BTW: the causal relationships are established. The brain isn’t complicated operationally it’s only complicated in it’s volume of parallel processing.
I havent finished my video series yet, but. you can learn a great deal about the nervous system from my “foundations’ videos.…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-02 06:34:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797154883025465542
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797153385914798099
( FYI: wetlands: fish, fowl, and cheap easy food. Man spread around waterlands and waterways. The dry periods and cold periods caused him to move.)
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-02 04:36:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797125169439199669
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796727234662691275
SEX DIFFERENCES IN COGNITION – AND CONSEQUENCES
Here is the short version:
1. Science consists of the process of discovering first principles(causes). We construct everything from chains of causality using first principles. It is a universal falsificationary logic.
2. The first cause and therefore first principle of human differences is sex differences. The second is degree of noetenic evolution (resulting in race) as neoteny is the direction of human evolution (domestication syndrome). The third is accumulated genetic load (resulting in class).
3. Sexes differ in cognition, speech, tactics, strategy, conflict, and warfare (see sex differences in antisocial behavior) with male force, fraud, and criminality and female manipulation, reputation destruction, and promiscuity.
4. Civilizations differ in their use of masculine and feminine strategy.
5. Religion(middle east) teaches lying and manipiulation. States (china) teach force and coercion, and Contractualism(law)(europe) teaches reciprocity and contract. (it’s much more complicated but that’s the simple version).
6) Sex differences function as a division of labor, time, and scale:
GIVEN Sex Differences in Cognition:
Feminine vs Masculine
Lateral (more) vs longitudinal Brain Organization (fast)
In Time (now) vs Over Time (then)
Direct (perceptible) vs Abstract (predicted) Causality
Empathizing vs Systematizing
Experience vs Consequence
HyperConsuming vs Capitalizing
Devotion in time vs Loyalty over time
Special Pleading/asymmetry vs Consistency/symmetry Status by Consumption w/o responsibility vs Status by Capitalizing with responsibility
Irresponsibility vs Responsibility for Commons
One/Few vs Populations/Many Small
Scale vs Large Scale
Prey(Submission) vs Preditor(Dominance)
Herd vs Packs Global vs National
Dysgenic vs Eugenic
Devolutionary vs Evolutionary
Left (parasitic) vs Right (productive)
AND GIVEN
Sex Differences in Limits:
Masculine: There is a limit to what responsibility I can bear.
–vs–
Feminine: There is no limit to the consumption I can bear.
AND GIVEN
Distribution of Sex Differences in the Population:
[masculine (systematizing) vs feminine (empathizing)] The distribution of traits is overlapping in the population distribution with a few cognitively feminine males and cognitively masculine females, as well a larger number of extreme males (autism) and extreme females (psychosis).
AS SUCH
Evolutionary Necessity of the Division of Cognition
Masculine conservatives perceive the world across time (reals) and feminine progressive perceive the world in time (feels). Progressive historians complain about history and conservative historians explain history.
Feminine in time vs Masculine over time.
Masculine minds will be better at everything at scale. But the feminine ability to intuitively manage many relationships and states of mind (children especially but other women as well is an equal advantage in the IN TIME domain.).
Unconstrained vs Constrained Visions (scarcity)
If the feminine mind did not hold the unconstrained vision, mothers would give up on their children. If the masculine mind did not hold the constrained vision, no group would survive the disorder. So, we see feminine opportunity and masculine scarcity. Evolution always divides the labor. Among humans it divides the cognitive labor of “TIME and SCALE”.
(Note: See Thomas Sowell: A Conflict of Visions)
Evolution of Differences in Cognition
Our findings are that all differences in cognition valuation and expression, other than those of genetic load or in-utero development, are caused by sex differences in the organization of the brain for the purpose of dividing the labor of the sexes into specializing in opposite time frames.
Why? Physics and Ternary Logic of the Universe.
Think of humans evolving from fast male sperm predator, and slow female egg prey if you want a humorous analogy to help you remember. But while easy to remember and somewhat humorous, the analogy is quite accurately the causality.
Explaining why this division of labor exists produces an origin of sex differences in physics and combined with differences in responsibility and status seeking provides the three causal properties that define human differences in behavior.
