Theme: Causality

  • course everything CAN BE EXPLAINED. The problem is in observing it. Much of the

    https://www.quora.com/Do-scientists-actively-believe-that-everything-has-an-explanation/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv&share=45b6e9e8Of course everything CAN BE EXPLAINED. The problem is in observing it.

    Much of the universe is open to electromagnetic inspection, but not enough of it. Until we can inspect something it is very hard to do anything other than deduce that explanation from the events that surround it.

    BUT THATS NOT THE POINT.

    The point you’re probably getting at, and the one science exists to expose, is the use of comforting or appealing, or satisfying LIES to fool people.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-16 16:14:00 UTC

  • scientists actively believe that everything has an explanation? “— Of course,

    https://t.co/0lUVIcaRLG—“Do scientists actively believe that everything has an explanation? “—

    Of course, everything CAN BE EXPLAINED. The problem is in observing it.

    Much of the universe is open to electromagnetic inspection, but not enough of it. Until we can inspect something it is very hard to do anything other than deduce that explanation from the events that surround it.

    BUT THATS NOT THE POINT.

    The point you’re probably getting at, and the one science exists to expose, is the use of comforting or appealing, or satisfying LIES to fool people.

    SCIENCE REDUCES LYING


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-16 14:45:00 UTC

  • Do Scientists Actively Believe That Everything Has An Explanation?

    Of course everything CAN BE EXPLAINED. The problem is in observing it.
    Much of the universe is open to electromagnetic inspection, but not enough of it. Until we can inspect something it is very hard to do anything other than deduce that explanation from the events that surround it.

    BUT THATS NOT THE POINT.
    The point you’re probably getting at, and the one science exists to expose, is the use of comforting or appealing, or satisfying LIES to fool people.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-scientists-actively-believe-that-everything-has-an-explanation

  • Do Scientists Actively Believe That Everything Has An Explanation?

    Of course everything CAN BE EXPLAINED. The problem is in observing it.
    Much of the universe is open to electromagnetic inspection, but not enough of it. Until we can inspect something it is very hard to do anything other than deduce that explanation from the events that surround it.

    BUT THATS NOT THE POINT.
    The point you’re probably getting at, and the one science exists to expose, is the use of comforting or appealing, or satisfying LIES to fool people.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-scientists-actively-believe-that-everything-has-an-explanation

  • (Nit: terminological advice in argumentation: Avoid “true” and “pure” and “real”

    (Nit: terminological advice in argumentation: Avoid “true” and “pure” and “real” – all are “no true Scotsman” arguments that belie lack of understanding of causality. Some choices: “equalitarian democracy”, “majoritarian democracy”, “monpoly democracy”, or some other variation that describes the cause as the use of equal votes yet unequal distribution of interests and ability in the population. The original English model granted a house for each class monarchy, nobility, middle class, and the church as an agent for women and the poor. this allowed us to create a market for the construction of commons between the classes rather than democracy. the error in the classical liberal model was in emerging middle class concentrating power in the parliament rather than continuing the model and expanding the parliament rather than adding new houses. This culminated in the enfranchisement of labor, then women, which if in separate houses would have preserved the use of government as a market, rather than as a ruling body. – Cheers )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-03 04:13:00 UTC

  • CURRENT TOPIC I”M WORKING: CLARITY ON METAPHYCIS OF TIME, RATHER THAN JUST ACTIO

    CURRENT TOPIC I”M WORKING: CLARITY ON METAPHYCIS OF TIME, RATHER THAN JUST ACTION

    Metaphysics: Time

    The most effective conservation of energy is to save time.

    We expend energy to alter events in new state we would not have in current state.

    In this sense we’d not produce but we save. And inventory what we save.

    We can understand that as farmers we would adapt our thinking to production an d inventory rather than as hunters to capture and save.

    But it is the mental concept of hunters that is correct.

    We act to reorganize and save.

    We capture this difference between expenditure of energy and capture of energy

    We expend some of that energy as heat and the rest as action, and attempt against nature to inventory the rest, and invest it in more of the same actions as possible.

