(FB 1544239779 Timestamp) There is a difference between serving women, and being in their service. I don’t feel “complete” without a woman to serve (make happy, care for, support). But I am not in the service of anyone but myself and my people. Women seem to find joy in attempting to put men into their service, but will despise those men if they are successful in doing so. You lose your entertainment value as vehicle for exercising feminine manipulation. 😉
Theme: Agency
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544237399 Timestamp) —“Curt: What are the best dogs for the coming struggle?”– A Friend ( Under the assumption that this is a serious question… lol ) Anything in the Working Dog group that doesn’t drool. Hard to argue with shepherds, dobermans, etc – but I find they are better for guard dogs, and I don’t find that all that useful – it makes them likely to absorb damage and end up expendable. Myself I prefer the Sporting group because they are less demanding, and all I want from a dog is entertainment, companionship and alarm services. The guns do the rest. The long legged floppy eared hounds can be good but I find them stupid. The rest are just … eh….
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544380948 Timestamp) GENDER BIOCHEMISTRY by Bill Joslin As far as I can tell – testosterone in men increases in-group loyalty and bonding (ingroup preference) but not out-group hostility. Oxytocin in women increases out-group hostility. This makes sense. Women in charge of young (reduced mobility and defense) by being outgroup sensitive would afford “proximity” sensing for a group (enemies are at the gates). Men who must then defend, do so cooperatively and this ingroup loyalty would have men fight to protect each other (opposed to fighting to kill an enemy or flee and abandon brothers). The two together: female-low resolution high sensitivity may not provide much detail in assessing the quality of a threat (those strangers might not be hostile, they might be, but might not be) – where as men, driven by loyalty will approach and assess the threat (they are not necessarily out-group hostile) and if it is a threat will not flee, but rather stand and defend. So we have a binary, at a distance, early warning (female) coupled with a spectrum, approach and assess defense (male). Our current migrant sentiment might be best seen as a female out-group hostility turned in on the ingroup (toward their own males due to feminist political power seeking) coupled with or playing off males low outgroup hostility and high loyalty (to their woman). We might harp on the girls in Curt’s circles – but it is the gals through mate selection who drive changes in males (hypergamy creates male hierarchy and selects for robustness and agression or the inverse as laid-out above). Girls maketh the man. It’s then males that provide a counter-balance. Women drive changes, men constrain the tails.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
(FB 1544392586 Timestamp) WHAT MEANEST THOU? 😉 —I need no faith. I need only the necessity of action. Faith is for those so poor in assets, character,agency,and will that they seek excuses for action, inaction, success and failure. That cowardice is for The Herd. Men satisfy the need for action & consequence and learn from it.— Deflation: Decidability > Confidence > Trust > Belief > Faith
- belief: Meaning “conviction of the truth of a proposition or alleged fact without knowledge” is by 1530s; it is also “sometimes used to include the absolute conviction or certainty which accompanies knowledge”
faith: From early 14c. as “assent of the mind to the truth of a statement for which there is incomplete evidence,” especially “belief in religious matters” (matched with hope and charity). Since mid-14c. in reference to the Christian church or religion; from late 14c. in reference to any religious persuasion.
trust: from Old Norse traust “help, confidence, protection, support,” from Proto-Germanic abstract noun *traustam (source also of Old Frisian trast, Dutch troost “comfort, consolation,” Old High German trost “trust, fidelity,” German Trost “comfort, coâ¦See More
confidence: From mid-15c. as “reliance on one’s own powers, resources, or circumstances, self-assurance.” Meaning “certainty of a proposition or assertion, sureness with regard to a fact” is from 1550s.