Nature likes ternary logic which is something we explore elsewhere if you want to twist your brain inside out on yet another issue. 😉
9) Methodology
Though our work is entirely based on the intersection between neuroscience – particularly over the past decade, and linguistic analysis (from computational linguistics) our methodology uses similar techniques to intelligence, personality, moral bias, and psychological bias testing, but we do so by constructing expression from the causality of the underlying organization of the brain (neurology) instead of deduction from from language alone. (Which has plagued psychology since its origin.)
Also See related: https://t.co/KNKUPjEub9… https://t.co/ZGJvdDhvdu… https://t.co/N6p8EyfyhQ… https://t.co/xzFbZa3qNq… https://t.co/K09FRiBZLs… https://t.co/W4ONTbyAbe
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-02 02:15:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1797089546103906304
You want people to see a future they can’t see, yet when they do the moral thing, but it allows a secondary effect that’s negative, you expect them to have seen it from. your advantage of hindsight. I think this is rather silly justification for your wants and priors.
Problems were real, serious, and people died in large numbers. The people sought a solution that would prevent those problems reoccurring. They had moral intentions, moral designs, and pursued them at great cost to them and their people in an attempt to avoid the greater costs they’d just experienced – as did the world.
So yes, I think you’re silly. 😉
Still think you’re brilliant, talented, charming, likable, and in my case, lovable – and mostly right – about anything at least where you don’t have some vested interest in the world being other than it was for the reasons it was to the people who were there at the time. 😉
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @platypoo7 @TheHammurabi
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-31 17:05:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796588925173051392
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796587284713832457
yes, though, a more complex causality.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-30 20:09:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796272801915265343
Reply addressees: @whiteracefuture
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1796236148391436488
MARS: MISSING MUSK’S POINT
Like many, you miss Musk’s point, which is that the incremental solution to these problems by actually testing our ideas and discovering alternatives is the only way that we get to interstellar flight and the capacity for mankind to live independently of this planet and our solar system – both of which seem to attempt to exterminate us with disturbing regularity.
In other words he’s not seeking mars for mars’ sake but mars as a step in the research and development program that brings us to the stars and evolutionary autonomy.
And it’s not like anyone on earth makes better use of capital than he does in advancing technology, precisely because he uses this approach to innovation in advancement they way the Japanese do in refinement.
We cant even get our government to worry about the next decade.
Reply addressees: @LinusEkenstam
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-28 23:55:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795604887322951680
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795600846077731068
IS BLAMING THE BOOMERS BLAMING THE DOG FOR IT’S TRAINER?
True. Boomers ruined everything that we can sense and perceive. But we can’t sense and perceive causality unless it’s in front of us.
So blaming the boomers is blaming the dog for being trained to behave that way, when we should look at who did what training and why.
Because it was a confluence of a tragedy (world war one) that destroyed the foundations of our western worldview (metaphysics, strategy), along with the left’s attempt to facilitate it, the financial sector’s attempt to facilitate it, and then the credentialist (academic) sector, and then the takeover of the institutions by the credentialists, the leftists, and the financial sector.
None of which would have been possible without the introduction of women in to the voting pool, under the special pleading that women innately demonstrate at all times.
We need to fix not only the left’s attempt to destroy our history, culture, institutions, and families, but to recapture the government, our education, our finance sector, and our group strategy, from these parasites.
I’ve done the work of how – although I’m sort of running behind due to a couple years of illness. But the power to restore our civilization is going to take a few million people in DC (at least) for at least 90 days, presenting the state as our ancestors did, with a suit against the state for the redress of grievances, and the threat that we will forcibly do so if they don’t voluntarily do so.
Otherwise we have a bloody civil war, or collapse and when either of those happens the world will fall into another world war on the scale we haven’t seen in a century, because the world wars were the unfinished job of ending empires in favor of nation states and free trade. And there is every very good chance that the three remaining attempts at empire will bring about a restoration of empires – and the poverty and wr that results.
I think we can convince two million or more Americans to show up and prevent all that from happening, and to restore the quality of life we had and still desire by doing so.
And then we can take it to Europe and save the entirety of our civilization from this alien sedition.
