Curt Doolittle

Theme: Causality

  • Read Reich. The differences are substantial. Particularly as I’ve said in neoten

    Read Reich. The differences are substantial. Particularly as I’ve said in neotenic evolution, which is the principle direction of human evolution, just as it is the principle direction of domestication of animals.

    You are not able to claim differences are nominal from anything other than false claims of statistical differences in large numbers.

    IQ alone is the primary difference between the races(species, subspecies) and and it’s so large a difference that we can see it expressed flawlessly in every single measure of every single country.

    Stop the word games and the lying. Instead work on the truth and trying to figure out how we can adapt education in particular and economy as an extension, and politics in each country to compensate core these vast differences.

    Reply addressees: @Callisto_ILUV @Battlestar85 @whatifalthist

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-20 19:03:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1704571940503977985

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1704565612880511408

  • “CURT: Please Explain: Africa’s population coverage (not density) prohibited iso

    —“CURT: Please Explain: Africa’s population coverage (not density) prohibited isolation and speciation..”—

    Sure. Great question.
    If a region has no population vs some population destributed by the maximum hunting-gathering yield of the territory vs dense population with the maxium agrarian yield of the territory, what is the difference in a group’s ability to isolate and speciate without consistently hybridizing with near neighbors, or even far neighbors?

    Africa was a genetic meat grinder until modern man, but with homo sapiens sapiens with the ‘full toolkit’ less of one, and with agrarian man much less of one. So while man evolved in africa upon exit he quickly isolated and speciated into the three aditional races of the world’s climatological regions.

    Reply addressees: @hbd_orbiter @SwannMarcus89

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 18:22:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703837018025791488

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703819671600771243

  • DEFINITIONS (The First Principles of The Universal Logic) By Dr Brad 1. The Univ

    DEFINITIONS
    (The First Principles of The Universal Logic)
    By Dr Brad

    1. The Universe’s Zero Point the lowest possible energy state of otherwise empty space that consists of the difference between the cosmic microwave background.

    2. Hierarchy of Zero Points represent the Base Condition of Capitalization (Stable Relations of matter/energy/information) of any Persistent Entity necessary for Persistent Entities to discover and Capitalize (accumulate matter/energy/information) upon the Operational Polarity of a given Domain. If the entity falls below the zero point then it will decompose into a lower state of less complexity and energy.

    3. Operational Polarities define Domains complexity of the organization of energy. From every zero point, of every Domain, the Ternary Logic of that domain consists of an Operational Polarity (difference, Potential) that if equilibrated produces a new dynamic equilibrium for any given Persistent Entity and Between Persistent Entities in that Domain – though, while under certain conditions, certain Persistent Entities produce highly stable relations and are therefore inert(lacking potential for additional recombinations), there are no conditions under which the stable relations and internal equilibrium of any persistent entity is prohibited from devolution back to the Universe’s Zero Point, or evolution to a higher energy state and organization.

    4. First Principle of any domain, in the hierarchy of domains, consists of the label for the complexity of operational polarities when equilibrated produce the new dynamic equilirium for that entity and between persistent entities in that domain, that are available at the scale of complexity in that domain in the hierarchy of domains.

    5. Ternary Logic describes the First Principle available given the Operational Polarities available to Persistent Entitites within Domains in the hierarchy of domains.

    6. Evolutionary Computation describes the operations of Persistent Entities between Domains, across Zero Points, by the use of first principles of equilibrating operational polarities within each domain.

    |Universal Logic|: Zero Point > Operational Polarities > First Principles > Ternary Logic > Evolutionary Computation

    …

    https://t.co/KxoYVWhdX1

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-16 16:41:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703086786396782593

  • Thanks. First principles reasoning. Those are the causes. Neuroscience is fascin

    Thanks.
    First principles reasoning. Those are the causes. Neuroscience is fascinating. 😉
    Of course, there is an overlap between the sexes with some men with feminine cognition and some women with masculine. We see this in data from every walk of life.
    -cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 08:37:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701515320240816256

    Reply addressees: @sarahlbowers @datepsych @SteveStuWill @cait_CST

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701512067813966016

  • Memory evolved first to self regulate, then emerged emerged to help us REACT. Ev

    Memory evolved first to self regulate, then emerged emerged to help us REACT. Eventually to predictively react and act. Remembering the past as we understand it as accessible memories consisting of sequences of episodes and their constituent parts, is one of the last most developed faculties that develops. In other words, memory as you experience it is the mirror image of the sophistication of consciousness as you experience it.

    If you get into the weeds in neuroscience, you can see the evolution of the brain, and it’s a relatively obvious and trivial sequence in retrospect once you grasp it.

    Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa @Yampeleg

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-11 22:59:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701369811886907392

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701297792608772344

  • For the audience, this is exactly what your brain does by adversarial prediction

    For the audience, this is exactly what your brain does by adversarial predictions by auto-association from the episode that’s the subject of your attention.
    Now, the difference is that we can also deconstruct by wayfinding, at least within the limits of our working memory. And we can use language(including symbols and numbers) and then writing to extend our working memory.
    So the problem that LLMS face, that they are using advrsarial prediction but not wayfinding as falsification. But that will emerge as cause and effect is incrementally aded to the model.
    Eventually it will be able to reason rather than just predict.

    Reply addressees: @Yampeleg

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-11 18:06:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701296291924324352

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701290397148856349

  • Who made this economic condition happen?

    Who made this economic condition happen?

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-08 20:52:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700250766693572836

    Reply addressees: @victorykn

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700248379798737087

  • Um. That’s overstating the case. Electricity is the slegehammer version of the m

    Um. That’s overstating the case. Electricity is the slegehammer version of the molecule. All of existence functions by difference in charge. That does not mean hurricanes are helpful to sailors.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-08 20:34:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700246187268309152

    Reply addressees: @MedEckardt @BrianRoemmele

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1700239630312878505

  • If you study physics, economics, and neuroscience – at least at the operational

    If you study physics, economics, and neuroscience – at least at the operational rather than biochemical level, you will have a rather complete understanding of the spectrum of models that constitute our observable universe. Knowing the limits of mathematics, computation, simulation, and sets(language) doesn’t hurt either. Because at that point you know the four sciences: physical, behavioral, logical, and the logical outcome of the evolutionary: continuous recursive disambiguation at all scales by the conversion of entropy into stable relations we call persistence.

    Reply addressees: @skdh @PavlosProkopeas

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 00:10:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699213545106223104

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698987982898774111

  • Economics is a science but mathematics is limited in description of it. This is

    Economics is a science but mathematics is limited in description of it. This is the fundamental difference between economics and physics. Because physical laws are rigidly consistent, firmly deterministic, continuous and invariant, and behavioral laws are only loosely categorically consistent, loosely deterministic, discrete and variant – for the simple reason that humans have memory, predict from it, with new information respond to changes in information (stimuli). Hydrogen and oxygen can’t wake up in the morning and decide they don’t want to make water.
    In retrospect we can explain economic phenomena, and loosely predict the general direction for a short time in the future, and because all economics eventually reduces to questions of demographics, we can produce some limits on our estimations – but explaining is not the same as predicting.
    And unfortunately science has presumed prediction rather than explanation as the qualification for science, rather than the gradual discovery of fundamental law and their plasticity in response to change.

    Reply addressees: @Leon1969 @skdh

    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 00:07:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699212664197554176

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698945772891382088