Theme: Causality

  • The fundamental principle of measurement in economics, behavioral economics, and

    The fundamental principle of measurement in economics, behavioral economics, and physics, is the accounting of the differences between the seen and unseen. It is easy to rely on justification (itself which is false, because all logic is only falsificationary), and it is easy to rely on the untestifiable for the same reason.

    There is literally zero chance you understand the production of mindfulness by that production of systems of measurement, by what we call religion than I do. 😉

    There isn’t anyone. Sorry.

    Reply addressees: @IsraelAnderson


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-14 22:57:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868067939318181888

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868063498510680099

  • Understood. I work in testimony, reciprocity, and their opposites of lying and i

    Understood. I work in testimony, reciprocity, and their opposites of lying and irreciprocity. So I reduce human behaviors to their first principles (science, causality) rather than analogy. THis allows for the ability to make judgements that are neutral (true and reciprocal vs false and irreciprocal) without emotional loading and framing that most people, the left, and lindsay in particular must rely upon.

    Reply addressees: @JRuebl47185 @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-13 18:43:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867641550278471681

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867638610499186724

  • Again: This is because as far as I know, homosexuality is an in utero developmen

    Again: This is because as far as I know, homosexuality is an in utero developmental failure that was insufficient to produce either male brain or miscarriage. The two most common theories attribute this to immune system responses to internal (genetic, biological, stress) or… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1220721692185710595


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-13 17:16:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867619667852112251

  • Q: CURT: –“How do you make an aesthetic argument for the greatness of bands lik

    Q: CURT: –“How do you make an aesthetic argument for the greatness of bands like led zeppelin, tool, the pixies and nirvana?”–

    Rather easily. And it’s a great question. Evolution of complexity. And by answering it we learn both about music and about human cognition. But…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-11 22:18:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866970869559689560

  • It’s always interesting when someone assumes I am unaware of something rather th

    It’s always interesting when someone assumes I am unaware of something rather that I have more knowledge of the causal hierarchy of existence at all scales than they do.;)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-09 22:34:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866250008280088835

    Reply addressees: @ArionWise11 @TonyGause49

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866209871965593885

  • A NARRATIVE UNIFYING EXISTENCE, CAUSALITY, AND TIME FROM FIRST PRINCIPLES We beg

    A NARRATIVE UNIFYING EXISTENCE, CAUSALITY, AND TIME FROM FIRST PRINCIPLES

    We begin with the presumption that existence emerges from an underlying quantum substrate: a landscape of virtual fields, fluctuations, and probabilistic events. The only starting conditions are relations—patterns of correlation and interaction that never exist in isolation but always in reference to something else. These relationships, by necessity, give rise to constraints and symmetries. Over time, constraints stabilize certain states, channeling random flux into increasingly persistent structures. In a world of fields and forces, stability results from equilibrium: the achievement of a low-energy configuration that resists immediate dissolution. Thus, from relations comes the necessity of stable relations—patterns that persist, replicate, and become scaffolds for further organization.

    Stability is never absolute; it is a provisional alignment of states under given conditions. With each interaction, energy redistributes. Sometimes the reconfiguration leads to lasting bonds, sometimes to ephemeral collisions. The causal tapestry of existence is woven from these local events scaling upward: interactions accumulate into ensembles, forming particles, atoms, molecules, and, in time, complex assemblies of interdependent structures. As scales increase, complexity emerges. This progression is no accident but a filtering process: only certain configurations endure in the relentless press of entropic dissolution. The improbable assemblies that resist entropy’s pull gain a foothold, channeling energy with ever more refined efficiency and mutual benefit.

    Aphorism: Stability emerges from cascades of favorable relations that resist their own unmaking.

    Within this relentless interplay, symmetry and conservation laws enforce limits on what configurations can form. Determinism in the classical sense yields to statistical patterns at the quantum level; nonetheless, on average, certain causal chains repeatedly succeed. Thus, over cosmic timescales, gravitational wells accumulate energy density, forging stars. Stars concentrate energy flow, enabling complex chemistry in their orbiting shells. Eventually, planetary environments harbor organized biochemistry. Life arises: a negentropic engine that draws order from chaos, fueled by energy gradients. From these gradients, organisms evolve, guided by iterative processes of variation, selection, and retention. These evolutionary computations refine the capacity of life to harness resources and navigate constraints.

    Aphorism: Life is negentropy harnessed by feedback loops that sustain and replicate the improbable.

    Over billions of years, biological organisms become hosts to emergent phenomena—minds capable of modeling their environment, forecasting outcomes, and cooperating to achieve shared goals. Social orders assemble from networks of reciprocal exchanges. The principle of reciprocity—when aligned with reliable signaling and enforcement—optimizes group survival, channeling collective energies into stable institutions. Civilizations rise and fall as tests of organizational robustness. Each civilization represents a unique solution set to the universal constraints of survival under shifting conditions. Some rely on strict hierarchies; others on distributed markets. Some reify tradition; others embrace innovation. Each system is a causal experiment in harnessing resources, securing cooperation, and propagating complexity forward in time.

