Theme: Civilization

  • THE FLOOD MYTH AND NOAH Noah is a myth that reflected the flood of the Persian g

    THE FLOOD MYTH AND NOAH
    Noah is a myth that reflected the flood of the Persian gulf 8000 years ago, the destruction of their lands, and their flight North in their primitive reed boats: the coracle. Early texts describe the arks including measurements. The people, the proto-Sumerians were not even semitic. In fact there is a suggestion they borrowed words and traded with the indus people.
    See https://t.co/4heXYkvzJs
    Time to grow up and leave behind children’s stories.
    The Jews merely copied others’ myths to construct a heroic history of their own they did not have. Lying in the middle east is an archaic and continuing art form.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-27 02:38:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751072059390558208

  • “If true, this represents a huge shift in Xi’s policies, if not his political st

    –“If true, this represents a huge shift in Xi’s policies, if not his political standing within the CCP.”–

    While I’m a decent student of chinese history at least until 1900, I can’t think like chinese leadership. I can easily think like Russian leadership. Sometimes I would love to live there long enough to internalize it. So I’m stuck, like all other analysts in the world, with working from incentives given fragmentary knowledge. πŸ˜‰

    So, that said … reading the ccp tea leaves is far harder than the kremlin. The kremlin is deliberate and always manipulative. It’s predictable. The CCP uses incremental suggestion that can be adjusted if it spins poorly with the population. It’s almost impossible to understand the correlation between statements, indirect statements, leaks, and rumors.

    This particular ‘leak’ which was translated by Lei, is written in tone and content as if it’s CCP material, and it’s leaked in a manner that tests the waters so to speak in proper chinese cultural tradition, before doubling down and creating the possibility of blame for failure.

    But given that Xi is demonstrating weight loss indicative of health problems, and that other leaks have suggested it’s pancreatic, there is some possibility that this is opposition content instead of his.

    However, if we look at his demeanor both in California and afterward it has been … surprising in the least … that he is pivoting to favor his economy over strategic expansion so rapidly.

    So again, reading the tea leaves, this could be honest recognition of the failure of his aggressive program and defense of the CCP rule by shifting position; it could be that he is changing his state of mind given his own sense of vulnerability within the party whether ill or not; and it could be that the opposition smells blood and is preparing the way for a change in direction; or it could be a feint by Xi or his opposition to buy time for the ancient and consistent traditional Chines strategy of ‘delay and deceive’ until the economy has adjusted and the CCP is in a less vulnerable position domestically that it can return to aggressive expansion in the hopes that less strategic civilizations (the west in particular) will dedicate it’s attention elsewhere, and restore it’s investment in china, using the west to facilitate china’s ascent.

    I mean. It’s sure as heck what I would do. πŸ˜‰

    Cheers
    -CurtD

    Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 20:47:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750983806247391232

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750973374317445267

  • SCOTT Yes. You got there. As elegantly as you do with regularity. For the broade

    SCOTT
    Yes. You got there. As elegantly as you do with regularity.

    For the broader audience: once you realize that the entirety of the conflict of the 20th is the introduction of women into economy and polity and the subsequent introduction of the pill, and the resulting reproductive, social, economic, and political ability for the feminine instinct, intuition, and mind to pursue it’s irresponsible, hyperconsumption (of everything from attention to capital), socialization of losses, privatizing of commons, and use of the feminine means of antisocial behavior as warfare (undermining, canceling, sedition, baiting into hazard, victim claiming, oppression claiming), and that the mating problem is merely the end result of the natural sequence of unregulated antisocial feminine expression, you subsequently realize that the problem isn’t our civilization it’s not just our mating, it’s our women, and that women have the precisely opposite long term instincts, intuitions that men do – despite the differences between male social and economic classes. It’s only the third time in history it’s been possible. In late Sparta. In late ancient Rome. And in the late modern West. With the same outcome every time.

    There are no surviving feminine polities for a reason. Even matrilineal polities are still politically paternal for inescapable evolutionary reasons of sex differences in perception, disambiguation, valuation, prediction, and preference.

    Why? The brains of the sexes evolved to divide the labor of time, population, and space with women the short, small, and near, and men the long, large and far. We label this under the technical term ’empathizing vs systematizing’ or colloquial ‘feels vs reals’ but the causality of that difference is the division of labor in time, population and space.

