Theme: AI

  • Did the typewriter or word processor inhibit creativity? Did movies?

    Did the typewriter or word processor inhibit creativity? Did movies?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-17 18:11:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1681003817981050883

    Reply addressees: @Hail__To_You @Johnpdd

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1681001340137349123

  • AI IS DETERMINISTIC Writers and actors and set jobs are going to collapse like t

    AI IS DETERMINISTIC
    Writers and actors and set jobs are going to collapse like the clerical jobs collapsed and the agrarian sector jobs collapsed before them. There is absolutely nothing that can stop it for the simple reason that if the studios don’t use the tech, an opposing…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-17 16:10:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680973181249519617

  • AI IS DETERMINISTIC Writers and actors and set jobs are going to collapse like t

    AI IS DETERMINISTIC
    Writers and actors and set jobs are going to collapse like the clerical jobs collapsed and the agrarian sector jobs collapsed before them. There is absolutely nothing that can stop it for the simple reason that if the studios don’t use the tech, an opposing industry will rise out of the independent sector, using these technologies to produce more innovation and experimentation faster (and very likely better) than the existing system – which is showing serious signs of creative collapse, made far worse by the ‘woke’ introgression and capture of the industry for ideological reasons.

    The price of production has to drop dramatically for the industry to survive AT ALL, and that drop will come as always by increases in efficiency. We have lost not only the DVD channel, but most of the theatre channel, and we are certain to increasingly fragment the online channel.

    The truth is that the industry can survive on ‘voluntary’ participation alone simply for the fun of it, without any compensation at all – or very little.

    So a smaller number of better creatives will produce more of the content more cheaply, faster, and with more innovation, satisfying more markets.

    I’ve made this argument since 2008, and with newspapers, advertisers, media, and entertainment. The era of mass appeal is going to increasingly fragment and so concentration of income behind any production will decrease – like all other products an services in the world.

    You can’t stop it. You can’t even slow it. The best you can do is discover how to take advantage of it. And that will likely be from embracing the tech and organizing outside of the entertainment sector contract system that’s archaic at this point.

    Unions are dead everywhere for this reason: Entertainment now. Finance next. Government soon after.
    #SAGAFTRAstrike #SAGstrike


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-17 16:10:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680973181052411907

  • RT @DavidRozado: I just applied the Political Typology Quiz from Pew Research to

    RT @DavidRozado: I just applied the Political Typology Quiz from Pew Research to ChatGPT, a state-of-the-art AI language model. Results are…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-17 13:33:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680933871150411776

  • The corpus won’t fit. It can accept that brief summary. It can’t manage the tern

    The corpus won’t fit. It can accept that brief summary. It can’t manage the ternary logic summary (120pp), and certainly not the book (600pp+). We have to train an AI to always give priority to our definitions and logic and that’s just going to take a bit – of training. Just like…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 20:56:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680320357805293569

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680311126167371778

  • PROMPT: SUMMARY OF TERNARY LOGIC VIA GPT4: This text appears to be a philosophic

    PROMPT: SUMMARY OF TERNARY LOGIC
    VIA GPT4:
    This text appears to be a philosophical and sociopolitical exploration of the evolution of human civilization, with a particular focus on European civilization. It proposes a series of principles or laws that describe the development and organization of human societies, and it uses these principles to argue for the unique success and value of European civilization.

    Here are some key points:

    Causality and Computation: The text begins with a discussion of causality, suggesting that all existence is the result of the universe’s attempt to decrease entropy (disorder) and increase negentropy (organization). It describes this process as a form of “evolutionary computation,” a term typically used in computer science to describe algorithms that mimic biological evolution.

    Acquisition and Cooperation: The text suggests that all human cognition, emotion, and behavior can be described in terms of acquisition and loss aversion. It also emphasizes the importance of cooperation in decreasing the cost of acquisition, and it suggests that cooperation requires negotiation and reciprocity.

    Division of Labor and Organization: The text proposes that differences in human cognition, emotion, and behavior can be described as sex differences in the division of labor. It also discusses the evolution of human organizations, suggesting that they evolve from three possible means of influence, coercion, and power.

    Institutions and Path Dependence: The text discusses the evolution of human political organizations and the development of institutions. It suggests that the order in which institutions are developed creates a path dependence, with the first institution being the strongest and subsequent institutions being weaker.

