Theme: Agency

  • Someone the other day said that women never admit they’re wrong, or that they’ve

    Someone the other day said that women never admit they’re wrong, or that they’ve screwed up. And that’s been bothering me, because I didn’t realize that I subconsciously recognize that when I’m dealing with a woman, that unless she’s asking me a question, she will never admit anything. And so I just don’t work that hard and dismiss her.

    This is not true of all women, but it’s true of the kind of woman that can’t exit her solipsism (emotionalism) and rationally determine the truth or falsehood of an argument independent of her feelings about it.

    it must be very hard for women to manage their emotions. I can only for a millisecond a few times a year imagine what it is like to think like a woman and it terrifies me. I would feel totally out of control.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 20:55:00 UTC

  • ARGUMENT WITH A SOLIPSIST (NON-RATIONAL FEMALE): ITS GENETICS Kathy. Why do you

    ARGUMENT WITH A SOLIPSIST (NON-RATIONAL FEMALE): ITS GENETICS

    Kathy.

    Why do you hold an opinion if you don’t even know the most trivial statistical descriptions of the economy? Except for Luxembourg the whole world is worse off. The difference is that the USA (as DESIGNED) is better for middle class people, and europe is better for working class people, and the global elite are not affected by policy, and the underclass is genetically inferior and unwanted and a drag on everyone else’s attempt to get INTO economic security.

    You can’t have both. Attempts to increase the security of the underclasses and increase the power of the political and underclasses, will merely reduce america to european levels of disposable income (much poorer), and our poor to their levels of poverty. Why? Because we have heavier underclass burdens. The europeans are just now experiencing the problems that we have had since ending slavery: genes matter. Why? whether yuo like it or not the overall wealth of your people is dependent upon the size of the underclass, and northern europe was just more effective at killing off the underclass through manorialism, hanging 1% per year, plague, war, and winter starvation.

    With lower burdens the middle class expanded downward and northern europeans were, by the early modern era, nearly all members of the genetic middle class no matter what economic class.

    By importing those people into the states, and making use of fiat credit (fiat money) we were able to finance the conversion of middle class genetics to middle class income.

    This doesn’t work with people who are not capable of middle class performance because of their genetics.

    Deal with it. People were not ‘oppressed’. They were domesticated. And the reason chinese, jews, and northern europeans were more prosperous and built higher evolved societies, is simply because between cold weather, harsh farming, wars and plagues, and intolerance for crime, they killed off or exported their underclasses.

    yet now well intentioned fools, fond of pseudoscience, are trying to reverse the very means by which our prosperity – your luxury – has been made possible.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 16:37:00 UTC

  • ALL MEN HAVE VOICE, BECAUSE ALL MEN HAVE VIOLENCE (read this) All men have influ

    ALL MEN HAVE VOICE, BECAUSE ALL MEN HAVE VIOLENCE

    (read this)

    All men have influence. They just assume that means voice rather than violence. But one can ignore voice. One can compromise with protesters. But one cannot ignore or compromise when dead.

    As I told the Ukrainian people, at every opportunity, and repeatedly. The only reason you have bad people in government is because you don’t kill enough of them that only good people remain.

    All men are born with a natural wealth of violence, the application of which we lend to the state, to exercise on our behalf, in a division of labor.

    But when the government no longer acts in the interests of ourselves, our families, our kin, our tribes, and our nations, then it is just another form of war, by slow means of attrition. It is the most dishonest and dishonorable of weapons of war.

    So take back your violence from the parasites who war against you, apply your violence once again to the incremental suppression of parasitism and predation, and take one step closer to the imposition of the Natural Law of Reciprocity, beyond which none may venture without restitution, punishment, and bloody constraint.

    It seems that the long line of Aryans, Europeans, Germania, Celts, Itals, Hellenes, Romans, Franks, Anglo Saxons, and Americans must once again, as we must every few generations, overthrow those who usurp our natural law, by one excuse or another, and thereby restore and reinforce the contract of employment for those whom we hire to rule justly, by restoring the terms of contract to the only moral terms of for rule that are possible: the natural law of reciprocity of sovereign men, and its incremental improvement and application by the judge discovered common law of testimony before a jury of our peers, and the voluntary exchange in markets for association, reproduction, cooperation, production, production of commons, and production of polities, in the only civilization to discover rule of law: the eradication of discretion in the adjudication of differences.

    Do you ancestors, your family, your kin, your tribe, your nation, and your people justice and continue the costly investment that they have made for 3500 years, in raising you, your kin, your nation and all mankind out of superstition, ignorance, tyranny, poverty, disease, and dysgenia.

    Kill those who would prey, steal, destroy, and commit genocide against you and your people. Kill them until they stop coming. Kill them until they stop trying. Kill them until they stop scheming. Kill them until they remember nothing but the great crimes that they have committed against you, yours and ours.

    Truth is enough. Restore Natural Law. Impose strict construction, decidability, and our standing before the courts in matters public and private. Extend the involuntary warranty on products and services, to the involuntary warranty against information placed into the commons. Defend not just our genes, not just our families, not just our property, not just our territory, not just our water, not just our air,but the very information that surrounds us as do the rest.

