Theme: Agency

  • Movement > Nervous System > ‘Brain’ > Embodiment > Awareness > Consciousness > M

    Movement > Nervous System > ‘Brain’ > Embodiment > Awareness > Consciousness > Mirroring[(imitation(physical), empathy(emotional) sympathy(mental)] > Reduction to analogy to experience > anthropomorphism(projection) > storytelling > Mythology. No knowledge, no literacy, no math, nothing is required for when we use “MAN AS THE MEASURE OF ALL THINGS TO MAN”.
    Gods function as a system of measurement, and one that can be generalized independent of the leadership of the group, and thus limit the leadership (dominance) in the group, this facilitating division of labor and cooperation as well as mindfulness from relief from the chaos of personalities.

    Reply addressees: @JackOfAwlTrades


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-11 21:41:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789410475798642689

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1789399194177794489

  • Religions. New age religions. All are just another fictionalism (story) to satis

    Religions. New age religions. All are just another fictionalism (story) to satisfy the neuroticism that arises with the emergence of consciousness among social creatures, unable to obtain mindfulness given the alienation of post tribal life, and and the uncertainty of life. The only non-false religion is individual and group debt to the universe, nature, one’s people, one’s ‘polity’, ancestors, and heroes. Everything else is quite literally a self induced, socially constructed, opiate. “Checking out” and abandoning responsibility for every single thing possible.

    Reply addressees: @Bearcat50 @Xene1042 @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-10 14:58:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788946602243084288

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788867450429161701

  • MORAL OUTRAGE IN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, BY THE VOX POPULI Do you know what the t

    MORAL OUTRAGE IN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, BY THE VOX POPULI

    Do you know what the terms “bias”, “cognitive bias”, “sex differences in moral bias”, “wishful thinking”, “projection”, “moral grandstanding” and futile attempts at “social construction” mean – and what their relationship is to developmental, cognitive, and experiential immaturity?

    There’s a relationship between developmental or cognitive maturity and moral grandstanding, particularly in the context of social construction.

    Moral grandstanding can sometimes arise from the interplay between an individual’s level of maturity both developmentally, in knowledge, and in scale of knowledge and their desire to influence social norms or perceptions.

    Let’s look a little deeper:

    Developmental and Cognitive Maturity:
    • Less mature individuals might exhibit moral grandstanding as they seek validation for their beliefs or actions due to insecurity, inexperience, or a desire to belong. They may oversimplify complex issues and express them in emotionally charged, absolutist terms.
    • As people mature cognitively and experientially, they often become more comfortable with nuance and are less driven to seek approval or moral affirmation through grandstanding.

    Experiential Maturity:
    • Personal experiences can shape one’s understanding of morality and social issues, often increasing empathy and reducing the need for moral posturing.
    • However, even those with significant life experience may engage in grandstanding if they feel their identity or worldview is threatened.

    Social Construction and Identity Formation:
    • Individuals often use moral grandstanding as a tool for identity formation and influencing social perceptions. By proclaiming moral positions publicly, people try to shape their identity as a member of a particular group.
    • This behavior is linked to the desire to construct a social image that aligns with specific norms or ideals, often driven by peer validation, especially in contexts where social media amplifies grandstanding.

    Cognitive Moral Scaling:
    Now there is also a problem of moral scaling. In that children are conscious only of being treated similarly, then we increasingly mature until we recognize that people are different in ability, phase of life, and interest, so we accept one another’s variations.

    Then we mature further if we have the experience, of running a family, or a small business, or an enterprise, or an industry, or a bureaucracy, or a government, or an attempt to organize other governments. Or worse, an attempt to geostrategically regulate the behavior of governments toward each other, extending even to war.

    This is the ‘scale’ problem of moral judgement. The most common of which is the feminine attempt to scale the moral intuition of the family over which they have both knoweldge and control, to the polity where they have no knowledge and control, and thus encourage moral hazard (bad behavior). Then they refuse to punish the bad behavior to correct it. Worse, they all to often, whether female or cognitively feminine male attempt to

    People, especially the less able, immature, ignorant, inexperience, or even experienced at a large scale, seem to project their level of moral intuition into fields where morality may result in a choice of Pareto optimums wherein all are equally unhappy, but cannot be made happier without making people even less happy, and where in some cases, particularly in war, some people must be made very very unhappy, and perhaps miserable, suffering, or dead in the present time in order to prevent an even worse consequence at some future point in time.

    So in addition to immaturity and maturity we also have a scale problem in both developmental and cognitive, and in experiential maturity.

    The solution to these issues is to train people in limits based reasoning (outcomes), first, including the heterogeneity of individuals, sexes, classes, ethnicities, civilizations, and races. And second, to provide a system of measurement that assists them in making the hard judgements when seeking the best for all not just now but for the long term future.

    Adult Behavior
    This is how adults must and do make practical decisions in the international arena. And the ignorance and immaturity (and too often femininity) of the population in a democratic polity, prevents them from speaking the whole truth and nothing but it, to a population that’s the equivalent of geostrategic preschoolers.

