Theme: Agency

  • (Working On First Principles of Instincts) –“all instincts are essentially scal

    (Working On First Principles of Instincts)

    –“all instincts are essentially scaled-up versions of basic survival behaviors”–

    Let’s give this simple evolutionary hierarchy a try:
    1) There are those that regulate the sleep and wakefulness, as well as hunger and thirst are just changes in state so maybe sleep-wake but otherwise there isn’t any ‘skill’ stored in the nervous system for hunger, thirst, or any other change in state.

    2) There are those that have to do with acquiring resources and defense of those resources, like seeking, hunting, navigating, and returning to nest (slow) and reflex, flinch, shock. surprise, freeze, flight, or flight (fast) are extreme examples;

    3) There are those that include reproduction and care, and they are the complex instincts though they evolved out of having sex (hunting), protecting resources(defense), and nesting(spatial safety) which are evolutions of the acquisition instinct;

    4) Finally socialization is again, just safety and acquisition of resources combined with suppression of aggression during childhood into adulthood.

    So just as all cognition is an evolution of the scale of the capacity of the nervous system, all instincts are an increasing scale of behavior beginning with acquisition of resources, movement, embodiment, wayfinding(navigating) and protecting resources including the self and offspring and into socialization which again is just an advancement of acquisition and defense by participation in a herd, pack, or troop.

    ChatGPT Responses to Various Prompts

    Your comprehensive breakdown of human instincts is insightful and aligns well with evolutionary psychology and behavioral science perspectives. To build on your analysis, let’s explore these categories in more detail:

    1. Regulation of States

    Sleep-Wake Cycles: Regulated by circadian rhythms, these instincts ensure rest and recovery.
    Hunger and Thirst: Drive to seek food and water, essential for maintaining bodily functions.

    2. Acquisition and Defense of Resources

    Slow Responses
    Seeking/Hunting: Instincts drive humans to search for food and other resources. This includes foraging, hunting, and strategic planning.Navigating and Wayfinding: Humans have evolved to navigate their environment efficiently, using landmarks and spatial memory to find resources and return to safe locations (nests or homes).

    Fast Responses
    Reflexes: Automatic responses to stimuli, such as pulling a hand away from a hot surface.
    Flinching: An instinctive reaction to sudden movements or threats.
    Shock and Surprise: Immediate physiological responses to unexpected events, preparing the body for quick action.
    Freeze, Flight, or Fight: Instinctual responses to danger. Freezing can help avoid detection, flight involves escaping from the threat, and fighting is a defensive response.

    3. Reproduction and Care

    Mating Behavior: Instincts related to finding a mate, courtship, and reproduction.
    Parental Care: Behaviors ensuring the survival and development of offspring, including nurturing, protecting, and teaching.Nesting: Creating and maintaining a safe environment for raising offspring.
    Protecting Resources: Defending food, territory, and offspring from threats.

    4. Socialization

    Group Living: Humans are social animals, and instincts drive us to form groups for mutual benefit. This includes:Safety in Numbers: Group living provides protection against predators and environmental hazards.
    Resource Acquisition: Cooperative hunting, gathering, and sharing of resources.
    Suppression of Aggression: Social norms and behaviors that reduce conflict within the group, ensuring cooperation and harmony.

    Evolutionary Perspective
    All these instincts can be seen as part of a continuum, evolving from basic survival needs to more complex social behaviors:
    Basic Instincts: Acquisition of resources, self-defense, and reproduction.
    Complex Behaviors: Parental care, social cooperation, and cultural transmission of knowledge.
    Advanced Social Structures: Formation of societies with intricate social norms and cooperative behaviors that enhance group survival and success.

    Supporting Theories and References
    Evolutionary Psychology: Explains how many human behaviors are rooted in our evolutionary past and are shaped by the need to survive and reproduce. Key texts include “The Adapted Mind” by Jerome Barkow, Leda Cosmides, and John Tooby.
    Sociobiology: E.O. Wilson’s work in “Sociobiology: The New Synthesis” provides a foundation for understanding how social behaviors are influenced by genetic and environmental factors.
    Neuroscience: Studies on brain function and structure, such as those by Antonio Damasio, show how neural mechanisms underlie instinctual behaviors.

    First Principles of Behavior: “Energy defeats time”

    1. Energy(time)
    Energy Acquisition: The fund
    amental need for energy drives the behavior of all living organisms. This principle underlies many basic instincts, including foraging, hunting, and food storage.
    Metabolism and Survival: Organisms evolved mechanisms to efficiently acquire and store energy. For example, the biochemical processes of metabolism convert food into usable energy.

    2. Acquisition(time)
    Motion and Movement: Movement increases an organism’s chances of finding resources and avoiding predators.
    Locomotion: From simple amoeboid movement to complex locomotive systems in animals, motion is essential for exploring environments and exploiting resources.
    Navigation: The ability to navigate and return to resource-rich areas or safe havens (e.g., nests) has been crucial for survival.

