Theme: Agency

  • Well of course I was shaming and prosecuting you for FRAUD, while you were shami

    Well of course I was shaming and prosecuting you for FRAUD, while you were shaming me for TRUTH. I mean, had personal agency you wouldn’t feel the need to engage in fraud in order to defend a falsehood, right? Or are you one of those insecure that cannot bear superiors?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 01:06:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954520381766893568

    Reply addressees: @Aintezbncheez @hysellaz @TheView

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954517279739297793


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954517279739297793

  • Because you lack the agency to discipline your emotions, such that ratio-scienti

    Because you lack the agency to discipline your emotions, such that ratio-scientific discourse is possible.

    Psychology and Sociology consist of a grammar and semantics of shaming. Thats all. A means of using the threat of ostracization as a means of imposing conformity.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 00:56:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954517866056966149

    Reply addressees: @Aintezbncheez @hysellaz @TheView

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954513886656409600


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954513886656409600

  • I mean, that’s the virtue of stoicism and aristotelianism over marxism/postmoder

    I mean, that’s the virtue of stoicism and aristotelianism over marxism/postmodernism/feminism. Stoics have no need or incentive to disapprove, shame, ridicule, gossip, rally and lie to protect a fallacious self image.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 00:49:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954516178696798208

    Reply addressees: @Aintezbncheez @hysellaz @TheView

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954513886656409600


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954513886656409600

  • Well in this case I am prosecuting your attempt to use shaming, as a means of fa

    Well in this case I am prosecuting your attempt to use shaming, as a means of false preservation of your self image. Whereas, an intellectually, morally, honest person would simply ask, “is that greater time, calories, content, discipline and precision that I can offer.”


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 00:46:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954515429229293570

    Reply addressees: @Aintezbncheez @hysellaz @TheView

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954513886656409600


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954513886656409600

  • STOICS HAVE FAR LESS NEED TO LIE

    STOICS HAVE FAR LESS NEED TO LIE
  • STOICS HAVE FAR LESS NEED TO LIE

    STOICS HAVE FAR LESS NEED TO LIE
  • STOICS HAVE FAR LESS NEED TO LIE

    STOICS HAVE FAR LESS NEED TO LIE


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 19:44:00 UTC

  • Yes You Can Judge. Everything. And Its Easy

    –‘snide’– I know. I know. But then, those who are capable don’t fear competition, but cherish it, and those who aren’t capable, admonish it. It’s purely logical to disapprove, shame, ridicule, gossip, and rally when on is inferior and fearful of competition. In fact, Good competition is rare. If you disapprove, shame, ridicule, gossip and rally against superiority that’s admission of inferiority. And, yes it is quite simply to judge superiority vs inferiority, as greater time, calories, content, symmetry, and precision – just as fine art is distinguishable from petty – by the time, calories, content, symmetry, discipline, innovation, and precision therein – just as all man’s thoughts, displays, words, deeds and achievements are distinguishable and their differences in quality decidable by the time, calories, content, symmetry, discipline, innovation, and precision therein. Just as we, as organic creatures are measurable by the time, calories, content, symmetry, discipline, innovation, and precision therein – in genes, body, behavior, and knowledge. And therein lies the difference between criticism of the lack of time, lack of calories, lack of content, lack of symmetry, discipline, innovation, and precision therein – and criticism of the judgement of others on the relative presence or lack of time, calories, content, symmetry, discipline, innovation, and precision. Either one can build himself or herself – or not. Either one can build a craft, skill, or art himself or herself – or not. Either one can build works, tha produce returns – or not. Either one can build a family that produces generations but imposes no costs now or future on others, between himself, and herself – or not. Either one can build a company that produces positive returns – or not. Either one can build a polity that produces positive returns without the need for immigration – or not. Either one can build a nation that produces positive returns without the need for parasitism and conquest – or not. These are facts to those who achieve them, and uncomfortable truths to those that fail, and heinous demands by those who will not try, and oppression by those who prefer parasitism.
  • YES YOU CAN JUDGE. EVERYTHING. AND ITS EASY –‘snide’– I know. I know. But then

    YES YOU CAN JUDGE. EVERYTHING. AND ITS EASY

    –‘snide’–

    I know. I know. But then, those who are capable don’t fear competition, but cherish it, and those who aren’t capable, admonish it.

    It’s purely logical to disapprove, shame, ridicule, gossip, and rally when on is inferior and fearful of competition. In fact, Good competition is rare.

    If you disapprove, shame, ridicule, gossip and rally against superiority that’s admission of inferiority.

    And, yes it is quite simply to judge superiority vs inferiority, as greater time, calories, content, symmetry, and precision – just as fine art is distinguishable from petty – by the time, calories, content, symmetry, discipline, innovation, and precision therein – just as all man’s thoughts, displays, words, deeds and achievements are distinguishable and their differences in quality decidable by the time, calories, content, symmetry, discipline, innovation, and precision therein. Just as we, as organic creatures are measurable by the time, calories, content, symmetry, discipline, innovation, and precision therein – in genes, body, behavior, and knowledge.

    And therein lies the difference between criticism of the lack of time, lack of calories, lack of content, lack of symmetry, discipline, innovation, and precision therein – and criticism of the judgement of others on the relative presence or lack of time, calories, content, symmetry, discipline, innovation, and precision.

    Either one can build himself or herself – or not.

    Either one can build a craft, skill, or art himself or herself – or not.

    Either one can build works, tha produce returns – or not.

    Either one can build a family that produces generations but imposes no costs now or future on others, between himself, and herself – or not.

    Either one can build a company that produces positive returns – or not.

    Either one can build a polity that produces positive returns without the need for immigration – or not.

    Either one can build a nation that produces positive returns without the need for parasitism and conquest – or not.

    These are facts to those who achieve them, and uncomfortable truths to those that fail, and heinous demands by those who will not try, and oppression by those who prefer parasitism.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 17:47:00 UTC

  • Why Are White People Very Innovative?

    GREAT QUESTION

    White people have:

    (a) desire for heroism regardless of disruption of the dominance hierarchy
    (b) desire for signaling regardless of disruption of the dominance hierarchy.
    (c) freedom to act regardless of disruption of the dominance hierarchy.
    (d) slightly more action bias (more likely to expend calories than not) If you look at the data by race in females in particular, it’s obvious.
    (e) relatively high IQ’s, time and resources to act with.
    (f) higher (but not as high as south west eurasians : semites) verbal facility.
    (g) and especially, while small, higher ‘neuroticism’ (worry) which correlates with (and causes) higher creativity.

    While many other cultures have some of these properties, no other culture (race, or subrace) has this combination of traits.

    Creativity requires ability, incentive, opportunity, resources, and time.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-are-white-people-very-innovative