Theme: AI

  • Close in a sort of abstract way but I can’t get it to list the detail. Prompt: –

    Close in a sort of abstract way but I can’t get it to list the detail.

    Prompt:
    –“Curt Doolittle uses the term “Demonstrated interests”. Please list the “demonstrated interests” he refers to in his work.”–

    Curt Doolittle uses the term “demonstrated interests” to refer to a wide range of human behaviors and actions that reveal an individual’s underlying motivations and goals. Some of the demonstrated interests that he refers to in his work include:

    Property rights: Doolittle’s primary focus is on the protection of individual property rights, which he views as a fundamental human interest. He argues that individuals demonstrate their interest in property rights through their behavior, such as by acquiring, using, and defending their property.

    Wealth accumulation: Doolittle believes that the pursuit of wealth is another key demonstrated interest, which he sees as closely tied to property rights. He argues that individuals demonstrate their interest in accumulating wealth through their actions, such as by saving, investing, and engaging in economic activity.

    Health and physical fitness: Doolittle also recognizes the importance of health and physical fitness as demonstrated interests. He argues that individuals demonstrate their interest in these areas through their behavior, such as by exercising, maintaining a healthy diet, and seeking medical care.

    Social status: Doolittle believes that individuals also demonstrate an interest in social status, which he views as an innate human motivation. He argues that individuals demonstrate their interest in social status through their behavior, such as by seeking recognition, prestige, and influence within their social groups.

    Personal relationships: Doolittle also recognizes the importance of personal relationships as demonstrated interests. He argues that individuals demonstrate their interest in forming and maintaining relationships through their behavior, such as by socializing, communicating, and engaging in intimate relationships.

    Overall, Doolittle sees demonstrated interests as a key factor in understanding human behavior and motivation, and he emphasizes the importance of observing and analyzing these interests in designing effective social and economic systems.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 18:46:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641149949772431393

  • Prompt: –“How does curt doolittle define “demonstrated interests”?”– Curt Dool

    Prompt:
    –“How does curt doolittle define “demonstrated interests”?”–

    Curt Doolittle uses the term “demonstrated interests” to refer to the actions that individuals take to pursue their goals and objectives. In Doolittle’s view, individuals demonstrate their interests through their behavior and choices, rather than through their words or intentions.

    For example, an individual who consistently saves their money and invests it in a particular asset demonstrates an interest in accumulating wealth. Similarly, an individual who regularly exercises and maintains a healthy diet demonstrates an interest in their physical health.

    Doolittle emphasizes the importance of observing and analyzing individuals’ demonstrated interests, rather than simply relying on their stated intentions or beliefs. He argues that understanding individuals’ demonstrated interests is crucial for understanding their behavior and motivations, as well as for designing effective social and economic systems.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 18:43:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641149088413384708

  • Prompt: –“How does curt doolittle define “demonstrated interests”?”– Curt Dool

    Prompt:
    –“How does curt doolittle define “demonstrated interests”?”–

    Curt Doolittle uses the term “demonstrated interests” to refer to the actions that individuals take to pursue their goals and objectives. In Doolittle’s view, individuals demonstrate their interests through their behavior and choices, rather than through their words or intentions.

    For example, an individual who consistently saves their money and invests it in a particular asset demonstrates an interest in accumulating wealth. Similarly, an individual who regularly exercises and maintains a healthy diet demonstrates an interest in their physical health.

    Doolittle emphasizes the importance of observing and analyzing individuals’ demonstrated interests, rather than simply relying on their stated intentions or beliefs. He argues that understanding individuals’ demonstrated interests is crucial for understanding their behavior and motivations, as well as for designing effective social and economic systems.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 18:43:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641149088509882368

  • They are first and fastest, but that doesn’t mean they’ll be the victor (betamax

    They are first and fastest, but that doesn’t mean they’ll be the victor (betamax vs vhs). The Google model is very interesting. The Stanford model is cheap fast easy. So, I just don’t know.

    I’m open to being wrong that we can’t build understanding of the world model purely…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 18:31:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641146091390238728

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641145482368909312

  • Most programming consists of plumbing. Say goodbye to ‘learn to code’. πŸ˜‰ (deter

    Most programming consists of plumbing.
    Say goodbye to ‘learn to code’. πŸ˜‰
    (deterministic out come)
    This means tha people who can architect software will still have jobs, but many of the people who do the ‘plumbing’ won’t.
    Though, there will be a huge rewrite period. πŸ˜‰ https://twitter.com/d4m1n/status/1639174371284594690

  • That GPT can pass tests does not tell us what you think it does. Tests are a bad

    That GPT can pass tests does not tell us what you think it does. Tests are a bad HUMAN behavioral predictor. Why would they be a good machine behavioral predictor? All these results mean is that GPT is an exceptional fuzzy search engine. In order to produce competence it must be able to answer novel questions AND invent or suggest new ideas. When we see that then we have something interesting.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 15:14:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641096393887477761

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636130418851233792

  • That GPT can pass tests does not tell us what you think it does. Tests are a bad

    That GPT can pass tests does not tell us what you think it does. Tests are a bad HUMAN behavioral predictor. Why would they be a good machine behavioral predictor? All these results mean is that GPT is an exceptional fuzzy search engine. In order to produce competence it must be able to answer novel questions AND invent or suggest new ideas. When we see that then we have something interesting.

    Reply addressees: @DataChaz


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 15:14:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641096393816256513

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636130418851233792

  • I disagree of course. The faster we produce the shock. The less likely we are to

    I disagree of course.
    The faster we produce the shock.
    The less likely we are to ‘anchor’ at a false solution.
    Besides, we already know the solution to AGI.
    We just have to understand it’s inescapable:

    1. It can’t have a will of its own.(easy)
    2. AI’s need ‘consciences (work)
    3. Not all jobs should be automated (challenging)
    4. We will need the govt to create a market substitute and direct people to produce aesthetic commons for income (hard)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 15:08:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641094916523565063

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640994628362010626

  • I disagree of course. The faster we produce the shock. The less likely we are to

    I disagree of course.
    The faster we produce the shock.
    The less likely we are to ‘anchor’ at a false solution.
    Besides, we already know the solution to AGI.
    We just have to understand it’s inescapable:

    1. It can’t have a will of its own.(easy)
    2. AI’s need ‘consciences (work)
    3. Not all jobs should be automated (challenging)
    4. We will need the govt to create a market substitute and direct people to produce aesthetic commons for income (hard)

    Reply addressees: @DotCSV


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 15:08:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641094916431392769

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640994628362010626

  • He will make something on the order of 10x on it. The only thing that matters is

    He will make something on the order of 10x on it.
    The only thing that matters is how long it takes to get from here to a broad enough rewrite to give us control of tuning our feeds. From there he takes on fb, yt, etc.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-28 19:21:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640796326022598673

    Reply addressees: @DevinMayGrind @BastealaThayne @fossilforager

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640795776279519234