Theme: Causality

  • I understand. It’s just not a problem I’m trying to solve. I’m trying to solve t

    I understand. It’s just not a problem I’m trying to solve. I’m trying to solve the causal problem — permanently. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-29 16:32:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1454124111169474563

    Reply addressees: @erikbrus25

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1454123325748391937

  • The question isn’t whether you’re conscious, but how conscious are you? In other

    The question isn’t whether you’re conscious, but how conscious are you? In other words, your degree of free will is determined by your own ignorance. So what happens if we understand human nature so completely that everything we think say and do is obviously explicable?


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 23:39:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453869056252157953

  • And I’ll use that Female:Cancer vs Male:Aging as the biological equivalent of th

    And I’ll use that Female:Cancer vs Male:Aging as the biological equivalent of the unregulated expression of female hyperconsumption and infatilization vs male hypercapitalization, and …again… reciprocal exchange discovering the continuously moving equilibrium between them


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 13:54:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453721920055111682

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453721500448530432


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    So, the algorithm for human behavior is extremely simple but because we have such large brains, capable of such exhaustive generalization, we can apply that algorithm endlessly as we can apply language in infinite permutation. But w/o reciprocity we get F:’cancer’ vs M:’aging’

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1453721500448530432

  • So, the algorithm for human behavior is extremely simple but because we have suc

    So, the algorithm for human behavior is extremely simple but because we have such large brains, capable of such exhaustive generalization, we can apply that algorithm endlessly as we can apply language in infinite permutation. But w/o reciprocity we get F:’cancer’ vs M:’aging’


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 13:53:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453721500448530432

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453720984070942729


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    So conservatism (adulting by capitalization) vs progressivism (infantilization by hyperconsumption) are biological intuitionistic and cognitive biases that have sexual origins in cognitive dimorphism, and the competition between them in reciprocity calculating ‘optimums’.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1453720984070942729

  • And what this understanding of infantilization doesn’t tell us directly, is that

    And what this understanding of infantilization doesn’t tell us directly, is that the difference between the classes is biological limitation on development causing infantilization of self regulation – at least on the conscientiousness axis.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 13:47:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453720141456297991

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453719761297166346


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    But this understanding still provides just the first principle, the causal axis of her behavior.What it doesn’t tell us is that this hyperconsumption is the result of the infant stage, and is produced by our tendency both male and female to coddle girls and women:infantilization.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1453719761297166346

  • But this understanding still provides just the first principle, the causal axis

    But this understanding still provides just the first principle, the causal axis of her behavior.What it doesn’t tell us is that this hyperconsumption is the result of the infant stage, and is produced by our tendency both male and female to coddle girls and women:infantilization.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-28 13:46:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453719761297166346

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453719411890679816


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    I mean for example, the female instinct is to maximize consumption so she and hers won’t be left behind, just as much as the male instinct is to maximize capital. So in any condition where the female can hyper-consumer without social regulation of it, she will do so on instinct.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1453719411890679816

  • On a generational timeline, across a sufficiently large population, all outcomes

    On a generational timeline, across a sufficiently large population, all outcomes are predictable because they are deterministic, because humans are marginally indifferent when subject to the same incentives under the same conditions.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-26 18:32:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453066954789507076

    Reply addressees: @f_smyt @Michell88086442

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453066312155123717

  • The only “hell” that exists is the one man creates by false pretense, false beli

    The only “hell” that exists is the one man creates by false pretense, false belief, false claim that we can violate the formal, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws of the universe, instead of struggling to discover apply and adapt to them and stay ahead of the red queen.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-26 17:24:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453049967006867457

    Reply addressees: @ArcadiaSteppe

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1453049468878835717

  • EXAMPLES OF TRIFUNCTIONALISM A positive and negative charge either produce a sta

