Theme: Causality

  • You are mistaken. You’re looking at patterns you understand rather than motivati

    You are mistaken. You’re looking at patterns you understand rather than motivations that are material and inescapable.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-15 01:04:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669148932914528256

    Reply addressees: @MatthewHill117

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669140822711840768

  • How can that be true if prediction is limited to mathematical reducibility? Inst

    How can that be true if prediction is limited to mathematical reducibility? Instead, the question is whether evidence is explainable from first principles: operational (computational) reducibility.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-14 16:30:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669019612334235654

    Reply addressees: @kanukistani

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669014255335505923

  • “CURT: WHERE DO EMOTIONS COME FROM?” About half our nervous system is devoted to

    “CURT: WHERE DO EMOTIONS COME FROM?”

    About half our nervous system is devoted to vision and the rest to everything else. Vision is faster, more precise, over longer distances than the other senses.

    The neocortex is a vast parallel processing engine that disambiguates and organizes millions of nerve impulses (literally just pulses) into objects, spaces, and backgrounds – and most importantly, in relation to our body.

    The Hippocampus integrates that information from the neocortex into a 3d world model (our sixth sense, where our body is in relation to our chest, calculating and coordinating eye head body and limb, direction, turning direction, speed, in relation to objects, spaces and backgrounds to produce an ‘episode’ that serves as an index to relate to all other memories, and then produces a competitive prediction engine by auto-association with previous memories.

    Thalamus and hypothalamus are both parts of the brain segment called the diencephalon. They sit on top of and in front of the brain stem. And the brain stem sits on top of the spinal cord, where, for all intents and purposes the brain is an evolutionary extension of the spinal cord, which is an evolution of the embryonic neural tube.

    The Thalamus (the director) coordinates sensory and motor functions and regulates them by consciousness, sleep, and alertness, then the Hypothalamus works together with the pituitary gland to regulate the secretion of hormones to maintain homeostasis that regulates body state.

    So these Predictions compete for attention in the Thalamus, based on predicted gains or losses, which then communicates to the hypothalamus and the combination results in alertness and preparation of body state for reacting to those predicted conditions – the experience of which we call ’emotions’.

    Both in-utero sex differences in hormones and the resulting organization of neurons cause Women to prioritize the prediction of personal reactions (empathy, emotions, in time, ‘feels’) with lower self-regulation and bias to desirability over evidentiary truth, and Men to prioritize the prediction of environmental changes (systematizing, outcomes, over time, ‘reals’) with higher self-regulation and biased to evidentiary truth. In other words, we evolved to protect women and children on one hand, and capture and hold territory and resources on the other.

    So emotions are bodily reactions to experiences(now) to predictions (then) depending upon whatever it is has captured our attention. Everything feels like what it does for a reason. 😉

    It’s really not that complicated. But before we had computers and neural networks it was hard for us to think of our brains with the operational examples available to us. Hence all the pseudoscience and nonsense in philosophy and psychology.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-13 16:20:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1668654633458323457

  • “CURT: WHERE DO EMOTIONS COME FROM?” About half our nervous system is devoted to

    “CURT: WHERE DO EMOTIONS COME FROM?”

    About half our nervous system is devoted to vision and the rest to everything else. Vision is faster, more precise, over longer distances than the other senses.

    The neocortex is a vast parallel processing engine that disambiguates and organizes millions of nerve impulses (literally just pulses) into objects, spaces, and backgrounds – and most importantly, in relation to our body.

    The Hippocampus integrates that information from the neocortex into a 3d world model (our sixth sense, where our body is in relation to our chest, calculating and coordinating eye head body and limb, direction, turning direction, speed, in relation to objects, spaces and backgrounds to produce an ‘episode’ that serves as an index to relate to all other memories, and then produces a competitive prediction engine by auto-association with previous memories.

    Thalamus and hypothalamus are both parts of the brain segment called the diencephalon. They sit on top of and in front of the brain stem. And the brain stem sits on top of the spinal cord, where, for all intents and purposes the brain is an evolutionary extension of the spinal cord, which is an evolution of the embryonic neural tube.

    The Thalamus (the director) coordinates sensory and motor functions and regulates them by consciousness, sleep, and alertness, then the Hypothalamus works together with the pituitary gland to regulate the secretion of hormones to maintain homeostasis that regulates body state.

    So these Predictions compete for attention in the Thalamus, based on predicted gains or losses, which then communicates to the hypothalamus and the combination results in alertness and preparation of body state for reacting to those predicted conditions – the experience of which we call ’emotions’.

