They are extremely vulnerable, and the culmination of “Cargo Cult” opportunism. It will take a while for their density to be such that it’s worth making a living off investment with capturing their cargo, but you know, I sure as heck know how to make a living at it, and a gang that gets organized enough will make a great living at it. I mean, you know that video from south africa where the locals cut up a beached whale while it’s still living, and run off with hunks of meat? A distribution channel of drones carrying ‘Cargo’ is simply a an opportunity for many generations of the division of labor more evolved than whale meat. Drones fly at 120 meters (130 yards) according to FAA regulations. Now if you’ve shot skeet, you can shoot down a done with 3 1/2” 12 gauge OOO Buckshot, with a drop of 18″. If you lead, and fire three shots in sequence assuming 18″ drop it’s shooting fish in a barrel. (and yes the gang bangers will develop ‘talent’ that will do it, and vehicles to do it from, and spend all f’king day doing it. You can use a rifled shotgun and slug pretty easily at 130 yards. Even with a .22 semi auto – because it’s so quiet and can put a lot of rounds up there. Or with another drone you can just tie nails to a bit of fishing net and drop it on the drone, or just smack into it with your landing gear. Now that’s before we get to the fact that they are even more vulnerable during delivery of the goods. And that even if their reasonably autonomous they aren’t endlessly autonomous. And that capturing, modifying, and using them for ‘other purposes’ is profitable in and of itself. So now, you get your own and deliver drugs anonymously and don’t need runners. I mean, the disintermediation from the human being is awesome. And you know, load it up with explosives and now people won’t interfere with it. I mean.. it’s a whole new criminal industry just waiting to happen! 😉 Sorry. Just had to rain on the parade. Edit
Theme: AI
-
Prediction: What Will Happen to The Commercial Drone Revolution?
They are extremely vulnerable, and the culmination of “Cargo Cult” opportunism. It will take a while for their density to be such that it’s worth making a living off investment with capturing their cargo, but you know, I sure as heck know how to make a living at it, and a gang that gets organized enough will make a great living at it. I mean, you know that video from south africa where the locals cut up a beached whale while it’s still living, and run off with hunks of meat? A distribution channel of drones carrying ‘Cargo’ is simply a an opportunity for many generations of the division of labor more evolved than whale meat. Drones fly at 120 meters (130 yards) according to FAA regulations. Now if you’ve shot skeet, you can shoot down a done with 3 1/2” 12 gauge OOO Buckshot, with a drop of 18″. If you lead, and fire three shots in sequence assuming 18″ drop it’s shooting fish in a barrel. (and yes the gang bangers will develop ‘talent’ that will do it, and vehicles to do it from, and spend all f’king day doing it. You can use a rifled shotgun and slug pretty easily at 130 yards. Even with a .22 semi auto – because it’s so quiet and can put a lot of rounds up there. Or with another drone you can just tie nails to a bit of fishing net and drop it on the drone, or just smack into it with your landing gear. Now that’s before we get to the fact that they are even more vulnerable during delivery of the goods. And that even if their reasonably autonomous they aren’t endlessly autonomous. And that capturing, modifying, and using them for ‘other purposes’ is profitable in and of itself. So now, you get your own and deliver drugs anonymously and don’t need runners. I mean, the disintermediation from the human being is awesome. And you know, load it up with explosives and now people won’t interfere with it. I mean.. it’s a whole new criminal industry just waiting to happen! 😉 Sorry. Just had to rain on the parade. Edit
-
The Other Reason for Academic Reform: Use Tech to Scale the Best, and Exit the R
The Other Reason for Academic Reform: Use Tech to Scale the Best, and Exit the Rest. https://t.co/uG9oXY9M5D
-
The Other Reason for Academic Reform: Use Tech to Scale the Best, and Exit the R
The Other Reason for Academic Reform: Use Tech to Scale the Best, and Exit the Rest. https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/the-other-reason-for-academic-reform-use-tech-to-scale-the-best-and-exit-the-rest/
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 00:35:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267253394126909441
-
The Other Reason for Academic Reform: Use Tech to Scale the Best, and Exit the Rest.
