(FB 1543675502 Timestamp) ÐÑо пÑоÑÑо. Ðам нÑжно болÑÑе ÑÑÑÑкой ÐÑÑÐ¸Ð½Ñ Ð² наÑей кÑлÑÑÑÑе и в РоÑÑии болÑÑе наÑего ÐÑÑинного ТеÑÑиÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð² Ð¸Ñ . Eto prosto. Nam nuzhno bol’she russkoy Istiny v nashey kul’ture i v Rossii bol’she nashego Istinnogo Testirovaniya v ikh. Es ist einfach. Wir brauchen mehr russische Wahrheit in unserer Kultur und Russland mehr von unserer Wahrheitsfindung in ihrer. It’s simple. We need more Russian Truth in our culture and Russia more of our Truth Telling in theirs.
Theme: Civilization
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543674852 Timestamp) WHY DO WOMEN UNDERMINE THE CIVILIZATION and CULTURE, the INSTITUTIONS, and MALES? (important explanations) —“…what kind of evolutionary pressure would create a desire to undermine the ingroup. All the plausible explanations I’ve seen had to do with abusing female impulses that have evolved for entirely different purposes….”—Martin Å tÄpán Females undermine the concentration of power in alphas in order to preserve some control over their reproductive choice and access to resources and male-provisioned resources, including defense. ie: females can barter attention, effort, care, and sex if they have control of the attention economy. Which is why females are so conscious (and gay men evidencing it) of attention and approval and agreeableness. So just as females operate on a status and attention economy, they fight within that economy: disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, moralizing, undermining, and reputation destruction. And decreasing the number of females is not necessarily in their disinterest – so literally killing off other females increases remaining female market value, so that his the strategy females pursue: that of Hens. Undermining the males (‘sh-t testing’) is useful both at the level of insuring the ‘fitness’ of males in defending them, preserving their ability to choose, assisting them in outing ‘cheaters’ (which women are terrible at, and men excel at), maximizing cost of (returns on) their attention, care, and sex. The only problem here is that women still sexually select for males as if we are under those conditions of hunter gatherers. And this explains the attraction of women to more primitive (less domesticated) groups of males with lower agency despite that the female condition is dependent upon those of us with higher agency, innovation, and adaptivity. Hence the necessity of more domesticated (higher agency) males of defending the ingroup females from conquest or even exposure to, lower agency, higher aggression, males. (FWIW:Delayed marriage provides women with greater reproductive certainty, and therefore greater sortition, and greater formation of genetic castes, and therefore greater speciation – hence white people.) Males conversely, operate on the physical equivalent of the warfare economy, and so losses of males weakens the pack, and dilution of the ingroup male genes weakens male reproductive (evolutionary) persistence, as well as reverses domestication (evolution of agency). I could write on this subject for hours by just weaving through male and female behavior at all levels. And doing so only further demonstrates Acquisitionism and the need for Testimonialism and Natural Law to preserve the Western Advantage given the destructive influences of women.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543636376 Timestamp) THE ABUSE OF THE TERM “NATION” IN ITS HISTORICAL AND MARXIST-POSTMODERN-FEMINIST CONTEXT (Note: I try to collapse one of the major the cycles of history here, and repeat the same idea from different angles because while the underlying causes are not that difficult, it seems relatively difficult for most of us. Repetition solves that problem.) So Nation = A Race or Subrace or Tribal Group of Similar Genetics, Language, Culture, Traditions, Institutions, and Group Evolutionary Strategy. Period. Everything Else is Just more sophomoric postmodern term abuse. |KIN| Individual > Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Race > Man. |TERRITORY| Land > Lands > Country > Empire |RULE| Warriors > Militia > Military (Insurers of Last resort) > Rule(Decidability, monopoly on power) > Government (Management, monopoly on commons) > State (Corporation holding Assets, monopoly on foreign relations) > Empire. In the context of this discussion, either you have a Nation-State, or an Empire. Nation (people), Nation-State (political order), Empire (multi-national political order). We use the term International as a shorthand for inter-imperial, stat, and national. Largely because our terminology evolved during the era of nation states dominated by european nation states – each of which was and always has been an empire, forcibly created by napoleon in france, by the invention of total war, and causing the rest of the world to react to scale in order to produce militaries of capability to resist them. America, Russia, China, and India are Empires. The UK is either a Federation or an Empire, and increasingly demonstrably a Federation. Italy consists