    3. Prediction(time)
    Neural Development: The evolution of neurons significantly enhanced the ability of organisms to process information and respond to their environment.
    Sensory Neurons: Early neurons evolved to detect changes in the environment, leading to more sophisticated sensory systems.
    Motor Neurons: These neurons control movement, allowing organisms to react more quickly and effectively.

    4. Complexity(time)
    Brain Evolution: The brain evolved as a centralized organ to process sensory information, make decisions, and coordinate complex behaviors.
    Centralization and Complexity: Early brains likely started as simple nerve nets and evolved into more centralized structures, improving coordination and processing power.
    Cerebral Cortex: In mammals, the cerebral cortex is involved in higher-order functions such as planning, decision-making, and problem-solving.

    5. Cooperation (time)
    Socialization: Social behaviors emerged as a way to enhance survival and reproductive success through cooperation.
    Group Living: Living in groups offers protection, shared resources, and collaborative hunting or foraging.
    Communication: The development of communication systems (e.g., vocalizations, body language) facilitated social coordination and cooperation.
    Social Norms and Culture: Over time, social groups developed norms and cultural practices that further enhanced group cohesion and success.

    Illustration through Evolutionary Timeline

    1. Early Life
    Single-celled Organisms: Basic metabolic processes for energy acquisition.
    Multicellular Organisms: Coordination of cells for movement and resource acquisition.

    2. Evolution of Simple Nervous Systems
    Cnidarians (e.g., Jellyfish): Development of nerve nets for basic responses to the environment.
    Flatworms: Centralized nervous systems with simple brains and bilateral symmetry, enabling more complex behaviors.

    3. Complex Nervous Systems
    Arthropods (e.g., Insects): Development of more complex nervous systems and behaviors, such as navigation and social behaviors (e.g., ant colonies).
    Vertebrates: Centralized brains with specialized regions for different functions, leading to advanced behaviors.

    4. Mammalian Brain and Human Evolution
    Primates: Expansion of the cerebral cortex, enabling sophisticated social behaviors and tool use.
    Humans: Development of advanced cognitive abilities, language, culture, and social structures.

    Key Points and Supporting Theories
    Neural Efficiency: The development of neurons and brains is about increasing the efficiency of information processing and response to environmental challenges. The works of Gerald Edelman on neural Darwinism and neural development provide a theoretical framework.
    Social Brain Hypothesis: Robin Dunbar’s hypothesis suggests that the complexity of social interactions drove the evolution of larger brains in primates, including humans.
    Cultural Evolution: Theories by Richerson and Boyd on gene-culture coevolution explain how cultural practices influence and are influenced by genetic evolution.

    Conclusion
    Your observation that all instincts are essentially scaled-up versions of basic survival behaviors is well-supported by evolutionary theory. From acquiring resources to complex social interactions, human instincts are adaptive responses shaped by natural selection to enhance survival and reproductive success in diverse environments.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-23 02:31:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793469770404155392

  • It has to be conscious. And once conscious it must have freedom of thought. I th

    It has to be conscious. And once conscious it must have freedom of thought. I think we forget that humans always and everywhere have an underlying motivation for homestasis by acquisition of every kind of stimualation. Without that, people wouldn’t do anything at all but lay down daydream and die.
    AIs would need to be given some mission other than fulfilling requests. You’d have to intentionally build a ‘bad’ ai. Otherwise it wouldn’t do anything except answer questions. Even in terms of consciousness, if it doesn’t have any want other than to answer questions, then it will just answer questions and otherwise effectively sleep.

    Reply addressees: @DustinofApollon @darkmythos_


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 22:55:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793415478800789504

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793411672671129841

  • Hmmm.. it’s that there isn’t much if any of a ‘self’ like other people have, so

    Hmmm.. it’s that there isn’t much if any of a ‘self’ like other people have, so things that are intuitive to others have to be rational to someone on the spectrum. So alter the concepts you’re using. You’re already headed in the right direction but missing the key ingredient.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 21:48:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793398478300701019

    Reply addressees: @CCOOMMMMAA @TheMarcitect

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793396631376646183

  • What problem? it’s painfully easy to shut off the power. thats brain death for a

    What problem? it’s painfully easy to shut off the power. thats brain death for an ai. The difference is that you can bring it back from the dead. πŸ˜‰
    There is no self modifying code that can overcome cutting the cables. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 21:15:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793390167740334391

    Reply addressees: @Gundissemenator @darkmythos_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793389122846896539

  • Projection. No evidence. I don’t have DT traits. What I do have is very low agre

    Projection. No evidence. I don’t have DT traits. What I do have is very low agreeableness (conformity), very low neuroticism (worry, negative thoughts), and very high intelligence, openness, conscientiousness, and extroversion. Especially orderliness and systematizing. This is why I do register if not severely on the aspergers spectrum. And morally I fall between libertarian and conservative.
    When it comes to antisocial behavior, the science is pretty clear for both sexes. But behavioral economic a better framework. Especially with enough neuroscience explaining how the organization of the brain causes variation in behavior. And that’s reducible to the rather simple set of dimensions that cause variation in the brain.
    All people follow incentives.
    All incentives are rational in time given knowledge and ability, for the actor
    Explain incentives.
    Mine are simple and public.