—“Most professors outside of the very top tier don’t break the 120 -130 range (not bright enough to move the dial). I was fortunate to have an outstanding Harvard educated law school professor, however, who was both intelligent (plus 3.83-4 standard deviations) and erudite. His course on contemporary legal theory alerted me to the enemy’s 20th c. techniques (Gramscian long march, Fabian infiltration, Frankfort cultural critique, feminism, post-modernism, and unrestrained legal positivism). Thank you Professor Durham.”—Scott De Warren
-
The Other Reason for Academic Reform: Use Tech to Scale the Best, and Exit the Rest.
—“Most professors outside of the very top tier don’t break the 120 -130 range (not bright enough to move the dial). I was fortunate to have an outstanding Harvard educated law school professor, however, who was both intelligent (plus 3.83-4 standard deviations) and erudite. His course on contemporary legal theory alerted me to the enemy’s 20th c. techniques (Gramscian long march, Fabian infiltration, Frankfort cultural critique, feminism, post-modernism, and unrestrained legal positivism). Thank you Professor Durham.”—Scott De Warren
-
Computer science appears to have made it possible for us to imagine ourselves correctly
Dec 5, 2019, 3:12 PM Computer science appears to have made it possible for us to imagine ourselves correctly: “why doesn’t it understand or “why doesn’t it know” was a common question in the first generation of computer users. Today, every generation knows it’s just a machine and needs explicit instructions on its own terms. Programming had the same effect. Databases even more so. And the current ‘pseudo-ai-tools’ have reached the point of producing design patterns “organizations that fulfill purposes”: the grammars of software whether relational database, hierarchical database, Text-Index, Bayesian (“ai”), Object, Functional, Script, Speech, Touch, Text, punc- card, or Switch. So it is far easier for our generations to understand the brain as a computational device and the mind as our introspection upon it. But it is still difficult for us to understand that we have surprisingly little agency until we develop sufficient introspection — if we can at all. The principle difference in my thought is that I see mankind as largely consisting of semi-conscious beings riding an unconscious elephant, with a very, very, few of us able to look in the mental mirror and recognize the driver…isn’t us.
-
Computer science appears to have made it possible for us to imagine ourselves correctly
Dec 5, 2019, 3:12 PM Computer science appears to have made it possible for us to imagine ourselves correctly: “why doesn’t it understand or “why doesn’t it know” was a common question in the first generation of computer users. Today, every generation knows it’s just a machine and needs explicit instructions on its own terms. Programming had the same effect. Databases even more so. And the current ‘pseudo-ai-tools’ have reached the point of producing design patterns “organizations that fulfill purposes”: the grammars of software whether relational database, hierarchical database, Text-Index, Bayesian (“ai”), Object, Functional, Script, Speech, Touch, Text, punc- card, or Switch. So it is far easier for our generations to understand the brain as a computational device and the mind as our introspection upon it. But it is still difficult for us to understand that we have surprisingly little agency until we develop sufficient introspection — if we can at all. The principle difference in my thought is that I see mankind as largely consisting of semi-conscious beings riding an unconscious elephant, with a very, very, few of us able to look in the mental mirror and recognize the driver…isn’t us.
-
Think of P as Code
Think of P as Code https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/think-of-p-as-code/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 12:43:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266349445077229568
-
Think of P as Code
Mar 8, 2020, 12:44 PM
—“I absolutely love the format and the structure of these posts. Propertarianism is no longer a “philosophy” – It’s software code. P is the programming language of natural law. Takes a while to hack it, but seems to help to think of it as code.” —James Dmitro Makienko
Yep. P Is “algorithmic Natural Law” I love when people ‘get it’