(FB 1550247431 Timestamp) THE SIMPLE STRATEGY OF THE WEAK By: Rosenborg Predmetsky —“It follows that the physically weaker must engage in subterfuge in order to survive the disgust of the stronger and better-constituted. Leftists and degenerate women disingenuously employ the masculine language of reciprocity in order to conceal the feminine substance of dysgenic equality, in attempting to convince others that they have been defrauded of their just deserts. This is the function of social constructionism; to make the creditor their debtor by arguing that inequality of outcome is the function of a historically contingent narrative rather than the natural order of things.”—- (via Brandon Hayes )
Theme: Agency
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550247431 Timestamp) THE SIMPLE STRATEGY OF THE WEAK By: Rosenborg Predmetsky —“It follows that the physically weaker must engage in subterfuge in order to survive the disgust of the stronger and better-constituted. Leftists and degenerate women disingenuously employ the masculine language of reciprocity in order to conceal the feminine substance of dysgenic equality, in attempting to convince others that they have been defrauded of their just deserts. This is the function of social constructionism; to make the creditor their debtor by arguing that inequality of outcome is the function of a historically contingent narrative rather than the natural order of things.”—- (via Brandon Hayes )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550346322 Timestamp) (diary: My aunt Barbara, an unattractive woman, was a villain to my (sweet naive, moral) mother, and forever duplicitous, manipulative, instigatory, married to a man of questionable sexuality, and covered up infidelities by her brothers wherever they (frequently) occurred. But then that side of the family is a train wreck of pettiness, alcoholism, and desperate attempt by lower middle and middle class people to hold to the pretense of upper middle class and lower upper class history. All great families regress to the mean without constant selective breeding and high investment parenting. Our paternal family did not survive the postwar period with remaining potential. And my talents are oddly the result of the french side, who were economically crushed by the depression period. I have far more in common with the lawyers, politicians, professors, and once-farmers on my mother’s paternal side than what remains of our once great family on my father’s. Worse, great families are one of the targets of the policy of the enemy. in fact the enemy’s program can be reduced to a war on our families.)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550341174 Timestamp) KOHLBER’S MORAL DEVELOPMENT (h/t: Rosenborg Predmetsky) Level 1. Preconventional Morality The earliest stage of moral development, obedience, and punishment is especially common in young children, but adults are also capable of expressing this type of reasoning. At this stage, Kohlberg says, children see rules as fixed and absolute. Obeying the rules is important because it is a means to avoid punishment. At the individualism and exchange stage of moral development, children account for individual points of view and judge actions based on how they serve individual needs. In the Heinz dilemma, children argued that the best course of action was the choice that best-served Heinzâs needs. Reciprocity is possible at this point in moral development, but only if it serves one’s own interests. Level 2. Conventional Morality Often referred to as the “good boy-good girl” orientation, the interpersonal relationships stage of moral development is focused on living up to social expectations and roles. There is an emphasis on conformity, being “nice,” and consideration of how choices influence relationships. This stage is focused on maintaining social order. At this stage of moral development, people begin to consider society as a whole when making judgments. The focus is on maintaining law and order by following the rules, doing oneâs duty and respecting authority. Level 3. Postconventional Morality The ideas of a social contract and individual rights cause people in the next stage to begin to account for the differing values, opinions, and beliefs of other people. Rules of law are important for maintaining a society, but members of the society should agree upon these standards. Kohlbergâs final level of moral reasoning is based on universal ethical principles and abstract reasoning. At this stage, people follow these internalized principles of justice, even if they conflict with laws and rules.