Theme: Agency

  • Genes Don’t Conspire, They Compete, Blindly

    There is no conspiracy among peoples with genetic and cultural homogeneity, any more than there is a conspiracy between women against men, or predators against prey, or competent against incompetent. We demonstrate differing degrees of neoteny, different moral intuitions, differing brain distributions, different endorphin distributions, and different morphology distributions for ancestral reasons. We all participate in the unconscious persistence of genetic, class, cultural, mythological, and institutional strategies. We can enumerate the properties of different group strategies, right down to the grammar of the speech and the methods of arguments, and the distributions of cognitive biases people and peoples use (which is one of the research programs what I work on). All of these properties and in group differences are both measureable at the individual and observable at the collective. One does not blame a dog for dragging it’s backside on the carpet. It’s a dog. One simply teaches the dog not to do so. One does not blame women for feminine cognitive biases and life preferences – they were an evolutionary necessity. One does not blame a competing group for pursuing it’s genetic interest at others expense – one simply creates norms, traditions, laws, institutions, and knowledge to prevent murder, violence, theft, fraud, fraud by omission, free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons, conspiracy, rent seeking, producing pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, propaganda, systemic lying, advocating or practicing moral and ethical irreciprocity, attempts at conversion, at institutional erosion, asymmetric reproduction, invasion, conquest, war, and genocide in either short term or long term means. Either a group can defend itself against destructive, parasitic and predatory competitors or it can’t. Groups compete. They compete by the means available to them. And groups learn to exploit every possible niche, from the most high trust, innovative, and productive, to the most low trust, parasitic, and destructive. But we cannot blame others for their immorality (free riding, parasitism and predation). We can only seek to defend ourselves against the immoral. There are no conspiracies. All our talk is just smoke and negotiation and deception on behalf of our genes. We are under the illusion that the rider drives the elephant, but the rider (our consciousness) is just a passenger on the elephant of our genes. Genes don’t conspire. They can’t.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. GENES DON’T CONSPIRE, THEY COMPETE, BLINDLY T

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    GENES DON’T CONSPIRE, THEY COMPETE, BLINDLY

    There is no conspiracy among peoples with genetic and cultural homogeneity, any more than there is a conspiracy between women against men, or predators against prey, or competent against incompetent. We demonstrate differing degrees of neoteny, different moral intuitions, differing brain distributions, different endorphin distributions, and different morphology distributions for ancestral reasons. We all participate in the unconscious persistence of genetic, class, cultural, mythological, and institutional strategies. We can enumerate the properties of different group strategies, right down to the grammar of the speech and the methods of arguments, and the distributions of cognitive biases people and peoples use (which is one of the research programs what I work on). All of these properties and in group differences are both measureable at the individual and observable at the collective. One does not blame a dog for dragging it’s backside on the carpet. It’s a dog. One simply teaches the dog not to do so. One does not blame women for feminine cognitive biases and life preferences – they were an evolutionary necessity. One does not blame a competing group for pursuing it’s genetic interest at others expense – one simply creates norms, traditions, laws, institutions, and knowledge to prevent murder, violence, theft, fraud, fraud by omission, free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons, conspiracy, rent seeking, producing pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, propaganda, systemic lying, advocating or practicing moral and ethical irreciprocity, attempts at conversion, at institutional erosion, asymmetric reproduction, invasion, conquest, war, and genocide in either short term or long term means. Either a group can defend itself against destructive, parasitic and predatory competitors or it can’t. Groups compete. They compete by the means available to them. And groups learn to exploit every possible niche, from the most high trust, innovative, and productive, to the most low trust, parasitic, and destructive. But we cannot blame others for their immorality (free riding, parasitism and predation). We can only seek to defend ourselves against the immoral. There are no conspiracies. All our talk is just smoke and negotiation and deception on behalf of our genes. We are under the illusion that the rider drives the elephant, but the rider (our consciousness) is just a passenger on the elephant of our genes. Genes don’t conspire. They can’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-05 21:08:11 UTC

  • ( I have had a number of female stalkers. When my wife filed for divorce, I join

    ( I have had a number of female stalkers. When my wife filed for divorce, I joined nearly every major dating service. (It was fascinating really). I do my research thoroughly. 😉 I found Amanda in I think the first month? Or rather she got drunk with her best friend Cathy and found me. Anyway, that took about 90 days to turn into a bit of a relationship and a few months more to get serious (exclusive). So during this time I also met Sandy (not her name). Very conversational. Talked a lot. Enjoyed it. But something bothered me, so I stopped returning her calls. And for reasons I will never understand this little (hot) blonde (hot) bundle of (hot) craziness turned into a possessive little stalker. Thankfully too far away, and I travelled too much for any serious concern. Now, I don’t know if you know this or not, but once you close your account or stop paying, they don’t take down your data – not unless you write them a letter. (Might have changed). Anyway. Some time ago I got a notification from a different service that a “Sandy” from the same city had tagged my profile. And, I just now got a letter from one a DIFFERENT service that this stalker’s account was closed and that they are not responsible for the consequences of any further contact. Seriously. This was almost nine years ago? I mean. There are fking crazy people in this world. “Still crazy after all these years.” I mean, I know that as an aspie I am kinda incompetent at this stuff but damn. Nine years? )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-05 17:56:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. UNDERSTANDING THEIR SUCCESS You absolutely po