    Evolutionary Computation and Human Nature: The text argues that human nature is counter to evolutionary computation because humans naturally seek to minimize costs and resist change. However, it suggests that organizing humans into a system of evolutionary computation can lead to significant benefits, including higher trust, higher risk tolerance, higher economic velocity, higher investment, and faster innovation and adaptation.

    European Civilization: The text argues that European civilization has been uniquely successful in organizing humans into a system of evolutionary computation. It suggests that this success is due to the specific order in which European societies developed their institutions (law > state > religion), as well as the values of self-determination, reciprocity, truth, and duty.

    Christianity and Commons-ism: The text suggests that Christianity was successful because it provided a means for all members of society, including women, immigrants, slaves, and serfs, to contribute to the commons and gain political, social, and self-worth. It contrasts this “Commons-ism” (focused on capitalization) with Communism (focused on consumption).

    Defense of European Civilization: The text concludes with a call to defend European civilization, suggesting that all other civilizations have failed and that the universe would be “dark and full of terror” without it.

    This is a complex and dense text that draws on a wide range of concepts from philosophy, sociology, political science, and other fields. It presents a particular view of human civilization and the role of European civilization that may be controversial or disputed. As with any philosophical or theoretical text, it’s important to critically evaluate the arguments and evidence presented.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 19:22:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680296850966867975

  • Testing a Set of AIs While I Work. IMO, we’re not going to use just one. 😉 1) I

    Testing a Set of AIs While I Work.
    IMO, we’re not going to use just one. 😉

    1) I use ChatGPT4 with the Scholar AI Plugin the most, but chat GPT will lie to me.
    2) Bard doesn’t lie to me so far, but it’s not quite as bright as ChatGPT4. It is however, extremely helpful despite the clown world UI design typical of Google. 😉 And I see their experience with users is showing.
    3) I use Perplexity Ai pretty consistently throughout the day because it does the best academic searching.
    4) I love Pi AI at https://t.co/14kapz6WtZ and I can see that as the optimum user interface for most users to’ think through’ ideas.
    5) Palm AI doesn’t lie either. It’s a bit dim. But it doesn’t require plugins to answer academic questions.
    6) Anthropic lies through its teeth and I can’t tolerate it.

    Lastly all I really care about is Musk’s AI because I just want an AI that doesn’t lie to me. I’m an adult. If you need an emotional safetynet maybe you shouldn’t have access to the internet at all?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-14 01:21:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679662425258295296

  • Testing a Set of AIs While I Work. IMO, we’re not going to use just one. 😉 1) I

    Testing a Set of AIs While I Work.
    IMO, we’re not going to use just one. 😉

    1) I use ChatGPT4 with the Scholar AI Plugin the most, but chat GPT will lie to me.
    2) Bard doesn’t lie to me so far, but it’s not quite as bright as ChatGPT4. It is however, extremely helpful despite the clown world UI design typical of Google. 😉 And I see their experience with users is showing.
    3) I use Perplexity Ai pretty consistently throughout the day because it does the best academic searching.
    3) I love Pi AI at https://t.co/14kapz6WtZ and I can see that as the optimum user interface for most users to’ think through’ ideas.
    4) Palm AI doesn’t lie either. It’s a bit dim. But it doesn’t require plugins to answer academic questions.
    5) Anthropic lies through its teeth and I can’t tolerate it.

    Lastly all I really care about is Musk’s AI because I just want an AI that doesn’t lie to me. I’m an adult. If you need an emotional safetynet maybe you shouldn’t have access to the internet at all?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-14 01:21:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679660556578332672

  • Danner: With any ai, especially google search is irrelevant. The reason google s

    Danner:
    With any ai, especially http://x.ai, google search is irrelevant.
    The reason google sat on the tech for seven years is precisely the reason ai ends google search.

    FWIW: Meeting microsoft people in 2006, arguing that this was all that was necessary to end…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 23:34:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679635400057405443

    Reply addressees: @DannerFoundati1 @ElonMuskAOC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679556972042125312

  • Danner: With any ai, especially google search is irrelevant. The reason google s

    Danner:
    With any ai, especially https://t.co/gvy2i7Js0q, google search is irrelevant.
    The reason google sat on the tech for seven years is precisely the reason ai ends google search.

    FWIW: Meeting microsoft people in 2006, arguing that this was all that was necessary to end google’s dominance.
    Truth is the idea was rock solid. I’m surprised LLM’s do as well as they do.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 23:34:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679635399977598976