The Posts on Teaching Men Using “King of the Hill” Games
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 13:53:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155838707829747714
Theme: Agency
-
Anyway. I understand that you appreciate the work your parents did and your resu
Anyway. I understand that you appreciate the work your parents did and your resulting lot in life. And that you are trying to use induction to conflate appreciation with good. I’m just staying on message: The presumption you can ‘improve’ children is false. Just don’t break them.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 13:29:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155832737670078465
Reply addressees: @Scholars_Stage
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155831826302287873
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Scholars_Stage Well, it’s not an idiotic thing to say in the context of your proposition being that parenting ‘matters’. Well, do you mean you’re thankful? Appreciative? Better off than the alternatives (you don’t know)? Or that you have a competitive advantage?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155831826302287873
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Scholars_Stage Well, it’s not an idiotic thing to say in the context of your proposition being that parenting ‘matters’. Well, do you mean you’re thankful? Appreciative? Better off than the alternatives (you don’t know)? Or that you have a competitive advantage?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155831826302287873
-
Well, it’s not an idiotic thing to say in the context of your proposition being
Well, it’s not an idiotic thing to say in the context of your proposition being that parenting ‘matters’. Well, do you mean you’re thankful? Appreciative? Better off than the alternatives (you don’t know)? Or that you have a competitive advantage?
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 13:25:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155831826302287873
Reply addressees: @Scholars_Stage
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155830925265006595
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155830925265006595
-
Again. An artifact of memory, not supported by the data. they satisfied it this
Again. An artifact of memory, not supported by the data. they satisfied it this way and this is wher eyou are and what you value but you don’t know or can’t imagine all the other permutations that are even better. (“Measure the seen and unseen, b/c all costs are the difference”)
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 13:22:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155830836748595201
Reply addressees: @Scholars_Stage
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155830362003529728
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155830362003529728
-
True but doesn’t change the underlying argument that parenting doesn’t much matt
True but doesn’t change the underlying argument that parenting doesn’t much matter. You are your genes. So are your parents.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 13:20:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155830335814459392
Reply addressees: @Scholars_Stage
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155829962579906560
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155829962579906560
-
So the point being your parents supplied the market of your personality (and int
So the point being your parents supplied the market of your personality (and intellectual) demands with something, but your market of personality demands would have been satisfied one way or the other – as long as not impeded. Because you generate that market.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 13:00:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155825317271015425
Reply addressees: @Scholars_Stage
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155824978664841218
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Scholars_Stage The data says that you would demonstrate openness to experience and discover opportunities no matter what. So you see what you see, but you don’t what you didn’t. Artifact of human memory. Known and unknown. You value what you’ve done. How do you know you won’t have done better?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155824978664841218
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Scholars_Stage The data says that you would demonstrate openness to experience and discover opportunities no matter what. So you see what you see, but you don’t what you didn’t. Artifact of human memory. Known and unknown. You value what you’ve done. How do you know you won’t have done better?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155824978664841218
-
The data says that you would demonstrate openness to experience and discover opp
The data says that you would demonstrate openness to experience and discover opportunities no matter what. So you see what you see, but you don’t what you didn’t. Artifact of human memory. Known and unknown. You value what you’ve done. How do you know you won’t have done better?
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 12:58:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155824978664841218
Reply addressees: @Scholars_Stage
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155819118928334848
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155819118928334848
-
And maybe, talking past one another, no effect on WHAT? On genes no, of course.
And maybe, talking past one another, no effect on WHAT? On genes no, of course. On life outcomes, yes, because costs are costs regardless of one’s characteristics.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 12:55:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155824147672567810
Reply addressees: @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155819814079860736
IN REPLY TO:
@JayMan471
@curtdoolittle Not really. No effect all around.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155819814079860736
-
(serious) Help? Trauma seems to produce pretty negative outcomes. Constant Econo
(serious) Help? Trauma seems to produce pretty negative outcomes. Constant Economic assistance seems to produce expected linear improvement. That part I’m sure of. If you mean both are deterministic I’ll buy that.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 12:53:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155823665675718657
Reply addressees: @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155819814079860736
IN REPLY TO:
@JayMan471
@curtdoolittle Not really. No effect all around.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155819814079860736
-
So to say parenting doesn’t matter is not true, it’s that bad parenting matters
So to say parenting doesn’t matter is not true, it’s that bad parenting matters a lot, but that if you love and socialize your children they’ll reach their potential. But any attempt to ‘improve on the stock’ is not going to happen – ever. Only the $ assets you give them will.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-29 12:34:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155818779307380738
Reply addressees: @Scholars_Stage
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1155817727489167366
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Scholars_Stage (I think it’s that bad parenting will make you worse, high investment parenting buys a discount on access to careers, and continuous family investment concentrates wealth over generations, but otherwise, genes determine outcomes, and early variance will dissipate on maturity.)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155817727489167366
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Scholars_Stage (I think it’s that bad parenting will make you worse, high investment parenting buys a discount on access to careers, and continuous family investment concentrates wealth over generations, but otherwise, genes determine outcomes, and early variance will dissipate on maturity.)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1155817727489167366