Theme: AI

  • Professor Who Coined Term ‘Net Neutrality’ Thinks It’s Time To Break Up Facebook

    Professor Who Coined Term ‘Net Neutrality’ Thinks It’s Time To Break Up Facebook (theverge.com http://theverge.com )

    Best known for coining the phrase “net neutrality” and his book The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information Empires, Wu has a new book coming out in November called The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age. In it, he argues compellingly for a return to aggressive antitrust enforcement in the style of Teddy Roosevelt, saying that Google, Facebook, Amazon, and other huge tech companies are a threat to democracy as they get bigger and bigger. “We live in America, which has a strong and proud tradition of breaking up companies that are too big for inefficient reasons,” Wu told me on this week’s Vergecast. “We need to reverse this idea that it’s not an American tradition. We’ve broken up dozens of companies.”

    “I think if you took a hard look at the acquisition of WhatsApp and Instagram, the argument that the effects of those acquisitions have been anticompetitive would be easy to prove for a number of reasons,” says Wu.

    And breaking up the company wouldn’t be hard, he says. “What would be the harm? You’ll have three competitors. It’s not ‘Oh my god, if you get rid of WhatsApp and Instagram, well then the whole world’s going to fall apart.’ It would be like ‘Okay, now you have some companies actually trying to offer you an alternative to Facebook.’”

    Breaking up Facebook (and other huge tech companies like Google and Amazon) could be simple under the current law, suggests Wu.

    But it could also lead to a major rethinking of how antitrust law should work in a world where the giant platform companies give their products away for free, and the ability for the government to restrict corporate power seems to be diminishing by the day.

    And it demands that we all think seriously about the conditions that create innovation. “I think everyone’s steering way away from the monopolies, and I think it’s hurting innovation in the tech sector,” says Wu.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-06 23:46:00 UTC

  • INTUITIONS AS NEURAL ECONOMY Because of my work on artificial intelligence, I th

    INTUITIONS AS NEURAL ECONOMY

    Because of my work on artificial intelligence, I think of intuitions as regional differences neural economy.

    As far as I know very minor changes in rewards and… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=290785941518303&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-05 15:51:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037367691076685824

  • It’s Time To Break Up Facebook

    Professor Who Coined Term ‘Net Neutrality’ Thinks It’s Time To Break Up Facebook (theverge.com) Best known for coining the phrase “net neutrality” and his book The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information Empires, Wu has a new book coming out in November called The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age. In it, he argues compellingly for a return to aggressive antitrust enforcement in the style of Teddy Roosevelt, saying that Google, Facebook, Amazon, and other huge tech companies are a threat to democracy as they get bigger and bigger. “We live in America, which has a strong and proud tradition of breaking up companies that are too big for inefficient reasons,” Wu told me on this week’s Vergecast. “We need to reverse this idea that it’s not an American tradition. We’ve broken up dozens of companies.” “I think if you took a hard look at the acquisition of WhatsApp and Instagram, the argument that the effects of those acquisitions have been anticompetitive would be easy to prove for a number of reasons,” says Wu. And breaking up the company wouldn’t be hard, he says. “What would be the harm? You’ll have three competitors. It’s not ‘Oh my god, if you get rid of WhatsApp and Instagram, well then the whole world’s going to fall apart.’ It would be like ‘Okay, now you have some companies actually trying to offer you an alternative to Facebook.’” Breaking up Facebook (and other huge tech companies like Google and Amazon) could be simple under the current law, suggests Wu. But it could also lead to a major rethinking of how antitrust law should work in a world where the giant platform companies give their products away for free, and the ability for the government to restrict corporate power seems to be diminishing by the day. And it demands that we all think seriously about the conditions that create innovation. “I think everyone’s steering way away from the monopolies, and I think it’s hurting innovation in the tech sector,” says Wu.

