Curt Doolittle

Theme: Agency

  • There Is No Reason to Complicate Things; Emergence Is Complicated Enough

    by Brandon Hayes Everybody knows Occam’s Razor; when you take that razor to human behavior and cut it in half, this is what emerges: Packs and Herds. Packs [masculine, thinking bias, eugenic (selects for specialty)] “Acceptance to a pack requires contribution; you’re good only for your value.” Herds [feminine, feeling bias, dysgenic (selects for conformity)] “Acceptance to a herd requires only blending in; you’re good only for camouflage.” No more NAXALT arguments; we all know, not all X are like that! But, you don’t get to boil-down a trend to a single data point and use that datum to disprove said trend; that’s called lying. This means stereotypes are accurate, as they with-stand the market of ideas, and behavioral evidence (data) to counter the stereotypical outcomes isn’t mounting. This shouldn’t upset anyone. Having a bare-bones (a skeleton) framework like this is incredible. The insights that can come from proper frameworks can’t be overstated. *h/t Curt Doolittle as there aren’t any others (that I know of AND I look, hard [link educators below if you have suggestions]) that produce as much intellectual output publicly; and I see no others fostering as much intelligent debate or facilitating as much actual learning as he. [Arguably Jordan Peterson, but Peterson has been slow to move his ideas forward; Maps of Meaning still being his under-rated masterwork and still being explained {This Pack/Herd split can be gleaned from that work as well as Erich Neumann’s:The Origins and History of Consciousness} but it’s not made explicit; the work meshes nicely together.] Curt has also closed holes in personality by concretizing the mapping onto brain structure/function: https://propertarianinstitute.com/…/human-brain-regions-functions/ “We ought not destroy competing packs to benefit the herds. Herds can’t respond efficiently to rapidly changing environments; what you get instead of problem solving is panic. Panic among animals shortens their time horizons (they make quicker decisions less thought through) for shorter term gains. This mistake accumulates until the day of reckoning comes about. The day all of your “not planning for the future” comes back to haunt you. Strong feelings are not the equivalent to being correct. There isn’t a feel good substitute for truth; no matter how much we’d like there to be!” I abhor virtue signaling; scoring cheap points offends my being; life isn’t a game (although easier if framed as such). The best version of everyone else makes a better world for ME! I am acting in my self-interest. I have been PM’d many times (warning of my offences) and blocked many more; this is good, I prefer to know where people stand; because many are standing on intellectual IEDs (emotional explosion is right under the surface). I intentionally use Facebook to incite (there’s an insight joke in there I’m sure). Invite ALL people to the table [humans do some of there deepest bonding over food {and information is meta-food}] and share with them. https://www.facebook.com/brandon.hayes.5851/posts/10103452526650821

  • There Is No Reason to Complicate Things; Emergence Is Complicated Enough

    by Brandon Hayes Everybody knows Occam’s Razor; when you take that razor to human behavior and cut it in half, this is what emerges: Packs and Herds. Packs [masculine, thinking bias, eugenic (selects for specialty)] “Acceptance to a pack requires contribution; you’re good only for your value.” Herds [feminine, feeling bias, dysgenic (selects for conformity)] “Acceptance to a herd requires only blending in; you’re good only for camouflage.” No more NAXALT arguments; we all know, not all X are like that! But, you don’t get to boil-down a trend to a single data point and use that datum to disprove said trend; that’s called lying. This means stereotypes are accurate, as they with-stand the market of ideas, and behavioral evidence (data) to counter the stereotypical outcomes isn’t mounting. This shouldn’t upset anyone. Having a bare-bones (a skeleton) framework like this is incredible. The insights that can come from proper frameworks can’t be overstated. *h/t Curt Doolittle as there aren’t any others (that I know of AND I look, hard [link educators below if you have suggestions]) that produce as much intellectual output publicly; and I see no others fostering as much intelligent debate or facilitating as much actual learning as he. [Arguably Jordan Peterson, but Peterson has been slow to move his ideas forward; Maps of Meaning still being his under-rated masterwork and still being explained {This Pack/Herd split can be gleaned from that work as well as Erich Neumann’s:The Origins and History of Consciousness} but it’s not made explicit; the work meshes nicely together.] Curt has also closed holes in personality by concretizing the mapping onto brain structure/function: https://propertarianinstitute.com/…/human-brain-regions-functions/ “We ought not destroy competing packs to benefit the herds. Herds can’t respond efficiently to rapidly changing environments; what you get instead of problem solving is panic. Panic among animals shortens their time horizons (they make quicker decisions less thought through) for shorter term gains. This mistake accumulates until the day of reckoning comes about. The day all of your “not planning for the future” comes back to haunt you. Strong feelings are not the equivalent to being correct. There isn’t a feel good substitute for truth; no matter how much we’d like there to be!” I abhor virtue signaling; scoring cheap points offends my being; life isn’t a game (although easier if framed as such). The best version of everyone else makes a better world for ME! I am acting in my self-interest. I have been PM’d many times (warning of my offences) and blocked many more; this is good, I prefer to know where people stand; because many are standing on intellectual IEDs (emotional explosion is right under the surface). I intentionally use Facebook to incite (there’s an insight joke in there I’m sure). Invite ALL people to the table [humans do some of there deepest bonding over food {and information is meta-food}] and share with them. https://www.facebook.com/brandon.hayes.5851/posts/10103452526650821

