May 2, 2020, 7:01 PM Things I know how to do that seem to work. – Be funny. – Be affectionate. – Be supportive constantly – Listen when necessary – Be a gentleman when necessary. – Make her look good to her friends. – Be tasteful. – Make money. – Fix things. – Lift heavy things. – Be scary when necessary. – Make her coffee. – Rub her feet. – Wash her hair. – Feed her chocolate – Bring flowers. – Buy her clothes. – Cook (a lot) – Do Laundry. Dust. Vacuum. Sew buttons etc now and then. Things I know I do that don’t seem to work. – Avoid shopping without threats of bodily harm. – Forget everything it’s possible to forget. (Everything) – Leave my clothes next to the bed. – Pile papers and books on my desk. – Forget to turn off CEO-Me – Forget to turn off Philosopher-Me – Pretend I don’t know the answer or how to do it. – Ignore all attempts to ‘alter my priorities’ – Express more frustration at being interrupted. – Fail to ignore stupidity – Appreciate beautiful women now and then.
Theme: Agency
-
Relationship Wisdom
May 2, 2020, 7:01 PM Things I know how to do that seem to work. – Be funny. – Be affectionate. – Be supportive constantly – Listen when necessary – Be a gentleman when necessary. – Make her look good to her friends. – Be tasteful. – Make money. – Fix things. – Lift heavy things. – Be scary when necessary. – Make her coffee. – Rub her feet. – Wash her hair. – Feed her chocolate – Bring flowers. – Buy her clothes. – Cook (a lot) – Do Laundry. Dust. Vacuum. Sew buttons etc now and then. Things I know I do that don’t seem to work. – Avoid shopping without threats of bodily harm. – Forget everything it’s possible to forget. (Everything) – Leave my clothes next to the bed. – Pile papers and books on my desk. – Forget to turn off CEO-Me – Forget to turn off Philosopher-Me – Pretend I don’t know the answer or how to do it. – Ignore all attempts to ‘alter my priorities’ – Express more frustration at being interrupted. – Fail to ignore stupidity – Appreciate beautiful women now and then.
-
The Social Utility of Sh-t Talking and Sh-T Testing
May 3, 2020, 9:18 AM TRUTH: Sh-t talking provides mindfulness. It provides safe competitive dominance play while showing respect at the same time. It requires self regulation. It requires cunning. It allows public accusation and admission of truths. It is desensitizing. It builds trust. I can’t say enough good about it. Whereas GSRRM does the opposite. The techniques of GSRRM and Sh-t_Testing as the via-negativa undermining vs Sh-t Talking and Bragging as the via-positiva advocating explain the social utility of each.
-
The Social Utility of Sh-t Talking and Sh-T Testing
May 3, 2020, 9:18 AM TRUTH: Sh-t talking provides mindfulness. It provides safe competitive dominance play while showing respect at the same time. It requires self regulation. It requires cunning. It allows public accusation and admission of truths. It is desensitizing. It builds trust. I can’t say enough good about it. Whereas GSRRM does the opposite. The techniques of GSRRM and Sh-t_Testing as the via-negativa undermining vs Sh-t Talking and Bragging as the via-positiva advocating explain the social utility of each.
-
Loyalty Does Not Require Equality
May 3, 2020, 2:02 PM [Y]es common people are comparatively simple. I don’t do simple. I don’t know how. That said, I LOVE the common man. I live to SERVE the common man. My work is in the INTEREST of the common man. That doesn’t mean I can speak his language. It doesn’t mean I consider us peers. Aristocracy does not coddle by denying class differences. We show loyalty despite our class differences. BEcause loyalty is enough. Because it is reciprocity. And we are kin.
-
Loyalty Does Not Require Equality
May 3, 2020, 2:02 PM [Y]es common people are comparatively simple. I don’t do simple. I don’t know how. That said, I LOVE the common man. I live to SERVE the common man. My work is in the INTEREST of the common man. That doesn’t mean I can speak his language. It doesn’t mean I consider us peers. Aristocracy does not coddle by denying class differences. We show loyalty despite our class differences. BEcause loyalty is enough. Because it is reciprocity. And we are kin.
