Theme: Causality

Gravity and Expansion determine the rate of change of that trade. The idea that changes at different rates at different velocities consist of nothing other than experience, is nonsense, because all change in velocity produces uniform changes in everything at every level of reality. If we send a mechanical device, or a decaying radioactive element to space and back they do in fact change at different (miniscule) rates. So it’s not psychological phenomenon. I hate pseudoscientific nonsense. AFAIK its just as likely that the rate of change is exaggerated by the expansion and contraction of space time, but that the rate of change is a constant (time), as it is that time is fully dependent upon the rate of change of the universe, and that it ceases if expansion ceases. I mean, I would love it if someone would correct me if I err, but you know, I haven’t found anything in any discipline that is terribly complicated. In fact, most of the problems of complexity were manufactured by the development of symbols. If we had done mathematics like they did in the time of newton then every idiot in the world would understand it. To say time passes, is simply a statement of memory. To say that all changes in state occur in sequence and that such a sequence occurs independent of perception, regardless of whether space-time is expanding or contracting. I perceive a sequence of changes in state. We can increase our velocity and slow or decrease our velocity and speed changes, but we cannot reverse it, nor can we speed or slow it to extremes. Now, there is a vast difference between observing phenomenon and travelling phenomenon. Light is just a view into history. And that light-history may be created at different rates. that’s all. I am not sure why this leads philosophers and scientists to disagree – or to fail to articulate such differences. I suspect that it is the open question of whether time (change) exists (and universe exists) beyond the expansion of our universe. (or if we are even correct about our vision of a universe.) Public Physics has become all too much like magic.

“Time” is the new pseudoscience. The faster we move through that space the slower we experience relative change. The shower we move through space, the faster we experience relative change. We are always in motion. The higher the gravity (density) the slower the relative change. The lower the gravity the faster the relative change. As far as I know the universe (space) that we exist within is expanding. Expanding at something approaching the speed of light. The speed of light appears to be the maximum rate of expansion at our current pressure, but the rate of expansion appears to have been higher at earlier pressure. Would the rate of change been different at higher pressure and higher velocity – as far as I know it was the same. So the rate of change at any point in the universe is determined by the rate of expansion minus the local density of space time that creates the opposite of expansion: gravity. So the fact that we experience entropy (change) faster or slower does not mean that time (change) ever stops, only that maximum and minimum rates of time change are existentially possible. Nor does it mean that it’s reversible. So when a physicist proposes that time is an illusion that’s nonsense. Memory allows us to differentiate between a sequence of states. And the rate of change that we call time varies depending upon relative velocity. And yes you can slow time down at higher velocity, although it is extremely expensive to do so (and dangerous). And yes you can speed time up at higher density. But it is expensive to do so (and dangerous). So the conflation of space and time into space time is a half truth. The truth is we have no idea what happens to the rate of change (speed of time) at the margins. It is possible that time has no meaning outside of expansion or contraction. But it is more likely that rates of time (change) are consistent and that expansion(faster) and contraction (slower) merely alter that rate of change. Similarly it is very difficult to believe that our universe is the only universe and that other universes don’t behave by the same laws. But for scientific purposes at the scale of our ability to act, it is certainly better science to assume we are alone than to envision standing on the backs of turtles ‘all the way down”.

“Time” is the new pseudoscience. The faster we move through that space the slower we experience relative change. The shower we move through space, the faster we experience relative change. We are always in motion. The higher the gravity (density) the slower the relative change. The lower the gravity the faster the relative change. As far as I know the universe (space) that we exist within is expanding. Expanding at something approaching the speed of light. The speed of light appears to be the maximum rate of expansion at our current pressure, but the rate of expansion appears to have been higher at earlier pressure. Would the rate of change been different at higher pressure and higher velocity – as far as I know it was the same. So the rate of change at any point in the universe is determined by the rate of expansion minus the local density of space time that creates the opposite of expansion: gravity. So the fact that we experience entropy (change) faster or slower does not mean that time (change) ever stops, only that maximum and minimum rates of time change are existentially possible. Nor does it mean that it’s reversible. So when a physicist proposes that time is an illusion that’s nonsense. Memory allows us to differentiate between a sequence of states. And the rate of change that we call time varies depending upon relative velocity. And yes you can slow time down at higher velocity, although it is extremely expensive to do so (and dangerous). And yes you can speed time up at higher density. But it is expensive to do so (and dangerous). So the conflation of space and time into space time is a half truth. The truth is we have no idea what happens to the rate of change (speed of time) at the margins. It is possible that time has no meaning outside of expansion or contraction. But it is more likely that rates of time (change) are consistent and that expansion(faster) and contraction (slower) merely alter that rate of change. Similarly it is very difficult to believe that our universe is the only universe and that other universes don’t behave by the same laws. But for scientific purposes at the scale of our ability to act, it is certainly better science to assume we are alone than to envision standing on the backs of turtles ‘all the way down”.