  • “Politics boils down to generation of demand in response to intuitions of geneti

    —“Politics boils down to generation of demand in response to intuitions of genetic self-interest. Why? IDEOLOGICAL explanatory power is less explanatory than BIOLOGICAL explanatory power.”—Butch Leghorn

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-27 09:51:00 UTC

  • THERE IS NO REASON TO COMPLICATE THINGS; EMERGENCE IS COMPLICATED ENOUGH by @[11

    THERE IS NO REASON TO COMPLICATE THINGS; EMERGENCE IS COMPLICATED ENOUGH

    by @[11019687:2048:Brandon Hayes]

    Everybody knows Occam’s Razor; when you take that razor to human behavior and cut it in half, this is what emerges: Packs and Herds.

    Packs [masculine, thinking bias, eugenic (selects for specialty)]

    “Acceptance to a pack requires contribution; you’re good only for your value.”

    Herds [feminine, feeling bias, dysgenic (selects for conformity)]

    “Acceptance to a herd requires only blending in; you’re good only for camouflage.”

    No more NAXALT arguments; we all know, not all X are like that! But, you don’t get to boil-down a trend to a single data point and use that datum to disprove said trend; that’s called lying. This means stereotypes are accurate, as they with-stand the market of ideas, and behavioral evidence (data) to counter the stereotypical outcomes isn’t mounting.

    This shouldn’t upset anyone. Having a bare-bones (a skeleton) framework like this is incredible. The insights that can come from proper frameworks can’t be overstated.

    *h/t Curt Doolittle as there aren’t any others (that I know of AND I look, hard [link educators below if you have suggestions]) that produce as much intellectual output publicly; and I see no others fostering as much intelligent debate or facilitating as much actual learning as he. [Arguably Jordan Peterson, but Peterson has been slow to move his ideas forward; Maps of Meaning still being his under-rated masterwork and still being explained {This Pack/Herd split can be gleaned from that work as well as Erich Neumann’s:The Origins and History of Consciousness} but it’s not made explicit; the work meshes nicely together.]

    Curt has also closed holes in personality by concretizing the mapping onto brain structure/function: https://propertarianism.com/…/human-brain-regions-functions/

    “We ought not destroy competing packs to benefit the herds. Herds can’t respond efficiently to rapidly changing environments; what you get instead of problem solving is panic.

    Panic among animals shortens their time horizons (they make quicker decisions less thought through) for shorter term gains. This mistake accumulates until the day of reckoning comes about. The day all of your “not planning for the future” comes back to haunt you.

    Strong feelings are not the equivalent to being correct. There isn’t a feel good substitute for truth; no matter how much we’d like there to be!”

    I abhor virtue signaling; scoring cheap points offends my being; life isn’t a game (although easier if framed as such). The best version of everyone else makes a better world for ME! I am acting in my self-interest. I have been PM’d many times (warning of my offences) and blocked many more; this is good, I prefer to know where people stand; because many are standing on intellectual IEDs (emotional explosion is right under the surface). I intentionally use Facebook to incite (there’s an insight joke in there I’m sure). Invite ALL people to the table [humans do some of there deepest bonding over food {and information is meta-food}] and share with them.

    https://www.facebook.com/brandon.hayes.5851/posts/10103452526650821Updated Sep 27, 2018, 9:46 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-27 09:46:00 UTC

  • Quora: How much is resentment due to differences in IQ distribution?

