Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • 2) Just because you are getting support and attention, do not assume you have li

    2) Just because you are getting support and attention, do not assume you have license to overreach and hubris. Civilizational differences are in our Laws: Western Empiricism, Easter Wisdom, Indian Mythology, Semitic Fraud (Pilpul/Critique), African Magic, Australian Devolution.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-06 22:13:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070803463804727298

    Reply addressees: @BretWeinstein

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070127960009564160

    IN REPLY TO:

    @BretWeinstein

    This is a modern creation myth, delivered as if it were an analysis.

    It is as inaccurate and self-serving the intersectionalist’s claim that all disparities arise from oppression.

    Those pushing these stories persuade through flattery. Don’t be fooled. Don’t take the bait. https://t.co/DH8e85dlOq

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070127960009564160

  • You stepped in it. Anyone who studies any of history will discover that the grou

    You stepped in it. Anyone who studies any of history will discover that the group strategy and tactic of some civilizations cause invention, some cause stagnation, and some cause devolution.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-06 22:12:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070803272284471302

    Reply addressees: @BretWeinstein

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070127960009564160

    IN REPLY TO:

    @BretWeinstein

    This is a modern creation myth, delivered as if it were an analysis.

    It is as inaccurate and self-serving the intersectionalist’s claim that all disparities arise from oppression.

    Those pushing these stories persuade through flattery. Don’t be fooled. Don’t take the bait. https://t.co/DH8e85dlOq

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1070127960009564160

  • by Ahmed Reda The enlightenment – or rather – the continuous evolution of wester

    by Ahmed Reda

    The enlightenment – or rather – the continuous evolution of western man from blacksmith to aristotle, to hume, to darwin et all, is produced by the incremental suppression of comforting falsehoods that imprison us in lack of agency. -Doolittle

    *NEVER FORGET THAT Rousseau, Kant and the Continentals were the Abrahamist reaction against Hume’s resurrection of Greek reason.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-04 05:15:00 UTC

  • JUSTIFICATION FOR GROUPING —“The Abrahamic program’s second revision (Marx, Fr

    JUSTIFICATION FOR GROUPING

    —“The Abrahamic program’s second revision (Marx, Freud, Boaz, Cantor, Mises, Rothbard, Strauss) has been catastrophic. “—CD

    —“That’s a pretty unintuitive grouping, what’s the justification for it?”— Trent Fowler

    Method of argument. Just like we have math, logic, rationalism (formal, kantian), empirical, and scientific, we also have sophistry(pseudo-rationalism), pseudoscience, and mysticism. The abrahamic method turns out to be as perfect a method of lying as the scientific method is of telling the truth.

    So, the abrahamic method consists of (but is not limited to ) (a) false promise (b) baiting moral hazard (c) creating opportunity for parasitism or undermining, (d) using Pilpul (sophism, justificationism), Critique (straw manning criticism without supplying operationally possible alternatives,), Heaping undue praise, and reputation destruction, by means of loding, framing, suggestion, overloading, psychologizing, moralizing, half truths and outright deceits.

    Now, I’ve spent a lot of time on it, but you have to ask yourself, why, if mathematical, logical, empirical, operational, rational, reciprocal, arguments with tests of scope, completeness, and coherence exist, why it would be that you would argue by any other means.

    I suspect you’re referring to either mises or rothbard, and the work is here if you want to go through it (as well as hoppe).

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/10/28/propertarianism-for-for-libertarians/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-03 15:42:00 UTC

  • ANGLO CIVILIZATION HAS PERSISTED FOR A VERY LONG TIME BY MODERN STANDARDS: CONST

    ANGLO CIVILIZATION HAS PERSISTED FOR A VERY LONG TIME BY MODERN STANDARDS: CONSTANT REVISION AND RESTORATION

    You can’t control a constitutional convention. It’s a random number generator which is why no one will tolerate it.

    Forcing Surrender to a set of demands for a set of constitutional changes on the other hand has a consistent record of success in anglo saxon civilization.

    It’s what we do.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-02 13:50:00 UTC

  • GRAMMARS OF CIVILIZATIONS TELL US ALL WE NEED TO KNOW Um. Sorry. But it’s not op

    GRAMMARS OF CIVILIZATIONS TELL US ALL WE NEED TO KNOW

    Um. Sorry. But it’s not open do debate.

    1 – Aristotle Wrote Proto Empiricism: Reason, Naturalism, Proto-empiricism, Law, Calculation. (TRUTH)

    2 – Sun Tzu, and Confucius wrote WISDOM LIT. Lao Tzu crossed the line into the questionable. (WISDOM)

    3 – The Indians wrote both mythology and wisdom literature, bordering on political science (WISDOM)

    4 – The Persians wrote supernormal and supernatural wisdom literature. (UTOPIAN UNIVERSALISM)

    5 – The Egyptians wrote RITUALISM Supernatural (Animism, Anthropomorphism, heathenism ) Doctrine and Ritual.

