Curt Doolittle

Theme: Agency

  • GSRRM IS ALSO A THE TOOL OF PSYCHOPATHS James Dmitro Makienko The tools listed i

    GSRRM IS ALSO A THE TOOL OF PSYCHOPATHS

    James Dmitro Makienko

    The tools listed in GRRSM and the extended version can be all described as being “a part of” female cognitive manipulation. These techniques are also common to sociopaths and narcissists.

    Techniques not mentioned include framing – “if you are X therefore you must do Y (baiting into hazard) which is not in your interest (no full disclosure of costs), but in the interest of manipulator (irreciprocity)” – example “If you are a christian you must accept transsexuals because of compassion and sermon-of-the-mount christ saying judge ye not…”

    Another technique is derailing the topic, so that you are not stating your point clearly and not arguing what you are saying and respond emotionally – and people don’t remember your point but remember that you’re an angry person who had a really long argument with someone.

    The response to that is to call out the manipulator on manipulation, and restate your point.

    And keep doing this over and over until they stop.

    —

    (CD: ^Yep, state their technique, return to central argument, repeat, until you exhaust them.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 13:03:00 UTC

  • HUMANE BEEF I will keep a cow or two in the yard and feed it well. I will kill t

    HUMANE BEEF

    I will keep a cow or two in the yard and feed it well. I will kill the cow by standard metod. It will never know it’s going to be harmed or experience anything. They are frequently manipulated by vets and others. I will have a butcher come to the yard with his truck and clean the cow, returning me the usual amount of about say, for cattle 58-62% , hogs 74% and market lambs 54%., and for cattle close to half as hamburger. doing so requires sunlight and grass, and maybe some agricultural feed. This does not require chemistry and energy or other man-made substitutes that are costly in energy to produce. This is the healthiest method of eating available to man. If we buy and raise two young cows at a time, and keep a large freezer, they will have company and be happy the whole time. They are cows.

    DATA

    The average american eats 200 lbs a year. (I eat more than that)

    With an average market (live or on hoof) weight of 1,150 lbs and the average yield of 62.2%, the typical steer will produce a 715 lb. (dressed weight) carcass.

    The dressed beef (or carcass) will yield approximately 569 lbs. (further details below) of red meat and trim (take home meat – which includes the average weight of 27 lbs of variety meat: liver, heart, tongue, tripe, sweetbreads and brains) and 146 lbs of fat, bone and loss. This is roughly a yield of 80% from the dressed or hanging weight – this is for a VERY LEAN Beef. A High Quality, USDA Choice Beef will yield approximately 70% of the Hanging or Dressed Weight. The yield on the take home meat weight from the live weight of the (VERY LEAN) steer is approximately 50%.

    Chuck – 209.5 lbs total, which is 29% of the dressed/hanging/carcass weight:

    Blade Roasts and Steaks 33.9 lbs.

    Ground Beef and Stew Meat 83.3 lbs.

    Arm Pot Roasts and Steaks 35.5 lbs.

    Cross Rib Pot Roast 25.4 lbs.

    Fat and Bones 31.4 lbs.

    Round – 155.8 lbs. total, which is 22% of the dressed/hanging/carcass weight:

    Top Round 34.6 lbs.

    Bottom Round 31.2 lbs.

    Tip 16.8 lbs.

    Rump 7.8 lbs.

    Ground Beef 33.4 lbs.

    Fat and Bones 32 lbs.

    Thin Cuts – 134.6 lbs. total, which is 19% of the dressed/hanging/carcass weight:

    Flank Steak 3.6 lbs.

    Pastrami Squares 2.9 lbs.

    Outside Skirt 2.2 lbs.

    Inside skirt 2.5 lbs.

    Boneless Brisket 16 lbs.

    Ground Beef and Stew Meat 87.3 lbs

    Fat and Bone 20.1 lbs.

    Short Loin – 115.7 lbs. total, which is 16% of the dressed/hanging/carcass weight:

    Porterhouse Steak 19.6 lbs.

    T-bone Steak 9.8 lbs.

    Strip Steak 15 lbs.

    Sirloin Steak 15.3 lbs.

    Tenderloin Steak 6.8 lbs.

    Ground Beef and Stew Meat 22.7 lbs.

    Fat and Bone 26.5 lbs.

    Rib – 66.6 lbs. total, which is 9% of the dressed/hanging/carcass weight:

    Rib Roast 23.9 lbs.

    Rib Steak 9.2 lbs.

    Short Ribs 8.6 lbs.

    Ground Beef and Stew Meat 16.5 lbs.

    Fat and Bone 8.4 lbs.

    Miscellaneous – 32.7 lbs. total, which is 5% of the dressed/hanging/carcass weight:

    Kidney and Hanging Tender 4.9 lbs.