-
It’s Our Duty to Protect Those Victimized by Baiting Into Hazard
May 3, 2020, 5:51 PM by Scott De Warren [N]oblesse oblige. Yes, ironically, It is our duty to protect our people, especially the majority that lack agency and the discernment to detect the enemy’s propaganda that baits them into hazard (and pulls the rest of us down with them). The irony is that these, our own people, constantly betray us by siding with the enemy. In England, France, and even America our people were encouraged to rebel against their king and aristocracy – often on the thinnest of pretexts. In the American revolution, for ex., Samuel Adams organized the rough dock workers to attack the upper classes and destroy their fine houses over what was essentially a 1% tax imposed by Britain on legal papers. Now the descendants of those dockworkers pay 50% taxes without blinking. Yet they will still rail against kings and aristocrats – the ones that taxed them 1% to protect them militarily while praising foreign hostiles that tax them 50% while taking way their borders, liberties, and that sponsor third world invasions because it is all sold as ‘democratic’. No, the people will be protected from such lies going forward by making the liars answerable in a court of law.
—“You have no duty to those that have betrayed you. If anything, the duty to those that haven’t betrayed you is to punish those that have.”—Martin Štěpán
-
It’s Our Duty to Protect Those Victimized by Baiting Into Hazard
May 3, 2020, 5:51 PM by Scott De Warren [N]oblesse oblige. Yes, ironically, It is our duty to protect our people, especially the majority that lack agency and the discernment to detect the enemy’s propaganda that baits them into hazard (and pulls the rest of us down with them). The irony is that these, our own people, constantly betray us by siding with the enemy. In England, France, and even America our people were encouraged to rebel against their king and aristocracy – often on the thinnest of pretexts. In the American revolution, for ex., Samuel Adams organized the rough dock workers to attack the upper classes and destroy their fine houses over what was essentially a 1% tax imposed by Britain on legal papers. Now the descendants of those dockworkers pay 50% taxes without blinking. Yet they will still rail against kings and aristocrats – the ones that taxed them 1% to protect them militarily while praising foreign hostiles that tax them 50% while taking way their borders, liberties, and that sponsor third world invasions because it is all sold as ‘democratic’. No, the people will be protected from such lies going forward by making the liars answerable in a court of law.
—“You have no duty to those that have betrayed you. If anything, the duty to those that haven’t betrayed you is to punish those that have.”—Martin Štěpán
-
Individual and Group Differences
INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP DIFFERENCES Differences in: 1) Physical, Cognitive, Verbal, ability – even differences in internal voice, and internal vision (about ten percent of the population lacks one or the other; or internal regulation (psychopathy vs sociopathy). 2) The importance of Trait-IQ vs Trait-Conscientiousness is the only innovation in my entire adult lifetime, in that success and wealth is dependent upon Conscientiousness, and IQ grants access to increasingly complex subject matter and rapidity of changing information, and this is due not necessarily to innovation but to rapidity of ability to learn anything and the attendant error detection. This is why people are equally successful across the IQ spectrum if they possess conscientiousness and unequally successful if they possess IQ alone – although this results in higher IQ people maintaining a superior distribution throughout the population which may be necessary for error reduction throughout the spectrum of people. 3) DIfferences between the two sexes are substantial, obvious, stereotypical, and the reasons are significant differences in brain structure and operation, with Lateral (whole-empathic-short-term vs Longitudinal (half-physical-long-term) producing extremely replicable results, the most common being the naxalt-vs-distribution perception, the priority of truth vs face/experience, the priority of physical vs experiential, the priority of empathic interpersonal vs systemic political. This is most visible at both the low end and high end where we see female psychological, social, and sexual expression of antisocial behavior and male physical and violent expression of antisocial behavior., 4) DIfference between moral intuitions: (masculine conservative capitalizing quality packs -vs- feminine consumptive, decapitalizing, quantity, herds) is rather obvious in the data, with the female herd strategy expressing all cognitive biases above and demonstrating near exclusive sensitivity to harm/care/proportionality, the libertarian or ascendant male demonstrating they also intuit demand for liberty and novelty, (finding the left parasitic