Theme: AI

@AshaLogos
FYI: Agreed. At the present rate of technological innovation any capital investment in training an AI that doesn’t (and can’t) lie because current AI’s excel at synthesis(generalization) but not at analysis (causality). Even as such they have terrible trouble with math and logic if they do much better with programming because programming requires rigid definitions.
Our work (which I AFAIK you are only vaguely aware of) can be written as the equivalent of program code. However it depends on a long hierarchy of first principles, which will require additional training. That additional training requries recursion and the AI’s are only beginning to develop this capability.
So we are ‘working’ on at least one of the AIs you’re suggesting.
But given the literary nature of your work (literary is a technical term, where the opposite is analytic) that seeks to convey values and experience and to train the intuition, I’d assume you’d ALSO like a literary AI rather than an analytic AI.
IMO we require both.
Everything else other than Truth(objective analytic) and Meaning (subjective literary) is merely a tool to accomplish some other purpose.

Reply addressees: @AshaLogos