Contributing, not cause.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 18:02:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634615799095672832
Reply addressees: @D__2__3
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634613132503969792
Theme: Causality
-
OBESITY STARTS RISIN IN ~1960 Obesity Rate vs TV Rate Compare Rate of TV Hours b
OBESITY STARTS RISIN IN ~1960
Obesity Rate vs TV Rate
Compare Rate of TV Hours by country.
Same effect.
So, carbs+tv+dopamine are bads
For humor: obesity a cost of desocialization. 😉 https://t.co/jwYeU6mVe5
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 17:19:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634605025463873536
-
SIMPLE REASON FOR CONSISTENCY OF HERITABILITY Simple reason: from *all* papers o
SIMPLE REASON FOR CONSISTENCY OF HERITABILITY
Simple reason: from *all* papers over time: Heritability is somewhere between 50 to 80% for the vast majority of complex polygenetic expressions.
Of that 50-80%, the permutations possible over the past six or more generations are too high to explain, but it’s likely closer to 80% if we could. And the other 20% is due to idiosyncratic natal and post-natal development, amplified by later experience.
It has to be. Why? Genetics are not mechanical and deterministic but organic and probabilistic. Humans are GROWN. And while that process is easily explainable, it’s a far more complex (incomprehensible) hierarchy of state changes at local and regional cellular levels than we ever imagined. Add oddities like local ‘baiting’ of neural organization to connect neural pathways, and we have the fascinating range of human behavior.
-Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 17:07:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634239577081692173
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634235814405107712
-
SIMPLE REASON FOR CONSISTENCY OF HERITABILITY Simple reason: from *all* papers o
SIMPLE REASON FOR CONSISTENCY OF HERITABILITY
Simple reason: from *all* papers over time: Heritability is somewhere between 50 to 80% for the vast majority of complex polygenetic expressions.
Of that 50-80%, the permutations possible over the past six or more generations are too high to explain, but it’s likely closer to 80% if we could. And the other 20% is due to idiosyncratic natal and post-natal development, amplified by later experience.
It has to be. Why? Genetics are not mechanical and deterministic but organic and probabilistic. Humans are GROWN. And while that process is easily explainable, it’s a far more complex (incomprehensible) hierarchy of state changes at local and regional cellular levels than we ever imagined. Add oddities like local ‘baiting’ of neural organization to connect neural pathways, and we have the fascinating range of human behavior.
-Curt DoolittleReply addressees: @datepsych
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 17:07:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634239576960057360
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634235814405107712
-
Mansplaining causality and consequence women don’t care about (systemizing, trut
Mansplaining causality and consequence women don’t care about (systemizing, truth)
-vs-
Womansplaining experience men don’t care about (empathizing, approval)
Like bots. No idea what either is doing.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-07 17:48:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633162772954378268
Reply addressees: @ladyinabag1 @ScottAdamsSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1633161937398689814
-
SCOTT: (Deep) Causality: – Feminine (left) magical thinking and storytelling vs
SCOTT: (Deep)
Causality:
– Feminine (left) magical thinking and storytelling
vs
– Masculine (right) hyperbola and testifying.
Why?
– Female, Feminine, Prey, Empathizing, in Time, evading responsibility, hyperconsuming. (children)
vs
– Male, masculine, predatory, systematizing, over time, seeking responsibility, hypcapitalizing. (polity)
YOU CAN”T MORALIZE THIS ARGUMENT
the history of wetsern civ is the history of male SYSTEMATIC argument. The left is not masculine. They are feminine.
Mother seduce and sedate by storytelling to overload the mind of children, and change their state.
Men debate by testimony, where they risk harm by overloading lying and denying.
YOU CAN’T FIX THIS.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 17:40:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632798389631942658
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632367277894139910
-
SCOTT: (Deep) Causality: – Feminine (left) magical thinking and storytelling vs
SCOTT: (Deep)
Causality:
– Feminine (left) magical thinking and storytelling
vs
– Masculine (right) hyperbola and testifying.
Why?
– Female, Feminine, Prey, Empathizing, in Time, evading responsibility, hyperconsuming. (children)
vs
– Male, masculine, predatory, systematizing, over time, seeking responsibility, hypcapitalizing. (polity)
YOU CAN”T MORALIZE THIS ARGUMENT
the history of wetsern civ is the history of male SYSTEMATIC argument. The left is not masculine. They are feminine.
Mother seduce and sedate by storytelling to overload the mind of children, and change their state.
Men debate by testimony, where they risk harm by overloading lying and denying.
YOU CAN’T FIX THIS.Reply addressees: @ScottAdamsSays
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-06 17:40:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632798389510217729
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1632367277894139910
-
As far as I know its the movement of ‘lightning’ so to speak as the quantum back
As far as I know its the movement of ‘lightning’ so to speak as the quantum background is compressed and polarity of dipoles are aligned and not. So it’s why spin has to vary. Essentially it’s the same process of the electric motor. So yeah. That’s the analogy.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-03 23:57:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631806083411976193
Reply addressees: @StevePender
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631665308694978560
-
That’s like saying gravity has been known for two and a half millennia. Well. So
That’s like saying gravity has been known for two and a half millennia. Well. Sorta. Turns out, like most things in nature, the subconscious is pretty simple, just like consciousness. If you mean what MEANING can we take from the subconscious – it can tell us only a little about our instincts (jung), and what ‘errors’ we have idiosyncratically accumulated in life.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-03 14:38:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631665306471997442
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631662271020638209
-
Never happen. RU population collapse is a deterministic inescapable future. With
Never happen. RU population collapse is a deterministic inescapable future. With tuberculosis, hiv, drugs, and alcohol that explain male mortality and you understand why.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-03 00:25:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631450799879475202
Reply addressees: @NorseJarl
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631449000485306369