[M]others must talk to their children in moral language in order to control them at low cost – their approval and disapproval – when children are dependent upon mother for cognitive processing and security. Women try to scale this technique to men where it only works in exchange for sex and affection instead of shared cognitive processing and security. Women try to scale this technique to politics where it only works by undermining political orders, by obscuring the physical and economic reality of parasitism they’re pursuing as if they are still feeding their own children, or trading sex with men for resources and security. This is why politics has become impossible. Because women have made us compete by undermining and lying rather than informing and educating the public. Because emotional appeals that justify intuitions of the ignorant semi-domesticated animal is much easier to distribute than knowledge, understanding, and necessity. This wouldn’t be possible if we had given women a separate house of commons, and retained the historical competition between women’s emotionality, manipulation, half-truths, and undermining, and men’s calculation under threat of physical retaliation. We cannot any longer use violence against our women for gossiping, rallying, ridiculing, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing to create deceit by obscuring truth with disapproval, in matters of truth and falsehood. So without a market for exchange-and-compromise on truthful contract terms, and without the ability to punish women’s approval before truth, and punish men’s face before truth, we are reduced to a small number of men perpetuating the origins of the success of western civilization and women’s privileges that derive from them, by demanding truth before face, truth before approval or disapproval, and contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms. The same is true for the jewish (feminine lying) and muslim (masculine lying) means of undermining western civilization’s universal demand for truth regardless of cost in all circumstances. We are the only people who practice truth before face, and truth before approval, forcing contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms, dragging humanity out of ignorance and poverty. And expansion of the franchise to those who have not yet demonstrated truth before face (masculine), and truth before approval (feminine), was our only substantial mistake. And we made that mistake because we did not understand the oath of adulthood, the jury, the size of the jury, the thang, the senate, the senate and house of commons, the house of lords and house of commons, as markets between classes with different responsibilities and abilities and demonstrated FAMILY competencies, just as we had produced markets for goods, services, and information. And we have only realized today that the market for information is as, if not more important, than the market for goods and services in an information economy. As such we must restore our past mistakes, restore our markets, and restore our prosecution, and our zero tolerance, for anything other than truth before face, regardless of the cost to self or others, so that we may produced contracts of reciprocity. Thus Endeth The Lesson
Theme: Agency
-
1) If you can’t write the dialog you haven’t observed the category of people you
1) If you can’t write the dialog you haven’t observed the category of people your character is a proxy for in similar circumstances. Go study people instead of reading books about it. Do your… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=497638124166416&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 20:02:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190358389194416128
-
(diary)(personal)(medical) Experiment in not taking the new ADHD med today (stim
(diary)(personal)(medical)
Experiment in not taking the new ADHD med today (stimulant). I think it’s more important that I’m NOT taking the OCD med. That said, while I’ve been really prolific again, for the past few hours I’ve been having much more difficulty retaining context. So, what does that mean? It means (a) it probably was more important to get off the other prescription than onto this one. (b) And it’s probably more important to get off it because i’m just not seriously ill any longer (that I know of). (c) This new prescription really does help keep the focus, at least in the second half of the day. (d) I don’t see any point in taking other than the minimum dose of it because I don’t seem to need it.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 19:11:00 UTC
-
1) If you can’t write the dialog you haven’t observed the category of people you
1) If you can’t write the dialog you haven’t observed the category of people your character is a proxy for in similar circumstances. Go study people instead of reading books about it. Do your research.
2) If you can’t write the scene, you can’t role play your characters init, because you haven’t studied people like your characters. Most of the time your characters are talking (crap) is because you’re actually writing to yourself to convince yourself, because your scenes and your characters aren’t acting rationally in context, in furtherance of the plot, because you can’t empathize with them. (Most people write lower middle class characters in middle class conditions, with upper middle class resources, because that’s all the people they know, the contexts they find attractive, and the wealth making the condition possible. The classes think, speak, act very differently.) Do your research.
3) Dramatic tension is only possible for people who share concerns that would provide them with tension. What constitutes tension for gender, class and age varies. Status and self image is important at the bottom, wealth as you rise, but insults mean nothing, and power at the top because money is plentiful – but power is given to leaders they don’t ‘have’ it. It’s all loyalty alliances and opportunity with similar people who merely ‘shop’ for opportunities. Do your research.
4) Leave open mystery, have the characters react, rather than explain, and use mystery (the unknown, uncertainty)….
Do your research. If you did your research the story will come out of you. If you think you have ‘talent’ then you have failed before you put prose to print.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 16:02:00 UTC
-
If you cast enough pearls before enough swine you will eventually attract someth
If you cast enough pearls before enough swine you will eventually attract something better than swine.
If you practice, you eventually an speak perfectly even with rocks in your mouth
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 12:52:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190250318585614336
-
PARENTAL INFLUENCE ON HUSBAND SELECTION It’s not that women didn’t select their
PARENTAL INFLUENCE ON HUSBAND SELECTION
It’s not that women didn’t select their own mates:
… (a) parents had the spectrum: control > veto > influence;
… (b) dependent upon the age at… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=497396114190617&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 12:31:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190244984089391104
-
If you cast enough pearls before enough swine you will eventually attract someth
If you cast enough pearls before enough swine you will eventually attract something better than swine.
If you practice, you eventually an speak perfectly even with rocks in your mouth
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 08:52:00 UTC
-
THE ORIGINS OF POLITICAL CONFLICT IN WOMEN’S GENETIC STRATEGY Mothers must talk
THE ORIGINS OF POLITICAL CONFLICT IN WOMEN’S GENETIC STRATEGY
Mothers must talk to their children in moral language in order to control them at low cost – their approval and disapproval – when children are dependent upon mother for cognitive processing and security.
