(FB 1542116608 Timestamp) I am finally getting to understand how Orthodox civ (post soviet) interprets criticism of the church given the good it has done for them. This is a rather significant problem because christianity in a traditional society like theirs retains its counterbalance to the state. So a christian is a good person in orthodoxy, whereas a natural law constitutionalist so to speak is that person in america and a bit less so in the UK until their empire collapsed under them and they fell into french virtue signaling. We have a different problem here.
Theme: Civilization
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542115518 Timestamp) THE CIVIL WAR OVER SPECIATION: THE ARGUMENT: Ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy, nationalism the optimum means of protecting it, nomocracy and markets in everything, the optimum means of political order to achieving it, and soft eugenics (regulating underclass rates of reproduction) a necessity of defeating regression to the mean, such that demographics correspond to states of development rather than regress the standards of living, because together they produce rates of adaptation faster than all possible alternatives. The mediocre seek safety in the herd and speech and defense from the pack. The exceptional seek achievement and action – and to leave its dead weight behind. We can afford to speciate by reproductive strategy. You and yours are welcome to speciate by your preferred means, if me and mine are by our preferred means. That is reciprocity. If we cannot agree to reciprocity, then defeat, conquest, enserfment, enslavement, and extermination are preferable to loss. The Herd seeks equality, proportionality, and the Pack hierarchy and reciprocity. These are genetic and therefore intuitionistic and pre-cognitive expressions of fitness for social orders. So we can Revolt, Separate, Prosper (or not), and Speciate or we can war. The coming civil war is not over race – it is over our new found wealth sufficient to speciate. Or in historical terms, we continue the conflict between masculine indo-european-asian and feminine anatolian-semitic-afro-asiatic. This means that we have the opportunity to exit the unfit from our order, and the undesirable from yours. Or we have the opportunity to have the bloodiest conflict in human history – and one that it is very hard to imagine the ‘right’ will not win. The people who talk, teach, and preach, vs the people who act, produce, and invent. If this isn’t acceptable to your and yours, then enemies you choose to be. -Cheers.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542113650 Timestamp) THE JEWISH CENTURY: MARXISM-SOCIALISM, LIBERTARIANISM, POSTMODERNISM, FEMINISM, NEO-CONSERVATISM, The Counter-Revolution Against Anglo Legal-Empiricism, and German Rational-Science Utopian Promise upon Achieving Monopoly Consensus + Straw Man + Pilpul and Critique: Rousseau (Feminine Subjective) + Schopenhauer, Hegel et al (Conflationists) + Kant (Masculine Analytic) -vs- Marx, Cantor, Freud, Adorno (Working and Underclasses) -vs- Mises, Friedman, Rand, Rothbard, (Middle Classes) -vs- Foucault, Derrida, Rorty (Priestly-Feminine Upper Middle) -vs- Friedan, Firestone, Dworkin (Feminists) -vs- Strauss-Neocons (Political/Military-Masculine – Upper) The gradual attack on Aristocratic Civilization from the bottom up. COMPARE TO JUDAISM > CHRISTIANITY > ISLAM. Same Technique, Same False Promise, Same Catastrophic Consequences
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542116608 Timestamp) I am finally getting to understand how Orthodox civ (post soviet) interprets criticism of the church given the good it has done for them. This is a rather significant problem because christianity in a traditional society like theirs retains its counterbalance to the state. So a christian is a good person in orthodoxy, whereas a natural law constitutionalist so to speak is that person in america and a bit less so in the UK until their empire collapsed under them and they fell into french virtue signaling. We have a different problem here.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542115518 Timestamp) THE CIVIL WAR OVER SPECIATION: THE ARGUMENT: Ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy, nationalism the optimum means of protecting it, nomocracy and markets in everything, the optimum means of political order to achieving it, and soft eugenics (regulating underclass rates of reproduction) a necessity of defeating regression to the mean, such that demographics correspond to states of development rather than regress the standards of living, because together they produce rates of adaptation faster than all possible alternatives. The mediocre seek safety in the herd and speech and defense from the pack. The exceptional seek achievement and action – and to leave its dead weight behind. We can afford to speciate by reproductive strategy. You and yours are welcome to speciate by your preferred means, if me and mine are by our preferred means. That is reciprocity. If we cannot agree to reciprocity, then defeat, conquest, enserfment, enslavement, and extermination are preferable to loss. The Herd seeks equality, proportionality, and the Pack hierarchy and reciprocity. These are genetic and therefore intuitionistic and pre-cognitive expressions of fitness for social orders. So we can Revolt, Separate, Prosper (or not), and Speciate or we can war. The coming civil war is not over race – it is over our new found wealth sufficient to speciate. Or in historical terms, we continue the conflict between masculine indo-european-asian and feminine anatolian-semitic-afro-asiatic. This means that we have the opportunity to exit the unfit from our order, and the undesirable from yours. Or we have the opportunity to have the bloodiest conflict in human history – and one that it is very hard to imagine the ‘right’ will not win. The people who talk, teach, and preach, vs the people who act, produce, and invent. If this isn’t acceptable to your and yours, then enemies you choose to be. -Cheers.