Deconflation into series allows us to see the insane precision ofthe huge vocabulary in the english language Decidability > Confidence(self) > Trust(other) > Belief(possibility) > Faith(religion-higher power, beyond ken)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544380948 Timestamp) GENDER BIOCHEMISTRY by Bill Joslin As far as I can tell – testosterone in men increases in-group loyalty and bonding (ingroup preference) but not out-group hostility. Oxytocin in women increases out-group hostility. This makes sense. Women in charge of young (reduced mobility and defense) by being outgroup sensitive would afford “proximity” sensing for a group (enemies are at the gates). Men who must then defend, do so cooperatively and this ingroup loyalty would have men fight to protect each other (opposed to fighting to kill an enemy or flee and abandon brothers). The two together: female-low resolution high sensitivity may not provide much detail in assessing the quality of a threat (those strangers might not be hostile, they might be, but might not be) – where as men, driven by loyalty will approach and assess the threat (they are not necessarily out-group hostile) and if it is a threat will not flee, but rather stand and defend. So we have a binary, at a distance, early warning (female) coupled with a spectrum, approach and assess defense (male). Our current migrant sentiment might be best seen as a female out-group hostility turned in on the ingroup (toward their own males due to feminist political power seeking) coupled with or playing off males low outgroup hostility and high loyalty (to their woman). We might harp on the girls in Curt’s circles – but it is the gals through mate selection who drive changes in males (hypergamy creates male hierarchy and selects for robustness and agression or the inverse as laid-out above). Girls maketh the man. It’s then males that provide a counter-balance. Women drive changes, men constrain the tails.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
(FB 1544392586 Timestamp) WHAT MEANEST THOU? 😉 —I need no faith. I need only the necessity of action. Faith is for those so poor in assets, character,agency,and will that they seek excuses for action, inaction, success and failure. That cowardice is for The Herd. Men satisfy the need for action & consequence and learn from it.— Deflation: Decidability > Confidence > Trust > Belief > Faith
- belief: Meaning “conviction of the truth of a proposition or alleged fact without knowledge” is by 1530s; it is also “sometimes used to include the absolute conviction or certainty which accompanies knowledge”
faith: From early 14c. as “assent of the mind to the truth of a statement for which there is incomplete evidence,” especially “belief in religious matters” (matched with hope and charity). Since mid-14c. in reference to the Christian church or religion; from late 14c. in reference to any religious persuasion.
trust: from Old Norse traust “help, confidence, protection, support,” from Proto-Germanic abstract noun *traustam (source also of Old Frisian trast, Dutch troost “comfort, consolation,” Old High German trost “trust, fidelity,” German Trost “comfort, coâ¦See More
confidence: From mid-15c. as “reliance on one’s own powers, resources, or circumstances, self-assurance.” Meaning “certainty of a proposition or assertion, sureness with regard to a fact” is from 1550s.
Deconflation into series allows us to see the insane precision ofthe huge vocabulary in the english language Decidability > Confidence(self) > Trust(other) > Belief(possibility) > Faith(religion-higher power, beyond ken)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544456652 Timestamp) Um. Haters (the people you are defeating) are a sign of your success in destroying their sacred cows. We ignore those who pose no threat to us. We heap praise on those who advocate for us. We throw hate at those who falsify us. I know the absolutist (little boys) are haters. It’s a good thing. It means I’m destroying their childish fantasies as I intend to. The White Law is the only Absolute I know of other than simple power. But simple power must be measured by some criteria. The only means I know of by which to measure that power is The White Law.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544393857 Timestamp) THE NARRATIVES WE BUILD It is very difficult to both think very deeply about the the universe, the world, life, and experience, and not produce an internal story of wonder. That is why all of us that think deeply about the universe, the world, life, and experience do so. That is, in no small part, because the alternative is too upsetting to survive with. Some of us see a vast, cold, dead, hostile, uncaring universe. Some of us wonder at its complexities. Some of us, but new worlds to conquer. Some of us all of the above.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544456652 Timestamp) Um. Haters (the people you are defeating) are a sign of your success in destroying their sacred cows. We ignore those who pose no threat to us. We heap praise on those who advocate for us. We throw hate at those who falsify us. I know the absolutist (little boys) are haters. It’s a good thing. It means I’m destroying their childish fantasies as I intend to. The White Law is the only Absolute I know of other than simple power. But simple power must be measured by some criteria. The only means I know of by which to measure that power is The White Law.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1544393857 Timestamp) THE NARRATIVES WE BUILD It is very difficult to both think very deeply about the the universe, the world, life, and experience, and not produce an internal story of wonder. That is why all of us that think deeply about the universe, the world, life, and experience do so. That is, in no small part, because the alternative is too upsetting to survive with. Some of us see a vast, cold, dead, hostile, uncaring universe. Some of us wonder at its complexities. Some of us, but new worlds to conquer. Some of us all of the above.