TRADE ROUTES. 3 – ASSYRIANS(MESOPOTAMIANS) CONQUER HITTITES (AND LEVANT/ANATOLIA) 4 – THE SEA PEOPLES (EUROPEANS) RAID AND DEFEAT ALL OLD WORLD CIVS EXCEPT EGYPT BY COLLAPSING WORLD TRADE (but egypt never recovers). 5 – ELAM(West Asians)->PERSIANS(EASTERN INDO EUROPEANS) ESTABLISH THE ACHAEMENID EMPIRE AND THREATEN GREECE 6 – GREEKS CONQUER ANATOLIA TO PERSIA TO EGYPT. (Macedon) (“Greece” is not the peninsula alone but the peninsula and the lands around the aegean, including the peloponnese, islands, and western anatolian coast. 7 – ROMANS CONQUER GREEKS. (Rome) 8 – GREEKS RE-CONQUER ROMANS (Bosphorus-Constantinople) by imposing middle eastern cults and religio-administrative rule in the Persian and Egyptian model. 9 – SELJUKS CONQUER ARABS, THEN EVENTUALLY GREEKS (Bosphorus -> Balkans and enter old europe) 10 – GERMANICS (Europeans) CONQUER SELJUKS, ARABS – THE NEW WORLD, AND ASIA 11 – JEWS AND MUSLIMS STAGE THE SECOND RECONQUEST OF EUROPA: MARXISM-SOCIALISM-POSTMODERNISM-FEMINISM AS AN INTELLECTUAL VANGUARD, WITH MUSLIMS PRACTICING RAIDING, TERRORISM, AND IMMIGRATION TO THE POINT OF FAILURE. THAT’S HISTORY. THATS HISTORY IN A NUTSHELL.

  • Temples Functioned as Banks

    October 9th, 2018 9:45 AM [T]he only historic facts we know are that (a) someone seems to have existed, (b) the fact that temples functioned as banks necessary for trade, and the uprising at the temple, (c)the prosecution and crucifixion of this person. Every other aspect appears to have been produced by the fictionalization and incorporation of other myths, that like all of judaism, began either in mesopotamia, persia, egypt, or greece. We can document and have the evolution of each of the myths, from the first evidence in anatolia, to the spread throughout the fertile crescent.

    The fact that most muslim scholars support the story of mohammed against all historical evidence. The fact that most christian scholars support the story of jesus against the historical evidence. And the fact that most jewish scholars support the existence of each of the characters and events, despite the evidence, tells us nothing. Truth is not determined by democracy, or by opinion, nor by historical authorship, but by evidence that survives falsification of all of the above. Someone named jesus seems to have lived. However, the only evidence we have that does not have origin in other myths and religions, is (a) uprising at the temple, (b) prosecution, (c) crucifiction. EVERYTHING ELSE was intentionally imported from prior religions synthesizing Seneca the Younger’s Stoicism, Greek Neo Platonism (idealism)/Authoritarianism, and Jewish pro roman reformation authors. The origin of the ‘risen after three days’ is most interesting because it actually refers to the morning star which, in the jewish tradition, was not just Horace but Lucifer.

  • Temples Functioned as Banks

    October 9th, 2018 9:45 AM [T]he only historic facts we know are that (a) someone seems to have existed, (b) the fact that temples functioned as banks necessary for trade, and the uprising at the temple, (c)the prosecution and crucifixion of this person. Every other aspect appears to have been produced by the fictionalization and incorporation of other myths, that like all of judaism, began either in mesopotamia, persia, egypt, or greece. We can document and have the evolution of each of the myths, from the first evidence in anatolia, to the spread throughout the fertile crescent.

    The fact that most muslim scholars support the story of mohammed against all historical evidence. The fact that most christian scholars support the story of jesus against the historical evidence. And the fact that most jewish scholars support the existence of each of the characters and events, despite the evidence, tells us nothing. Truth is not determined by democracy, or by opinion, nor by historical authorship, but by evidence that survives falsification of all of the above. Someone named jesus seems to have lived. However, the only evidence we have that does not have origin in other myths and religions, is (a) uprising at the temple, (b) prosecution, (c) crucifiction. EVERYTHING ELSE was intentionally imported from prior religions synthesizing Seneca the Younger’s Stoicism, Greek Neo Platonism (idealism)/Authoritarianism, and Jewish pro roman reformation authors. The origin of the ‘risen after three days’ is most interesting because it actually refers to the morning star which, in the jewish tradition, was not just Horace but Lucifer.

  • The Flip Side of Colonialism

    October 9th, 2018 9:31 AM THE FLIP SIDE OF COLONIALISM

    1. Colonialism was a profound if not most profound good since the invention of farming – we dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, disease, hard labor, child mortality, early death, suffering, tyranny, and subjectivity to the vicissitudes of nature – kicking and screaming all the while.
    2. Slavery was universal and whites were more frequently the subject of it (by muslims) than perpetrators of it. Whites are not malaria-immune but many blacks are. Whites have higher (hotter) metabolisms, and blacks don’t. Whites had to be taken from the criminal class. Africans were captured by other africans as prisoners of war in order to attempt to unify west african empires (which would have happened).
    3. Creating middle classes by resource exploitation, and selling manufactured (value added) goods to developing peoples was the only means possible of dragging the vast body of dirty, ignorant, superstitious, violent, poor, disease ridden, un-domesticated human animals out of of their condition, and reforming their societies incrementally until they themselves could create a middle class civilization capable of self governance without threat to more advanced civilizations.

    Our failure was only in having the european civil wars and leaving our project incomplete. That failure led to the only significant problem of colonialism: (a) the failure to complete the replacement french despotism with english developmentalism. (b) the absence of the technology of fiat money credit that would have eliminated the need for gold and resource extraction. (c) the collapse left an opening for French Socialism, Jewish Communism, Islamic Fundamentalism. (d) the introduction of medicines and health science without the introduction of eugenics (birth control). (e) the failure of our investments in the third world which generally were too insubstantial to do other than delay or inhibit internal growth of demand. This meant that the warm weather colonies most able to produce high value goods (particularly sugar) with Africans, and therefore (a) had more survivors, (b) spread the genres of previously constrained peoples to new territories, (c) forcibly modernized both cultures, civilizations and Genes. And it was not ‘known’ that enslaved primitives were capable of civilized behavior at the time. It was only in the 19th century after the industrial revolution that we found that citizens were more profitable than serfs, were more profitable than slaves. I don’t ignore anything. I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to expose and educate the ignorant, unable, sophomoric, and willingly deceptive. 　 lol