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    UNDERSTANDING THEIR SUCCESS

    You absolutely positively interpret men and women differently. You absolutely positively attribute lower agency to women. You absolutely positively intuit the masculine and feminine cognitive biases. These biases are genetic, and reinforced through learning in both the observer and the observed. The problem is, that THEY are cognitively female. And pursue the cognitive and reproductive strategy of females. So while you should tolerate women, you should not tolerate THEM. This is one of the reasons why their strategy works. We hear feminine argument, for redistribution in support of generations, but we are really hearing is redistribution in the destruction of our generations by outsiders.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-05 13:16:37 UTC

  • UNDERSTANDING THEIR SUCCESS You absolutely positively interpret men and women di

    UNDERSTANDING THEIR SUCCESS

    You absolutely positively interpret men and women differently. You absolutely positively attribute lower agency to women. You absolutely positively intuit the masculine and feminine cognitive biases. These biases are genetic, and reinforced through learning in both the observer and the observed. The problem is, that THEY are cognitively female. And pursue the cognitive and reproductive strategy of females. So while you should tolerate women, you should not tolerate THEM. This is one of the reasons why their strategy works. We hear feminine argument, for redistribution in support of generations, but we are really hearing is redistribution in the destruction of our generations by outsiders.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-05 09:16:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. LESSONS FROM THE GULAG 3. I realized that fri

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    LESSONS FROM THE GULAG

    3. I realized that friendship, comradeship, would never arise in really difficult, life-threatening conditions. Friendship arises in difficult but bearable conditions (in the hospital, but not at the pit face).

    4. I realized that the feeling a man preserves longest is anger. There is only enough flesh on a hungry man for anger: everything else leaves him indifferent.

    6. I realized that humans were human because they were physically stronger and clung to life more than any other animal: no horse can survive work in the Far North.

    7. I saw that the only group of people able to preserve a minimum of humanity in conditions of starvation and abuse were the religious believers, the sectarians (almost all of them), and most priests.

    8. Party workers and the military are the first to fall apart and do so most easily.

    9. I saw what a weighty argument for the intellectual is the most ordinary slap in the face.

    Excerpt from “Forty-Five Things I Learned in the Gulag”


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-04 17:41:08 UTC

  • ( You live as long as you are remembered. Your actions live as long as their con

    ( You live as long as you are remembered. Your actions live as long as their consequences. Perform Consequential Acts. Life a Life of Memorable Actions. )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-04 13:42:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1014504657945808897

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. ( You live as long as you are remembered. You

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    ( You live as long as you are remembered. Your actions live as long as their consequences. Perform Consequential Acts. Live a Life of Memorable Actions. )

    —“And even when we are inevitably forgotten people, we live so long as the legacy perpetuated in cooperation with our forebears persists.”–Zachary Miller


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-04 13:42:02 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. “Guilt Pangs of Autistics” Pangs from those m

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    “Guilt Pangs of Autistics”

    Pangs from those many times throughout your life where you correct teachers and professors with autistic frustration over some error they’re making, and they they interpret it as emotional investment on your part, or offense, or criticism of them.

    No. Um. We just can’t stand mistakes. You’re just an object like a desk or a pet. It isn’t personal. We don’t have the concept of ‘personal’ until later in life. Really. And we’re horrified when you ‘take it personally’. You just convince us that the world is full of crazy people.

    Those of us who succeed, learn to role play by imitating others. And we obtain through discipline and study that which you obtained at birth. I still may not always be able to read your facial expressions but I can read your body language just fine. The reason being that your face is subtle but your body is not. It states your understanding of our relationship every second, the way your face states your feelings.

    I have a lot of guilt pangs over those episodes. Not the least of which is in the knowledge that I couldn’t control my impulse to ‘correct’ the teachers and professors. By the time I was in my early twenties I learned to just leave the room. “There is nothing to be learned here”.

    And into my thirties I did the same with meetings (really). “There is nothing smart going on here”. I learned to vote with my feet. This had the consequence of producing respect (and fear). When it was just an attempt to control my frustration at ignorance, error, and stupidity, and to devote my time to more important issues. Walking away from stupidity is the greatest negative reinforcement you can provide.

    Now, my understanding is that along the spectrum – before we develop unrecoverable damage, we largely have higher neural density, and it simply takes longer to program that neural density with intuition than it does with practicing (repetition).

    If that is the case then we are the next step in evolution, and that next step in evolution. Why? it will take us longer to mature a human through learning than it does an animal through instinct.

    And that is an interesting evolutionary risk. Since at some point if you are so dependent upon learning over intuition, then it is a weakness for a genome.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-04 13:27:35 UTC

  • ( You live as long as you are remembered. Your actions live as long as their con

    ( You live as long as you are remembered. Your actions live as long as their consequences. Perform Consequential Acts. Live a Life of Memorable Actions. )

    —“And even when we are inevitably forgotten people, we live so long as the legacy perpetuated in cooperation with our forebears persists.”–Zachary Miller


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-04 09:42:00 UTC