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542113650 Timestamp) THE JEWISH CENTURY: MARXISM-SOCIALISM, LIBERTARIANISM, POSTMODERNISM, FEMINISM, NEO-CONSERVATISM, The Counter-Revolution Against Anglo Legal-Empiricism, and German Rational-Science Utopian Promise upon Achieving Monopoly Consensus + Straw Man + Pilpul and Critique: Rousseau (Feminine Subjective) + Schopenhauer, Hegel et al (Conflationists) + Kant (Masculine Analytic) -vs- Marx, Cantor, Freud, Adorno (Working and Underclasses) -vs- Mises, Friedman, Rand, Rothbard, (Middle Classes) -vs- Foucault, Derrida, Rorty (Priestly-Feminine Upper Middle) -vs- Friedan, Firestone, Dworkin (Feminists) -vs- Strauss-Neocons (Political/Military-Masculine – Upper) The gradual attack on Aristocratic Civilization from the bottom up. COMPARE TO JUDAISM > CHRISTIANITY > ISLAM. Same Technique, Same False Promise, Same Catastrophic Consequences
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542211837 Timestamp) THE WEST AND TRAGEDY VS SUFFERING If you don’t understand Nietzsche’s insight that tragedy was the west’s alternative to semitic suffering, which socialized the problem of difficulty rather than privatizing it, then you do not understand either Nietzsche nor the uniqueness of the west. Heroism bred Tragedy. And it is Tragedy vs Suffering that separates the west from the rest.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542210631 Timestamp) THE COMING CIVIL WAR ISN’T JUST ABOUT RACE by Göran Dahl The purest and most basal of all conflicts are those between different genetic clusters – it doesn’t get more fundamental than that. You’re not really disagreeing with Curt’s proposition that it’s a war of reproductive strategies, you’re just left hanging without a proper explanation. It will be a race war, but there will also be race traitors as you may imagine; those who aid and abet outgroups through intimate relationships and deliberate actions that are deemed detrimental to our fitness. So a lot of in-group members will be butchered because of their crimes, and at the same time, there is evidence that suggests that their propensity to commit treason is genetic. So saying that it’s going to be a race war is not enough; it’s also going to be an intra-racial conflict where those with weaker selection for ethnocentrism get weeded out, because they’re more likely to do something considered anti-white. We usually refer to these people as leftists. Since we and leftists pursue (on average) different evolutionary strategies, we can also state that there is going to be a conflict revolving around speciation. Of course, speciation is unlikely to occur because it takes hundreds of thousands of years on average (and that’s for small, isolated groups prone to genetic drift). Likewise, I think people will find it more prudent to extirpate leftists altogether to prevent them from posing a threat ever again, so instead of a speciating divergence, only a single portion of the species will survive to evolve further.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542211837 Timestamp) THE WEST AND TRAGEDY VS SUFFERING If you don’t understand Nietzsche’s insight that tragedy was the west’s alternative to semitic suffering, which socialized the problem of difficulty rather than privatizing it, then you do not understand either Nietzsche nor the uniqueness of the west. Heroism bred Tragedy. And it is Tragedy vs Suffering that separates the west from the rest.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542210631 Timestamp) THE COMING CIVIL WAR ISN’T JUST ABOUT RACE by Göran Dahl The purest and most basal of all conflicts are those between different genetic clusters – it doesn’t get more fundamental than that. You’re not really disagreeing with Curt’s proposition that it’s a war of reproductive strategies, you’re just left hanging without a proper explanation. It will be a race war, but there will also be race traitors as you may imagine; those who aid and abet outgroups through intimate relationships and deliberate actions that are deemed detrimental to our fitness. So a lot of in-group members will be butchered because of their crimes, and at the same time, there is evidence that suggests that their propensity to commit treason is genetic. So saying that it’s going to be a race war is not enough; it’s also going to be an intra-racial conflict where those with weaker selection for ethnocentrism get weeded out, because they’re more likely to do something considered anti-white. We usually refer to these people as leftists. Since we and leftists pursue (on average) different evolutionary strategies, we can also state that there is going to be a conflict revolving around speciation. Of course, speciation is unlikely to occur because it takes hundreds of thousands of years on average (and that’s for small, isolated groups prone to genetic drift). Likewise, I think people will find it more prudent to extirpate leftists altogether to prevent them from posing a threat ever again, so instead of a speciating divergence, only a single portion of the species will survive to evolve further.