Cheers
CD
Reply addressees: @keithinSimi
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-25 20:22:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1794463955303186433
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1794461151520309499
Correct Answer: 1) There isn’t code just supply demand and probability: The equilibrium between the environment, the cell’s homeostasis(demand), and the DNA (supply), where specialization of a cell is dependent upon the environment, which of course, consists of nearby cells and their inputs, outputs, whether chemical or charge. 2) it’s common understanding that the DNA consists of an inventory that is almost aways closed, and some section only opens when a demand string arrives and opens it. 3) The length of human DNA is constant over time. But modification can include mutation, rearrangement, number of copies, insertions and deletions (small), inversions, translocations, duplications, and then epigenetic variations in expression by variation in histones that carry the DNA strands, but they are only variations in expression. So, it’s a dance of supply and demand between the dna, the cell, other cells, and the environment they swim in. Just like we as humans do.
Reply addressees: @PicoPaco17
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-23 14:04:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793644208311472128
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793083282827198585
Autism is the result of the extremely compartmentalized brain, just as psychosis is the result of an insufficiently compartmentalized brain.
This happens to be the difference between male and female neurological development: compartmental and over time, vs integrated and in time.
We are all an admixture of these traits, so while there is a general trend for both, there are some men and some women in one another’s cognitive structures just as there are some men and some women in one another’s sexual preferences.
Reply addressees: @TheMarcitect
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 21:21:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793391822389104641
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792884027294408926
@Plinz,
I’d like a little more clarity since I assume you mean by ‘sound’ a ‘formal’ or ‘constructable’ explanation of ‘the physical, neurological, and associative construction of representation?
So Why Did It Take So Long?
Early 20th Century: Gestalt Psychology – how complex representations are produced in the mind.
1950s-1960s: Early cognitive models and generative grammar. (Age of the cognitive revolution)
1970s-1980s: Connectionism, formal semantics, and cognitive linguistics. (Distributed representation)
1990s-2000s: Embodied cognition, neuroimaging, corpus linguistics, and distributional semantics.
Recent Years: Computational models, deep learning, and cross-disciplinary research integrating multidimensional data analysis.
And;
1. Neurologically we do know.
2. The emergence of LLM’s have popularized what we have known.
3. Depending upon your meaning, yes, until Turing we didn’t have the theory we have now. (Because Babbage failed to produce a theory, costing us a century, and the divergence of mathematic, logic, philosophy, and physics that ensued).
4. And linguistics has, at least since Chomsky adapted Turing for grammar, but in particular at least the past three decades, known (and I employed seventy something library science people for years working on it);
5. Philosophers have discussed ‘what’s it like to think like a bat’, meaning embodiment, scale, and time differences.
6. Artists, whether visual, poetic, or musical, or literary have known and made use of it, despite not grasping its constitution.
7. Mythology and theology certainly have understood.
And while the ancients thought in atoms (objects) and did grasp that ‘there can’t be nothing because we can’t observe anything without something to compare it to’, so it’s just “persistent relations in time, all the way down”.
It Took A Profound Reversal in Our Thought
And we thought, until at least Popper, but it’s certainly still the main framework of human thought, that justification produced non-falsehood, when conversely, the universe consists of persistent relations, and all logic is falsificationary, and even with a full knowledge of all first principles in the universe, given limits on computational and mathematical reducibility cannot cover the scope of operational possibility, rendering prediction of possibilities limited to some general regularly of the emergence of new patterns.
So there is a pattern in the history of human cognition that like the arc from embodiment through to the operational logic of first principles that evolves from human object, space, background place and location use in wayfinding, and the parsimony of memory needed to remember routes, as well as the parsimony of language necessary to explain both routes and their increasingly abstract applications of wayfinding to all manner of thoughts … that the brain is working in the opposite direction from distributed information, eliminating all information that does not consist of relations, and then combining those relations into perceptions we can then use to wayfind.
So it’s natural that given all of our introspectively possible cognition would result from such objects and justifications that we would fail to observe the unintrospectable construction of those things from nothing but relations in time between vibrations of neurons.
Cheers.
CD
Reply addressees: @Plinz
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-19 22:44:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792325373306269696
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792140352410791980