    This is a kind, and scientific means of explaining that most moral outrage in the field of international relations is almost entirely childish: immature.

    Affections
    CD

    Reply addressees: @Brand_der_Plank


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-08 17:09:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788255005377437696

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788243614562234596

  • (correct. iq, behavior, culture, traditions)

    (correct. iq, behavior, culture, traditions)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-08 15:59:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788237264608260348

    Reply addressees: @MaMo_ @GPEditor

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1788236874240405635

  • (NLI Insights) Why Have We Formally Defined the Existing Sixth Sense Man Has Alw

    (NLI Insights)
    Why Have We Formally Defined the Existing Sixth Sense Man Has Always Had?
    (cognitive science, neuroscience)
    In our work over the past week we’ve separated the classical categorization of internal(interoceptive) and external(exterosensive) sensory systems into three, the third consisting of Spatial-Navigational Senses, which splits off Proprioception(position of body and limbs) and Vestibular Sense(orientation, particularly in response to gravity and present direction of movement) to join with the world model produced by the disambiguation of objects, spaces, and backgrounds (by the parietal lobe) necessary for movement, vs the disambiguation of objects with spaces necessary for manipulation, whether risk or opportunity (from the temporal lobe).

    Both of which, along with the other senses, feed into the organization of objects(action) and spaces(movement, navigation) into scenes, (the cortices that feed into the hippocampal region).

    And indexing the inputs to those scenes into episodes, storing those indexes (cumulative pattern of neural firings) creating memories of episodes and associating those episodes with other episodes (hippocampal region).

    Allowing us to predict potential consequences (futures), some of which capture our attention (thalamus), for immediate reaction by the amygdala(emotion), basal ganglia(threat), or delayed reaction by release into our prefrontal cortex (conscious control: short term memory, problem solving, goal pursuing, by recursion (feedback into the next moment of stimulation).

    Together producing the experience we call consciousness, which consists of a three dimensional body (muti-sensory system) and the dominance of a two dimensional sensory facility (vision) which it must self organize through training (repetition) into three dimensional spatial relations, and project upon it, a three dimensional approximation of objects(interests), space(navigation), and limits(backgrounds), using ‘invisible’ (intuitionistic) triangles (our facing direction), and hexagons of those triangles (bodily spaces), combined with eye direction, head direction, body direction, limb position, speed of movement, rate of turn, given internal bodily state, and together used to predict possible actions we can take in those spaces, with the bodies we have, in the condition were in, in the time we have to act given those circumstances.

    The result is another example of the universe’s use of ternary logic to gradually through hierarchies use simplicity to create extraordinary complexity through the competition between cells for coherence “neurons that fire together wire together”, so that those that ‘agree’ not only in the moment but over very short sequences (pulses) in time, that they are identifying similar stimuli extant in the real world wether internal external, or eventually, in the imaginary world of our auto association, imagination, memory, and fantasy.

    THE ARGUMENT
    Given our exteroceptive senses, our interoceptive senses, there are three interoceptive senses that reflect our homeostasis (visceroception, thermoception, and nociception), but the other two: proprioception(position) and vestibular sense(orientation) and the unstated sense that is perhaps the most important: three dimensional disambiguation in to objects, spaces, background and motion, appear to categorize a third category of related senses that we should logically separate from the historical categorizations.

    The traditional division into exteroceptive (external stimuli), interoceptive (internal state), and proprioceptive (body position) senses does capture a broad spectrum of our sensory experiences.

    Therefore, we propose to consider a separate category that specifically addresses spatial and navigational senses, because it adds clarity to the sensory processing framework, and illustrates the physical nature of the construction experience from first causes to intuitions to consciousness.

    TRADITIONAL CATEGORIES
    • Exteroceptive Senses: Detect external stimuli (e.g., vision, hearing, touch, taste, smell).
    • Interoceptive Senses: Monitor internal physiological states (e.g., hunger, thirst, the need for air, pain, internal temperature).
    • Proprioceptive Sense: Provides information about body position through receptors in the muscles, tendons, and joints.

    SUGGESTED THIRD CATEGORY:
    “Spatial-Navigational Senses”
    • Proprioception: Although traditionally categorized under proprioceptive senses, your suggestion to consider it in a separate spatial-navigational category emphasizes its role in spatial awareness rather than just body position.
    • Vestibular Sense (Balance and Orientation): Crucial for understanding body orientation in space, particularly in relation to gravitational forces.
    • Three-Dimensional Disambiguation: This involves the cognitive processing necessary to interpret and organize visual information into comprehensible structures like objects, spaces, backgrounds, and movements. It underpins our ability to navigate and interact effectively with our environment.
    (Note: we simply MUST come up with another totally incomprehensible term for this sense just so it’s consistently as obscure as the others.) 😉

    JUSTIFICATION FOR A NEW CATEGORY
    • Spatial Coherence: These senses collectively contribute to a coherent understanding of the body’s position and movement within three-dimensional space. They provide critical data not just on the body itself but on its relationship to the surroundings.
    • Cognitive and Behavioral Relevance: This grouping reflects their interconnected roles in facilitating cognitive functions such as navigation, motion perception, and spatial orientation, which are fundamental to survival and interaction with the environment.
    • Neurological Integration: These senses are deeply integrated at the neurological level, with significant interplay in areas of the brain involved in spatial memory, navigation, and motor coordination (e.g., the hippocampus, inner ear, cerebellum, and motor cortices).

    IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW CLASSIFICATION
    • Research and Understanding: A reclassification might lead to more targeted research into how these senses interact and influence each other, potentially unveiling new insights into spatial perception and cognitive mapping.
    • Clinical Applications: Improved classification can enhance diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in neurology and rehabilitation, particularly for conditions affecting balance, movement, and spatial orientation.

    CLOSING
    By considering these senses as part of a dedicated spatial-navigational category, we could deepen our understanding of how humans interpret and maneuver through space, recognizing the complex interdependencies of these sensory systems.

    This approach respects the complexity of sensory processing and could refine our understanding of neural integration across different sensory modalities.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 23:27:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787625307492470785

  • No. We would re-civilize, educate, and train you into capable mature adults, fro

    No. We would re-civilize, educate, and train you into capable mature adults, from the feral children so many have devolved into, so that families could continue to produce replacement level population and civilization can continue without precipitous collapse. Men will respond…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 20:37:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787582417869349314

    Reply addressees: @ArdisArdor18416 @Tomiesdaugther @spaceangelvoice

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787580067071086818


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    (burn)
    No I’m calling you out for the fraud of attempting to justify your burdening others with you genetic detritus thereby continuing the expansionary increase of the cost of your poor genes, poor character, poor upbringing, poor behavior, and deficient performance onto society and polity because you couldn’t both keep your legs closed, develop the character and economic security for motherhood, make yourself desirable for a man before and after reproduction, and hold a family together so that you weren’t a burden upon others who clearly rejected you as did your husband or boyfriend, or lover, or friend with benefits, or one night stand, or participant in the train that ran though your bedroom each night with regularity.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1787580067071086818

  • INDIVIDUAL-ISM IS A PRODUCT OF COMMONS-ISM IS A PRODUCT OF HERO-ISM FOR THE COMM

    INDIVIDUAL-ISM IS A PRODUCT OF COMMONS-ISM IS A PRODUCT OF HERO-ISM FOR THE COMMON GOOD
    –“I try to think of genetic “self” preservation like Asimov’s 3 Laws of Robotics”–

    (Ethocentism)

    Unfortunately while individual maximization of potential is both practical in individual, economic, and political application, and as such is an optimum product of the commons of a polity, no man is an island, and as such all human achievement of potential is and always will be a product of his participation in and regulation by a commons produced by a polity. As such, as with many sophistries in philosophy, Asimov’s three laws depend upon a polity to produce and necessitate them as a commons.

    And secondly, because this is another sophistic metaphysical presumption, the time preference of one’s criteria for decision making such as you’ve demonstrated by the choice of the limit of genetic persistence of the group genome, morphology, phenotype, civilization, and culture, is also a product of the capacity of the polity to produce commons sufficient to extend both individual and group time preference to that limit.

    While at first glance this may seem contrary to your ambitions to preserve an ethnostate, the opposite is true. It’s a vindication of it.

    As such, justifying the pursuit of power to institutionalize delay of gratification by extending time preference in the production of the optimum discovered and known commons for both past present and future: Whiteness: the institutional demand for the individual responsibility for the spectrum of private to common for shared producers of that commons, and responsibility for the past debt to ancestors, present cost of commons for one another, and transfer of that inheritance and cost as investment for future generations: producing continuous evolution in duty to truth, excellence, beauty and the institution of discounts on complex cooperation, stress, uncertainty, and mindfulness and culture of heroism in their production.

    If you understand this it is both science, profound, inspirational, the foundation of a natural religion of European people for their ancestors and nature, and the criteria for the foundations of law to persist our people.

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 20:16:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787577132022915073

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787544074200773072

  • I can do X b/c we can know incentives They can do Y, when we do not know them

    I can do X b/c we can know incentives
    They can do Y, when we do not know them.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 00:45:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787282499078422529

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @WerrellBradley

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787281644858023982

  • The purpose of the female BODY and BRAIN is to seduce, manipulate, and regulate

    The purpose of the female BODY and BRAIN is to seduce, manipulate, and regulate offspring. That doesn’t require truth. It only requires creating a debt response in others, and using guilt to provoke the debt response. Seriously that’s all it is. Everything else consist of the female state of conflict between those instincts and intuitions and the risk, threat, and danger of using those skills on other than children.

    Reply addressees: @JackOfAwlTrades


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-05 22:11:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787243629477531649

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787225880013537739

  • RT @AutistocratMS: Women (and feminine men) are always shown doing NAXALT but th

    RT @AutistocratMS: Women (and feminine men) are always shown doing NAXALT but they engage in AXALT just as readily, depending on whichever…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-05 18:06:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787182104175865925