  • It’s Time To Break Up Facebook

    Professor Who Coined Term ‘Net Neutrality’ Thinks It’s Time To Break Up Facebook (theverge.com) Best known for coining the phrase “net neutrality” and his book The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information Empires, Wu has a new book coming out in November called The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age. In it, he argues compellingly for a return to aggressive antitrust enforcement in the style of Teddy Roosevelt, saying that Google, Facebook, Amazon, and other huge tech companies are a threat to democracy as they get bigger and bigger. “We live in America, which has a strong and proud tradition of breaking up companies that are too big for inefficient reasons,” Wu told me on this week’s Vergecast. “We need to reverse this idea that it’s not an American tradition. We’ve broken up dozens of companies.” “I think if you took a hard look at the acquisition of WhatsApp and Instagram, the argument that the effects of those acquisitions have been anticompetitive would be easy to prove for a number of reasons,” says Wu. And breaking up the company wouldn’t be hard, he says. “What would be the harm? You’ll have three competitors. It’s not ‘Oh my god, if you get rid of WhatsApp and Instagram, well then the whole world’s going to fall apart.’ It would be like ‘Okay, now you have some companies actually trying to offer you an alternative to Facebook.’” Breaking up Facebook (and other huge tech companies like Google and Amazon) could be simple under the current law, suggests Wu. But it could also lead to a major rethinking of how antitrust law should work in a world where the giant platform companies give their products away for free, and the ability for the government to restrict corporate power seems to be diminishing by the day. And it demands that we all think seriously about the conditions that create innovation. “I think everyone’s steering way away from the monopolies, and I think it’s hurting innovation in the tech sector,” says Wu.

  • Intuitions as Neural Economy

    Because of my work on artificial intelligence, I think of intuitions as regional differences neural economy. As far as I know very minor changes in rewards and frustrations produce HUGE accumulated differences in regional (functional network) dependence. Some people have the resource curse in neural economy, some people do not, and some people are resource poor, and worse, some have resource poor and very poor transport systems (white matter). And others have totally unconstructive asymmetries of reward and frustration….. lots to go wrong, many things need to go right. So it takes a great deal of training with some, and mere exposure for others…. and for others… its fucking impossible. They’re semi domesticated animals.

  • Intuitions as Neural Economy

    Because of my work on artificial intelligence, I think of intuitions as regional differences neural economy. As far as I know very minor changes in rewards and frustrations produce HUGE accumulated differences in regional (functional network) dependence. Some people have the resource curse in neural economy, some people do not, and some people are resource poor, and worse, some have resource poor and very poor transport systems (white matter). And others have totally unconstructive asymmetries of reward and frustration….. lots to go wrong, many things need to go right. So it takes a great deal of training with some, and mere exposure for others…. and for others… its fucking impossible. They’re semi domesticated animals.

  • INTUITIONS AS NEURAL ECONOMY Because of my work on artificial intelligence, I th

    INTUITIONS AS NEURAL ECONOMY

    Because of my work on artificial intelligence, I think of intuitions as regional differences neural economy.

    As far as I know very minor changes in rewards and frustrations produce HUGE accumulated differences in regional (functional network) dependence.

    Some people have the resource curse in neural economy, some people do not, and some people are resource poor, and worse, some have resource poor and very poor transport systems (white matter).

    And others have totally unconstructive asymmetries of reward and frustration….. lots to go wrong, many things need to go right.

    So it takes a great deal of training with some, and mere exposure for others…. and for others… its fucking impossible. They’re semi domesticated animals.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-05 11:51:00 UTC

  • So, any other platform, or are we gonna have to copy the guys at The Right Stuff

    So, any other platform, or are we gonna have to copy the guys at The Right Stuff?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-04 16:23:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037013382057156609

    Reply addressees: @MartianHoplite

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037009746614673410


    IN REPLY TO:

    @MartianHoplite

    @curtdoolittle Yeah. Double zucced. For total bullshit too. Most of the time in the past it’s just because I sliped up and said something careless. But they must be getting really sophisticated to ban subtle shades of implied disapproval or something. Not sure if I’ll be able to avoid it now.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037009746614673410

  • Tue, 04 Sep 2018 16:30:32 GMT I suppose it’s not clear that: neural competition

    Tue, 04 Sep 2018 16:30:32 GMT

    I suppose it’s not clear that: neural competition and computational efficiency; reciprocity and natural law; and markets in everything, to a eugenic high trust polity – function together as a continuous and consistent hierarchy of optimum decidability from sense perception to collective human action.

  • “If you want to know the correct opinion on anything relating to the internet –

    —“If you want to know the correct opinion on anything relating to the internet – censorship, privacy, net neutrality, bluecheck privilege – it’s the opposite of what the NIGARFAGTs want: Netflix, Instagram, Gofundme, Amazon, Reddit, Facebook, Apple, Google, and Twitter.”—Michael Andrade