    And the reason we have been so insanely good at everything we do is that cooperation (Organizing) is so disproportionately rewarding because the concentration of energy is so rewarding. And because the use of information via cooperation, trade, and money and now post-money substitutes has assisted us in ever larger concentrations of energy/effort.

    Man transcends to god hood by outwitting the universe’s course of events

    Our ultimate expression of this strategy is to effectively stop time for all but the energy we consume.

    ***So just as truth exists in the greatest informational parsimony short of tautology, perfect transcendence exists in perfect energy parsimony short of the stopping of time***.

    We are no longer farmers and no longer need be subject to the metaphysics of farmers.

    Savers of time. And as such the savers of energy.

    For humans, time and energy and mass are synonyms.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-30 10:42:00 UTC

  • THE ONY AUTHORITY IS TOTALITY OF CONSEQUENCE ***There is no authority but totali

    THE ONY AUTHORITY IS TOTALITY OF CONSEQUENCE

    ***There is no authority but totality of consequence***

    Forever ignorant, forever ill-informed, forever limited by reason, we have increasingly general rules to rely upon when we must make the dozens if not hundreds of decisions we make daily.

    To make those decisions, we rely upon those methods of decision making we call manners, ethics, morals, traditions, history, natural laws, and formulae, consist entirely of theories that have survived over time, through a multitude of uses.

    Infrequently in human history, these theories change along with the great shifts in our geography, economy, technology, and knowledge and cause changes to manners, ethics, morals, traditions, our interpretation of and value of historical examples, and the set of formulae that we use most frequently.

    And we demonstrate those changes by altering our family structure, property allocations, and means of commons production: the structure of reproduction, the structure of production of goods and services, and the structure of production of commons.

    We can, from this history, given enough ‘shifts’ to compare with each other, derive basic rules of human cooperation that remain unchanged regardless of the weights and values and decision criteria we use in each era.

    These general rules are what we refer to as “natural law”.

    And that Natural Law is reducible to this principle: In any given structure of reproduction, production, and production of commons, all normative manners, ethics, morals, traditions, histories, myths, and institutions will adapt such that we produce the least imposition of costs upon one another’s expended efforts -parasitism- necessary to preserve that structure of reproduction, production, and production of commons.

    We seem, in each era, to produce some variation between Nash and Pareto optimums to until all possible rents at all possible levels are consumed. This maximization of rents (efficiency) creates both efficiency and fragility. And then when the necessary shocks arrive to trade routes, disease, climate, populations, war, immigration, conversion, the society cannot be reordered under the existing system of production and rents.

    This is why small nations are superior to large: they experiment small, and they fail small, and are subject to constant competition that forces early failure. This is the secret to western civilization. Because we cooperate better than other peoples by the near total suppression of free riding, and the inescapability of contract, we can create networks instead of hierarchies, and remain flexible at the cost of constant competition which gainst us constant adaptation.

    The USA will fail, just as Europe will fail – and we must make them fail. Because scale merely misleads us with visible efficiencies at the cost of invisible fragilities by maximizing rents along with maximizing redistribution.

    This is the law of nature. This is the law of man.

    Thus endeth the lesson.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-19 05:03:00 UTC

  • As logic tests internal consistency, operations existential possibility

    As logic tests internal consistency, operations existential possibility.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-18 11:48:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/755006387042807808

    Reply addressees: @excarcini @garrettlgray @Wasian_NRx @DonRadolf @jordanbpeterson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754819726644158464


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754819726644158464

  • The question is whether it is easier to lie and err in experience or cause

    The question is whether it is easier to lie and err in experience or cause.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-18 11:38:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/755003916144766976

    Reply addressees: @excarcini @garrettlgray @Wasian_NRx @DonRadolf @jordanbpeterson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754819726644158464


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754819726644158464

  • The cause of all human experience is explicable in operational language

    The cause of all human experience is explicable in operational language.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-18 11:37:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/755003672497623041

    Reply addressees: @excarcini @garrettlgray @Wasian_NRx @DonRadolf @jordanbpeterson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754819726644158464


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/754819726644158464