Theme: Causality

  • DECIDABILITY IS THE OPERATIONAL NAME FOR THE CAUSE OF FIRST PRINCIPLES Philosoph

    DECIDABILITY IS THE OPERATIONAL NAME FOR THE CAUSE OF FIRST PRINCIPLES

    Philosophers often talk about the difference between seeking first principles, and seeking fit, commensurability, untility, choices or preferences.

    —“A first principle is a basic proposition or assumption that cannot be deduced from any other proposition or assumption. In philosophy, first principles are from the First Cause method taught by Aristotelians, and nuanced versions of first principles are referred to as postulates by Kantians. In mathematics, first principles are referred to as axioms or postulates. In physics and other sciences, theoretical work is said to be from first principles, or “ab initio”, if it starts directly at the level of established science and does not make assumptions such as empirical model and parameter fitting.”—

    In propertarianism I call this the search for “decidability”. The point at which we can decide (must), versus choose (can), versus prefer (may). So in this sense, “decidabilty” is the operational definitino of ‘first principle”.

    In the examples above, first principles (decidability) in mathematics is provided by position in an order (positional names), adding(increasing) to or subtracting(decreasing) from a position in that order. To say that mathematics instead consists of axioms is only partly true. The axioms are logical consequences of positional names. As such they are variables, and only first principles. For example, ZFC axioms in mathematics are statemetns of set theory (ideals) not operations (reals).

    As I’ve written elsewhere, Kantianism is a psychological not operational system of thought in the german (conflationary) school of philosophy (and logic), versus the anglo analytic (depersonalized, or legal ) school of philosophy (logic), or what I suppose we should call today’s cognitive science or neural network school of logic – which is no longer philosophy but operational science. In Propertarianism I translate Kantianism’s apriori logic into formal logic.

    THE NEW AGE OF PHILOSOPHY
    So I would call the current era the Operational and Neural Network Age of Logic, leaving behind the second age of idealism (Platonism).

    What’s the problem with neural networks? We can’t introspect on them yet either (although we will).

    EVOLUTION FROM FIRST CAUSES:
    Myth: inter-Imaginary,
    Law: inter-personal, and
    Engeneering inter-physical
    … … … … … Play … Literature ->
    Mythology … History ————>
    … … … … .. Theology (myth+law) ->
    Law … Politics … Economics —>
    …. … … … Philosophy(law+math) ->
    … … … … … … … …. … ..Science ->
    Engineering … Mathematics —–>


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-24 22:27:52 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104746717748472408

  • Boost of @curtd DECIDABILITY IS THE OPERATIONAL NAME FOR THE CAUSE OF FIRST PRIN

    Boost of @curtd DECIDABILITY IS THE OPERATIONAL NAME FOR THE CAUSE OF FIRST PRINCIPLES

    Philosophers often talk about the difference between seeking first principles, and seeking fit, commensurability, untility, choices or preferences.

    —“A first principle is a basic proposition or assumption that cannot be deduced from any other proposition or assumption. In philosophy, first principles are from the First Cause method taught by Aristotelians, and nuanced versions of first principles are referred to as postulates by Kantians. In mathematics, first principles are referred to as axioms or postulates. In physics and other sciences, theoretical work is said to be from first principles, or “ab initio”, if it starts directly at the level of established science and does not make assumptions such as empirical model and parameter fitting.”—

    In propertarianism I call this the search for “decidability”. The point at which we can decide (must), versus choose (can), versus prefer (may). So in this sense, “decidabilty” is the operational definitino of ‘first principle”.

    In the examples above, first principles (decidability) in mathematics is provided by position in an order (positional names), adding(increasing) to or subtracting(decreasing) from a position in that order. To say that mathematics instead consists of axioms is only partly true. The axioms are logical consequences of positional names. As such they are variables, and only first principles. For example, ZFC axioms in mathematics are statemetns of set theory (ideals) not operations (reals).

    As I’ve written elsewhere, Kantianism is a psychological not operational system of thought in the german (conflationary) school of philosophy (and logic), versus the anglo analytic (depersonalized, or legal ) school of philosophy (logic), or what I suppose we should call today’s cognitive science or neural network school of logic – which is no longer philosophy but operational science. In Propertarianism I translate Kantianism’s apriori logic into formal logic.

    THE NEW AGE OF PHILOSOPHY
    So I would call the current era the Operational and Neural Network Age of Logic, leaving behind the second age of idealism (Platonism).

    What’s the problem with neural networks? We can’t introspect on them yet either (although we will).