    Restore our accountability in both word and deed. Prohibit word and action for which a man may not perform restitution in matters private or public. Demand due diligence against fraud, as well as ignorance, error, bias, wishful-thinking, suggestion, overloading, fictionalism, and outright deceit.

    Let no man in word or deed repeat the crimes of the prophets and Abrahamists, or the secular prophets we call the philosophers of deceit, or the secular frauds we call social pseudoscientists – all of whom who have attempted as they have in the ancient world, to promise a heaven in this world or the next by the systematic advocacy of parasitism by a host of methods and contrivances, at the cost of civilization and the transcendence of man through continuous domestication of his parasitism.

    Every dark age has been preceded by a mass migration of the undomesticated animal man to the lands of those tho speak truthfully either in China or Europa. We must never allow this again.

    Never again. Truth is enough. Truth is enough if demand it or violence.

    Use your wealth of violence. Transcend yourself. Transcend your people, and transcend mankind in the process.

    Kill them all until none remain.

    Sic Semper Tyrannis.

    Deus Vult.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-30 15:01:00 UTC

  • WHY ARE WOMEN CRAZY? TO SOME DEGREE, THEY NEED TO BE. MOSTLY BECAUSE OF FEMINISM

    WHY ARE WOMEN CRAZY? TO SOME DEGREE, THEY NEED TO BE. MOSTLY BECAUSE OF FEMINISM

    –“I’ll bet a lot of women act crazy after Curt talks at them.”—Erika Walker

    Statistically speaking, because of the much higher incidence of mental illness in women it’s more likely that they were crazy in the first place. Men develop antisocial behaviors but women mental illness. look it up. women are also much more likely to practice denial. sorry. just is what it is. women are also more likely to display cognitive biases such as ‘NAXALT’. Rather than denying it why don’t we explain why? INSUFFICIENT SOCIALIZATION.)

    THE WORKING THEORY: DESOCIALIZATION

    The best working argument in the literature is that women need and lack the social pressure of a lot of women, plus the freedom of emotional expression of high socialization especially when young, and will do better if they have younger siblings or their own children in their teens. Extending childhood, using schooling as a means of infantilization, and depriving girls from heavy socialization with older generations of women, allows women to develop extremes of behavior instead of focusing hypersensitivity on the maintenance of young.

    LETS REVERSE IT

    if women weren’t ‘crazy’ so to speak, they wouldn’t tolerate the cost of such expensive offspring for such extended periods of time. Women evolved to work together to raise generations, and even then, half of their offspring died before the first cycle of maturity (age seven), and half of those before maturity. Women feel a sense of emotional ‘panic’ much earlier. Because children die so much more easily than adults. And men feel a sense of emotional panic so much less easily, because we are, frankly, by comparison, except for our top 1/3, relatively expendable.

    MODERNITY IS BAD FOR US

    Modernity has made men sad and suicidal, and women crazy or at least crazier than is normal. All so that we could increase taxes and increase the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, extend childhood to the detriment of our offspring, and put people into total retirement rather than using them for easy work that keeps them fit and socialized.

    (Do you see how I use criticism as opportunity for education?)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-27 18:40:00 UTC

  • CONTEMPLATING RELIGION AND METHODS Once you comprehend a god, a demigod, a hero,

    CONTEMPLATING RELIGION AND METHODS

    Once you comprehend a god, a demigod, a hero, or a saint, you can pray to him, or her and be surprised at the result. The technique works if you practice it whether you necessarily believe these gods exist as other than literary, social, and psychological constructs. There are evolutionary reasons for the success of physical rituals, mental rituals, unanswered prayer, and contemplation of conversations with gods, demigods, heroes and saints who you cannot lie to. It is precisely this inability to lie to them that performs the necessary function.

    Whether there is some extra-physical consequence is something else – my perception of these matters is that synchronicity is not rare, but the rule. But whether this is the result of exposure to similar stimuli or the result of consequences of another’s excitement of some unknown fabric of the universe is something I do not know but do not need to.

    The net result is whether gods, demigods, heroes and saits exists as literature, norm, and memory, and that events that seem supernatural are the result of patterns in wishful thinking, or synchronicity due to social similarity, or the result of excitement of some subatomic structure of the universe, does not matter.

    The reason being that the the value of reading about heroies and literary figures, talking to gods demigods, heroes and saints in mental-voice, talking to ancestors in mental voice, imagining talking to people we know or have known in mental voice, and talking to people in fact with both mental and spoken voice, all serve similar purposes, with the interesting benefit that w can only lie to real people and ourselves. It is in talking to the gods that we cannot lie to them, and in doing so cannot lie to one another.

    Moreover, this discourse, these rituals, are extremely effective at helping us both work through the problems of life using the knowledge of people we know, respect, admire, or ‘worship’.