    Fat, Suet and Cutting Loss 27.8 lbs.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 12:09:00 UTC

  • The wealthier you are, the more talented you are the more ability you have to pu

    The wealthier you are, the more talented you are the more ability you have to pursue biases (preferences). This manifests largely in middle and upper middle classes since upper classes are outliers.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 17:07:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221842141594423297

    Reply addressees: @Crypto4Lif @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221630454048026624

    IN REPLY TO:

    @edodreaming

    @charlesmurray Independent of income differences?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221630454048026624

  • The more freedom (luxury) we have NOT to compromise (conform), and instead to pu

    The more freedom (luxury) we have NOT to compromise (conform), and instead to pursue our natural (genetic) interests, the more we pursue our natural (genetic) interests because there is no cost of not doing so.

    Painfully obvious. Economics in Everything.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 17:02:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221841029109817344

    Reply addressees: @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221451040316362753

    IN REPLY TO:

    @charlesmurray

    Proposition 1. “Sex differences in personality are consistent worldwide and tend to widen in more gender-egalitarian cultures.” Who would have predicted that sex differences in personality are wider in Denmark than in Burkina Faso? But the pattern is thoroughly replicated.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221451040316362753

  • There are many checks on men’s antisocial behavior in fulfillment of demand for

    There are many checks on men’s antisocial behavior in fulfillment of demand for cognitive load – although sports, and video games are wasteful they aren’t harmful, and business and the arts are constructive. There are no such checks on women’s behavior.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 13:49:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221792376450179072

    Reply addressees: @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221792061344698373

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @clairlemon Vegetarianism, like animal activism, political activism, or gossiping and undermining, is among the strange obsessions that women devote their cognitive demand for emotional load to in the absence of more constructive outputs (children). The problem is there is no check on women.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1221792061344698373

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @clairlemon Vegetarianism, like animal activism, political activism, or gossiping and undermining, is among the strange obsessions that women devote their cognitive demand for emotional load to in the absence of more constructive outputs (children). The problem is there is no check on women.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1221792061344698373

  • Vegetarianism, like animal activism, political activism, or gossiping and underm

    Vegetarianism, like animal activism, political activism, or gossiping and undermining, is among the strange obsessions that women devote their cognitive demand for emotional load to in the absence of more constructive outputs (children). The problem is there is no check on women.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 13:48:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221792061344698373

    Reply addressees: @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221791526969401344

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @clairlemon Secondly, pejoratively, the female nervous system evolved to carry a cognitive load that included empathy with offspring. Just as when men aren’t supplied with competition they behave dysfunctionally, when women aren’t supplied with emotional load they find “strange obsessions”.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1221791526969401344

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @clairlemon Secondly, pejoratively, the female nervous system evolved to carry a cognitive load that included empathy with offspring. Just as when men aren’t supplied with competition they behave dysfunctionally, when women aren’t supplied with emotional load they find “strange obsessions”.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1221791526969401344

  • Secondly, pejoratively, the female nervous system evolved to carry a cognitive l

    Secondly, pejoratively, the female nervous system evolved to carry a cognitive load that included empathy with offspring. Just as when men aren’t supplied with competition they behave dysfunctionally, when women aren’t supplied with emotional load they find “strange obsessions”.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 13:46:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221791526969401344

    Reply addressees: @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221791016304480261

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @clairlemon Let’s avoid conflating sentience, awareness, and the consciousness spectrum – and prevent overreach. These things are our food. Not abusing them and not eating them are two different things. And the reason not to abuse them is that we don’t want such people in our midst. https://t.co/sO1yvXPoyg

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1221791016304480261

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @clairlemon Let’s avoid conflating sentience, awareness, and the consciousness spectrum – and prevent overreach. These things are our food. Not abusing them and not eating them are two different things. And the reason not to abuse them is that we don’t want such people in our midst. https://t.co/sO1yvXPoyg

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1221791016304480261

  • THE PSYCHOLOGICAL FUNCTION OF RELIGION —“Notes on religion from “Willpower” by

    THE PSYCHOLOGICAL FUNCTION OF RELIGION

    —“Notes on religion from “Willpower” by Roy F. Baumeister

    (Willpower Stabilized/Sense of Place)

    “Less obvious benefits included the finding that religion reduces people’s inner conflicts among different goals and values.”

    (Practice Habit-Forming)

    “Religious believers build self-control by regularly forcing themselves to interrupt their daily routines in order to pray.”