    Aphorism: Reciprocity is the currency of complex cooperation, the membrane that filters unstable group structures from stable ones.

    From universal laws to historical specifics, the narrative remains the same: Relations coalesce into stable patterns that generate complexity. Complexity emerges from cumulative interactions tested by temporal pressures. Existence is a cascade of patterns sorted by trial and error, rewarded by durability and adaptability. Just as stars emerge from gravitational constraints, civilizations emerge from resource and coordination constraints, each optimizing patterns that outcompete alternatives.

    In all domains—physical, biological, social—these stable configurations refine themselves via evolutionary computation. At the atomic scale, stable nuclei are selected by nuclear forces and decay rates. At the biological scale, organisms are selected by environmental conditions. At the social scale, norms and institutions are selected by cultural and ecological pressures. Evolutionary computation is the grand integrator, a recursive engine that uses feedback from past outcomes to adjust future configurations, producing incremental improvement over time.

    Aphorism: Evolutionary computation is the universal engine, perpetually re-sculpting form from the clay of formless possibility.

    Concluding Synthesis:
    In total, existence is a recursive sorting algorithm applied to the flux of quantum possibility. Patterns stabilize, complexity builds, and from the tensions between entropy and negentropy, from the interplay of cooperation and competition, from the continuity of time and the invariance of law, emerges the grand panorama of forms. Everything reduces to iterative processes of disambiguation (resolving uncertainty into stable states), recombination (mixing components into new configurations), and adaptation (revising structures to persist in changing conditions).

    Final Aphorism:
    “Existence consists of the dance of patterns refining themselves into ever more coherent symphonies of stable relation—an endless choreography of disambiguation, recombination, and adaptation performed beneath the silent baton of time.”


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-05 23:47:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1864818905497374721

  • Correct, though their causality is a bit lacking. We’ve known this for thirty ye

    Correct, though their causality is a bit lacking. We’ve known this for thirty years.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-05 02:29:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1864497283833975027

    Reply addressees: @queijomeiacura @thltd_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1864472168152608860

  • EXPLAINING TIME AS THE POSITIONAL RATE OF CHANGE PERCEIVABLE BECAUSE OF MEMORY.

    EXPLAINING TIME AS THE POSITIONAL RATE OF CHANGE PERCEIVABLE BECAUSE OF MEMORY.
    There exists a state of, and therefore zero point of, energy in the universe. There exists a zero point of the rate of change in the universe -and therefore a zero point of time regardless of its system of measurement. There exist differences in energy density in the universe that causes a variation in the rate of change at that point in the universe. There exists a relationship between the rate of change and the slower rate of human memory formation that lets us perceive change. This is why time is experienced as constant at a position in the universe and why time is perceived as relative at different positions of the universe, while time is consistent at the zero point of change throughout the universe where the rate of change of the quantum background is not otherwise affected by the presence of density. The only thing interesting here is why density and its absence cause variation in all physical processes, and this itself appears to be caused by the maximum rate of adjustment of the quantum background as density increases. Which is, of course, eminently logical, given that all existence that persists consists of portions of the quantum background in spin, causing density and the forces that emerge from it.

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2024-12-03 14:02:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1863946819165945856

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1863752454522708135

  • I made an argument. It is the most reductive argument possible. It is the outcom

    I made an argument. It is the most reductive argument possible. It is the outcome of the science. I may have been earlier than most in this understanding, but multiple books will be published in the next year on the subject by primary researchers in the field.

    As LLMs are presently illustrating, and advancements in the queue demonstrating, it’s just memory of memory of memory all the way down, in a continuous stream.

    If you had an argument instead of an assertion you would make it. But (a) there is no phenomena that cannot be explained by basic neuroscience, (b) you have put forth no argument to counter with neuroscience.

    In general my people tell me not to wste my time with silly people, but it helps those in the process of learning to observe the spectrum of errors, biases, and deceits made use of by those of you who assert what you cannot testify to – and therefore lie.

    Reply addressees: @iEslam @DaveShapi


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-28 17:03:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1862180582593372163

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1862178783618314548

  • Sam, you’re wrong. Consciousness is a deterministic consequence of a sufficient

    Sam, you’re wrong. Consciousness is a deterministic consequence of a sufficient quantity of neurons in sufficiently recursive hierarchy. Sorry. In retrospect it’s not even complicated.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-11-28 15:04:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1862150515922223430

    Reply addressees: @iEslam @DaveShapi

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1861628891598615029