    QUORA QUESTION: “How much of the resentment that blacks feel towards whites and that whites feel towards Jews is ultimately due to the lower average IQ of the lower performing group?” THE CORRECT ANSWER FIRST A group’s median or average IQ describes the center of the distribution. So all members of a group do not have higher or lower IQ’s. By and large there are just more people at the bottom of the IQ range due to reproductive practices, in some groups than another. Now the extremes are pygmies (very low), and Ashkenazim (a bit higher), and east Asians who for some reason do not pay an IQ penalty for rural existence (we have no idea why yet). Africans are physically superior in almost every way other than endurance, but trail in verbal ability (not in reasoning). Each group that reduces the size of its underclass expresses the best talents of its middle and upper classes. Jewish verbal ability, white and south american indian endurance; white engineering, innovation, creativity, and arts (and war); east African physical ability. East Asian rates of learning, and ability to work. SECOND Groups dislike competitors. Whites do not dislike East Asians. Protestants were and maybe still are, uncomfortable with Catholics. Catholics and Protestants uncomfortable with Jews. Everyone on earth is uncomfortable with Muslims. Why? Each group struggles to produce the manners, habits, ethics morals, values, traditions, laws, and institutions that optimize the group’s competitive strategy. The middle of the demographic distribution is determined by the size of the underclass. The middle of the distribution creates the greatest demand for norms, laws, and institutions. The traditions of east Asians and whites are very different but because of our distributions and group competitive strategies, we are compatible. The traditions, ethics morals, and laws of Jews and Muslims are not compatible with whites and east Asians. (or anyone else for that matter). So while Jews and Muslims are political activists seeking power to alter white civilization, east Asians and whites do not seek power to alter one another’s civilizations. The problem for blacks and Hispanics is that their distribution is lower and lower only because unlike whites, Jews, and east Asians, the blacks, Hispanics, and Muslims (the peoples of steppe and desert), have not reduced the size of their underclass through selective breeding, warfare, manorialism, and harsh winters. In other words, if you pursue political influence you will be hated. If you accumulate wealth you will be tolerated. If you integrate fully accumulate wealth but do not pursue political change by which to alter norms, traditions, laws, and institutions, then you will not be hated. CLOSING The principle problem then is quite simple:

    1. WE ARE COMPETITORS IF WE ARE DIFFERENT ENOUGH TO WANT DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONS.
    2. PROXIMITY BETWEEN COMPETITORS CREATES HATRED.
    3. IT’S THAT SIMPLE: DIVERSITY IS REALLY, REALLY,REALLY BAD.

  • Quora: How much is resentment due to differences in IQ distribution?

    QUORA QUESTION: “How much of the resentment that blacks feel towards whites and that whites feel towards Jews is ultimately due to the lower average IQ of the lower performing group?” THE CORRECT ANSWER FIRST A group’s median or average IQ describes the center of the distribution. So all members of a group do not have higher or lower IQ’s. By and large there are just more people at the bottom of the IQ range due to reproductive practices, in some groups than another. Now the extremes are pygmies (very low), and Ashkenazim (a bit higher), and east Asians who for some reason do not pay an IQ penalty for rural existence (we have no idea why yet). Africans are physically superior in almost every way other than endurance, but trail in verbal ability (not in reasoning). Each group that reduces the size of its underclass expresses the best talents of its middle and upper classes. Jewish verbal ability, white and south american indian endurance; white engineering, innovation, creativity, and arts (and war); east African physical ability. East Asian rates of learning, and ability to work. SECOND Groups dislike competitors. Whites do not dislike East Asians. Protestants were and maybe still are, uncomfortable with Catholics. Catholics and Protestants uncomfortable with Jews. Everyone on earth is uncomfortable with Muslims. Why? Each group struggles to produce the manners, habits, ethics morals, values, traditions, laws, and institutions that optimize the group’s competitive strategy. The middle of the demographic distribution is determined by the size of the underclass. The middle of the distribution creates the greatest demand for norms, laws, and institutions. The traditions of east Asians and whites are very different but because of our distributions and group competitive strategies, we are compatible. The traditions, ethics morals, and laws of Jews and Muslims are not compatible with whites and east Asians. (or anyone else for that matter). So while Jews and Muslims are political activists seeking power to alter white civilization, east Asians and whites do not seek power to alter one another’s civilizations. The problem for blacks and Hispanics is that their distribution is lower and lower only because unlike whites, Jews, and east Asians, the blacks, Hispanics, and Muslims (the peoples of steppe and desert), have not reduced the size of their underclass through selective breeding, warfare, manorialism, and harsh winters. In other words, if you pursue political influence you will be hated. If you accumulate wealth you will be tolerated. If you integrate fully accumulate wealth but do not pursue political change by which to alter norms, traditions, laws, and institutions, then you will not be hated. CLOSING The principle problem then is quite simple:

    1. WE ARE COMPETITORS IF WE ARE DIFFERENT ENOUGH TO WANT DIFFERENT INSTITUTIONS.
    2. PROXIMITY BETWEEN COMPETITORS CREATES HATRED.
    3. IT’S THAT SIMPLE: DIVERSITY IS REALLY, REALLY,REALLY BAD.

  • MORE WE KNOW, THE MORE NATURE THE LESS NURTURE. Which is a good thing. Because .

    https://www.amazon.com/Blueprint-How-DNA-Makes-Press/dp/0262039168/THE MORE WE KNOW, THE MORE NATURE THE LESS NURTURE.

    Which is a good thing. Because … well….