    Both in-utero sex differences in hormones and resulting organization of neurons cause Women to prioritize the prediction of personal reactions (empathy, emotions, in time, ‘feels’) with lower self-regulation and bias to desirability over evidentiary truth, and Men to prioritize the prediction of environmental changes (systematizing, outcomes, over time, ‘reals’) with higher self-regulation and biased to evidentiary truth. In other words we evolved to protect women and children on one hand, and capture and hold territory and resources on the other.

    It’s really not that complicated. But before we had computers and neural networks it was hard for us to think of our brains with the operational examples available to us. Hence all the pseudoscience and nonsense in philosophy and psychology.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-13 16:12:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1668652673032237064

  • “CURT: WHERE DO EMOTIONS COME FROM?” Thalamus and hypothalamus are both parts of

    “CURT: WHERE DO EMOTIONS COME FROM?”
    Thalamus and hypothalamus are both parts of the brain segment called the diencephalon. They sit on top of and in front of the brain stem. Differences between them are: Thalamus (the directory) coordinates sensory and motor functions and regulates them by consciousness, sleep, and alertness then the Hypothalamus works together with the pituitary gland to regulate the secretion of hormones to maintain homeostasis that regulates body state. The neocortex is a vast parallel processing engine that disambiguates and organizes nerve impulses into a 3d world model (our sixth sense) and the Hippocampus integrates that information and produces a competitive prediction engine by auto-association. These Predictions compete for attention in the Thalamus, based on gains or losses, which communicates to the hypothalamus and the combination results in alertness and preparation of body state for predicted conditions – the experience of which we call ’emotions’.

    It’s really not that complicated. But before we had computers and neural networks it was hard for us to think of our brains with the operational examples available to us. Hence all the pseudoscience and nonsense in philosophy and psychology.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-13 16:20:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1668646361590317057

  • Great Powers Go Thru Cycles … from which we can learn the cause and effect rel

    Great Powers Go Thru Cycles … from which we can learn the cause and effect relationships, that combine to produce radical reorganization of international relations.
    1. Fragility: Extraordinary Debt Requires regularity, without which the order cannot be maintained.
    2. Internal Conflict: Internal Discord resulting from any variety of causeas most importantly asymmetries in interests.
    3. External Conflict: Rise of Competitive Powers
    4. Disruption: Techological Innovation, esp. that gives rise to competitive powers.
    5. Destruction: Acts of nature: droughts, floods and pandemics
    –Raly Dalio


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-13 15:29:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1668641664280264706

  • We know the first principle of the universe. We only have known it for a few yea

    We know the first principle of the universe.
    We only have known it for a few years.
    (a) under pressure the universe will evolve any possible ability to condense energy, regardless of the density and pressure. In other words, the universe isn’t tuned.
    (b) the result of the ability to release pressure by spin and velocity, vibration, and transmission is evolutionary computation of all existence.
    (c) it appears that the universe is eternal, but at the zero point, time is extremely slow, so slow in fact eternity may not have anything to do with experienced time at our gravity and velocity. Time may not in fact exist for other than matter.

    Reply addressees: @ricm2 @justuseapen


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-09 18:15:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667233862059958278

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1667230559641149462

  • I usually attack any claim of power because it’s a suggestion open to substituti

    I usually attack any claim of power because it’s a suggestion open to substitution without causal evidence.

    “As density increases opportunity costs decrease as such volume increases and monetary velocity increases.”

    What does that have to do with power?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-08 20:11:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1666900841859538956

    Reply addressees: @Helium_He3

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1666900005322649600

  • It’s a difference in temporal prediction. Predicting emotions of others in short

    It’s a difference in temporal prediction. Predicting emotions of others in short time, vs prediction outcomes in the environment across time.

    The brain is a difference engine producing a prediction engine. Our differences are biases in dimensions of prediction.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-08 14:04:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1666808389987635209

    Reply addressees: @_Itsmrfoxy_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1666805784813121538

  • Not sure I understand which way you mean that. A quantum state like a transistor

    Not sure I understand which way you mean that.
    A quantum state like a transistor requires a certain quanta (amount) of energy capture to survive (maintain state) rather than collapse back into the quantum background (aether). In this sense it analogous to digital computing. However within(across) any given state transition(0/1) we can use superposition (aggregation) to create something closer to analog computing, but without losing the causal origin of each input.

    Reply addressees: @tysonmaly


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-07 15:50:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1666472612757684228

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1666470508576096261