Definition: Mindfulness https://propertarianism.com/2019/10/03/definition-mindfulness/
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 20:29:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179856130413121536
Definition: Mindfulness https://propertarianism.com/2019/10/03/definition-mindfulness/
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 20:29:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179856130413121536
“CURT, PLEASE DEFINE MINDFULNESS?”
—“What do you mean when you use the word “mindfulness”?”— Andrew Cordeaux @AndrewCordeaux
1) I mean the physical, cognitive and emotional discipline to control the subject of attention on the present intent, insulated from distractions whether personal, environmental, or interpersonal. 2) But with preference for the stoic method (self authoring, virtues of action), the epicurean objective (within one’s control), testimonial (scientific) knowledge, the play (ritual), and team sport, festival, and feast (celebration). 3) The buddhist method, originally practical and insular evolved into semi-mystical, and survived the attack by monotheistic abrahamism, where the western schools that were practical and action oriented, were destroyed by design by the Abrahamic conquest and dark age. 4) East asian ritual, and Hindu ‘way of life’ survived as well. Each of these methods of physical, mental and emotional discipline reflects local demand given local degree of agency during the period of transformation. (although buddhism was imposed on japan unfortunately). 5) So I use ‘mindfulness’ in the sense that all groups sought to meet demands for some technique of achieving mindfulness of their eras by slightly different means. Since buddhism developed the most direct analysis of the objective, the terminology evolved into a universal. 6) But as in all things, the stoic method, epicurean objective, and scientific(empirical) paradigm, and pursuit of agency(dominance) rather than withdrawal (submission), reflect the european rather than african, semitic, hindu, east asian metaphysics: realism, naturalism, agency.
“CURT, PLEASE DEFINE MINDFULNESS?”
—“What do you mean when you use the word “mindfulness”?”— Andrew Cordeaux @AndrewCordeaux
1) I mean the physical, cognitive and emotional discipline to control the subject of attention on the present intent, insulated from distractions whether personal, environmental, or interpersonal. 2) But with preference for the stoic method (self authoring, virtues of action), the epicurean objective (within one’s control), testimonial (scientific) knowledge, the play (ritual), and team sport, festival, and feast (celebration). 3) The buddhist method, originally practical and insular evolved into semi-mystical, and survived the attack by monotheistic abrahamism, where the western schools that were practical and action oriented, were destroyed by design by the Abrahamic conquest and dark age. 4) East asian ritual, and Hindu ‘way of life’ survived as well. Each of these methods of physical, mental and emotional discipline reflects local demand given local degree of agency during the period of transformation. (although buddhism was imposed on japan unfortunately). 5) So I use ‘mindfulness’ in the sense that all groups sought to meet demands for some technique of achieving mindfulness of their eras by slightly different means. Since buddhism developed the most direct analysis of the objective, the terminology evolved into a universal. 6) But as in all things, the stoic method, epicurean objective, and scientific(empirical) paradigm, and pursuit of agency(dominance) rather than withdrawal (submission), reflect the european rather than african, semitic, hindu, east asian metaphysics: realism, naturalism, agency.
Orrgsm Is a Resource, Just Like Violence https://propertarianism.com/2019/10/03/orrgsm-is-a-resource-just-like-violence/
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 20:09:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179851063257632768
ORRGSM IS A RESOURCE, JUST LIKE VIOLENCE ORRGSM like Violence for which it is a substitute, is simply a resource. The question is what you are using the resource for … punishing the dissemination of undesirable truth and demand for reciprocity, or punishing the dissemination of falsehood and ir-reciprocity.
ORRGSM IS A RESOURCE, JUST LIKE VIOLENCE ORRGSM like Violence for which it is a substitute, is simply a resource. The question is what you are using the resource for … punishing the dissemination of undesirable truth and demand for reciprocity, or punishing the dissemination of falsehood and ir-reciprocity.
Galileo was fighting supernaturalism and denial in the physical sciences: physics, chemistry, biology. He was the principle advocate of Science: The restoration of testimony using mathematics in court a court of peers to all aspects of life.
Darwin was fighting supernaturalism in the biological sciences. He was the principle advocate of realism and naturalism in biology: the restoration of naturalism in biological and social sciences.
Propertarians are fighting pseudoscience and sophism and denial in the human sciences: language, psychology, sociology, politics, and group strategy: The completion of social science: The application of testimony using the measurement of reciprocity.
What’s Next? We will only save ourselves, and mankind from another dark age if we do not make the mistakes of the greeks and the romans, and the monarchists – optimism that other men, are equal in ability and interest to european men.
Galileo was fighting supernaturalism and denial in the physical sciences: physics, chemistry, biology. He was the principle advocate of Science: The restoration of testimony using mathematics in court a court of peers to all aspects of life.
Darwin was fighting supernaturalism in the biological sciences. He was the principle advocate of realism and naturalism in biology: the restoration of naturalism in biological and social sciences.
Propertarians are fighting pseudoscience and sophism and denial in the human sciences: language, psychology, sociology, politics, and group strategy: The completion of social science: The application of testimony using the measurement of reciprocity.
What’s Next? We will only save ourselves, and mankind from another dark age if we do not make the mistakes of the greeks and the romans, and the monarchists – optimism that other men, are equal in ability and interest to european men.
Training the Moral Intuition https://propertarianism.com/2019/10/03/training-the-moral-intuition/
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 19:59:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179848471664349184
[I] suppose that like many people, you assume man is moral, rather than amoral – merely choosing between the moral and immoral as incentives provide. We can in fact read others intentions and incentives. We could not cooperate on means or ends otherwise. However history says that such reading of intentions and incentives creates moral behavior, and trains moral intuition – not that moral behavior is intuitive. It’s not. Only reading of intentions and incentives. As anyone who has raised young children finds rather obvious. (worth repeating)