    Correction of our condition is rather easy really. But I won’t get into correcting incentives in this post. It’s long enough already.

    You probably won’t read this but I’ll have said it anyway. πŸ˜‰

    If you want me to go into the ‘science’ behind this I’m happy to at excruciating detail. I’m sure we would have an interesting discussion. No one of consequence ever converses with me without being affected by having done so. πŸ˜‰

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 17:48:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750938660902404097

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750883071635927312

  • You don’t. Quite obviously. What do urbanites die of, even in fortified cities p

    You don’t.
    Quite obviously.
    What do urbanites die of, even in fortified cities pre-industrial warfare?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 04:08:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750732397375549748

    Reply addressees: @Boonsch @HTTP_Lovecraft

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750731879710343648

  • “Those with no pride in themselves often substitute pride in their nation’s achi

    –“Those with no pride in themselves often substitute pride in their nation’s achievements β€” that is, other people’s accomplishments.”– SRC

    Hmmm…. That doesn’t hold SRC.

    (a) Yes that may be true that the have no significant achievements.
    (b) However they may be preserving capital by doing no harm to the capital those prior achievements brought into being and handed down.
    (c) That capital is measurable both by comparison with competitors, and by pricing the cost of the harms to that capital.
    (d) And they may (and often are) simply demonstrating willingness to defend that capital, by their words and deeds demonstrating they will, and as a consequence considering themselves virtuous for doing so.

    The most obvious example is “How do you price the ‘bowling alone’ disintegration of the civil society?”

    Or how do you price the intentional destruction of fraternal education and civil society organizations?

    Or how do you price the financialization of the healthcare industry?

    Or how do you price ending liability for interference ina marriage, and instituting no fault divorce, child support and alimony?

    Or how do we price the consequence of the pill – given that we are beginning to understand not only the biological consequences but the psychological, marital, social, economic, and political consequences?

    Or how do you price NOT suppressing something like the ‘woke’ (race marxist) continuation of the pseudoscientific marxist sequence, or the marxist sequence as a reformation of the abrahamic supernatural sequence – both of which, if not so desirable could easily be measured as frauds and harms? We are still paying the cost of the latter. Meanwhile we are paying the cost of the former.

    Or worse, how do we price the introduction of women in to the voting pool without giving them their own house of government so that trades could be conducted between the classes given their separate interests as the anglo and european system had done for millennia?

    Or worse, ignoring the common law constraint on female antisocial behavior and instead letting it spread throughout the workplace academy bureaucracy and now military, when female antisocial behavior is always and everywhere reducible to evasion of responsibility for defense of the commons on one end and undermining, canceling, and sedition on the other? (Gossiping, Shaming, Rallying, RIdiculing, Psychologizing, Moralizing, Ostracizing) And instead they seek minimum responsibility, maximum privilege, maximum preference, and maximum hyperconsumption without the first thought of reciprocal exchange – the entire premise upon which our civilization is based, and why we outpaced the rest in the three ages of civilization: bronze, iron, and steel.

    We thought men were bad. But we had no idea the consequences of women in organizations. Something that is so politically incorrect that it is all but a moral sin to speak of it.

    So what has been the cost of the failure to suppress social, political, and informational frauds as equally as we have suppressed commercial frauds?

    Or to carry that forward, what is the cost of Income Statement government financing of the corporate state vs Balance Sheet government financing of the monarchies? The fact that these questions are both answerable but evaded is reducible to the deception that is made possible by not doing so. Cui bono.

    All of these ‘crimes’ are made possible by the fact that prior to the present it was challenging to disadvantageous to self destructive for institutions (state, finance, faith) to determine whether a proposition of social, economic, political, strategic, or evolutionary nature was testifiable and not criminal harm or theft especially from common capital, and therefore both good and true.

    Yet as far as I know, and I’m fairly confident I understand this problem as well or better than anyone living, the truth is, for reasons above, no longer a criteria for decidability, because decidability by truth requires sovereignty and reciprocity, and the feminine and the left and the abrahamic sequence all seek power to evade decidability, truth, sovereignty, reciprocity so that they can evade voluntary exchange, evade merit, evade the work and risk of production, and most importantly, evade the policing of the commons against those who would do as they do.