    (External Accountability/Internal Consistency)

    “Religious people tend to feel that someone important is watching them. That monitor might be God, a supernatural being who pays attention to what you do and think, often even knowing your innermost thoughts and reasons, and can’t be easily fooled if you do something apparently good for the wrong reason.”—Todd E. Magnusson

    —“(Willpower Stabilized/Sense of Place) Less obvious benefits included the finding that religion reduces people’s inner conflicts among different goals and values.”—

    Mindfulness. This is a neurological necessity. The fact that we are infinitely adaptive does not mean that we not infinitely stressed by infinite adaptation. The stoic method with Epicurean objectives achieves this best.

    —“ritual”—

    yes. continuous programming of stable state despite continuous exposure to life. Stoic ritual is superior.

    –” that someone important is watching them”–

    Yes. Again, stoic ritual, casts that person as ‘you’, giving you agency and knowledge of it.

    The general argument so far is that ritual religion of slaves is necessary for the bottom, that stoicism an epicureanism for the middle, and stoicism and aryanism for the top.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 06:24:00 UTC

  • AGENCY IS A DEMONSTRATION OF SUCCESSFUL WILL TO POWER —“I struggle with Agency

    AGENCY IS A DEMONSTRATION OF SUCCESSFUL WILL TO POWER

    —“I struggle with Agency… Someone who goes to the gym regularly because they want to be buff and ripped would be said to be exercising agency. An alignment of desire and rational action / persistence. However, is a gambler exercising agency when they gamble on the daily? Or is agency simply contentiousness bearing fruit against a declared aim?”– Gary Knight

    In simple terms:

    —“contentiousness bearing fruit against a declared aim?”–

    Yes.

    Although, in most cases, gambling regularly is a form of self medication, it is true that people win, and you can’t play if you don’t win. And it’s simply an expensive means of entertainment. And whether entertainment or medication can lead to addiction, which is the very opposite of agency.

    Agency is the sum total of that which leads you to independent action in fulfillment of your ambitions – overcoming (‘overman’) the physical, emotional, intellectual, interpersonal, social, economic, political, military, and knowledge, impediments to a desired end.

    Will to power is an inspiration.

    Agency is its demonstration.

    Omniscience and Omnipotence are it’s ends.

    The transcendence of man into the gods we imagine.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 06:07:00 UTC

  • I”M DOING WHAT I SAID I WOULD DO – ALBEIT SLOWLY —“What is your Response to pe

    I”M DOING WHAT I SAID I WOULD DO – ALBEIT SLOWLY

    —“What is your Response to people now 24 who said they knew about you since they were 12 but you accomplished nothing? (not my opinion) What is your response to the same nihilists who say the Virginia rally accomplished nothing and the grassroots rights will sit around as their country gets overtaken by the left as their rally was meaningless?”—

    Well, let’s see. I started a site in 09. I went public in 12-13. Eli is the only person I know of that’s been with me that long. Hmm… So it’s possible I guess.

    What does accomplished nothing mean? What was I supposed to have accomplished?

    I set out to produce a value neutral language of ethics and politics; then to express the history of my people in those terms; then to create a constitution of natural law; and I promised a set of deliverables: (a) a moral license (b) a set of demands, (c) a plan of transition, and (d) a means of insurrection. And I said I would only take a leadership role if other leadership didnt emerge. I’m either doing or have done all those things.

    Just over a year ago we started the institute on one hand, and john’s videos on revolution on the other. We have about a dozen people capable of using or building upon P. if we double that we’ll have the number I was shooting for, and if we get to 100 we’ll have certainly achieved our goals.

    Conversely, what has anyone else done except bring us the catastrophe of c’ville, get deplatformed, and learned the painful lesson I warned them about in ’16 when they went down the identitarian message, rather than revolution and rights messages? Where are all those people now? Their toast.

    What did Hoppe or Rothbard or the Mises institute or CATO do? Absolutely nothing. What about the Conservatives? Nothing. Why? Thy had the wrong f—king answer. There is only one solution and that is war. And there is only one way of avoiding war, and that is to make the horror of it so certain that the other side prefers to separate rather than lose two thirds of its numbers.

    Y’all want to move mountains on impulse. You’re filled with rage and fear. You’re first movers like me. But you are not strategic planners like me. I am an engineer. I’m doing what I said. And the Overton window is moving at exactly the rate I predicted it would.

    We will get our revolution when there is the least resistance from our own. And that will be shortly.

    Go read about the IRA and about Mao, and then study what ISIS did to fund itself.

    I think shit thru. That’s why I take time.

    And if other leadership emerges that’s fine with me.

    Someone just has to do it.

    I don’t need it. I can be happy with one woman, a computer, a sports car, and a few friends.

    The only reason I do this is because I love my people, it needs doing, and everyone else is doing it even worse than I am.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-26 15:17:00 UTC