Theme: Agency

  • Now, females of the species evolved this trait in order to rally numbers of beta

    Now, females of the species evolved this trait in order to rally numbers of betas to contain alphas, so that females had more control over their reproduction (and safety). But …. you don’t exactly have reproduction to trade. In fact, you’ve done the opposite. Redistributed it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 16:20:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059118228436381697

    Reply addressees: @PRO__UNLIMITED @PopChassid

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059110265629876230


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059110265629876230

  • (I”ve been working on the problem of articulating in scientific and logical pros

    (I”ve been working on the problem of articulating in scientific and logical prose, how (((the left))) uses the female signal strategy (non-argument) to ‘poison the well’ of our high trust people, so that I can explain how Abrahamism,Marxism, Postmodernism, and Feminism function.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 13:46:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059079471729463297

    Reply addressees: @LibrarianVee @yossy770 @getongab @Mottel

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059078284800131072


    IN REPLY TO:

    @LibrarianVee

    @curtdoolittle @yossy770 @getongab @Mottel Wo! Love your list of false arguments here

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059078284800131072

  • Small town. My sister. (Gorgeous, and uncomplicated.) Comes home after babysitti

    Small town. My sister. (Gorgeous, and uncomplicated.) Comes home after babysitting. “I don’t want to go there again. … The father looks like a rapist … I don’t know … He just gives me the creeps. He looks like a rapist.” We find out four years later… yep. You cannot hide your nature. Pedophiles look and act like we expect, rapists like we expect, crooks like we expect, and thugs like we expect, and yes, you can by and large estimate a person’s IQ by their face, gestures, and reaction times. The only ones who hide it well are in the upper classes because they can pay bribes for it one way or another.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 12:55:00 UTC

  • Bill Joslin “safety breeds folly” (which is why we must embrace and then tame ou

    Bill Joslin “safety breeds folly” (which is why we must embrace and then tame our animal – not transcend it and leave it behind. )

    Michael Hayes “To shield men from the effects folly is to fill the world with fools.”

    Taleb: … Anti-fragile….

    Nietzsche: … ‘what doesn’t kill us only makes us stronger’


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 10:02:00 UTC

  • We all use the tools available to us to attempt express our will to power (deman

    We all use the tools available to us to attempt express our will to power (demand for agency).

    I have built a bunch of companies now, and am building a body of work. I’ve studied every field that I can study without getting my hands too dirty. I amuse myself teaching men of various agencies, as a way testing my work and improving my ability to communicate novel ideas.

    My ‘availability’ for ‘the students’ is simply necessary for my work (and somewhat entertaining since I have either been in a foreign country with limited circle, or here in the states with limited circle since I started working publicly) and my work relationships have always provided my social circle.

    I have had a thousand or more conversations with men and women from all walks of life who think using different words to change meaning is the same thing as acting to cause change in reality. And every individual does the same thing – try to make a story where the world fits his or her needs rather than adapting to the world such that one can seize the opportunity in it.

    So, we are not above a story we tell ourselves (yourselves) because selling a story is the only offering we have to attract attention with. If you have no capital, no organization, no income stream, no power relationships, are not politically engaged or engageable, not strong, athletic, or martial, then you have nothing to sell but stories.

    And if that is the case, then you probably are not willing or able to work hard enough to acquire any of the above.

    You can spend your prime years attempting to tell stories, and sell them. You do what you can with the rather good mind you (y’all) have. And with enough practice over six or ten years, you will either abandon it or find some use for it. But you could be working in craft, commerce, entertainment, education, or politics instead – and while you have probably lost seven to ten years of life to maleducation, you can spend another six to ten selling a story until your consequent failure is sufficient evidence for people your age to dismiss you.

    I’m a scientist, and those of you who sell stories, well, you need, want to be, and admire the priesthood- or rather the secular version of it – just as do all members of the academy. If you are on the libertarian or right end of the spectrum, you are just on the outside of the mainstream, and cannot employ it in the academy and are not knowledgeable enough yet to employ it in the media (might happen). .

    I understand this. But I have an approach to the problem of the present era, and that is to move the world forward, IN THE TERMS OF THOSE WHO HAVE AND MAINTAIN, POWER. Those people with whom I have understanding and experience.

    So, you know, if you want to tell yourself stories or create an english speaking version of the european new right, then I think you will need to work pretty hard at it.

    I will just move forward with ‘if it isn’t true, then how to I satisfy market demand truthfully’. And provide a solution that is in the material economic and kinship interests of enough of my people to cause them to demand that implementation by force.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 09:17:00 UTC

  • Whatever political position you favor is just as highly correlated. Male brain M

    Whatever political position you favor is just as highly correlated. Male brain Male reproductive strategy, Female brain structure Female reproductive strategy. Not complicated.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-03 20:05:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058812341003915264

    Reply addressees: @ScottHa92264813 @SteveStuWill @sullydish

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058076280501895168


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058076280501895168

  • My Version of The Socratic Method: Competition

    [I] teach by creating games that men will compete in. This is how men are best taught. Instead of asking questions I start arguments. Instead of preaching an angle, I attack a proposition and force others to defend it. Instead of assuming equality I play king of the hill and bait them into attacking me. Instead of writing essays of appeal I write arguments to criticize.

  • My Version of The Socratic Method: Competition

    [I] teach by creating games that men will compete in. This is how men are best taught. Instead of asking questions I start arguments. Instead of preaching an angle, I attack a proposition and force others to defend it. Instead of assuming equality I play king of the hill and bait them into attacking me. Instead of writing essays of appeal I write arguments to criticize.

  • Sun Tzu’s Art of War a Work of Agency

    SUN TZU’S ART OF WAR A WORK OF AGENCY (worth repeating) [T]here is only one book in world literature that is an equal to the western canon, and that is the art of war – although the european works of Machiavelli, are more advanced, the universal applicability of the first of all does it best. It is an essay in the amoral (not immoral). We spend so much time in moral mind, we leave ourselves open to defeat. So,he retrains us to think objectively rather than morally. It is not a book about war. It is a book by which we restore agency, lost in the training of our norms. Machiavelli provides the same advice more directly in The Prince and his Art of War: morality has no place in war or its preparation. The norms ‘untrain us’ to succeed in war. Hece all men must be trained in both war of the amoral, and commerce and cooperation of the moral. (Said this sometime in the past few days and thought it needed repeating that these books are not on war. They are on restoring that which we are untrained in civil orders, and must be if we are to survive competitors.)

  • Sun Tzu’s Art of War a Work of Agency

    SUN TZU’S ART OF WAR A WORK OF AGENCY (worth repeating) [T]here is only one book in world literature that is an equal to the western canon, and that is the art of war – although the european works of Machiavelli, are more advanced, the universal applicability of the first of all does it best. It is an essay in the amoral (not immoral). We spend so much time in moral mind, we leave ourselves open to defeat. So,he retrains us to think objectively rather than morally. It is not a book about war. It is a book by which we restore agency, lost in the training of our norms. Machiavelli provides the same advice more directly in The Prince and his Art of War: morality has no place in war or its preparation. The norms ‘untrain us’ to succeed in war. Hece all men must be trained in both war of the amoral, and commerce and cooperation of the moral. (Said this sometime in the past few days and thought it needed repeating that these books are not on war. They are on restoring that which we are untrained in civil orders, and must be if we are to survive competitors.)