Theme: Agency

  • Man ‘is’, (exists as) that which he has demonstrated by his history. the stories

    Man ‘is’, (exists as) that which he has demonstrated by his history. the stories (sedations) we tell ourselves at any point in history, merely serve to ameliorate our instincts (largely status) in relation to our resources (physical, emotional, mental) budges, and existential resources in all their forms – from physical things to relationships to knowledge.

    So are you asking “What is man?”, or “What methods of sedation (self medication) has man used through history?”

    Propertarianism ‘accounts for’ (takes account of):

    Math, Logic, Science (Physics-Chemistry-Biology, Psychology, Law, Economics, History, Literature, Philosophy, Religion, The Occult, the Fictionalisms, and Methods of Deceit.

    What it most takes account of, and no others do, is the transition of our understanding, knowledge and instrumentation from human scale to pre (supra/below) and post (super/above) human scale.

    And as such at humans scale (Morality, Instructions, arithmetic(construction),confirmation) we speak in justifications (Via-Positivas) because we can directly apprehend such constant relations, where at below and above human scale (Law, Science, Mathematics(deduction), Falsification) we speak in falsifications (Via-Negativas) because we cannot directly perceive those constant relations with our senses.

    The world wars (Anglo/Balance and Russian/Expansion Screw Ups) interrupted the darwinian-mengerian-specerian-maxwellian-poincarian-nietzschiean-romanticist revolution. And the 20th century in social science was lost, as the cult-of-dysgenic-socialism found itself in a christ figure versus a darwinian evil of eugenic-national-socialism, which allowed the suppression of the second scientific revolution (in germany).

    But beginning in the 1990’s science has (slowly) rescued us such that without immigration we would have corrected the problem already.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 13:49:00 UTC

  • GOOD STUFF: LIFE LESSONS OF A CEO Some of My Favorite, Oft-Repeated Sayings as a

    GOOD STUFF: LIFE LESSONS OF A CEO

    Some of My Favorite, Oft-Repeated Sayings as a CEO:

    “Understanding is Overrated”

    “Agreement is an unnecessary luxury”

    “A consulting company in particular, but a sales organization in general, are first and foremost intelligence agencies.”

    “An intelligence agency’s strategy is ‘insert and expand’” (that one always got laughs)

    “The truth is the optimum form of argument. If you can’t argue with the truth you are too ignorant to argue your point.”

    “Good advertising is the truth spoken elegantly and succinctly” (that’s not mine, but it is the golden rule of marketing and advertising.).

    “If you’re in fact, any good, overinvest in customer acquisition and retention – win desirable deals. Only play the numbers game if you suck. Most people suck.”

    “The reason you can’t improve your market position is because no one good enough to change your market position will work for you. Either be a better person for the upper 10% (in actuality, 1%) to work for or replace yourself with someone who is.”

    “It’s a lot harder to say no, and a lot easier to take bad news, from a an attractive and competent woman. We win deals and make money with our men. We get and keep customers with our women. Most competitors are too stupid to do the same.”

    “The reason startups and early companies burn out, is that the management team devotes its energies to the simple and internal rather than the acquisition and retention of customers, talent, operational excellence, and knowledge.”

    “There are maximums that can be captured from to any market. When you approach that maximum, find a new investment that can make use of your customer base, advertising, marketing, sales network.”

    “Leveraging a brand is always easier to sell to investors, management, and staff, but always the worst idea for customers, market, and success. A product must stand on its own, and pursuit of ‘leverage’ is an excuse to produce a mediocre product that will fail. The only leverage that has any value is the promise to customers that the satisfaction of one purchase from the brand will be met with another of equal satisfaction.”

    “If I can’t convince the board to agree with me, then I’m either wrong, don’t understand the problem well enough, of have people on the board too stupid to understand. The job is to know which of those is the problem. It’s usually the first or second but not always.”

    “The CEO’s job is human capital. Customers, Employees, and Organization of people in pursuit of medium and long term objectives. Everyone else does work. If you’re doing anything else you’re not a good ceo.”

