Xianity need not be taught as cuckery but as legitimization for expansion by force. Not because it is just another dogma. But because of the abrahamic cults it is the only one that is productive and trust producing rather than parasitic and deceit producing.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-18 13:26:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097487541987692545
ABRAHAMIC MONOPOLY DEATH CULTS
I mean, more people are dead because of judaism, christianity,and islam than anything other than the great plagues and diseases. Islam is worse than the black plague, and possibly close to malaria – the deadliest disease of all.
I mean, between Boaz, Freud, and Marx we have 100M dead in this century alone. Good numbers on christianity are impossible but trivial by comparison because most all are due to disease in the new world. Islam is the master of death cults with close to 1B dead, and a genetic decline worse than all but a few global volcanic catastrophes.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-18 11:38:00 UTC
UM. NO, CHRISTIANITY INHIBITED OUR REVIVAL
Aryanism built europe and still does. Christianity was at best an infantilizing nursemaid for the celtic holocaust, resulting migrations to fill the vacuum, and resulting fall of the old (greco) and new(Roman) european empire (Civilization). And had christians spread literacy and aristotle rather than illiteracy and magic…we would have recovered within a century. But no. christianity destroyed our civilization.
The rate of productivity under the aryan(indo european) religion and the rate of productivity under the abrahamic (afro asiatic) religion is what it is. There is no comparison. The rate of innovation once we exited religious thought is what it is.
Abrahamism=Darkness.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-18 11:02:00 UTC
You mean like the islamic empire?
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-17 23:26:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097276213033398273
Reply addressees: @Jake38109894 @ArielFelidae
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097240675224113154
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097240675224113154
that’s rather ridiculous since the church couldn’t fight off the muslims, and it wasn’t until the vikings invaded france the church could raise warriors to resist. There is a reason catholic countries are more corrupt than protestant. the church bred corruption.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-17 21:22:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097245020845936642
Reply addressees: @ArielFelidae @Jake38109894
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097218235316031489
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1097218235316031489
GENERATIONS OF WARFARE
The concept of four “generations” in the history of modern warfare was created by a team of United States analysts, including William S. Lind, for the purpose of an argument for “the changing face of war” entering into a “fourth generation”.
1. First-generation warfare refers to Ancient and Post-classical battles fought with massed manpower, using line and column tactics with uniformed soldiers governed by the state.
2. Second-generation warfare is the Early modern tactics used after the invention of the rifled musket and breech-loading weapons and continuing through the development of the machine gun and indirect fire. The term second generation warfare was created by the U.S. military in 1989.
3. Third-generation warfare focuses on using Late modern technology-derived tactics of leveraging speed, stealth and surprise to bypass the enemy’s lines and collapse their forces from the rear. Essentially, this was the end of linear warfare on a tactical level, with units seeking not simply to meet each other face to face but to outmaneuver each other to gain the greatest advantage.
4. Fourth-generation warfare as presented by Lind et al. is characterized by “Post-modern” a return to decentralized forms of warfare, blurring of the lines between war and politics, combatants and civilians due to nation states’ loss of their near-monopoly on combat forces, returning to modes of conflict common in pre-modern times.
(wiki)
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-17 14:57:00 UTC
I care about preserving christianity’s 30,000 sects for christians and their globalist universalist equalitarian disease, advancing our natural religion of the hearth for heathens and nationalist, the sciences for the secularists, and the law for those of us who must rule. And let the market accommodate people’s needs. Christianity will be the feminine and underclass religion, heathenism masculine and middle class, and those of us with power and agency need none.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-17 12:26:00 UTC
CHRISTIANS ARE NATURAL LEFTISTS
Christians were always the ally of the left – there reason for the war against the south, the reason for immigration, the reason for ‘civil rights’. The christians only moved to the ‘right’ once they understood that the state wanted to become the new religion in the franco-jewish-soviet model. Christianity is not nationalist, is not particularist, is not masculine, is not heroic, is not militaristic, expansionary, truthful, sovereign. It’s antithetical to the west: a purely semitic cult. It was the church’s necessity of accommodating the aristocracy that made our people survive christianity and made the claims of something other than destruction of our people possible.
They are not members of the libertarian or right. Instead, libertarians and the right give ‘nod’ to christians the way men give ‘nod’ to women, and value christianity the way men value women. But Christians are not ‘men’ , nor ‘european’ but simply semitic (female strategy) of resistance, undermining, and dysgenia.
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-17 11:22:00 UTC
CAN OUR PEOPLE SURVIVE WHILE ACCOMMODATING CHRISTIANITY? (NO)
by Daniel Gurpide
Is it possible to accommodate Christianity once the veil of ignorance has been torn asunder? Is it possible to teach the five core tenets which constitute the ‘optimum group strategy’, discard the rest of the claptrap, and still call that Christianity? Theoretically, yes; in practice, it is as easy as to reinsert a Champagne cork back into the bottle.
Nowhere are the effects caused by the pursuit of the tenets of Jewish-Christian egalitarianism more existentially dramatic—because it threatens the very survival of the communities concerned—than in the demographic suicide now being committed by the West. The West faces massive Third World immigration, and high fertility rates combined with below-replacement white birth rates. As Lothrop Stoddard feared, a rising tide of colour is swamping the West; and it is guilt about the Third World which is the primary cause of mass immigration into Western lands. Comparison with Japan repays attention, for this Far Eastern country experiences the same economic conditioning as Europe or the United States, but has managed to control migratory fluxes remarkably well.
Christianity is a derivative, a heresy, from Judaism, but it teaches Europe precisely the opposite lesson as far as ethnocentrism is concerned. In Christianity, European peoples cannot—as a people—have a relation with God: this is for the Jewish people alone. European people can have a relation with God only as individuals. Judaism is a religion for survival in a multicultural society. It is a religion for governing the behaviour of a Jewish minority in the presence of a non-Jewish majority. Christianity, on the other hand, is a religion for governing the behaviour of Christians in a homogeneous Christian society. In a multicultural society it becomes suicidal.
The original meaning of the Latin word religio—from religare, to tie fast—was never used until Constantinian times to describe the ‘superstitio nova ac malefica’ represented by Christianity and has nothing to do with the metaphysical or fideistic concepts introduced by monotheism. It is simply what binds together the members of a political and ethno-cultural community. As such, religion has two aspects: the myth—the representation that we choose to have of our own past, and more generally of the universe, in relation to the future, the destiny that we want to create; and the rite—the evocation and celebration of our being together with the intention of provoking a general mobilisation of spirits.
Historical consciousness is also part of human agency. It is time to choose!
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-17 11:08:00 UTC
EZRA POUND
—“Angered by the carnage of World War I, Pound lost faith in Great Britain and blamed the war on usury and international capitalism. He moved to Italy in 1924 and throughout the 1930s and 1940s embraced Benito Mussolini’s fascism, expressed support for Adolf Hitler, and wrote for publications owned by the British fascist Sir Oswald Mosley. During World War II, he was paid by the Italian government to make hundreds of radio broadcasts criticizing the United States, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Jews, as a result of which he was arrested in 1945 by American forces in Italy on charges of treason.”—
Source date (UTC): 2019-02-16 09:40:00 UTC