    6 – The Abrahamists wrote Mythology, Rebellion, and Lie and Destruction of all of the above. (UTOPIAN LIE)

    Abrahamism is a cancer upon mankind.

    ABRAHAMISM: False Promise (lie) > Mythology (lie/False History) > Pilpul(Positiva, Justificationism) > Critique(Negativa, Straw Man) > Supernaturalism, Sophism, Pseudoscience.

    The west fights between the best Aristotle and Law, and the worst Abrahamism and Lies.

    Only the Far East is staged to survive the cancer.

    The answer?

    THE WHITE LAW

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-02 12:01:00 UTC

  • Это просто. Нам нужно больше русской Истины в нашей культуре и в России больше н

    Это просто. Нам нужно больше русской Истины в нашей культуре и в России больше нашего Истинного Тестирования в их.

    Eto prosto. Nam nuzhno bol’she russkoy Istiny v nashey kul’ture i v Rossii bol’she nashego Istinnogo Testirovaniya v ikh.

    Es ist einfach. Wir brauchen mehr russische Wahrheit in unserer Kultur und Russland mehr von unserer Wahrheitsfindung in ihrer.

    It’s simple. We need more Russian Truth in our culture and Russia more of our Truth Telling in theirs.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-01 09:45:00 UTC

  • WHY DO WOMEN UNDERMINE THE CIVILIZATION and CULTURE, the INSTITUTIONS, and MALES

    WHY DO WOMEN UNDERMINE THE CIVILIZATION and CULTURE, the INSTITUTIONS, and MALES?

    (important explanations)

    —“…what kind of evolutionary pressure would create a desire to undermine the ingroup. All the plausible explanations I’ve seen had to do with abusing female impulses that have evolved for entirely different purposes….”—Martin Štěpán

    Females undermine the concentration of power in alphas in order to preserve some control over their reproductive choice and access to resources and male-provisioned resources, including defense. ie: females can barter attention, effort, care, and sex if they have control of the attention economy. Which is why females are so conscious (and gay men evidencing it) of attention and approval and agreeableness.

    So just as females operate on a status and attention economy, they fight within that economy: disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, moralizing, undermining, and reputation destruction.

    And decreasing the number of females is not necessarily in their disinterest – so literally killing off other females increases remaining female market value, so that his the strategy females pursue: that of Hens.

    Undermining the males (‘sh-t testing’) is useful both at the level of insuring the ‘fitness’ of males in defending them, preserving their ability to choose, assisting them in outing ‘cheaters’ (which women are terrible at, and men excel at), maximizing cost of (returns on) their attention, care, and sex.

    The only problem here is that women still sexually select for males as if we are under those conditions of hunter gatherers. And this explains the attraction of women to more primitive (less domesticated) groups of males with lower agency despite that the female condition is dependent upon those of us with higher agency, innovation, and adaptivity.

    Hence the necessity of more domesticated (higher agency) males of defending the ingroup females from conquest or even exposure to, lower agency, higher aggression, males. (FWIW:Delayed marriage provides women with greater reproductive certainty, and therefore greater sortition, and greater formation of genetic castes, and therefore greater speciation – hence white people.)

    Males conversely, operate on the physical equivalent of the warfare economy, and so losses of males weakens the pack, and dilution of the ingroup male genes weakens male reproductive (evolutionary) persistence, as well as reverses domestication (evolution of agency).

    I could write on this subject for hours by just weaving through male and female behavior at all levels. And doing so only further demonstrates Acquisitionism and the need for Testimonialism and Natural Law to preserve the Western Advantage given the destructive influences of women.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-01 09:34:00 UTC

  • THE ABUSE OF THE TERM “NATION” IN ITS HISTORICAL AND MARXIST-POSTMODERN-FEMINIST

    THE ABUSE OF THE TERM “NATION” IN ITS HISTORICAL AND MARXIST-POSTMODERN-FEMINIST CONTEXT

    (Note: I try to collapse one of the major the cycles of history here, and repeat the same idea from different angles because while the underlying causes are not that difficult, it seems relatively difficult for most of us. Repetition solves that problem.)

    So Nation = A Race or Subrace or Tribal Group of Similar Genetics, Language, Culture, Traditions, Institutions, and Group Evolutionary Strategy. Period.