    “Government regulation has largely ruined accounting and financial reporting. And Accountants are justifiably lazy in recording transactions meaningfully, because that requires complexity. Demand (a) profit and loss from operations and operations alone in cash format. (c) profit and loss from administrative costs. (d) profit and loss from asset management, (e) profit and loss from ‘government interference in the business’: EBITDA (before interest, depreciation, and amortization), (f) net profit, and net after taxes. (g) and that both income statement and balance sheet reporting is provided as a rolling eighteen month to thirty-six month view. This is what the people in the business need to understand. Finance is not its own customer. (h) MBA’s are often better CFO’s that are CPA’s for this reason: bias to managing the organization rather than transaction costs of information management in accounting. The more companies you manage the more board members you have, the more useful this information is in suppressing silly questions and bad decisions and worse advice.”

    “The maximum transparency that does not expose you to competitive pressure if leaked is always preferable to letting people fly in the dark.”

    “The answer to any problem in your company or a customer’s company is known somewhere by someone – always. They lack the ability or will to circumvent the obstacles to advancing it. Treat every single soul as a source of information and improvement.”

    “The secret to staff meetings is to ask questions to test whether all opportunities are being seized, and risks mitigated or not. This is quality control by continuous education in urgency. That’s all. If you aren’t driving the business by yearly or semi-annual strategy and goal setting, but are managing in staff meetings you’re incompetent.”

    “Manage a company as if it is a grad school class, and teach as many people in that class as possible. Distribute organizational goals to all who are willing to participate in that class as homework. Grade them on it. People will value the career development and understanding of the business because they are informed participants constantly implementing adaptive change, not uninformed victims resisting it. If you aren’t good enough to do it, hire someone who is.”

    “There is a difference between cunning, smart, and moral. And they refer to the stages of a company: startup, immature, and mature. You must be cunning at first, build a management team that is smart, and an organization that is moral. This is why moral people run large companies and immoral people small ones.”

    “HR is by and large (a) admission that your staff is weak at mentoring and managing, and (b) an agent of the enemy we call the state, (c) constantly advancing the socialist-communist agenda. Have recruiters, an in house lawyer, and put benefits in accounting.”

    “Almost all middle management is absolutely dead weight and the source of political infighting. Divide tasks and responsibilities to useful people instead.”

    “Weak people universally overestimate their abilities, and strong people underestimate their abilities. Weak people commit to seize opportunities. Strong people commit to maintain opportunities.”

    “Power laws apply: 20% do 80% of everything. Of that 20%, 80% do everything useful. Of that 20%, 20% do everything important. Of that 20%, 20% do everything critical. The upper 1% and 10% and 20% of your organization make all the difference. This is true in all aspects of human existence bar none. If people understand this you will have a healthier organization. Truth is always better than fiction.”

    “People are, in the west, intentionally not educated in economics, finance, and accounting, nor radical differences in employee productivity (pareto rule) nor do they understand how narrow are profit margins and high taxation. They need to be taught. All of them.” (I ran a monthly class to educate all new employees on how money flows through an organization and how long it took for an employee to contribute to profit and how little each of us does. This was a revelation to almost everyone.)

    “The admin girls will always know everything – they are the optimum intelligence organization. They gossip constantly with every one because they are perceived as low risk. Treat that network as an asset for both collection and distribution of information – that is true.”

    “Women are, by and large, far, far, better at details, gathering information, maintaining productivity (marathons) understanding others quickly, coercing more gently, and adapting to fit into groups more quickly, and can sell commodities by relationship value alone – which is the only criteria of decidability in commodities. Men are more loyal, will make greater sacrifices, devote more time, more single mindedly (sprinters) are less susceptible to social coercion, are preferred managers for this reason, and will produce more outliers than women. Women are reliable even in the absence of pressures, and will organize themselves slowly. Men are dependable under stress and will organize themselves quickly -and there is a difference. Both will eventually come to similar conclusions. If there are differences in role and compensation it is not due to the direct factors but the indirect factors: men absorb cellular damage on behalf of women and children, and they absorb hardships on behalf of the management team. Don’t pretend people are all the same. They aren’t. Not even a little bit. If they are, then you’re selling a commodity by price alone.”

    “Gossip and conspiracy in another person’s self interest is a good thing. The opposite is not. Develop an institutional means of advancing compliments and suppressing gossip. This was one of our most important initiatives.”

    “Technology is eventually a butt-crack trade, rather than a profession, and will evolve mirror the class hierarchy of the construction industry. Make money at it while you can.”

    “In any decision between doing it better and anything else, do it better until no better will matter.”