    So, the evolution of economic thought has taught those of us whose logical foundations are predicated upon it, that one accounts for all costs both seen and unseen, and opportunity costs, both seen by our actions, and unseen by our inactions.

    One of the reasons I am an anti-philosophy philosopher so to speak, is that disentangling the imaginary pretense from the faith, and the moral pretense of philosophy, the justificationary pretense of the ratio-empirical, leaving us with the constructively testifable from first principles, is that it is all too easy for empirical, philosophical, and theological to make excuses to avoid the truth when it suits a prior, and when most priors are so, because they provide a discount, and false priors are so because they cause an involuntary transfer from the productive to the non by free riding, socialization of losses or privatization of commons, fraud, conspiracy, corruption, sedition, treason and war.

    The Natural law is quite simple. An extension of physics to all human behavior, and all behavior to cooperation. The only reason for mine to kill and take from thine is sovereignty in demonstrated interests, reciprocity in display word and deed, leaving us with voluntary markets for cooperation and involuntary markets for resolution of disputes that we call the court whether common or state.

    So quite the contrary. just as christianity contrived a means of virtue, self worth, and status by doing no wrong, those who claim virtue by doing no wrong to the capital of the commons are just, moral, and deserving of their claim of virtue.

    We must account for the seen and unseen. When I do not take your wallet that I have found, but isntead drop it in the mailbox so that it is delivered to you, then I have forgone an opportunity. When I do not engage in a crime, I have forgone an opportunity. When I do not impose a cost on genetic, behavioral, normative, traditional, cultural, or institutional capital than have forgone an opportunity.

    Most of the high trust society is paid thus indirectly by means of NOT doing something – because it is the only thing we can do equally. And it is this high trust and the commons that we produce and capitalize that has made the west evolve faster than the rest and faster than the rest altogether.

    Affections
    – CD

    Reply addressees: @SRCHicks


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-25 21:27:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750631404994449408

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750575627642581003

  • Eh.. The Etruscans like the later Romans, were of steppe ancestry. The durable e

    Eh.. The Etruscans like the later Romans, were of steppe ancestry. The durable evidence of anatolian farmers does exist in the gene pools across europe, and the megalithic culture resulting from an admixture of farmers and hunter gatherers that began in spain and france is one of their legacies. But europa is genetically and more so culturally a product of the steppe herders, and their technological and cultural advance across europe.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-25 13:30:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750511545916833792

  • Not an argument. my point was arabization under islam was destructive to civiliz

    Not an argument. my point was arabization under islam was destructive to civilizations. And that Arabization had cognitive, cultural, and genetically deleterious consequences.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-25 11:27:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750480417868636328

    Reply addressees: @AKA_eyesspy @FernandoGLV1212

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750459306263081234

  • WISDOM LITERATURE: WHY CHOOSE BARBARIC SEMITIC SUPERSTITION OVER CULTURED GREEK

    WISDOM LITERATURE: WHY CHOOSE BARBARIC SEMITIC SUPERSTITION OVER CULTURED GREEK REASON?
    Judaism, Christianity, Islam. It’s still superstition. That doesn’t mean it isn’t wisdom. Superstition is the first ‘proto-logic’ available to the mind of man because it is the most anthropomorphic with the least knowledge of anything other than man required. One needs no knowledge, not experience, other than tribal and familial life to comprehend it.

    The question is, why, in the past, or today, if you have the choice of Greek wisdom from 500bc, or the choice of jewish wisdom from 100ad, that is a counter revolution against greek wisdom, and where the bible was conceived as a competitor to the ‘gospel’ of the ancient world: the Epic Cycle, and where that competitor is trivially primitive in content and condition, would you choose that ancient wisdom literature over the wisdom of the Epic Cycle and epicurean, stoic, platonic, and aristotelian reason. Other than you can teach it to a population with an average iQ of 80 like the middle east instead of 100 like europeans.

    Reply addressees: @FernandoGLV1212


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-25 01:26:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750329219941371904

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750315607180861619

  • DISAMBIGUATING AND CLASSIFYING CIVILIZATIONS. (There are only six types.) Brad s

    DISAMBIGUATING AND CLASSIFYING CIVILIZATIONS.
    (There are only six types.)
    Brad suggested that we develop a more concrete representation of our system of classifying civilizations. So, we did a little bit of work and gave the rules to GPT, and asked the right question and were surprised by the quality of the classification system it produced for us.

