Theme: AI

  • Sorry. Yes, it’s lightweight version of other forms of modeling: electronic, Flo

    Sorry. Yes, it’s lightweight version of other forms of modeling: electronic, Flowchart, ERD, OOD, State, Workflow, Mindmap, Now NN Patterns. And he’s imported the symbolism from NN patterns into MM. Dozens of similar paradigms.(Great chart of NN design patterns somewhere online.)

    Reply addressees: @bierlingm @RoamResearch

  • Sorry. Yes, it’s lightweight version of other forms of modeling: electronic, Flo

    Sorry. Yes, it’s lightweight version of other forms of modeling: electronic, Flowchart, ERD, OOD, State, Workflow, Mindmap, Now NN Patterns. And he’s imported the symbolism from NN patterns into MM. Dozens of similar paradigms.(Great chart of NN design patterns somewhere online.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-10 18:34:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292892033154154497

    Reply addressees: @bierlingm @RoamResearch

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1292883020236623879

  • RT @JFGariepy: R.I.P. the Internet, 1995-2020

    RT @JFGariepy: R.I.P. the Internet, 1995-2020.

  • RT @JFGariepy: R.I.P. the Internet, 1995-2020

    RT @JFGariepy: R.I.P. the Internet, 1995-2020.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-08-08 00:31:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1291894855342403586

  • More Denialism: Smachtenberger, Weinstein

    MORE DENIALISM – THE JEWISH DESIRE FOR A THIRD WAVE OF FALSE PROMISES [I]t’s easy to undermine Daniel’s argument:  Our techne (tools) can be turned on ourselves. We can control our population through eugenics (Prohibiting reproduction of the bottom), so that we maintain equilibrium with resources while continually evolving until we need little work to keep the population evolving. It’s interesting that he’s still trying to satisfy the female instinct for survival of all, which would lead to devolutionary dysgenics as it has outside of Europe and China. The entire program of Jewish pseudoscience from Boas, Freud, Marx to Derrida, Friedan, (and daniel, eric, and brett) is an attempt to deny the fact that only Europeans and Chinese managed to maintain natural selection – by infanticide, agrarian manorialism, markets, credit, and aggressive capital punishment. And that the intentional defeat of the eugenics movement, and suppression of eugenics research by Jews in the postwar period, and suppression of genetic research by Christians in the post-cold war period, are the origin of the crisis of our age. Just as they have been the origin of the crisis of the russians, the germans, and a hundred other cases. Why? Because you can try to avoid the obvious and the truthful with dreams of violating the physical (entropy, scarcity), natural (a division of labor, reciprocity), and evolution (regression to the mean, eugenics) and invent a third wave of false promises ( wave one superstition: Judaism, Christianity, Islam; wave two pseudoscience: Marxism, neo-Marxism, postmodernism, and wave three: sophistic pseudoscience? ). Or you can do what Europeans have done, throughout our history, and embrace the reason for European successes: discovery, adaption to, and application of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.

  • More Denialism: Smachtenberger, Weinstein

    MORE DENIALISM – THE JEWISH DESIRE FOR A THIRD WAVE OF FALSE PROMISES [I]t’s easy to undermine Daniel’s argument:  Our techne (tools) can be turned on ourselves. We can control our population through eugenics (Prohibiting reproduction of the bottom), so that we maintain equilibrium with resources while continually evolving until we need little work to keep the population evolving. It’s interesting that he’s still trying to satisfy the female instinct for survival of all, which would lead to devolutionary dysgenics as it has outside of Europe and China. The entire program of Jewish pseudoscience from Boas, Freud, Marx to Derrida, Friedan, (and daniel, eric, and brett) is an attempt to deny the fact that only Europeans and Chinese managed to maintain natural selection – by infanticide, agrarian manorialism, markets, credit, and aggressive capital punishment. And that the intentional defeat of the eugenics movement, and suppression of eugenics research by Jews in the postwar period, and suppression of genetic research by Christians in the post-cold war period, are the origin of the crisis of our age. Just as they have been the origin of the crisis of the russians, the germans, and a hundred other cases. Why? Because you can try to avoid the obvious and the truthful with dreams of violating the physical (entropy, scarcity), natural (a division of labor, reciprocity), and evolution (regression to the mean, eugenics) and invent a third wave of false promises ( wave one superstition: Judaism, Christianity, Islam; wave two pseudoscience: Marxism, neo-Marxism, postmodernism, and wave three: sophistic pseudoscience? ). Or you can do what Europeans have done, throughout our history, and embrace the reason for European successes: discovery, adaption to, and application of the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.

  • It’s simple man. You keep putting a quarter in the bot. The bot will never stop

    It’s simple man. You keep putting a quarter in the bot. The bot will never stop unless you do.

    Algorithms are a pain in the ass that way.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-10 21:04:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1281695706680561666

    Reply addressees: @Bx1bXer9 @TwoLitersOfLuck

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1281695423640547328

  • So (a) end proof of work, making ordinary monolithic transaction systems like ba

    So (a) end proof of work, making ordinary monolithic transaction systems like banking today, (b) limit the minimum fractional value of a share before ‘writing down’.(c) allow rolling up of fractions into new shares.

    I mean it’s fantastic.

    Reply addressees: @h0b0spic3s @Manse111

  • So (a) end proof of work, making ordinary monolithic transaction systems like ba

    So (a) end proof of work, making ordinary monolithic transaction systems like banking today, (b) limit the minimum fractional value of a share before ‘writing down’.(c) allow rolling up of fractions into new shares.

    I mean it’s fantastic.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-02 17:02:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1278735931902656513

    Reply addressees: @h0b0spic3s @Manse111

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1278735538028232704


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @h0b0spic3s @Manse111 Moreover, I and others have proposed all accounting systems be modified to this technique so that moneysubsitutes can be tracked throughout the full lifecycle, providing the accounting information we lack to undestand the state of economies.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1278735538028232704

  • Don’t misinterpret me. I’ve said the same thing continuously since at least ’14:

    Don’t misinterpret me. I’ve said the same thing continuously since at least ’14: the technology converted from proof or work, to monolithic transactions will allow the development of a perfect currency, and use of interset in ALL ASSETS as a medium of exchange.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-07-02 17:00:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1278735229948170241

    Reply addressees: @h0b0spic3s @Manse111

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1278730454644994049