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550346322 Timestamp) (diary: My aunt Barbara, an unattractive woman, was a villain to my (sweet naive, moral) mother, and forever duplicitous, manipulative, instigatory, married to a man of questionable sexuality, and covered up infidelities by her brothers wherever they (frequently) occurred. But then that side of the family is a train wreck of pettiness, alcoholism, and desperate attempt by lower middle and middle class people to hold to the pretense of upper middle class and lower upper class history. All great families regress to the mean without constant selective breeding and high investment parenting. Our paternal family did not survive the postwar period with remaining potential. And my talents are oddly the result of the french side, who were economically crushed by the depression period. I have far more in common with the lawyers, politicians, professors, and once-farmers on my mother’s paternal side than what remains of our once great family on my father’s. Worse, great families are one of the targets of the policy of the enemy. in fact the enemy’s program can be reduced to a war on our families.)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550341174 Timestamp) KOHLBER’S MORAL DEVELOPMENT (h/t: Rosenborg Predmetsky) Level 1. Preconventional Morality The earliest stage of moral development, obedience, and punishment is especially common in young children, but adults are also capable of expressing this type of reasoning. At this stage, Kohlberg says, children see rules as fixed and absolute. Obeying the rules is important because it is a means to avoid punishment. At the individualism and exchange stage of moral development, children account for individual points of view and judge actions based on how they serve individual needs. In the Heinz dilemma, children argued that the best course of action was the choice that best-served Heinzâs needs. Reciprocity is possible at this point in moral development, but only if it serves one’s own interests. Level 2. Conventional Morality Often referred to as the “good boy-good girl” orientation, the interpersonal relationships stage of moral development is focused on living up to social expectations and roles. There is an emphasis on conformity, being “nice,” and consideration of how choices influence relationships. This stage is focused on maintaining social order. At this stage of moral development, people begin to consider society as a whole when making judgments. The focus is on maintaining law and order by following the rules, doing oneâs duty and respecting authority. Level 3. Postconventional Morality The ideas of a social contract and individual rights cause people in the next stage to begin to account for the differing values, opinions, and beliefs of other people. Rules of law are important for maintaining a society, but members of the society should agree upon these standards. Kohlbergâs final level of moral reasoning is based on universal ethical principles and abstract reasoning. At this stage, people follow these internalized principles of justice, even if they conflict with laws and rules.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550420779 Timestamp) PATTERNS OF SPEECH Notice how someone (sophisticated with world experience yet entirely empirical) like Michael comments and how other people (unsophisticated, without worldly experience, and entirely sentimental or anecdotal) comment. I ought to do a study of categories of comments just to show people how wise, smart, ignorant, and stupid people comment on a ignorant-wise, stupid-smart grid just to illustrate by pattern recognition what different people think like and act like. wise people ask. smart people tell ignorant people reject stupid people retaliate
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550420779 Timestamp) PATTERNS OF SPEECH Notice how someone (sophisticated with world experience yet entirely empirical) like Michael comments and how other people (unsophisticated, without worldly experience, and entirely sentimental or anecdotal) comment. I ought to do a study of categories of comments just to show people how wise, smart, ignorant, and stupid people comment on a ignorant-wise, stupid-smart grid just to illustrate by pattern recognition what different people think like and act like. wise people ask. smart people tell ignorant people reject stupid people retaliate
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550448812 Timestamp) CLARITY (a) only individuals act (b) only groups conspire (c) whether individuals or groups act against the interests of the commons, it is still a collection of individuals, since even groups consist of individuals. (d) organizations demonstrate preference not stated belief or thought. (e) if some organization or affiliation or identity can be identified as problematic it is certainly possible to exit the organization and all people within it as conspirators regardless of stated opinion or belief. CONVERSELY (f) it is very difficult to imagine extracting someone by genome. HOWEVER (g) war is war, so if it escalates from tort (court) to combat (war) then the law no longer applies. THEREFORE I have said repeatedly, fix the law the good will stay the bad will leave, and organizations that are hostile will be shuttered.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550460291 Timestamp) You notice it’s been the cucks that cry about civil war and not the pagans. Test is successful. Purely indirect empirical evidence. There is no better evidence of the difference between those of us with the natural religion of our people worshiping our people, and the unnatural religion of others worshipping falsehoods.