of the north and the south – although Federated or Imperial a question unresolved. Spain because – because of her regional conflicts, an empire. France because of Brittany and algeria an empire. The Universalist (pseudoscientific-marxist and sophist-postmodernist and denialist-feminist) movements attempt to construct a redefinition of terms to fool the idiots into working against their interests by reversing eugenic paternalism. The Particularist (scientific, empiricist, paternalist) order simply states what exist, and asks us to choose which order is in our interests, advocating the preservation of eugenic paternalism. It’s not complicated. It’s the pseudoscientists, sophists, denialists, and outright liars and idiots that make the current world APPEAR complicated by layers of loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit. These questions are all open to simple answer. But the dysgenic left kleptocracy attempts to achieve by pseudoscience sophism denialism and deceit, that which the jewish, christians, and islamists achieved by supernaturalism, sophism, denialism and deceit: another dark age, in the multi-millennial war between the eugenic indo europeans, and the dysgenic afro-asiatics. REVOLT ONE Indo European Expansion by Heroic Paternal Militarism vs Semitic invention of Religious Resistance REVOLT TWO Greco Roman Expansion of Empiricism vs Semitic Religious Resistance REVOLT THREE Anglo-European Expansion of Science, Law, Accounting, and Technology vs Semitic Pseudoscientific, Sophist (pseudo-rational), Denialist, Resistance. Just the eugenic masculine heroic aristocracy against the dysgenic feminine resistance. Male vs Female at Scale. Males fight ingroup for position (pack strategy ). Females fight ingroup to Destroy and never stop (herd strategy). Males fight outgroup to cooperate or destroy. Females encourage outgroup to undermine ingroup. None of this rational choice but purely genetic and evolutionary in influence. Surviving Europeans, the Conquered Persians, and Lost Indo-Aryans applied the male strategy of colonize and domesticate for profit. Semites (afro-asiatics), apply the female strategy and use disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, and reputation destruction to excite the underclasses to rebel against those who have made their circumstance possible. The story of Cain and Able is the story of paternal urban agrarian vs maternal herding wanderer. And the different moral intuitions between them and between men and women continue to determine our cyclical competition. Unfortunately, the female intuition is only useful at social scale, and the male intuition at political scale. And when the feminine wins, as we have seen, the great civilizations are destroyed, just as much from plague and war without but from undermining within. Version Two Jews (undermine) > Christians (acquiesce) > Muslims (conquer and replace) Version Three Marxists (undermine) > Postmodernists (acquiesce) > Islamists (conquer and replace) The test of Racial competition of whom only the east asians and indians seem willing to resist by cultural means in india(culturo-centrism), and by state means in china, japan, and Korea (ethnocentrism) That is the explanation of the cycles of history at scale. Cheers
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543675502 Timestamp) ÐÑо пÑоÑÑо. Ðам нÑжно болÑÑе ÑÑÑÑкой ÐÑÑÐ¸Ð½Ñ Ð² наÑей кÑлÑÑÑÑе и в РоÑÑии болÑÑе наÑего ÐÑÑинного ТеÑÑиÑÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð² Ð¸Ñ . Eto prosto. Nam nuzhno bol’she russkoy Istiny v nashey kul’ture i v Rossii bol’she nashego Istinnogo Testirovaniya v ikh. Es ist einfach. Wir brauchen mehr russische Wahrheit in unserer Kultur und Russland mehr von unserer Wahrheitsfindung in ihrer. It’s simple. We need more Russian Truth in our culture and Russia more of our Truth Telling in theirs.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543674852 Timestamp) WHY DO WOMEN UNDERMINE THE CIVILIZATION and CULTURE, the INSTITUTIONS, and MALES? (important explanations) —“…what kind of evolutionary pressure would create a desire to undermine the ingroup. All the plausible explanations I’ve seen had to do with abusing female impulses that have evolved for entirely different purposes….”—Martin Å tÄpán Females undermine the concentration of power in alphas in order to preserve some control over their reproductive choice and access to resources and male-provisioned resources, including defense. ie: females can barter attention, effort, care, and sex if they have control of the attention economy. Which is why females are so conscious (and gay men evidencing it) of attention and approval and agreeableness. So just as females operate on a status and attention economy, they fight within that economy: disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, moralizing, undermining, and reputation destruction. And decreasing the number of females is not necessarily in their disinterest – so literally killing off other females increases remaining female market value, so that his the strategy females pursue: that of Hens. Undermining the