Curt Doolittle

Theme: Causality

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551204493 Timestamp) NO WOO WOO. UNIVERSE MOST LIKELY PRESERVES INFORMATION BY MULTI-OSCILLATION 1) I don’t accept anything. it’s simply that I can’t falsify any of these theories or the category of theories all of them belong to and I can falsify every other category of theories that all other alternatives belong to. 2) Secondly, given that the universe appears to consist of nothing more than information, and that such information has no other method of retention than the universe itself, nothing can exist other than the universe as the store of information. 3) As such space time (whatever the universe consists of) consists in one of the three theoretical constructions (oscillating, multi-oscilating, or or curvilinearly infinite (self referential) with multi-oscilating providing means of preserving information between states. That’s my best guess with knowledge at our disposal – only because it is the only option that does not survive falsification at this moment in time

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551204493 Timestamp) NO WOO WOO. UNIVERSE MOST LIKELY PRESERVES INFORMATION BY MULTI-OSCILLATION 1) I don’t accept anything. it’s simply that I can’t falsify any of these theories or the category of theories all of them belong to and I can falsify every other category of theories that all other alternatives belong to. 2) Secondly, given that the universe appears to consist of nothing more than information, and that such information has no other method of retention than the universe itself, nothing can exist other than the universe as the store of information. 3) As such space time (whatever the universe consists of) consists in one of the three theoretical constructions (oscillating, multi-oscilating, or or curvilinearly infinite (self referential) with multi-oscilating providing means of preserving information between states. That’s my best guess with knowledge at our disposal – only because it is the only option that does not survive falsification at this moment in time

  • (FB 1552574419 Timestamp) As far as I know we are very close to submission to th

    (FB 1552574419 Timestamp) As far as I know we are very close to submission to the inescapable necessity, that the physics of the universe at existential scale is complete, and that no forces or interactions exist or can that we do not know of. Moreover that modifying our ‘stories’ such that they, our experiences, our thoughts, and actions work ever closer to those rules. In other words, a majority of people demonstrate preference for the results even if a minority demonstrate preference for what produces those results. Worse, that we evolved our language, cooperation in a division of labor, and all our works, in a period of very short ‘safety’ here on this earth, and here in this place in the universe. We do not have any luxury of ‘free riding’ on this world or the universe. But it is this particular difference between those of us who seek to consume(relax) above all else, and those of us who seek to produce(achieve) above all else, that separates our understanding of the world. As far as I can determine, we all seek to create stories that are discordant with that universe for a host of reasons – all of which are reducible to our desires being contrary to it. Because we survive and prosper by the same means as does all life: the seizure of opportunity to resist entropy.

  • (FB 1552574419 Timestamp) As far as I know we are very close to submission to th

    (FB 1552574419 Timestamp) As far as I know we are very close to submission to the inescapable necessity, that the physics of the universe at existential scale is complete, and that no forces or interactions exist or can that we do not know of. Moreover that modifying our ‘stories’ such that they, our experiences, our thoughts, and actions work ever closer to those rules. In other words, a majority of people demonstrate preference for the results even if a minority demonstrate preference for what produces those results. Worse, that we evolved our language, cooperation in a division of labor, and all our works, in a period of very short ‘safety’ here on this earth, and here in this place in the universe. We do not have any luxury of ‘free riding’ on this world or the universe. But it is this particular difference between those of us who seek to consume(relax) above all else, and those of us who seek to produce(achieve) above all else, that separates our understanding of the world. As far as I can determine, we all seek to create stories that are discordant with that universe for a host of reasons – all of which are reducible to our desires being contrary to it. Because we survive and prosper by the same means as does all life: the seizure of opportunity to resist entropy.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553528182 Timestamp) —“The left wants “liberation” from the laws of nature. And that is impossible, for she is the ultimate Fascist.”—Andy Ujku

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553607703 Timestamp) —“50% of adult hyenas mortality comes from attacks from a full grown male lion.”— Co evolution.

  • “50% of adult hyenas mortality comes from attacks from a full grown male lion.”-

    —“50% of adult hyenas mortality comes from attacks from a full grown male lion.”—

    Co evolution.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-26 13:41:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1110537379796959232

  • Do you know what aa ben franklin pitch is? (a lie). Wbat are the negatives? Ther

    Do you know what aa ben franklin pitch is? (a lie).
    Wbat are the negatives?
    There is no free ride. There is no difference between economics and physics.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-23 01:36:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109267544563765248

    Reply addressees: @scottsantens @BasicIncomeIMG

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1040683616488103936

    IN REPLY TO:

    @scottsantens

    I’ve been researching the idea of Unconditional Basic Income since 2013. Here’s a list of findings I’ve compiled from various UBI experiments, unconditional cash transfer studies, and cash dividend research.

    The data speaks for itself.

    Data: https://t.co/gTtB9g78KU #basicincome https://t.co/LVAqwP6WY6

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1040683616488103936

  • RT @DegenRolf: The widespread propensity among mammalian species to care for the

    RT @DegenRolf: The widespread propensity among mammalian species to care for the deceased is a spillover effect of the oxytocin-based nurtu…

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-21 00:53:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108531929442332672

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53507053_10157045175782264_108167938

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53507053_10157045175782264_1081679387419475968_o_10157045175777264.jpg All personality systems are trying to describe underlying biological traits expressible as physical differences in brain structure and production.

    All of them are ‘partly correct’.

    http://www.psychologycharts.com/big-five-personality-traits.htmlLan KenWhat’s the take away?Mar 12, 2019, 3:43 PMCurt DoolittleAll personality systems are trying to describe underlying biological traits expressible as physical differences in brain structure and production.Mar 12, 2019, 3:44 PMLan KenCurt Of course. Then we’d see certain personality groups in certain populations.Mar 12, 2019, 3:44 PMCurt DoolittleWe do. They concentrate in three foci:

    1 – feminine consumptive (Female)

    2 – libertarian predictive (ascendant male)

    3 – male conservative (establishedmale)

    really. It’s so fking obvius and so painful that we just spent a century with marxist and postmodern ((())) pseudoscience.Mar 12, 2019, 3:47 PMJWarren PrescottFor a system or a model to have value scientifically, it must have predictive capabilities or it’s of no value.

    All models are constructs for the purpose of accurizing and optimizing those predictive capabilities. The better the model, the better one is at planning and developing.Mar 12, 2019, 4:17 PMGeorge CarvlinIt’s specialization vs utilityMar 12, 2019, 4:22 PMNick’s ReasonThere is a YT channel dedicated to Myers Briggs and they are going as far as attempting to map the MBTI to peoples morphology too. Effectively a form of Constitutional Psychology / Somatoypes.

    It’s an interesting hypotheses. Though, it would be extremely difficult to study with modern scientific rigor because of the sheer number of confounding variables.Mar 13, 2019, 4:04 AMNick’s Reasonhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWWwQlDFnYbX_dgDP8lJ09AMar 13, 2019, 4:05 AMNick’s Reasonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mEDb5A_hN0Mar 13, 2019, 4:36 AMAll personality systems are trying to describe underlying biological traits expressible as physical differences in brain structure and production.

    All of them are ‘partly correct’.

    http://www.psychologycharts.com/big-five-personality-traits.html

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-12 15:38:00 UTC