Theme: Agency

  • “Things like motivation can only be measured in the outcomes they produce. You c

    —“Things like motivation can only be measured in the outcomes they produce. You can claim to be as motivated as you like; but with not fruits, you’d only be demonstrating/ expressing a lie {a claim to motivation you don’t demonstrate}.”–Brandon Hayes


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-12 09:53:00 UTC

  • A NOTE TO ALL YOUNG MEN SEARCHING FOR POLITICAL ANSWERS —(response to email re

    A NOTE TO ALL YOUNG MEN SEARCHING FOR POLITICAL ANSWERS

    —(response to email request for help)—

    It is in the nature of ambitious young men to rush to an hypothesis of their own construction upon their first few encounters with enlightenment – accompanied by the desperate wish to share their revelation. It is in the nature of great theorists to develop a question or hypothesis, and to survey the great thinkers of history to date, and those similar innovations in related fields, to inform, correct, or falsify that hypothesis – with extraordinary effort and thoroughness – and all but those few we remember, fail.

    All of us write to learn. It is the most effective way of learning that we know of. It is easy to fool yourself in your imagination. A little less so in speech. Far harder in the written word. And very challenging in the published word – where your cherished efforts are the subject of misunderstanding, legitimate criticism and often, legitimate ridicule.

    We are in a period of change. There is vast pent up demand during these periods. Ours is a more catastrophic period than most due to invasion and population collapse due to the policies of the last century. And so you, like many others, are searching for an answer that the thinkers of the last century, and the present, failed to provide.

    We generate demand for types of social orders (the suite of cooperative economies), governments (means of production of commons, insurer of last resort), and rule (decision making of last resort) with the geography, capital, demographics, and military capacity to produce those we desire, and to deny alternatives – by seizing opportunistic moments in time. We do not have undiscovered countries (borderlands, continents) to settle as greenfields under the protection of distant empires. So just as we must work with the people we have, we must work with the opportunities we have, and the social orders that are possible to bring about with them.

    At present western advantage in other than demographic distribution has been liquidated through redistribution to the rest of the world. Nationalism is returning – largely in reaction to islamism, the same way we reacted to communism. And as strange as it might seem at the moment, with Chinese leadership, what looks very much like national socialism with communist dress of some sort, is emerging rapidly as the principle model of the 21st century.

    There is a reason that libertarian thought consists largely if not entirely of introductory books. There is a reason that geostrategy, economics, law, and war, do not. There is reason all Sovereignty (european aristocracy), Liberty (Anglo), Free City (German), Libertarian (the Pale), and Libertine (French) opportunities existed, and why they no longer do so.

    What all of these systems share is Sovereignty of the Individual under our ancient european customary laws (tort), and a Demand for Reciprocity to produce that sovereignty. The result of doing so is Rule of Law. What we differ in, is the GROUP COMPETITIVE STRATEGY, and the POSSIBLE organization of rule, government, economy, and social order within it that allows that social order to survive in competition with the other social orders.

    A general fights with the resources available, not the one he wishes to have. A people fight with the social, economic, political, and military order they have, not the one they wish they had. An activist fights with the available conditions by applying, like a general, the most force in the weakest places, to steer a more favorable outcome than the one at present, but not the most optimum he desires. A theorist fights with the knowledge available not the knowledge he wishes he had.

    A man is sovereign because he has the power to be so, because he has sufficient insurers to guarantee so. A man has liberty by permission of the sovereign. A man has freedom because he is a more profitable asset to the sovereign than a serf or slave. A man is a serf or slave because he has no alternative. The uniqueness of western civilization is the militia. The organized application of violence, by sovereign men, producing rule of law, and as a consequence, no alternative but markets in every aspect of life. There is no theory you can construct to sell. In the market for sale of political orders, you will find liberty is the want of the few even if its proceeds are the want of the many, and freedom is a synonym for theft from some and gifts to others. There is only one means of producing sovereignty: a sufficient number of men willing to use violence to deprive everyone else of imposing any alternative.

    Suggest you watch George Friedman and Peter Zeihan’s videos from this year and last. They are accessible summaries of work from around the world. This will help you understand the environment in which we are producing the upcoming social orders.

    IF YOU WANT THE INSTITUTE’S HELP

    Our reading list is here and there is none better to choose from: http//Propertarianism.com/reading-list/.

    Most if not all of the books, plus hundreds more, are in our library and can be read for free online.

    We will be offering courses in “The education you wish you had” beginning in January.

    They will include:

    The Uniqueness of Western Civilization: European History from the ice age forward.