males (‘sh-t testing’) is useful both at the level of insuring the ‘fitness’ of males in defending them, preserving their ability to choose, assisting them in outing ‘cheaters’ (which women are terrible at, and men excel at), maximizing cost of (returns on) their attention, care, and sex. The only problem here is that women still sexually select for males as if we are under those conditions of hunter gatherers. And this explains the attraction of women to more primitive (less domesticated) groups of males with lower agency despite that the female condition is dependent upon those of us with higher agency, innovation, and adaptivity. Hence the necessity of more domesticated (higher agency) males of defending the ingroup females from conquest or even exposure to, lower agency, higher aggression, males. (FWIW:Delayed marriage provides women with greater reproductive certainty, and therefore greater sortition, and greater formation of genetic castes, and therefore greater speciation – hence white people.) Males conversely, operate on the physical equivalent of the warfare economy, and so losses of males weakens the pack, and dilution of the ingroup male genes weakens male reproductive (evolutionary) persistence, as well as reverses domestication (evolution of agency). I could write on this subject for hours by just weaving through male and female behavior at all levels. And doing so only further demonstrates Acquisitionism and the need for Testimonialism and Natural Law to preserve the Western Advantage given the destructive influences of women.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543636376 Timestamp) THE ABUSE OF THE TERM “NATION” IN ITS HISTORICAL AND MARXIST-POSTMODERN-FEMINIST CONTEXT (Note: I try to collapse one of the major the cycles of history here, and repeat the same idea from different angles because while the underlying causes are not that difficult, it seems relatively difficult for most of us. Repetition solves that problem.) So Nation = A Race or Subrace or Tribal Group of Similar Genetics, Language, Culture, Traditions, Institutions, and Group Evolutionary Strategy. Period. Everything Else is Just more sophomoric postmodern term abuse. |KIN| Individual > Family > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Race > Man. |TERRITORY| Land > Lands > Country > Empire |RULE| Warriors > Militia > Military (Insurers of Last resort) > Rule(Decidability, monopoly on power) > Government (Management, monopoly on commons) > State (Corporation holding Assets, monopoly on foreign relations) > Empire. In the context of this discussion, either you have a Nation-State, or an Empire. Nation (people), Nation-State (political order), Empire (multi-national political order). We use the term International as a shorthand for inter-imperial, stat, and national. Largely because our terminology evolved during the era of nation states dominated by european nation states – each of which was and always has been an empire, forcibly created by napoleon in france, by the invention of total war, and causing the rest of the world to react to scale in order to produce militaries of capability to resist them. America, Russia, China, and India are Empires. The UK is either a Federation or an Empire, and increasingly demonstrably a Federation. Italy consists of the north and the south – although Federated or Imperial a question unresolved. Spain because – because of her regional conflicts, an empire. France because of Brittany and algeria an empire. The Universalist (pseudoscientific-marxist and sophist-postmodernist and denialist-feminist) movements attempt to construct a redefinition of terms to fool the idiots into working against their interests by reversing eugenic paternalism. The Particularist (scientific, empiricist, paternalist) order simply states what exist, and asks us to choose which order is in our interests, advocating the preservation of eugenic paternalism. It’s not complicated. It’s the pseudoscientists, sophists, denialists, and outright liars and idiots that make the current world APPEAR complicated by layers of loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit. These questions are all open to simple answer. But the dysgenic left kleptocracy attempts to achieve by pseudoscience sophism denialism and deceit, that which the jewish, christians, and islamists achieved by supernaturalism, sophism, denialism and deceit: another dark age, in the multi-millennial war between the eugenic indo europeans, and the dysgenic afro-asiatics. REVOLT ONE Indo European Expansion by Heroic Paternal Militarism vs Semitic invention of Religious Resistance REVOLT TWO Greco Roman Expansion of Empiricism vs Semitic Religious Resistance REVOLT THREE Anglo-European Expansion of Science, Law, Accounting, and Technology vs Semitic Pseudoscientific, Sophist (pseudo-rational), Denialist, Resistance. Just the eugenic masculine heroic aristocracy against the dysgenic feminine resistance. Male vs Female at Scale. Males fight ingroup for position (pack strategy ). Females fight ingroup to Destroy and never stop (herd strategy). Males fight outgroup