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 11:19:00 UTC

  • —“How Can I Understand Stoicism?”—

    October 24th, 2018 2:29 PM —“CURT: HOW CAN I UNDERSTAND STOICISM?”— Well there are a number of implied questions in there. 1) Do you mean so that you understand why I say it is superior to religion for the purpose of building mindfulness? 2) Do you want to learn how and why it functions scientifically? 3) Do you want to improve your own view of life (very hard to imagine anyone who follows me has that kind of issue, but maybe) 4) Do you want to solve a problem in your life or others? So, here is a series that takes you through the ‘Adult Version” from scientific through literary, to statistical. BOOK LISTSCIENTIFIC VIEW “Stoic Philosophy as Rational and Cognitive Psychotherapy ” This is the closest book to the science of stoicism that I know of: https://www.amazon.com/Philosophy-Cognitive-Behavioural-Therapy-Psychotherapy/dp/1855757567 CURATIVE (NEGATIVE) VIEW “Build Your Resistance” This takes the idea and puts it into practice: https://www.amazon.com/Build-Your-Resilience-Survive-Situation/dp/1444168711/ AMPLYFYING (POSITIVE) VIEW “A Guide to the Good Life” https://www.amazon.com/Guide-Good-Life-Ancient-Stoic/dp/0195374614 BIOGRAPHICAL (EXAMPLE) VIEW: Everyone recommends reading The Meditations of Aurelius as EVIDENCE that a great and powerful man used the practice every day in his diary. The alternative to (or supplement to) reading his book is THINK LIKE A ROMAN EMPEROR: https://www.amazon.com/How-Think-Like-Roman-Emperor/dp/1250196620 which walks you thru the great man’s life and puts context to his writings. For me it was actually The Letters of Michel de Montaigne (a christianized jew) that gave me an intellectual role model. So I recommend that as well. POLITICAL VIEW: Same for Machiavelli’s “The Prince” which i consider the first book on political science precisely because it is a work of stoic mindfulness. STATISTICAL VIEW: While it isn’t positioned this way, both BLACK SWAN (Unpredictable Outliers are Far More Important Than Daily Noise) and ANTI-FRAGILE (“That which doesn’t kill you makes you stronger, and stronger, and stronger”) are effectively works on Stoicism for smart people. ==== COMMENTARY === So, if you’re a high-iq aspie you’re a stoic by nature. Why? Um. We don’t have all those social fears because we frankly can’t feel any of them. lol. And we kind of think they’re silly. However, we are often ‘ostracized’ when young and have to find out how to fit in. So we have the opposite problem. My family – at least on my mother’s side (french) is just naturally stoic. So my interest in stoicism is political, and because of that scientific. So, I can recommend books to normies, but for geeks who need the scientific approach (who are naturally predisposed to resist suggestion) it’s actually pretty hard find a book to recommend – because most stoic reading is framed as self help. Stoicism isn’t framed as “Hey, between stoicism and nature, hero, deity worship (‘thanks’), and public ritual and festival (safety in the pack or herd), this set of practices was the collective constitution of our ancient religion”. It’s just that we didn’t IMPOSE that religion as did the monotheists, and didn’t write it down as a LAW. Same for our entire philosophy of western civilization (which is what I have tried to do.) We didn’t say: “Military service, particularly in formations, requires you develop stoicism in order to survive and thrive under the stresses of it all”. So between the necessity of military mindfulness, and the utility of applying that mindfulness to the even more chaotic social order our aristocratic ancestors converted the techniques into a standard method of education. They didn’t call it religion but philosophy. So there are people who want self-help so that they can self author (Develop Mindfulness). And there are people who want to understand WHY self help (self authoring) serves the function of rational self training vs the rituals and myths of the supernatural in GROUP form. Stoicism consists of cognitive behavioral therapy in the negative sense, and simply education and training in the positive sense. I consider it ‘self authoring’. but that is because it is taught as an individual discipline rather than a ‘we’ as is religion. I find stoicism to be reducible to ‘don/t’ take it personally, Do your best, Tell the Truth. Keep your word’. The problem is that there are bigger human questions that we need mental defense against. Some people need a guide. Some people are self guided. Some people need to follow the herd as their guide. one way or the other CBT (cognitive behavioral therapy) to discipline the mind (Train) works.