    The Theory and History of The Arts

    The Theory and History of the Conduct of War

    The Natural Law (of Sovereign Men): The history of our law, and the Strictly Constructed Natural Law of Reciprocity (which is my restatement of hoppe’s german rationalist method in anglo scientific prose)

    The Means of Cooperation: Micro, Social(human Capital), and Macro Economics (they way econ should be taught)

    The Perfect Government: The various possible political orders given the conditions in which one produces the private and common.

    The Group Evolutionary Strategies of Competing Groups, Cultures, and Civilizations

    Online Courseware. Video. Short Readings. Assignments(essay). Discussion. Feedback. More Discussion.

    This is not feel good material. It is US 300-600 level material. And requires work.

    So far ART and LAW look like they will start in January. WAR sometime later.

    Otherwise, if you have very specific questions I’m available on FB pretty much all the time.

    Cheers.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-10 20:19:00 UTC

  • Um. Haters (the people you are defeating) are a sign of your success in destroyi

    Um. Haters (the people you are defeating) are a sign of your success in destroying their sacred cows. We ignore those who pose no threat to us. We heap praise on those who advocate for us. We throw hate at those who falsify us.

    I know the absolutist (little boys) are haters. It’s a good thing. It means I’m destroying their childish fantasies as I intend to.

    The White Law is the only Absolute I know of other than simple power. But simple power must be measured by some criteria. The only means I know of by which to measure that power is The White Law.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-10 10:44:00 UTC

  • WHAT MEANEST THOU? 😉 —I need no faith. I need only the necessity of action. F

    WHAT MEANEST THOU? 😉

    —I need no faith. I need only the necessity of action. Faith is for those so poor in assets, character,agency,and will that they seek excuses for action, inaction, success and failure. That cowardice is for The Herd. Men satisfy the need for action & consequence and learn from it.—

    Deflation: Decidability > Confidence > Trust > Belief > Faith

    – belief: Meaning “conviction of the truth of a proposition or alleged fact without knowledge” is by 1530s; it is also “sometimes used to include the absolute conviction or certainty which accompanies knowledge”

    – faith: From early 14c. as “assent of the mind to the truth of a statement for which there is incomplete evidence,” especially “belief in religious matters” (matched with hope and charity). Since mid-14c. in reference to the Christian church or religion; from late 14c. in reference to any religious persuasion.

    – trust: from Old Norse traust “help, confidence, protection, support,” from Proto-Germanic abstract noun *traustam (source also of Old Frisian trast, Dutch troost “comfort, consolation,” Old High German trost “trust, fidelity,” German Trost “comfort, co…See More

    – confidence: From mid-15c. as “reliance on one’s own powers, resources, or circumstances, self-assurance.” Meaning “certainty of a proposition or assertion, sureness with regard to a fact” is from 1550s.

    Deconflation into series allows us to see the insane precision ofthe huge vocabulary in the english language

    Decidability > Confidence(self) > Trust(other) > Belief(possibility) > Faith(religion-higher power, beyond ken)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 16:56:00 UTC

  • I need no faith. I need only the necessity of action. Faith is for those so poor

    I need no faith. I need only the necessity of action. Faith is for those so poor in assets, character,agency,and will that they seek excuses for action, inaction, success and failure. That cowardice is for The Herd. Men satisfy the need for action & consequence and learn from it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 16:27:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071803511107710977

  • I need no faith. I need only the necessity of action. Faith is for those so poor

    I need no faith. I need only the necessity of action. Faith is for those so poor in assets, character,agency,and will that they seek excuses for action, inaction, success and failure. That cowardice is for The Herd. Men satisfy the need for action & consequence and learn from it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 16:26:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071803406749233153

    Reply addressees: @RaduBT

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071792934444548101


    IN REPLY TO:

    @RaduBT

    @curtdoolittle The Universe has Order. It is Coherent (isotropic universe). Otherwise it could not Exist. The “laws” of the nature are unchanged, but as Planck said, we should not assume they will stay the same. Nothing in this Universe could prove they will stay the same. He have to have faith

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071792934444548101

  • GENDER BIOCHEMISTRY by Bill Joslin As far as I can tell – testosterone in men in

    GENDER BIOCHEMISTRY

    by Bill Joslin

    As far as I can tell – testosterone in men increases in-group loyalty and bonding (ingroup preference) but not out-group hostility. Oxytocin in women increases out-group hostility.

    This makes sense. Women in charge of young (reduced mobility and defense) by being outgroup sensitive would afford “proximity” sensing for a group (enemies are at the gates).

    Men who must then defend, do so cooperatively and this ingroup loyalty would have men fight to protect each other (opposed to fighting to kill an enemy or flee and abandon brothers).

