(FB 1546785774 Timestamp) by Aaron Kahland IQ is ultra meaningful – we have illustrated time and again that a society’s (country’s) average IQ is seven times more important than your own IQ in determining your standard of living. Individual IQ isn’t that important (at least within an sd of the mean) yet average IQs are critically important. In other words, better off a fool in Luxembourg than a genius in Lebanon. (CD: Trust is a byproduct of the decrease in frictions (via-negativa) of truthful discourse and better calculation of options.)
Theme: Agency
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546785774 Timestamp) by Aaron Kahland IQ is ultra meaningful – we have illustrated time and again that a society’s (country’s) average IQ is seven times more important than your own IQ in determining your standard of living. Individual IQ isn’t that important (at least within an sd of the mean) yet average IQs are critically important. In other words, better off a fool in Luxembourg than a genius in Lebanon. (CD: Trust is a byproduct of the decrease in frictions (via-negativa) of truthful discourse and better calculation of options.)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546714105 Timestamp) Everyone is trolling. They are more obvious and not, and more intentional and not. But to some degree we all do nothing but negotiate for our preferences either by shaming, begging, advisin, exchanging, competing, or conquering. 😉
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546714105 Timestamp) Everyone is trolling. They are more obvious and not, and more intentional and not. But to some degree we all do nothing but negotiate for our preferences either by shaming, begging, advisin, exchanging, competing, or conquering. 😉
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546868605 Timestamp) Adolph spent a lot of time speaking in beer halls and adapting his manner method and content. The Beatles spent a lot of time playing in germany and adapting their style, method, and content. These are two ends of the spectrum of 10k hours. There is no substitute for continuous market testing. There is no substitute for testing your arguments. Welcome to the revolution…
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546868605 Timestamp) Adolph spent a lot of time speaking in beer halls and adapting his manner method and content. The Beatles spent a lot of time playing in germany and adapting their style, method, and content. These are two ends of the spectrum of 10k hours. There is no substitute for continuous market testing. There is no substitute for testing your arguments. Welcome to the revolution…
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546806967 Timestamp) —“Curt: what constitutes fight shooting vs target shooting?”— Target shooting is a way of keeping the cost down and continuing the tradition of riflemen upon which the USA is founded (as are the marines). But small arms today are absurdly effective, and the truth is that rifle rounds are the sort of ‘weapon that keeps on giving’ so to speak, in that they just keep going and going and going. Pistol rounds are, honestly, extremely effective at .380 and over, with all that mattering is the hit location, and rate of immobilization. Current 9mm semi autos are ‘almost’ idiot-proof, and carry 15+ rounds, and 30 if necessary. Pistols are easily concealed as are lots of extra magazines, and are wonderful indoors. Learning to ‘fight’ with a pistol like our ancestors did with swords (particularly fencing) is what policemen and swat teams are trained to do. (Not that I”m advocating gun-fu, which while interesting is just amusement.) See this example, starting on page 32. http://www.actiontarget.com/…/Advanced_Tactica_Handgun… ie: moving targets while you are moving, multiple targets, entry into spaces, shooting from wounded, shooting when down. shooting from cover vs concealment. reloading one handed. Normal everyday cop training. (PERSONAL: For me, I pretty much don’t do anything other than mozambique drills, double taps, while moving, and point-shooting. In fact, if I ever start teaching again I’m going to teach point shooting first, right after all the ‘don’t hurt yourself’ basics, and before anything else. My next handgun if I ever get the urge for another will be a ‘melted’ 9mm 1911 without sights.)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1546806967 Timestamp) —“Curt: what constitutes fight shooting vs target shooting?”— Target shooting is a way of keeping the cost down and continuing the tradition of riflemen upon which the USA is founded (as are the marines). But small arms today are absurdly effective, and the truth is that rifle rounds are the sort of ‘weapon that keeps on giving’ so to speak, in that they just keep going and going and going. Pistol rounds are, honestly, extremely effective at .380 and over, with all that mattering is the hit location, and rate of immobilization. Current 9mm semi autos are ‘almost’ idiot-proof, and carry 15+ rounds, and 30 if necessary. Pistols are easily concealed as are lots of extra magazines, and are wonderful indoors. Learning to ‘fight’ with a pistol like our ancestors did with swords (particularly fencing) is what policemen and swat teams are trained to do. (Not that I”m advocating gun-fu, which while interesting is just amusement.) See this example, starting on page 32. http://www.actiontarget.com/…/Advanced_Tactica_Handgun… ie: moving targets while you are moving, multiple targets, entry into spaces, shooting from wounded, shooting when down. shooting from cover vs concealment. reloading one handed. Normal everyday cop training. (PERSONAL: For me, I pretty much don’t do anything other than mozambique drills, double taps, while moving, and point-shooting. In fact, if I ever start teaching again I’m going to teach point shooting first, right after all the ‘don’t hurt yourself’ basics, and before anything else. My next handgun if I ever get the urge for another will be a ‘melted’ 9mm 1911 without sights.)
-
(FB 1546804687 Timestamp) GOALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR AGENCY AS WELL AS NATURE.
(FB 1546804687 Timestamp) GOALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR AGENCY AS WELL AS NATURE. I prefer we target the virtue spectrum from stoicism (little agency), to epicureanism (personal agency, to aristocracy (political agency) rather than a universal. The technique serves the mind no matter what virtues we seek to give it, but that does not mean ‘monotheism’ so to speak in that we must all seek the same. We each have different agency. We require goals that provide mindfulness in accordance with our agency.
-
(FB 1546804687 Timestamp) GOALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR AGENCY AS WELL AS NATURE.
(FB 1546804687 Timestamp) GOALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR AGENCY AS WELL AS NATURE. I prefer we target the virtue spectrum from stoicism (little agency), to epicureanism (personal agency, to aristocracy (political agency) rather than a universal. The technique serves the mind no matter what virtues we seek to give it, but that does not mean ‘monotheism’ so to speak in that we must all seek the same. We each have different agency. We require goals that provide mindfulness in accordance with our agency.