Curt Doolittle

Theme: Civilization

  • SACRED INVERSION There have been things in the world properly made sacred by inv

    SACRED INVERSION

    There have been things in the world properly made sacred by inversion; we’re doing our damnedest to reverse the sanctity of these things by making them “normal” once again.

    Jonathan Pageau gives a wonderful presentation on the perversion of “modern” art. He speaks to the world “turning upside down.” I see this as the world turning from sacred back to merely ordinary. 🙁 [The reversal of a necessary and brilliant upending]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUcdDfmjoTQ.

    Humans have a nature and thus bring a “collective subjectivity” to the value judgement of artistic endeavors. In other words it’s not “simply” subjective.

    By: G.K. Chesterton:

    “The family may fairly be considered, one would think, an ultimate human institution. Every one would admit that it has been the main cell and central unit of almost all societies hitherto, except, indeed, such societies as that of Lacedaemon, which went in for “efficiency,” and has, therefore, perished, and left not a trace behind. Christianity, even enormous as was its revolution, did not alter this ancient and savage sanctity; it merely reversed it. It did not deny the trinity of father, mother, and child. It merely read it backwards, making it run child, mother, father. This it called, not the family, but the Holy Family, for many things are made holy by being turned upside down. But some sages of our own decadence have made a serious attack on the family. They have impugned it, as I think wrongly; and its defenders have defended it, and defended it wrongly. The common defence of the family is that, amid the stress and fickleness of life, it is peaceful, pleasant, and at one. But there is another defence of the family which is possible, and to me evident; this defence is that the family is not peaceful and not pleasant and not at one.”

    Scott Adams, whom I have a great respect for misses the mark in his most controversial (and that’s saying a lot figuring most of his positions support Trump in some manner or another) video yet; the problem of the nuclear family.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyVK_T9m5R0

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 08:47:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://archive.org/details/TheClashOfCivilizations-anIslamicView.pdfINCOMPATIBILITY

    https://archive.org/details/TheClashOfCivilizations-anIslamicView.pdf

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 12:08:00 UTC

  • Evolution or Scope of Religion over time. Phase 1: Burials > (Possible 1a: Marki

    Evolution or Scope of Religion over time.

    Phase 1: Burials > (Possible 1a: Marking as Monument?) > Phase 2: Sacrifices > Phase 3: Seasons > Phase 4: Politics > Phase 5: Education

    Each of these is rather obvious in progression as complexity increases.

    The only ‘evil’ here is monotheism. The greatest evil in history is Abrahamic Monotheism. And it is our duty to eradicate this mental disease from mankind over the next few centuries.

    It is the most important advance we can give to our people.

    Truth is enough.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 10:52:00 UTC

  • HOW OUR RELIGION WAS ABRAHAMISED: by Yiannis Kontinopoulos Poet Homer -> Saul of

    HOW OUR RELIGION WAS ABRAHAMISED:

    by Yiannis Kontinopoulos

    Poet

    Homer -> Saul of Tarsus

    Prophet

    Aristotle -> Abraham

    Hero

    Achilles -> Muhammad

    Superhero

    Mithras -> Moses

    Deity

    Sol Invictus -> Jesus

    God

    Dyeus Pater -> Yahweh/Allah

    Mindfulness

    Stoicism -> Faith

    Ritual/Feast

    Mithraic Mysteries -> Mass

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 10:19:00 UTC

  • DIVERGENCE OF ADVANCED NATIONS (TODD: –“I am a demographer”–, Which I hope ill

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yz4zUGlhK8THE DIVERGENCE OF ADVANCED NATIONS

    (TODD: –“I am a demographer”–, Which I hope illustrates my constant point that ‘demographics is everything’. )

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yz4zUGlhK8

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 10:10:00 UTC

  • DOOLITTLE VS HUNTINGTON – MINOR DIFFERENCE WITH MAJOR CONSEQUENCES —“The under

    DOOLITTLE VS HUNTINGTON – MINOR DIFFERENCE WITH MAJOR CONSEQUENCES

    —“The underlying problem for the West is not Islamic

    Fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilisation whose

    people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and

    are obsessed with the inferiority ol°their power. The problem

    for Islam is not CIA orthc US. Department of defense. It is

    the West, a different civilisation whose people are convinced

    of the universality of their culture and believe that their

    superior, if declining, power imposes on them the obligation to impose that culture throughout the world. These are the

    basic ingredients that fuel conflict between Islam and the

    West.”— Huntington.

    DOOLITTLE’S EXPANSION OF HUNTINGTON:

    My position is that it is not just the west against islam (since islam is the only civilization hostile to modernity remaining), but that it is Western Aryanism: Truth, Sovereignty, Agency, and Eugenics and the Male Pack Strategy of Nation States, against Semitic Abrahamism: Deceit, Submission, and Dysgenics, and the female herd strategy of empires of ignorance.

    In other words, it is against the Abrahamic Method, and it’s instantiations in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and Marxism (jewish), postmodernism (christian), Feminism (secular), and Islamism (islamic), forms

    The evidence is what it is. Nothing can change it.

    HUNTINGTON VS DOOLITTLE

    It’s not just culture and belief, but the survival and transcendence of mankind rather than it’s continuous devolution and destruction that occurs wherever islam, judaism spread.

