Curt Doolittle

Theme: Agency

  • Is Leftism a Disease? It’s Because We Are Speciating

    (dividing into species) —“Curt do you think that leftism is simply a mental illness or is there an actual reason why people adopt such an unreasonable belief system?”— I think it’s a pre-cognitive genetic (evolutionary) strategy that some people have evolved just as conservatism is a genetic (evolutionary) strategy that others have evolved. And I think the difference is caused by the female reproductive strategy that favors women and the lower classes, and male reproductive strategy that favors males and the middle/upper classes. And this is confirmed pretty simply by the reproductive attractiveness of conservatives and liberals. Conservatives tend to be more reproductively desirable, and have greater agency. These are genetic markers. My view is that we WERE speciating regionally by race when we discovered metalworking. My view is that we are wealthy enough to speciate by need for commons – and that’s what we are in the process of doing. And that the mistake is to think that our interests are better served by the production of COMPROMISE commons versus SPECIALIZED COMMONS that suit our reproductive strategies. All peoples are better served by the production of SPECIALIZED COMMONS. And we can (finally) afford to produce them. And that is what we see across the world. WE NEED TO SPECIATE. WOLVES(conservatives) Packs, and SHEEP(liberals) Herd. Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.

  • Is Leftism a Disease? It’s Because We Are Speciating

    (dividing into species) —“Curt do you think that leftism is simply a mental illness or is there an actual reason why people adopt such an unreasonable belief system?”— I think it’s a pre-cognitive genetic (evolutionary) strategy that some people have evolved just as conservatism is a genetic (evolutionary) strategy that others have evolved. And I think the difference is caused by the female reproductive strategy that favors women and the lower classes, and male reproductive strategy that favors males and the middle/upper classes. And this is confirmed pretty simply by the reproductive attractiveness of conservatives and liberals. Conservatives tend to be more reproductively desirable, and have greater agency. These are genetic markers. My view is that we WERE speciating regionally by race when we discovered metalworking. My view is that we are wealthy enough to speciate by need for commons – and that’s what we are in the process of doing. And that the mistake is to think that our interests are better served by the production of COMPROMISE commons versus SPECIALIZED COMMONS that suit our reproductive strategies. All peoples are better served by the production of SPECIALIZED COMMONS. And we can (finally) afford to produce them. And that is what we see across the world. WE NEED TO SPECIATE. WOLVES(conservatives) Packs, and SHEEP(liberals) Herd. Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.

  • IS LEFTISM A DISEASE? WE ARE SPECIATING (dividing into species) —“Curt do you

    IS LEFTISM A DISEASE? WE ARE SPECIATING

    (dividing into species)

    —“Curt do you think that leftism is simply a mental illness or is there an actual reason why people adopt such an unreasonable belief system?”—

    I think it’s a pre-cognitive genetic (evolutionary) strategy that some people have evolved just as conservatism is a genetic (evolutionary) strategy that others have evolved.

    And I think the difference is caused by the female reproductive strategy that favors women and the lower classes, and male reproductive strategy that favors males and the middle/upper classes.

    And this is confirmed pretty simply by the reproductive attractiveness of conservatives and liberals. Conservatives tend to be more reproductively desirable, and have greater agency. These are genetic markers.

    My view is that we WERE speciating regionally by race when we discovered metalworking.

    My view is that we are wealthy enough to speciate by need for commons – and that’s what we are in the process of doing.

    And that the mistake is to think that our interests are better served by the production of COMPROMISE commons versus SPECIALIZED COMMONS that suit our reproductive strategies.

    All peoples are better served by the production of SPECIALIZED COMMONS. And we can (finally) afford to produce them.

    And that is what we see across the world.

    WE NEED TO SPECIATE.

    WOLVES(conservatives) Packs, and SHEEP(liberals) Herd.

    Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 18:13:00 UTC

  • GENDER STRATEGIES That’s probably a good way of positioning our gender roles and

    GENDER STRATEGIES

    That’s probably a good way of positioning our gender roles and our cognitive differences:

    -Female Work to Create The Good – Via Positiva (progressive)

    -Male Work to Eradicate The Bad – Via Negativa (conservative)

    While all market participants seek disequilibrium, all markets must produce equilibria in order to compete.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 10:40:00 UTC