    The two together: female-low resolution high sensitivity may not provide much detail in assessing the quality of a threat (those strangers might not be hostile, they might be, but might not be) – where as men, driven by loyalty will approach and assess the threat (they are not necessarily out-group hostile) and if it is a threat will not flee, but rather stand and defend.

    So we have a binary, at a distance, early warning (female) coupled with a spectrum, approach and assess defense (male).

    Our current migrant sentiment might be best seen as a female out-group hostility turned in on the ingroup (toward their own males due to feminist political power seeking) coupled with or playing off males low outgroup hostility and high loyalty (to their woman).

    We might harp on the girls in Curt’s circles – but it is the gals through mate selection who drive changes in males (hypergamy creates male hierarchy and selects for robustness and agression or the inverse as laid-out above).

    Girls maketh the man.

    It’s then males that provide a counter-balance.

    Women drive changes, men constrain the tails.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 13:42:00 UTC

  • WHAT MEANEST THOU? 😉 —I need no faith. I need only the necessity of action. F

    WHAT MEANEST THOU? 😉

    —I need no faith. I need only the necessity of action. Faith is for those so poor in assets, character,agency,and will that they seek excuses for action, inaction, success and failure. That cowardice is for The Herd. Men satisfy the need for action & consequence and learn from it.—

    Deflation: Decidability > Confidence > Trust > Belief > Faith

    – belief: Meaning “conviction of the truth of a proposition or alleged fact without knowledge” is by 1530s; it is also “sometimes used to include the absolute conviction or certainty which accompanies knowledge”

    – faith: From early 14c. as “assent of the mind to the truth of a statement for which there is incomplete evidence,” especially “belief in religious matters” (matched with hope and charity). Since mid-14c. in reference to the Christian church or religion; from late 14c. in reference to any religious persuasion.

    – trust: from Old Norse traust “help, confidence, protection, support,” from Proto-Germanic abstract noun *traustam (source also of Old Frisian trast, Dutch troost “comfort, consolation,” Old High German trost “trust, fidelity,” German Trost “comfort, co…See More

    – confidence: From mid-15c. as “reliance on one’s own powers, resources, or circumstances, self-assurance.” Meaning “certainty of a proposition or assertion, sureness with regard to a fact” is from 1550s.

    Deconflation into series allows us to see the insane precision ofthe huge vocabulary in the english language

    Decidability > Confidence(self) > Trust(other) > Belief(possibility) > Faith(religion-higher power, beyond ken)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 11:27:00 UTC

  • SELF AUTHORING – SUPPRESSION OF MALINTUITION (suppression of the influence of co

    SELF AUTHORING – SUPPRESSION OF MALINTUITION

    (suppression of the influence of cognitive biases)

    (repost)

    —“Q: Hey Curt, do you have a thought on the use of self-affirmations to create change in the self? For example, do you consciously talk positively with yourself with the intent on changing your own perception (personal narrative) ? Or do you think such a practice of positive self-affirmation can be used as an effective way of changing one’s personal narrative?”—

    Yes, that’s the essence of self authoring and stoicism is a formal approach to it.

    Yes it works. Although you can only change to what is true and good from what is false and not good.

    Most of the time I try to talk myself into either:

    1 – ‘Be kind; be overly kind; they are only children, and doing the best they can in life.’ (It is very hard to control the autistic urge to anger and to punish perceived stupidity)

    or

    2 – ‘Keep going no matter what, no matter how hard, you always win in the end”

    or

    3 – “You can’t change that, and don’t need to, just do better in the future.”

    or

    4 – “People think about you a lot less than you imagine, and generally better than you imagine, so don’t worry about it”.

    And those are things everyone probably needs to do. I don’t have the problem of ‘don’t take it personally’. I’m not agreeable enough to be affected by others. when they are wrong, only when I have been wrong.

    I have a lot of guilt about my occasionally losing tolerance for mortals and losing battle with my autism and hurting or disappointing people I care about; my divorce and one other relationship i should have handled better (i was very ill in both circumstances); underperforming for my investors. And the only one of those I can fix is my investors.

    cheers

    (edit)

    The only thing I would add is “What is the worst that can happen?” I think this is the advice people thank me for the most. If we are too concerned with failure to take risks that do not harm us,then we unnecessarily pass on opportunities for success. People forgive failure in pursuit of moral ends. failure in and of itself if costing nothing harmful or immoral is a good thing – we learn from it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 00:24:00 UTC

  • There is a difference between serving women, and being in their service. I don’t

    There is a difference between serving women, and being in their service. I don’t feel “complete” without a woman to serve (make happy, care for, support). But I am not in the service of anyone but myself and my people. Women seem to find joy in attempting to put men into their service, but will despise those men if they are successful in doing so. You lose your entertainment value as vehicle for exercising feminine manipulation. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-07 22:29:00 UTC