to cooperate or destroy. Females encourage outgroup to undermine ingroup. None of this rational choice but purely genetic and evolutionary in influence. Surviving Europeans, the Conquered Persians, and Lost Indo-Aryans applied the male strategy of colonize and domesticate for profit. Semites (afro-asiatics), apply the female strategy and use disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, and reputation destruction to excite the underclasses to rebel against those who have made their circumstance possible. The story of Cain and Able is the story of paternal urban agrarian vs maternal herding wanderer. And the different moral intuitions between them and between men and women continue to determine our cyclical competition. Unfortunately, the female intuition is only useful at social scale, and the male intuition at political scale. And when the feminine wins, as we have seen, the great civilizations are destroyed, just as much from plague and war without but from undermining within. Version Two Jews (undermine) > Christians (acquiesce) > Muslims (conquer and replace) Version Three Marxists (undermine) > Postmodernists (acquiesce) > Islamists (conquer and replace) The test of Racial competition of whom only the east asians and indians seem willing to resist by cultural means in india(culturo-centrism), and by state means in china, japan, and Korea (ethnocentrism) That is the explanation of the cycles of history at scale. Cheers
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543776639 Timestamp) ANGLO CIVILIZATION HAS PERSISTED FOR A VERY LONG TIME BY MODERN STANDARDS: CONSTANT REVISION AND RESTORATION You can’t control a constitutional convention. It’s a random number generator which is why no one will tolerate it. Forcing Surrender to a set of demands for a set of constitutional changes on the other hand has a consistent record of success in anglo saxon civilization. It’s what we do.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543918554 Timestamp) by Ahmed Reda The enlightenment â or rather â the continuous evolution of western man from blacksmith to aristotle, to hume, to darwin et all, is produced by the incremental suppression of comforting falsehoods that imprison us in lack of agency. -Doolittle *NEVER FORGET THAT Rousseau, Kant and the Continentals were the Abrahamist reaction against Hume’s resurrection of Greek reason.
-
Grammars of Civilizations Tell Us All We Need to Know
(FB 1543770072 Timestamp) GRAMMARS OF CIVILIZATIONS TELL US ALL WE NEED TO KNOW [S]orry. But it’s not open do debate. 1 – Aristotle Wrote Proto Empiricism: Reason, Naturalism, Proto-empiricism, Law, Calculation. (TRUTH) 2 – Sun Tzu, and Confucius wrote WISDOM LIT. Lao Tzu crossed the line into the questionable. (WISDOM) 3 – The Indians wrote both mythology and wisdom literature, bordering on political science (WISDOM) 4 – The Persians wrote supernormal and supernatural wisdom literature. (UTOPIAN UNIVERSALISM) 5 – The Egyptians wrote RITUALISM Supernatural (Animism, Anthropomorphism, heathenism ) Doctrine and Ritual. 6 – The Abrahamists wrote Mythology, Rebellion, and Lie and Destruction of all of the above. (UTOPIAN LIE) Abrahamism is a cancer upon mankind. ABRAHAMISM: False Promise (lie) > Mythology (lie/False History) > Pilpul(Positiva, Justificationism) > Critique(Negativa, Straw Man) > Supernaturalism, Sophism, Pseudoscience. The west fights between the best Aristotle and Law, and the worst Abrahamism and Lies. Only the Far East is staged to survive the cancer. The answer? THE WHITE LAW
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1543869749 Timestamp) JUSTIFICATION FOR GROUPING —“The Abrahamic programâs second revision (Marx, Freud, Boaz, Cantor, Mises, Rothbard, Strauss) has been catastrophic. “—CD —“That’s a pretty unintuitive grouping, what’s the justification for it?”— Trent Fowler Method of argument. Just like we have math, logic, rationalism (formal, kantian), empirical, and scientific, we also have sophistry(pseudo-rationalism), pseudoscience, and mysticism. The abrahamic method turns out to be as perfect a method of lying as the scientific method is of telling the truth. So, the abrahamic method consists of (but is not limited to ) (a) false promise (b) baiting moral hazard (c) creating opportunity for parasitism or undermining, (d) using Pilpul (sophism, justificationism), Critique (straw manning criticism without supplying operationally possible alternatives,), Heaping undue praise, and reputation destruction, by means of loding, framing, suggestion, overloading, psychologizing, moralizing, half truths and outright deceits. Now, I’ve spent a lot of time on it, but you have to ask yourself, why, if mathematical, logical, empirical, operational, rational, reciprocal, arguments with tests of scope, completeness, and coherence exist, why it would be that you would argue by any other means. I suspect you’re referring to either mises or rothbard, and the work is here if you want to go through it (as well as hoppe). https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/10/28/propertarianism-for-for-libertarians/