  • —“How Can I Understand Stoicism?”—

    October 24th, 2018 2:29 PM —“CURT: HOW CAN I UNDERSTAND STOICISM?”— Well there are a number of implied questions in there. 1) Do you mean so that you understand why I say it is superior to religion for the purpose of building mindfulness? 2) Do you want to learn how and why it functions scientifically? 3) Do you want to improve your own view of life (very hard to imagine anyone who follows me has that kind of issue, but maybe) 4) Do you want to solve a problem in your life or others? So, here is a series that takes you through the ‘Adult Version” from scientific through literary, to statistical. BOOK LISTSCIENTIFIC VIEW “Stoic Philosophy as Rational and Cognitive Psychotherapy ” This is the closest book to the science of stoicism that I know of: https://www.amazon.com/Philosophy-Cognitive-Behavioural-Therapy-Psychotherapy/dp/1855757567 CURATIVE (NEGATIVE) VIEW “Build Your Resistance” This takes the idea and puts it into practice: https://www.amazon.com/Build-Your-Resilience-Survive-Situation/dp/1444168711/ AMPLYFYING (POSITIVE) VIEW “A Guide to the Good Life” https://www.amazon.com/Guide-Good-Life-Ancient-Stoic/dp/0195374614 BIOGRAPHICAL (EXAMPLE) VIEW: Everyone recommends reading The Meditations of Aurelius as EVIDENCE that a great and powerful man used the practice every day in his diary. The alternative to (or supplement to) reading his book is THINK LIKE A ROMAN EMPEROR: https://www.amazon.com/How-Think-Like-Roman-Emperor/dp/1250196620 which walks you thru the great man’s life and puts context to his writings. For me it was actually The Letters of Michel de Montaigne (a christianized jew) that gave me an intellectual role model. So I recommend that as well. POLITICAL VIEW: Same for Machiavelli’s “The Prince” which i consider the first book on political science precisely because it is a work of stoic mindfulness. STATISTICAL VIEW: While it isn’t positioned this way, both BLACK SWAN (Unpredictable Outliers are Far More Important Than Daily Noise) and ANTI-FRAGILE (“That which doesn’t kill you makes you stronger, and stronger, and stronger”) are effectively works on Stoicism for smart people. ==== COMMENTARY === So, if you’re a high-iq aspie you’re a stoic by nature. Why? Um. We don’t have all those social fears because we frankly can’t feel any of them. lol. And we kind of think they’re silly. However, we are often ‘ostracized’ when young and have to find out how to fit in. So we have the opposite problem. My family – at least on my mother’s side (french) is just naturally stoic. So my interest in stoicism is political, and because of that scientific. So, I can recommend books to normies, but for geeks who need the scientific approach (who are naturally predisposed to resist suggestion) it’s actually pretty hard find a book to recommend – because most stoic reading is framed as self help. Stoicism isn’t framed as “Hey, between stoicism and nature, hero, deity worship (‘thanks’), and public ritual and festival (safety in the pack or herd), this set of practices was the collective constitution of our ancient religion”. It’s just that we didn’t IMPOSE that religion as did the monotheists, and didn’t write it down as a LAW. Same for our entire philosophy of western civilization (which is what I have tried to do.) We didn’t say: “Military service, particularly in formations, requires you develop stoicism in order to survive and thrive under the stresses of it all”. So between the necessity of military mindfulness, and the utility of applying that mindfulness to the even more chaotic social order our aristocratic ancestors converted the techniques into a standard method of education. They didn’t call it religion but philosophy. So there are people who want self-help so that they can self author (Develop Mindfulness). And there are people who want to understand WHY self help (self authoring) serves the function of rational self training vs the rituals and myths of the supernatural in GROUP form. Stoicism consists of cognitive behavioral therapy in the negative sense, and simply education and training in the positive sense. I consider it ‘self authoring’. but that is because it is taught as an individual discipline rather than a ‘we’ as is religion. I find stoicism to be reducible to ‘don/t’ take it personally, Do your best, Tell the Truth. Keep your word’. The problem is that there are bigger human questions that we need mental defense against. Some people need a guide. Some people are self guided. Some people need to follow the herd as their guide. one way or the other CBT (cognitive behavioral therapy) to discipline the mind (Train) works.