    Plomin is an authority. and the debate is over.Updated Sep 26, 2018, 3:32 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-26 03:32:00 UTC

  • It’s Time to Choose Our Future

    (FB BAN FOR 30 DAYS FOR THIS POST) The female of our species, or more correctly, the female mind in our species, is extremely susceptible to individual psychosis and solipsism, and even more so, herd panic, trend and consensus; and verbalizing those behaviors by drama, outburst, disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, and reputation destruction that never ceases. This is the reason why women’s testimony has been discounted throughout history; why the cancer of abrahamism was spread through women; why women defected against their men and their civilization yet again, to feminism-postmodernism; and why there are continuous calls for “women must be heard”; and then, not surprisingly, counter-to-all-evidence that “women must be believed”. The female lacks the degree of male agency because she is more dependent upon the panic of herd than the hunting of the pack. It is rather obvious that once given the franchise under the presumption of agency, that women took out their anger on the church in europe, and on men in america. It’s rather obvious that as much as marxism was designed to appeal to and rally men at the bottom, that feminism and postmodernism were designed to appeal to and rally women as was christianity. It is rather obvious that women’s urge to nest and preen are more easily manipulated by advertising marketing and media. But Truth is Truth. The feminine mind lacks agency regardless of the sex of its bearer. And we cannot both preserve our civilization which is the originator of truth, reason, science, and all that comes from it by once again submitting to the herd of the female in this modern era as we did in the ancient. “Herd Panic”, and “herd consensus”, as well as the series solipsism, psychosis, and disapproval, shaming, ridicule, outburst, rallying gossiping and reputation destruction as a means of obscuring the truth due to lack of agency and fear of falling out of sync with the herd, must become part of our conscious vocabulary and argument such that we bring the distinction between lack of agency, falsehood and fear, versus agency, truth and reason. Lacking agency means you are not yet human and therefore not worthy of or capable of reciprocity any more than is a child – but require parenting. It is truth that in modernity we have greater prosperity and as such greater ability to absorb the damage of the feminine mind than in the past. But that reservoir is not limitless. That same prosperity however does leave us a choice: we can oppress one another, or we can revolt and separate, and develop feminine (failing) dysgenic orders and return to the animals and another dark age, or masculine competitive eugenic orders, that will continue our transcendence. It’s time to choose which of those consequences we will pursue.

  • It’s Time to Choose Our Future

    (FB BAN FOR 30 DAYS FOR THIS POST) The female of our species, or more correctly, the female mind in our species, is extremely susceptible to individual psychosis and solipsism, and even more so, herd panic, trend and consensus; and verbalizing those behaviors by drama, outburst, disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, and reputation destruction that never ceases. This is the reason why women’s testimony has been discounted throughout history; why the cancer of abrahamism was spread through women; why women defected against their men and their civilization yet again, to feminism-postmodernism; and why there are continuous calls for “women must be heard”; and then, not surprisingly, counter-to-all-evidence that “women must be believed”. The female lacks the degree of male agency because she is more dependent upon the panic of herd than the hunting of the pack. It is rather obvious that once given the franchise under the presumption of agency, that women took out their anger on the church in europe, and on men in america. It’s rather obvious that as much as marxism was designed to appeal to and rally men at the bottom, that feminism and postmodernism were designed to appeal to and rally women as was christianity. It is rather obvious that women’s urge to nest and preen are more easily manipulated by advertising marketing and media. But Truth is Truth. The feminine mind lacks agency regardless of the sex of its bearer. And we cannot both preserve our civilization which is the originator of truth, reason, science, and all that comes from it by once again submitting to the herd of the female in this modern era as we did in the ancient. “Herd Panic”, and “herd consensus”, as well as the series solipsism, psychosis, and disapproval, shaming, ridicule, outburst, rallying gossiping and reputation destruction as a means of obscuring the truth due to lack of agency and fear of falling out of sync with the herd, must become part of our conscious vocabulary and argument such that we bring the distinction between lack of agency, falsehood and fear, versus agency, truth and reason. Lacking agency means you are not yet human and therefore not worthy of or capable of reciprocity any more than is a child – but require parenting. It is truth that in modernity we have greater prosperity and as such greater ability to absorb the damage of the feminine mind than in the past. But that reservoir is not limitless. That same prosperity however does leave us a choice: we can oppress one another, or we can revolt and separate, and develop feminine (failing) dysgenic orders and return to the animals and another dark age, or masculine competitive eugenic orders, that will continue our transcendence. It’s time to choose which of those consequences we will pursue.

  • They call it mindfulness, and we call it free will or agency. But it’s the same

    They call it mindfulness, and we call it free will or agency. But it’s the same thing: how much distance do you have from your impulses and intuitions such that you can reason.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-25 13:39:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1044582193987825664