Women try to scale this technique to men where it only works in exchange for sex and affection instead of shared cognitive processing and security.
Women try to scale this technique to politics where it only works by undermining political orders, by obscuring the physical and economic reality of parasitism they’re pursuing as if they are still feeding their own children, or trading sex with men for resources and security.
This is why politics has become impossible. Because women have made us compete by undermining and lying rather than informing and educating the public. Because emotional appeals that justify intuitions of the ignorant semi-domesticated animal is much easier to distribute than knowledge, understanding, and necessity.
Tis wouldn’t be possible and we had given women a separate house of commons, and retained the historical competition between women’s emotionality, manipulation, half-truths, and undermining, and men’s calculation under threat of physical retaliation. We cannot any longer use violence against our women for gossiping, rallying, ridiculing, shaming, moralizing, psychologizing to create deceit by obscuring truth with disapproval, in matters of truth and falsehood.
So without a market for exchange-and-compromise on truthful contract terms, and without the ability to punish women’s approval before truth, and punish men’s face before truth, we are reduced to a small number of men perpetuating the origins of the success of western civilization and women’s privileges that derive from them, by demanding truth before face, truth before approval or disapproval, and contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms.
The same is true for the jewish (feminine lying) and muslim (masculine lying) means of undermining western civilization’s universal demand for truth regardless of cost in all circumstances.
We are the only people who practice truth before face, and truth before approval, forcing contractual exchange on truthful reciprocal terms, dragging humanity out of ignorance and poverty.
And expansion of the franchise to those who have not yet demonstrated truth before face (masculine), and truth before approval (feminine), was our only substantial mistake.
And we made that mistake because we did not understand the oath of adulthood, the jury, the size of the jury, the thang, the senate, the senate and house of commons, the house of lords and house of commons, as markets between classes with different responsibilities and abilities and demonstrated FAMILY competencies, just as we had produced markets for goods, services, and information.
And we have only realized today that the market for information is as, if not more important, than the market for goods and services in an information economy.
As such we must restore our past mistakes, restore our markets, and restore our prosecution, and our zero tolerance, for anything other than truth before face, regardless of the cost to self or others, so that we may produced contracts of reciprocity.
Thus Endeth The Lesson
Curt Doolittle
November 1, 2019
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 08:48:00 UTC
-
PARENTAL INFLUENCE ON HUSBAND SELECTION It’s not that women didn’t select their
PARENTAL INFLUENCE ON HUSBAND SELECTION
It’s not that women didn’t select their own mates:
… (a) parents had the spectrum: control > veto > influence;
… (b) dependent upon the age at marriage, with parental influence declining the later the age of marriage
… (c) insurance was provided by the family, and income (self insurance) harder to come by. So the family had an interest in the success of the marriage.
… (d) adult death was common, and children without a father or mother put pressure on the family network to feed children in eras where productivity had not been industrialized, and food was always scarce, and a lot of work to produce (which is why women killed so many children)
… (e) property was often transferred and it was of such value that it had to be restorable to the family.
One of The Big Lies, is that traditions are arbitrary rather than of economic necessity in the context in which they are practiced.
These ‘big lies’ are the feminine means of psychologizing and moralizing that which is fact, so that they can undermine by fomenting conflcit between people who are ignorant, rather than argue the facts of reality.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 08:31:00 UTC
-
PACKS: WE ARE HUNTING THE LARGEST PREY. 🙂 (for Sheepdog Nomocracy folks) —“Ri
PACKS: WE ARE HUNTING THE LARGEST PREY. 🙂
(for Sheepdog Nomocracy folks)
—“Risk to predators hunting dangerous prey is an emerging area of research and could account for possible persistent differences in gray wolf (Canis lupus) pack sizes. … Our data support the hypothesis that the persistence of differences in pack-size may be perpetuated by differences in risk to wolves of their primary prey, and we highlight two important extensions of this idea: (1) the potential for wolves to provision and defend injured pack-mates from other wolves and (2) the importance of less-risky, buffer prey to pack-size persistence and year-to-year variation.”—
WOLF SUPER-PACKS (PAC’s? 😉 ) EXIST
—“In the winter of 2010-11, a “super pack” of wolves numbering up to 400 reportedly terrorized the Russian town of Verkhoyansk (population 1,300) in northern region of Yakutia, one of the remotest inhabited areas in the northern hemisphere. More than 30 horses were killed in just four days, according to local officials, and teams of hunters were established to patrol neighbourhoods and shoot the wolves on sight.”—
NORTHERN WOLVES ARE BIGGEST
—“Wolves increase exponentially in size the further they are from the equator. Wolves of the tropics are often no larger than medium sized dogs, but those of the far north (Alaska, Canada, and Russia) can be in excess of 120lbs. The largest wolf ever killed in North America was taken in Alaska in 1939 and tipped the scales at 175lbs. In the former Ukraine SSR, a still more massive wolf was killed that weighed 190lbs. There are unsubstantiated reports of 200lb+ specimens, presumably alpha males in areas that boast a steady food supply.”—
WOLVES IN THE AMERICAS ARE NICER
—“Wolves in the Americas are less likely to attack humans than elsewhere in the world.There are very few verifiable records of wolf attacks in the US and Canada, but in Europe and Asia, wolves are far nastier. Historical accounts indicate over 3,000 people killed in France between 1580-1830. In the Middle Ages throughout Europe, special structures were built along highways for travelers to take refuge from roving packs. The wolves of India and Russia are also particularly well known to claim human victims. During World War I, soldiers from the Allied and Central Forces were occasionally forced to join forces fighting off starving wolves attracted by the scent of blood on the battlefield.”—
NO MERCY
—“Wolves eat their prey alive.”—
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 19:03:00 UTC