PILL CLARITY. 😉
by Greg Hamilton
Blue (BP) is narrative,
… Red(RP) is reality,
… … Black(BP) is nihilism,
… … … White(WP) is hope.
Hope for the future: WP.
Being realistic about the situation: RP.
If you’re pointing out the reality: RP
Selling nihilism: BP
Acknowledging the system will fail is just RP.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 15:12:00 UTC
People feel no sense of control. Most of this is due to the fact that they don’t, the rest to the media, the rest to the destruction of the family, the rest to mobility.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 15:16:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107662127832141825
People feel no sense of control. Most of this is due to the fact that they don’t, the rest to the media, the rest to the destruction of the family, the rest to mobility.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 11:16:00 UTC
yeah. well its a spectrum. he has much better biographical memory than i do. i tend to see possible futures the way he sees numbers. but the behavior and personality i can easily see in myself. especially that you can grow out of the drawbacks of autism.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-16 04:56:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106781284636991488
Reply addressees: @AntiKalergi
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106766262250729473
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106766262250729473
—“In the U.S. and most Western countries, the birth years most often used for GenJones are 1954-1965. Extensive research has shown dramatic differences between the collective personality traits of Boomers versus Jonesers.”—
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-15 17:09:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106603298398732288
I have known for almost two decades. For you it’s just realizing you have no other choice. That it’s just you me, and the rest of us willing to act. And that’s it. We are the men of the west and we are either the first of the rest or the end of the west. The bottleneck or the flood. You choose. you choose to make the choice. Life and limb for eternity. it’s not complicated. It’s just a measurement you can’t fudge.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-15 15:18:00 UTC
It will take only one gathering of 1M men.
—“Curt Doolittle with all of your followers you could pull this off today. What’s the hold up?”—Steven Gant
A moral license (100%)
A set of demands (constitution 60%)
A a plan of transition (70%)
A mens of insurrection (100%)
My solution makes people like Yang look like kindergarten teachers. It’s mostly organic. In all our people’s interests. And it is almost impossible to resist – other than by politicians, bureaucrats, and the financial sector.
The worst thing you can do is bring a product to market too early, or to move from research and development to marketing, or from marketing to expansion, before the market is ready.
As I said to other ‘leadership’. The only thing it will take within a year, is for about 12 of us to ‘agree’ to stay on message, and it’s done. Any one of those who doesn’t agree is done forever. So it will be some set of them.
But it has to suit the timing. Timing matters.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-15 15:01:00 UTC
AFAIK the only means of improving cognitive performance that has any basis is (a) disciplining your executive function (b) physical fitness and health – particularly water and oxygenation, (c) accumulated general knowledge, (d) investment in more than one discipline that forces you to settle competitions between the frames. Everything else is simply ‘learning’ not ‘improving’.
Intelligence should consist of that information and repetition necessary for you to identify and permute upon increasingly divergent, increasingly recursive patterns in time.
The only way to improve that is to cut the cost of pattern identification by ‘loading patterns’ – meaning ‘reading’ in the past and may be ‘reading and watching videos’ in the present.
Simple Formula:
“g” general ability both performance and verbal + Short term memory + general knowledge + work (personality traits) – stupid ideas(and there are a lot of those) = demonstrated general intelligence.
Lift heavy things. Run fast a bit. Read Shit. Train Your Brain to Focus on what you want it to (mindfulness), and work your ass off.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-08 10:45:00 UTC
Academic performance has far less to do with intelligence and far more to do with personality traits. High IQ, particularly on the spectrum, many take extra time to mature.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 23:25:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1103798752492560384
Reply addressees: @Cat9bx0219
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084588974650331136
IN REPLY TO:
@Cat9bx0219
Is it possible to have a high iq and be a C student or even a low iq A student?
I feel like I know someone like the former. He’s very curious, but seems to have a very short attention span and prolly a lil lazy.
Maybe he’s one of those “brilliant, but lazy” people? I don’t know
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1084588974650331136
IQ and autism
05, Sunday, Oct 2014
Posted by pumpkinperson in Uncategorized
Tags: autism, executive function, IQ, schizophrenia
For those who have never studied statistics, the non-autistic population in Western countries is said to have an average IQ of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. A standard deviation of 15 simply means that the standard amount by which most people deviate from the average is around 15 points, in other worlds, about two thirds of the non-autistic population have IQ’s from 85 to 115.
As for the autistic population, a recent study found 16% of autistic spectrum children had IQ’s below 50, while 3% had IQ’s above 115.
Assuming a normal distribution, an IQ of 116+ is 1.87 Standard Deviations (SD) above the autistic mean, and an IQ below 50 is 1 SD below the autistic mean. This suggests that autistic people have a mean IQ of 72 and an SD of 23 compared to the non-autistic population (mean 100, SD=15). In other words, while the average autistic person has a much lower IQ than the average neurotypical, the autistic population is much more cognitively variable. This resolves the paradox of why autistic people can simultaneously have a reputation for being both mentally disabled and brilliant scientists. Because, compared to neurotypicals, autistic people will be dramatically over-represented at both ends of the bell curve.
Above IQ 100
About 50% of neurotypicals have IQ’s above 100, compared to only 10% of autistic people.
Above IQ 115
About 14% of neurotypicals have IQ’s this high, compared to to only 3% of autistic people.
Above IQ 130
About 2% of neurotypicals score this high, compared to only 0.5% of autistic people
Above IQ 145
Only one in 924 neurotypicals score this high, compared to only one in 1,838 autistic people
Above IQ 160
Only about one in 42,000 neuotypicals scores this high, compared to one in 18,000 autistic people. At this level of giftedness, autistic people are actually OVER-REPRESENTED!!!!!!!!!!!
Above IQ 175
Only about one in five million neurotypicals score this high, compared to about one in 300,000 autistic people.
Above IQ 190
Only about one in 1.5 billion neurotypicals score this high, compared to about one in 14 million autistic people.
The fact that autistic people are so incredibly variable in IQ confirms Pumpkin Person’s groundbreaking theory that autism is not actually one phenotype, but two phenotypes, that have been arbitrarily conflated by psychologists: Nerdiness (slow life history?) which causes high IQ, and executive dysfunction which causes low IQ.
Analogously, schizophrenia is probably also two phenotypes: coolness (fast life history?), which causes low IQ, and executive dysfunction, which causes even lower IQ.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 18:37:00 UTC