    EVOLUTION FROM FIRST CAUSES:
    Myth: inter-Imaginary,
    Law: inter-personal, and
    Engeneering inter-physical
    … … … … … Play … Literature ->
    Mythology … History ————>
    … … … … .. Theology (myth+law) ->
    Law … Politics … Economics —>
    …. … … … Philosophy(law+math) ->
    … … … … … … … …. … ..Science ->
    Engineering … Mathematics —–>


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-24 22:27:52 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105752621694800353

  • It’s this difference between verbal-idealism(words), mathematical-physical ideal

    … It’s this difference between verbal-idealism(words), mathematical-physical idealism(existence), and computational-economic thought (action).

    … At this point I’m convinced that understanding ‘the grammars’ is about as important as understanding basic physics.

    -Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-10 13:43:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292818794143010818

    Reply addressees: @bierlingm @adamsafron

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292818572671164417


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @bierlingm @adamsafron If you can’t state it’s dependencies (realism, naturalism ) measure it (categories) or operationalize (transformations) you don’t understand it (narration).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1292818572671164417

  • It’s this difference between verbal-idealism(words), mathematical-physical ideal

    … It’s this difference between verbal-idealism(words), mathematical-physical idealism(existence), and computational-economic thought (action).

    … At this point I’m convinced that understanding ‘the grammars’ is about as important as understanding basic physics.

    -Cheers

    Reply addressees: @bierlingm @adamsafron

  • You can see it more closely here. Look how the organge turns into a very fast bu

    You can see it more closely here. Look how the organge turns into a very fast burning “firehose” and then within a second or two the major explosion occurs.
    https://twitter.com/Supreme_1017/status/1291072251593359360


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-07 02:02:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1291555248453099524

    Reply addressees: @rofujones @realDonaldTrump @POTUS @WhiteHouse @ASavageNation @EMichaelJones1 @OverzatMichael @stillgray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1291554508263260161


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @rofujones @realDonaldTrump @POTUS @WhiteHouse @ASavageNation @EMichaelJones1 @OverzatMichael @stillgray Watch the regular fire burn and just before the explosion the very bright orange fire that generated enough heat to ignite the ammonium nitrate.
    https://twitter.com/kyf2020/status/1291021170637189126

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1291554508263260161

  • You can see it more closely here. Look how the organge turns into a very fast bu

    You can see it more closely here. Look how the organge turns into a very fast burning “firehose” and then within a second or two the major explosion occurs.
    https://t.co/TidDOpnQzG

    Reply addressees: @rofujones @realDonaldTrump @POTUS @WhiteHouse @ASavageNation @EMichaelJones1 @OverzatMichael @stillgray

  • Watch the regular fire burn and just before the explosion the very bright orange

    Watch the regular fire burn and just before the explosion the very bright orange fire that generated enough heat to ignite the ammonium nitrate.
    https://twitter.com/kyf2020/status/1291021170637189126


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-07 01:59:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1291554508263260161

    Reply addressees: @rofujones @realDonaldTrump @POTUS @WhiteHouse @ASavageNation @EMichaelJones1 @OverzatMichael @stillgray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1291554015134851073


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @rofujones @realDonaldTrump @POTUS @WhiteHouse @ASavageNation @EMichaelJones1 @OverzatMichael @stillgray It started as a normal fire like all the other Ammonium Nitrate explosions. We see, in one of the views, the fire turn from normal combustion to accelerant-fed, and within seconds the ammonium nitrate ignites. Neglect certainly. Accident possibly. Sabotage maybe. But no weapons.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1291554015134851073

  • Watch the regular fire burn and just before the explosion the very bright orange

    Watch the regular fire burn and just before the explosion the very bright orange fire that generated enough heat to ignite the ammonium nitrate.
    https://t.co/ZOmejDhRGU

    Reply addressees: @rofujones @realDonaldTrump @POTUS @WhiteHouse @ASavageNation @EMichaelJones1 @OverzatMichael @stillgray

  • It started as a normal fire like all the other Ammonium Nitrate explosions. We s

    It started as a normal fire like all the other Ammonium Nitrate explosions. We see, in one of the views, the fire turn from normal combustion to accelerant-fed, and within seconds the ammonium nitrate ignites. Neglect certainly. Accident possibly. Sabotage maybe. But no weapons.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-07 01:57:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1291554015134851073

    Reply addressees: @rofujones @realDonaldTrump @POTUS @WhiteHouse @ASavageNation @EMichaelJones1 @OverzatMichael @stillgray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1291542628358643714

  • It started as a normal fire like all the other Ammonium Nitrate explosions. We s

    It started as a normal fire like all the other Ammonium Nitrate explosions. We see, in one of the views, the fire turn from normal combustion to accelerant-fed, and within seconds the ammonium nitrate ignites. Neglect certainly. Accident possibly. Sabotage maybe. But no weapons.

    Reply addressees: @rofujones @realDonaldTrump @POTUS @WhiteHouse @ASavageNation @EMichaelJones1 @OverzatMichael @stillgray