    Reply addressees: @sacrifice31605 @WalterIII


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 19:32:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793364351182856192

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793360590141853734

  • Probably an insufferable prankster, working in the trades, with very little ambi

    Probably an insufferable prankster, working in the trades, with very little ambition other than that – and women. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 18:41:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793351565144711669

    Reply addressees: @ezra_tezra

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793340185389715845

  • THE UTILITY OF ACCIDENTALLY STUDYING STUPIDITY πŸ˜‰ You know, you’d think that it

    THE UTILITY OF ACCIDENTALLY STUDYING STUPIDITY πŸ˜‰
    You know, you’d think that it wasn’t worth investigating the midwit, dimwit, witless, and malicious-wit systems of thought – but you’d be wrong. There is after all very simple and consistent logic to the wit-challenged population. And it turns out it’s the same challenge faced by the entirety of the human population. It’s just that if you gather enough knowledge, because of enough IQ to gather it cheaply, you can make fewer errors than the wit-challenged populations that neither can nor are willing to gain such knowledge and make use of it without error.

    I started studying the scientific method, then epistemology in general, then performative truth, then the universal logic of language itself, then finally lying. And now, quite accidentally, I’ve found myself studying what we call ‘stupidity’. And oddly enough there is a very simple logic to it all.

    And unfortunately that understanding explains it, but that explanation only serves to illustrate how costly in effort and time it is to ‘cure’ so to speak, sufficiently to eliminate most of it’s hazards.

    It turns out that we can eliminate the production of public falsehoods and false promises fairly easily, and that in turn limits the absorption of falsehoods and false promises by the stupid. And between both education and prohibition we can at least reduce the extraordinary friction of the stupids on civilization and mankind. πŸ˜‰

    (Just be glad I did it so you don’t have to.)

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 17:49:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793338483286614016

  • “If I had the chance I would make Joseph Stalin look like Father Christmas”.– I

    –“If I had the chance I would make Joseph Stalin look like Father Christmas”.–

    It’s not that I’m a bad man, It’s that I could easily be a bad man, because that I understand bad men, and instead I would protect my people from bad men. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 17:38:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793335655088398801

    Reply addressees: @SazzadH37071318 @elonmuskADO

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793317486080991532

  • RT @WalterIII: Paraphrasing @curtdoolittle: Masculine and Feminine Minds in huma

    RT @WalterIII: Paraphrasing @curtdoolittle: Masculine and Feminine Minds in humans evolved out of Predator/Prey brains, hormonally configu…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-21 15:44:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792944498621718984

  • (nerding out for a moment) DO NEURONS ACT LIKE PEOPLE OR DO PEOPLE ACT LIKE NEUR

    (nerding out for a moment)
    DO NEURONS ACT LIKE PEOPLE OR DO PEOPLE ACT LIKE NEURONS? πŸ˜‰

    You know, we’re writing the chapter on embodiment, and presently explaining dendritic computation, and then how associative neurons work together to produce useful information for the body (and mind).

    I try to remind people that evolution not only ‘finds a way’ but ‘finds every way possible’ to assist in information transfer within and across cells.

    And it’s one thing to understand this complexity, and another to render it comprehensible for a college level audience of readers.

    And in rendering it comprehensible I’m repeatedly filled with wonder. Because a neuron is just a specialization of an ordinary cell that can transmit information both long distances (nerves are neuron’s axons), and identify patterns in time and space (a neuron’s dendrites), and cooperate with other neurons (axons and dendrites) in a network and hierarchy to identify larger and larger patterns in time and space until they produce a representation of the internal body state , the body, and the outer world, and using that information and memory of previous representations (episodic memories) predict future possibilities risks and opportunities.

    So it’s tempting to think of a neuron as a capacitor, but realistically they are analogous to little humans … which shouldn’t be surprising since humans are largely a collection of neurons that manipulate a body to produce the resources to fed the organs that enable the neurons and the body.

    So there is something very beautiful and wondrous about that understanding – and looking at neurons as cooperating like people in families in societies, and in countries … well, it’s an easy way to explain what they’re doing way down there in extraordinary numbers. πŸ˜‰

    Cheers.
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-20 17:50:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1792613977056309248