  • Dangerous Minorities

    “The Democratic Majority Fallacy” |CAUSALITY| .01% -> 1% -> 20% -> EVERYONE ELSE. That is that historically it only takes 1-2% and no more than 3% of a (male) population to cause revolutionary destructive harm, just as it takes only 1-2% to create revolutionary productive good. The success of either end of the spectrum depends upon the state of development of the people, their degree of heterogeneity, the consequential degree of disparity, the consequential degree of competition, and the percentage of the populace that will practice alternative norms. Norms create a market for cooperation. Markets for production AFTER the market for norms (cooperation), and markets for commons after production, and markets for polities after commons. So no. It matters more if 1% of immigrants are hostile than it does if 1% of citizens are fully domesticated. Don’t let democratic reasoning fool you. The Pareto rule and the power laws ALWAYS rule – FROM EVERY DIRECTION. .5% of a hostile populace is enough. Abrahamism, particularly militant, fundamentalist, irreciprocal, equalitarian, anti-reason abrahamism, is the equivalent of a single cancer cell. It spreads rapidly and kills everything it touches from the inside out. Judaism was bad, christianity, worse, and islam the very worst. Islam(Judaism, Christianity) = Monopoly. Paganism = Markets. IT’S NOT COMPLICATED: MARKETS IN EVERYTHING TO EVOLVE, OR DEVOLUTION AND REGRESSION.

  • Dangerous Minorities

    “The Democratic Majority Fallacy” |CAUSALITY| .01% -> 1% -> 20% -> EVERYONE ELSE. That is that historically it only takes 1-2% and no more than 3% of a (male) population to cause revolutionary destructive harm, just as it takes only 1-2% to create revolutionary productive good. The success of either end of the spectrum depends upon the state of development of the people, their degree of heterogeneity, the consequential degree of disparity, the consequential degree of competition, and the percentage of the populace that will practice alternative norms. Norms create a market for cooperation. Markets for production AFTER the market for norms (cooperation), and markets for commons after production, and markets for polities after commons. So no. It matters more if 1% of immigrants are hostile than it does if 1% of citizens are fully domesticated. Don’t let democratic reasoning fool you. The Pareto rule and the power laws ALWAYS rule – FROM EVERY DIRECTION. .5% of a hostile populace is enough. Abrahamism, particularly militant, fundamentalist, irreciprocal, equalitarian, anti-reason abrahamism, is the equivalent of a single cancer cell. It spreads rapidly and kills everything it touches from the inside out. Judaism was bad, christianity, worse, and islam the very worst. Islam(Judaism, Christianity) = Monopoly. Paganism = Markets. IT’S NOT COMPLICATED: MARKETS IN EVERYTHING TO EVOLVE, OR DEVOLUTION AND REGRESSION.

  • Gender Strategies

    That’s probably a good way of positioning our gender roles and our cognitive differences: -Female Work to Create The Good – Via Positiva (progressive)-Male Work to Eradicate The Bad – Via Negativa (conservative) While all market participants seek disequilibrium, all markets must produce equilibria in order to compete.

  • Gender Strategies

    That’s probably a good way of positioning our gender roles and our cognitive differences: -Female Work to Create The Good – Via Positiva (progressive)-Male Work to Eradicate The Bad – Via Negativa (conservative) While all market participants seek disequilibrium, all markets must produce equilibria in order to compete.

  • Three Axis of Cognitive Speciation

    (core concept that simplifies propertarianism) There are only so many evolutionary venues available for human speciation given our adaptation after the development of language is largely cognitive: (a) neoteny(or its reversal) (b) gender dimorphism (or its reversal) Now, dimorphism generally refers to externally visible structural differences, however we have significant internal structural differences (neurological) as well as structural differences in neurochemistry (velocity and incentives). Ideal human adaptivity requires increasing neoteny, and increasing dimorphism (specialization). So some groups are more evolutionarily advanced than others. We must then adapt to our in group distributions. That produces cultural and strategic specialization. But in the end we are largely varying and SPECIATING along the gender, neotonic, and distributional axis. x—> gender y—> neoteny z—> distribution <Truth/Moral <— superiority—-inferiority—>False/Immoral>

  • Three Axis of Cognitive Speciation

    (core concept that simplifies propertarianism) There are only so many evolutionary venues available for human speciation given our adaptation after the development of language is largely cognitive: (a) neoteny(or its reversal) (b) gender dimorphism (or its reversal) Now, dimorphism generally refers to externally visible structural differences, however we have significant internal structural differences (neurological) as well as structural differences in neurochemistry (velocity and incentives). Ideal human adaptivity requires increasing neoteny, and increasing dimorphism (specialization). So some groups are more evolutionarily advanced than others. We must then adapt to our in group distributions. That produces cultural and strategic specialization. But in the end we are largely varying and SPECIATING along the gender, neotonic, and distributional axis. x—> gender y—> neoteny z—> distribution <Truth/Moral <— superiority—-inferiority—>False/Immoral>