    EXAMPLES OF TRIFUNCTIONALISM

    1. A positive and negative charge either produce a stable equilibrium (particle) or they dissipate. So a triangle with negative at the bottom left, positive at the bottom right, and the height of the triangle the amount of energy or mass captured in the stable relation.
    2. In any opportunity for exchange two people will only voluntarily do so if they both increase their capital (have more than they did before hand).
    3. There are two sexes, the hyperconsumptive female (bottom left negative) and the hyperproductive male (bottom right positive) with voluntary exchange “marriage” the compromise between them that produces reproduction (the hight of the triangle).
    4. There are three methods of coercion: force (defense), undermining (care), bribery (trade). Undermining the negative bottom left, force the positive bottom right, and trade the energy captured by reciprocal exchange.
    5. Humans specialize in these means of coercion producing elites in that master these means of coercion, we call them right bottom feminine priesthoods offering false promises in exchange for inclusion, masuline warriros producing states offering defense in exchange for taxation, and craftsmen, scientists, entrepreneurs, and lawyers who master cooperation and the law of cooperation, that satisfies the equilibrium between the male and female interests.
    6. There are three possible formal institutions, of coercion, the bottom right force(defense) and the state, and the bottom left undermining (inclusion) and Religion, and the law (cooperation, dispute resolution, trade). Only trade captures energy as a voluntary exchange (stable equilibrium) between male (force) and female (undermining).
    7. Given the three means of coercion and the three possible institutions of coercion, humans evolve them in different sequences. Some develop force and state first (china) some religion first (middle east) and some law first (europeans). ANd this initial foundation creates a path-dependence (hierarchy of priority) meaning the first institution is strongest, the second institution is less so, and the third institution is weakest.
    8. The rate of evolutionary adaptation of any people is determiend by their first institution, where religion is the slowest, the state the medium, and the law the fastest means of discovery, innovation, and adaptation. This explains the difference btweeen the rates of evolution of all civilizations. It explains teh chrsitian dark ages. It explains the failure of islam. It explains the success but stagnation of china. It explains the rate of evolution of europeans. It even explains why india was unable to produce formal institutions at scale, and why african produced no institutions.

    This is a brief overview of the most simple examples that we can use to illustrate that the universe operates by a very simple rule of increasing the base of the triangle and the height of the triangle by computing via cooperating, the capture of increasing energy and mass.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-26 02:31:57 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107165484129089321

  • @hankbmartin 1) A positive and negative charge either produce a stable equilibri

    @hankbmartin
    1) A positive and negative charge either produce a stable equilibrium (particle) or they dissipate. So a triangle with negative at the bottom left, positive at the bottom right, and the height of the triangle the amount of energy or mass captured in the stable relation.

    2) There are two sexes, the hyperconsumptive female (bottom left negative) and the hyperproductive male (bottom right positive) with voluntary exchange “marriage” the compromise between them that produces reproduction (the hight of the triangle).

    3) There are three methods of coercion: force (defense), undermining (care), bribery (trade). Undermining the negative bottom left, force the positive bottom right, and trade the energy captured by reciprocal exchange.

    4) Humans specialize in these means of coercion producing elites in that master these means of coercion, we call them right bottom feminine priesthoods offering false promises in exchange for inclusion, masuline warriros producing states offering defense in exchange for taxation, and craftsmen, scientists, entrepreneurs, and lawyers who master cooperation and the law of cooperation, that satisfies the equilibrium between the male and female interests.

    5) There are three possible formal institutions, of coercion, the bottom right force(defense) and the state, and the bottom left undermining (inclusion) and Religion, and the law (cooperation, dispute resolution, trade). Only trade captures energy as a voluntary exchange (stable equilibrium) between male (force) and female (undermining).

    6) Given the three means of coercion and the three possible institutions of coercion, humans evolve them in different sequences. Some develop force and state first (china) some religion first (middle east) and some law first (europeans). ANd this initial foundation creates a path-dependence (hierarchy of priority) meaning the first institution is strongest, the second institution is less so, and the third institution is weakest.

    7) The rate of evolutionary adaptation of any people is determiend by their first institution, where religion is the slowest, the state the medium, and the law the fastest means of discovery, innovation, and adaptation. This explains the difference btweeen the rates of evolution of all civilizations. It explains teh chrsitian dark ages. It explains the failure of islam. It explains the success but stagnation of china. It explains the incredible rate of discovery adaptation and evolution of europeans. It even explains why india was unable to produce formal institutions at scale, and why african produced no institutions, other than the four types of families.

    This is a brief overview of the most simple examples that we can use to illustrate that the universe operates by a very simple rule of increasing the base of the triangle and the height of the triangle by computing via cooperating, the capture of increasing energy and mass.

    That’s about as simple as I can make it.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-10-26 02:27:35 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107165466962151956