  • I HAD TO LOOK IT UP. “bug man” —“Rootless, lifeless, metropolitan drones who h

    I HAD TO LOOK IT UP.
    “bug man”
    —“Rootless, lifeless, metropolitan drones who have a permanent thousand-yard stare due to an existence void of any meaning other than waiting for the next iPhone.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-22 22:17:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1054496930376699904

  • Definitions: Empathy > Sympathy > Understanding

    October 22nd, 2018 10:40 AM DEFINITIONS: EMPATHY > SYMPATHY > UNDERSTANDING I use understanding for reason, sympathy for motives and intentions, and empathy for feelings. |COMMUNICATION| Empathy(Feel/Value/reaction) > Sympathy (Intuition/Incentives/cause) > Understand (Reason/Words/Argument-Negotiation)

  • The Rationality of Man

    October 21st, 2018 12:52 PM THE RATIONALITY OF MAN (important concept)

    –“If man was logical, and could be moved to action by empirical evidence, then libertarianism would have caught on much more than it did.”— Jesse Schultz

    [W]ell. You know, man is terribly logical given his perpetual dependence on fragmentary information in a kaleidic universe, and his need to produce the greatest returns in the shortest time, with the least effort, at the greatest certainty at the lowest risk, while under the burden (limits) of physical, emotional, and intellectual economy (costs). Man is forever rational (logical in the sense you mean it. Hence why we can sympathize (reasoning), and empathize (feeling) with one another.) and choose to cooperate with one another (predictability and trust) – or not. (You might want to read this paragraph a few times.) Via positiva some of us produce opportunities to exploit, and via negativa, some of us limit those opportunities that can be exploited to those that are reciprocal (not harmful to the incentive to cooperate rather than prey upon one another.) I work in the current era at post-human scale: via negativa. It is for others to produce MANY different via-positivas within the LIMITS of this via-negativa. Ergo, a market not monopoly of narratives (mythos), and at least one for each class. Meritocracy is only DESIRABLE to those who can survive DIRECTLY by their merits. Meritocracy is VALUABLE to everyone who survives because meritocracy INDIRECTLY preserves the incentive to cooperate. Because cooperation is simply so much more productive than any other action we can take (at least over time.)

  • Definitions: Empathy > Sympathy > Understanding

    October 22nd, 2018 10:40 AM DEFINITIONS: EMPATHY > SYMPATHY > UNDERSTANDING I use understanding for reason, sympathy for motives and intentions, and empathy for feelings. |COMMUNICATION| Empathy(Feel/Value/reaction) > Sympathy (Intuition/Incentives/cause) > Understand (Reason/Words/Argument-Negotiation)

  • The Rationality of Man

    October 21st, 2018 12:52 PM THE RATIONALITY OF MAN (important concept)

    –“If man was logical, and could be moved to action by empirical evidence, then libertarianism would have caught on much more than it did.”— Jesse Schultz

    [W]ell. You know, man is terribly logical given his perpetual dependence on fragmentary information in a kaleidic universe, and his need to produce the greatest returns in the shortest time, with the least effort, at the greatest certainty at the lowest risk, while under the burden (limits) of physical, emotional, and intellectual economy (costs). Man is forever rational (logical in the sense you mean it. Hence why we can sympathize (reasoning), and empathize (feeling) with one another.) and choose to cooperate with one another (predictability and trust) – or not. (You might want to read this paragraph a few times.) Via positiva some of us produce opportunities to exploit, and via negativa, some of us limit those opportunities that can be exploited to those that are reciprocal (not harmful to the incentive to cooperate rather than prey upon one another.) I work in the current era at post-human scale: via negativa. It is for others to produce MANY different via-positivas within the LIMITS of this via-negativa. Ergo, a market not monopoly of narratives (mythos), and at least one for each class. Meritocracy is only DESIRABLE to those who can survive DIRECTLY by their merits. Meritocracy is VALUABLE to everyone who survives because meritocracy INDIRECTLY preserves the incentive to cooperate. Because cooperation is simply so much more productive than any other action we can take (at least over time.)

  • DEFINITIONS: EMPATHY > SYMPATHY > UNDERSTANDING I use understanding for reason,

    DEFINITIONS: EMPATHY > SYMPATHY > UNDERSTANDING

    I use understanding for reason, sympathy for motives and intentions, and empathy for feelings.

    |COMMUNICATION| Empathy(Feel/Value/reaction) > Sympathy (Intuition/Incentives/cause) > Understand (Reason/Words/Argument-Negotiation)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-22 14:40:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1054382018765750277