    Huntington was arguing in the cold war model of political and military strategy.

    I’m arguing against extinction of mankind, by the extinction of truth, reason, science, and sovereignty.

    Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are technologies not of rebellion but of undermining, conquest, consumption, and destruction through devolution and consumption.

    Islame consumed each civilization. It is cancer.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 09:55:00 UTC

  • TODD IN DEPTH: MARRIAGE DIFFERENCES MATTER – PERHAPS MOST OF ALL

    https://www.samizdata.net/2013/11/first-thoughts-on-america-3-0-the-emmanuel-todd-connection/EMMANUEL TODD IN DEPTH: MARRIAGE DIFFERENCES MATTER – PERHAPS MOST OF ALL.

    https://www.samizdata.net/2013/11/first-thoughts-on-america-3-0-the-emmanuel-todd-connection/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 09:24:00 UTC

  • TODD AND FAMILY STRUCTURES

    https://morganwlfc.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/an-introduction-to-emmanuel-todd-in-english-part-one/EMMANUEL TODD AND FAMILY STRUCTURES

    https://morganwlfc.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/an-introduction-to-emmanuel-todd-in-english-part-one/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 09:22:00 UTC

  • HAJNAL LINE —“What is it called? Hansa line? Hanja line? I can’t find anything

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hajnal_lineTHE HAJNAL LINE

    —“What is it called? Hansa line? Hanja line? I can’t find anything when searching for it”—

    Hajnal Line: Line where bipartite manorialism spread in northern europe, producing delayed marriage and higher investment parenting, and seems to have been the cause of low clannishness, the work ethic, and high trust.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hajnal_line

    Just as Kevin Macdonald worked on the Jewish Question, Jayman/Steve Hsu and others on the genetic question, to a large degree HBD_Chick (who stays anonymous just as did Jayman) works on clannishness and she popularized (among the HBD movement) the work of both Emmanuel Todd (French historian), and John Hajnal (Hungarian-British Mathematician) in their work on the differences between populations in europe – particularly given their family structures.

    This work dovetails with Hannan’s “Albion’s Seed” argument about the retention of local british culture as waves of british immigrants spread across the states.

    -Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-28 09:18:00 UTC

  • A VIKING CHRISTMAS STORY (edited) Twas the night before Christmas, and all throu

    A VIKING CHRISTMAS STORY

    (edited)

    Twas the night before Christmas, and all through the village

    The men sharpened knives and the boys dreamt of pillage.

    The skulls were all hung by the chimney with care

    In hopes on the morrow, more would be there.

    The girls were nestled all snug in their beds,

    While visions of jewelry, danced in their heads.

    And mamma in her gown, and I in my shirt,

    Had just caught our breath from a quick winter’s flirt.

    When out on the river there arose such a clatter,

    I sprang from the bed, to see what was the matter.

    Away to the Hall, I flew in a rush,

    Tore open the shutters, and threw up the sash.

    The moon on the breast of the new-fallen snow

    Gave the lustre of mid-day to objects below.

    When, what to my wondering eyes should appear,

    But a longboat with shields, and great men with their gear.

    With a bearded old man, lively and wisened,

    I knew in a moment it must be Lord Odin.

    More rapid than eagles his warriors they came,

    And he whistled, and shouted, and called them by name!

    “Now, Dasher! now, Dancer! now, Prancer and Vixen!

    On, Comet! On, Cupid! on, Donner and Blitzen!

    To the top of the porch! to the top of the wall!

    Now dash away! Dash away! Dash away all!”

    As dry leaves that before the wild hurricane fly,

    When they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky.

    So up to the house-top the coursers they flew,

    With bags full of booty, and Lord Odin too.

    And then, in a twinkling, I heard at the door

    The laughter of brethren hardened by war.

    As I drew in my head, and was turning around,

    Lord Odin, through the portal, came with a bound.

    He was dressed all in grey, from his head to his foot,

    And his clothes were all fouled with snow and with soot.

    A bundle of booty he had flung on his back,

    And he looked like a merchant, just opening his pack.

    His eyes-how they twinkled! his laughter how merry!

    His cheeks were like roses, his nose like a cherry!

    The beard of his chin was as white as the snow,

    And his purses, hung neatly, from his belt, in a row.

    The stump of a pipe, he held tight, in his teeth,

    And the smoke it, encircled his head, like a wreath.

    He had a long face, pointed hat, and grey cloak,

    That shook when he laughed, like the bough of an oak.

    He was tall and thin, but a jolly old elf,

    And I laughed when I saw him, in spite of myself!

    But a wink of his eye, and a twist of his head,

    Soon gave me to know, I had nothing to dread.

    He spoke not a word, but went straight to his work,

    And filled all the stockings, then turned with a jerk.

    And laying his finger, aside of his cheek,

    And giving a nod, tossed my share to my feet.

    He sprang to his boots, and to men gave a whistle,

    And away we all flew like the down of a thistle.

    And I heard him exclaim, ‘ere we ran into the night,

    “Happy Viking to all, and to all a good-fight!”

    -Curt Doolittle

    (With Apologies to Dickens)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-25 11:16:00 UTC