    Now, it has a problem with rates of adaptation, because it has some ‘conventional’ bias (that’s false) which, if I work on the prompts I can fix, but this is about right otherwise:

    Civilizational Types Analysis
    So if:
    1) civilization refers to the highest organizing category prior to ‘man’,
    and;
    2) there are only three possible categories of influence, and therefore three categories of elites, and three categories of institutions of coercion:
    (a) force/defense(state/command),
    (b) trade/boycott(economy, tort law),
    (c) inclusion/inclusion (social/moral/religion),
    and;
    3) if the sequence of the development of those institutions causes a path dependence, where the first institution is the dominant, the second less so, and the third weak or failure, then civilization, empire, federation, and state need not correspond to civilization.

    4) So given the path dependence of (a), (b), (c) can produce only six combinations of civilizational structures, we can separate civilizations into six types.

    Force Trade Inclusion,
    Force Inclusion Trade,
    Trade inclusion Force,
    Trade Force Inclusion,
    Inclusion Trade Force,
    Inclusion Force Trade.

    5) Interestingly some of these types cannot survive. More interestingly, it appears that humans have tried all of them and the remaining civilizations do fit the pattern.

    DOMINANT INSTITUTION CIVILIZATIONS

    Force-Dominant Civilizations (FDC)
    Primary Institution: Force/Defense
    Characteristics: Militaristic, centralized power, strong state control.
    Historical Example: Sparta

    Trade-Dominant Civilizations (TDC)
    Primary Institution: Trade/Boycott
    Characteristics: Commercially driven, emphasis on economic policies and trade networks.
    Historical Example: Phoenician civilization

    Inclusion-Dominant Civilizations (IDC)
    Primary Institution: Inclusion/Exclusion
    Characteristics: Social cohesion, moral/religious dominance, communal decision-making.
    Historical Example: Ancient Israel

    THE INSTITUTIONAL SEQUENCES

    Force Trade Inclusion (FTI)
    Description: Begins with strong military focus.
    Characteristics: Centralized power, military strength.
    Rate of Adaptation: Quick adaptation due to trade, moderate innovation.
    Defense and Stability: Strong defense, moderate stability.
    Example: Roman Empire

    Force Inclusion Trade (FIT)
    Description: Prioritizes military and social cohesion.
    Characteristics: Militaristic and socially cohesive.
    Rate of Adaptation: Slower innovation, quick defense adaptation.
    Defense and Stability: Strong defense, high stability.
    Example: Byzantine Empire

    Trade Inclusion Force (TIF)
    Description: Led by commerce, followed by social unity.
    Characteristics: Economically driven, socially unified.
    Rate of Adaptation: High innovation, adaptable economy.
    Defense and Stability: Vulnerable defense, moderate stability.
    Example: Dutch Republic

    Trade Force Inclusion (TFI)
    Description: Commerce-driven with strategic military development.
    Characteristics: Commercially vibrant, militarily capable.
    Rate of Adaptation: High innovation, reasonable defense.
    Defense and Stability: Balanced defense, moderate stability.
    Example: British Empire

    Inclusion Trade Force (ITF)
    Description: Starts with social unity, progresses to trade.
    Characteristics: Socially cohesive, later economic growth.
    Rate of Adaptation: Slow innovation, late defense development.
    Defense and Stability: Weaker defense, high stability.
    Example: Tibetan Empire

    Inclusion Force Trade (IFT)
    Description: Social cohesion leads, then defense, then trade.
    Characteristics: Socially and religiously dominant.
    Rate of Adaptation: Least innovative, slow economic adaptation.
    Defense and Stability: Moderate defense, highest stability.
    Example: Ancient Israel

    Note that all I supplied were the rules and the AI produced the descriptions, characteristics and examples. The correct choice of example was fascinating.

    Cheers
    -CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-25 01:20:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750327628903444480

  • Technically speaking the church put the post-vikings to good use because they we

    Technically speaking the church put the post-vikings to good use because they were a domestic challenge. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-23 18:37:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749863830572646564

    Reply addressees: @JohnSmi55895339 @opa2024 @TThorngren40664

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749862773654188160