    Everything Else is Just more sophomoric postmodern term abuse.

    |KIN| Individual > Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Race > Man.

    |TERRITORY| Land > Lands > Country > Empire

    |RULE| Warriors > Militia > Military (Insurers of Last resort) > Rule(Decidability, monopoly on power) > Government (Management, monopoly on commons) > State (Corporation holding Assets, monopoly on foreign relations) > Empire.

    In the context of this discussion, either you have a Nation-State, or an Empire. Nation (people), Nation-State (political order), Empire (multi-national political order).

    We use the term International as a shorthand for inter-imperial, stat, and national. Largely because our terminology evolved during the era of nation states dominated by european nation states – each of which was and always has been an empire, forcibly created by napoleon in france, by the invention of total war, and causing the rest of the world to react to scale in order to produce militaries of capability to resist them.

    America, Russia, China, and India are Empires. The UK is either a Federation or an Empire, and increasingly demonstrably a Federation. Italy consists of the north and the south – although Federated or Imperial a question unresolved. Spain because – because of her regional conflicts, an empire. France because of Brittany and algeria an empire.

    The Universalist (pseudoscientific-marxist and sophist-postmodernist and denialist-feminist) movements attempt to construct a redefinition of terms to fool the idiots into working against their interests by reversing eugenic paternalism.

    The Particularist (scientific, empiricist, paternalist) order simply states what exist, and asks us to choose which order is in our interests, advocating the preservation of eugenic paternalism.

    It’s not complicated. It’s the pseudoscientists, sophists, denialists, and outright liars and idiots that make the current world APPEAR complicated by layers of loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit.

    These questions are all open to simple answer. But the dysgenic left kleptocracy attempts to achieve by pseudoscience sophism denialism and deceit, that which the jewish, christians, and islamists achieved by supernaturalism, sophism, denialism and deceit: another dark age, in the multi-millennial war between the eugenic indo europeans, and the dysgenic afro-asiatics.

    REVOLT ONE

    Indo European Expansion by Heroic Paternal Militarism vs Semitic invention of Religious Resistance

    REVOLT TWO

    Greco Roman Expansion of Empiricism vs Semitic Religious Resistance

    REVOLT THREE

    Anglo-European Expansion of Science, Law, Accounting, and Technology vs Semitic Pseudoscientific, Sophist (pseudo-rational), Denialist, Resistance.

    Just the eugenic masculine heroic aristocracy against the dysgenic feminine resistance.

    Male vs Female at Scale.

    Males fight ingroup for position (pack strategy ). Females fight ingroup to Destroy and never stop (herd strategy).

    Males fight outgroup to cooperate or destroy. Females encourage outgroup to undermine ingroup. None of this rational choice but purely genetic and evolutionary in influence.

    Surviving Europeans, the Conquered Persians, and Lost Indo-Aryans applied the male strategy of colonize and domesticate for profit. Semites (afro-asiatics), apply the female strategy and use disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, and reputation destruction to excite the underclasses to rebel against those who have made their circumstance possible.

    The story of Cain and Able is the story of paternal urban agrarian vs maternal herding wanderer. And the different moral intuitions between them and between men and women continue to determine our cyclical competition.

    Unfortunately, the female intuition is only useful at social scale, and the male intuition at political scale. And when the feminine wins, as we have seen, the great civilizations are destroyed, just as much from plague and war without but from undermining within.

    Version Two

    Jews (undermine) > Christians (acquiesce) > Muslims (conquer and replace)

    Version Three

    Marxists (undermine) > Postmodernists (acquiesce) > Islamists (conquer and replace)

    The test of Racial competition of whom only the east asians and indians seem willing to resist by cultural means in india(culturo-centrism), and by state means in china, japan, and Korea (ethnocentrism)

    That is the explanation of the cycles of history at scale.

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-30 22:52:00 UTC

  • Another nit: Great Men “Candidates” evolve (emerge) in batches, usually over thr

    Another nit: Great Men “Candidates” evolve (emerge) in batches, usually over three generations of incentives (really). In other words, the market for great men exists at all times (iron law of oligarchy so to speak). World Communism was such a threat (and it’s legacy still is) that it created demand for great men to both take advantage of it, and to oppose it with Fascism. Everything else that occured within those societies was simply utilitarian. whether we get a Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot is merely a function of utility in the sphere of influences.

    And as controversial as it might seem today, Hitler and Mussolini if not Stalin and Mao, will be judged by history quite differently. And it is happening already. Science evolves with the death of the advocates of theories.

    As a struggle for expansion during an era of western dominance we skew one bias, and as an attempt to save the core of western civilization in a period of anticipation of decline, we skew yet another.

    History is unkind to the consensus of an era. That is because consensus is merely utilitarian – rarely true.

    Its not uncommon to see informed debate that the anglos should have stayed out of the wars, rather than contributing to cause and conflict.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-30 14:59:00 UTC