    We know that the submission response provides a chemical reward to the mind by activating the ‘surrender to the pack’ response, that allows us to abandon our reason, and return to the experience of our middle, animal, brain.

    We know that the combination of practicing such spirituality (submission to the trust of the pack) and ‘letting go’ or “surrender it up to god’ provides relief for active minds unable or lacking the information to find solutions, or lacking the control to do so.

    I prefer that we all practice the stoic method, rather than the ritual method, rather than the buddhist method, rather than the prayer method, rather than the drug induced or dream state methods. The stoic acts us to ACT and THINK with discipline in daily life, rather than imaginary or supernatural, or by withdrawing from life.

    But it may in fact be that the stoic method is beyond the lesser able – Although, I do not see how it’s just harder to learn than the alternatives. BUt we teach reading, grammar, and math and that’s harder than stoicism.

    It may be that recitational prayer is the ‘dumbest and most effective’ method of producing rituals at the lowest cost with the least effort, in the shortest time. Other rituals are more expensive and harder to learn. recitation produces the resulting mental state without much demand of the individual.

    But even if we emphasize the stoic method, and gain the mindfulness we all require in a world far more complex than the pack, literary, mythical, supernormal, heroic, saintly characters whom we can conduct imaginary conversations will do perform the near equivalent of providing us with answers if we know enough about the minds of the characters. The reasons for this is that these characters evolve precisely because they provide this effect.

    For these reasons I have become less concerned with the method of achieving this state than the externalities caused by a large number of people making use of this state. And so far as I can tell, we can combine these different disciplines into a single religoin as the abrahamists have done by various forms of conflation and deceit.

    Or we can adopt the scientific ones of the stoics, heroic and saintly literature, and temples to various ‘characters’ the conversation and ‘sacrifice’ or ‘exchange’ to which, the discipline, synchronicity, or as yet undiscovered vibrations of the fabric of the universe, produce rather impressive results.

    Personally If I could visit temples around the world as I have visited churches, and say prayers to many gods for my children, wife, sisters, mother and my grandmother as I have, I would find it personally rewarding, and personally enlightening. Not because I believe these gods ‘exist’ in any particular way that is meaningful. But because of the actions that are required of me to perform those ritual, change ME, change my people, and change the world as a consequence, all of which are changed for the better.

    There is a a problem with the superficial Island 120 population (the church of ted) that must be defeated. Whether we defeat them through the form of literary contemplation I am recommending, or through the form of natural law that I am contemplating, or through the form of restoring the teachingn of virtues, vocabulary, grammar, logic, testimony, and rhetoric, or whehter we do some alternative, I do not much care.

    What I care about is ending the system of lies and conflation invented by Zoroaster and weaponized by the abrahamists of jewish, christian, and islamic and all variations thereof.

    It is a cancer upon this earth.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 21:17:00 UTC

  • HOW WOMEN IDENTIFY FITNESS AND DEVELOP ATTRACTION Women use the status of males

    HOW WOMEN IDENTIFY FITNESS AND DEVELOP ATTRACTION

    Women use the status of males to determine fitness. Men pursue status for that reason.

    Women have only been able to choose mates since the evolution of cooperation.

    The evolution of cooperation made it possible for women to rally other males to their defense, thereby granting sex in exchange for letting them control access to sex.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 14:18:00 UTC

  • BETAS GOTTA BETA You know, I was the shortest guy in my class for a long time, b

    BETAS GOTTA BETA

    You know, I was the shortest guy in my class for a long time, but I never would take it. It only gets worse, so I fought my way through school usually one or more fights per week, sometimes more than one a day. Then I’d go home to an alcoholic and abusive father.

    Eat the parasitic. Fight evil. Collect allies. Prey on both.

    Betas need dominance. GIve it to them.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 13:49:00 UTC

  • DEFINITION: INTELLIGENCE The rate at which one adapts to new information that in

    DEFINITION: INTELLIGENCE

    The rate at which one adapts to new information that increasingly depends upon predicate information to extend perception allowing comparisons and decisions of that which is increasingly closed to direct perception.

    Ergo, the rate at which we acquire and adapt to increasingly abstract general and specific rules of the universe.

    Ergo, how long will it take you and how many repetitions to master an idea that is currently beyond your comprehension.

    For some of us merely hearing it the first time causes us to organize our thoughts and ideas in moments. For others they take much longer, and for some they cannot really grasp what is beyond physical repetition.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 13:39:00 UTC

  • I want meritocracy so that I can be ruled by my betters, and spend my time on th

    I want meritocracy so that I can be ruled by my betters, and spend my time on that which I care to, rather than defending myself from those not better than I.

    I pray the god, deliver us unto kings, and save us from ‘the people’.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 08:39:00 UTC

  • Do highly academically accomplished people often deliberately make themselves no

    Do highly academically accomplished people often deliberately make themselves non-open because too much openness wo… https://www.quora.com/Do-highly-academically-accomplished-people-often-deliberately-make-themselves-non-open-because-too-much-openness-would-distract-them/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=786b016d


    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-26 01:24:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/867914418952208384