and the right oppressive) and the conservative pack strategy demonstrating the entire spectrum equally, adding disgust/purity, loyalty/hierarchy. (Which is why conservatives and libertarians find leftists disgusting and disloyal) 5) In Races, Subraces, Tribes, and Classes, (degree of neotonic evolution and subsequent rate of sexual maturity, depth of sexual maturity, degree of emotional agency, and the resulting sexual market value, social market value, economic market value); 6) Value to one another is demonstrated by the evidence. If you require others to pay for you by sacrifice of their consumption and reproduction then you are a burden on others. In small heterogenous polities due to kin preference and selection and due to limited political competition, and in genetically middle class societies, people are more redistributive. DON”T ASK OTHERS TO LIE So when you say ‘racist, sexist, ableist’ you are saying you want others to lie – the point here being you may not be cognitively able to tolerate the truth given the feminine construction of your brain, such that you cannot distinguish between the preferable and the true. PROBLEM ONE Why? For the female her offspring are expensive investments that she must fool herself into continuing to pay the cost of, and her offspring as largely incompetent must be encouraged to continue to persist their genes despite the continuous feedback that they are of lower sexual, social, economic, political, market value to others than their existence, consumption, and reproduction warrants. PROBLEM TWO Worse? Add dunning kruger incompetence to those who have lower intelligence, lower conscientiousness, and a more feminine cognition, and you get those people who disagree with anything I wrote here. SCIENCE: START WITH Sex Differences in the Brain: Simon Baron Cohen. Differences in Moral Intuition: Jonathan Haidt Group differences in Genetics: Robert Reich. And my reading list: propertarianism.com/reading-list/ covers the rest. Which will take a lifetime unless like me your intelligence is far above the normal threshold, your memory is far above the normal threshold, and you are wealthy enough to devote otherwise unreasonable amounts of time to research.
-
Individual and Group Differences
INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP DIFFERENCES Differences in: 1) Physical, Cognitive, Verbal, ability – even differences in internal voice, and internal vision (about ten percent of the population lacks one or the other; or internal regulation (psychopathy vs sociopathy). 2) The importance of Trait-IQ vs Trait-Conscientiousness is the only innovation in my entire adult lifetime, in that success and wealth is dependent upon Conscientiousness, and IQ grants access to increasingly complex subject matter and rapidity of changing information, and this is due not necessarily to innovation but to rapidity of ability to learn anything and the attendant error detection. This is why people are equally successful across the IQ spectrum if they possess conscientiousness and unequally successful if they possess IQ alone – although this results in higher IQ people maintaining a superior distribution throughout the population which may be necessary for error reduction throughout the spectrum of people. 3) DIfferences between the two sexes are substantial, obvious, stereotypical, and the reasons are significant differences in brain structure and operation, with Lateral (whole-empathic-short-term vs Longitudinal (half-physical-long-term) producing extremely replicable results, the most common being the naxalt-vs-distribution perception, the priority of truth vs face/experience, the priority of physical vs experiential, the priority of empathic interpersonal vs systemic political. This is most visible at both the low end and high end where we see female psychological, social, and sexual expression of antisocial behavior and male physical and violent expression of antisocial behavior., 4) DIfference between moral intuitions: (masculine conservative capitalizing quality packs -vs- feminine consumptive, decapitalizing, quantity, herds) is rather obvious in the data, with the female herd strategy expressing all cognitive biases above and demonstrating near exclusive sensitivity to harm/care/proportionality, the libertarian or ascendant male demonstrating they also intuit demand for liberty and novelty, (finding the left parasitic and the right oppressive) and the conservative pack strategy demonstrating the entire spectrum equally, adding disgust/purity, loyalty/hierarchy. (Which is why conservatives and libertarians find leftists disgusting and disloyal) 5) In Races, Subraces, Tribes, and Classes, (degree of neotonic evolution and subsequent rate of sexual maturity, depth of sexual maturity, degree of emotional agency, and the resulting sexual market value, social market value, economic market value); 6) Value to one another is demonstrated by the evidence. If you require others to pay for you by sacrifice of their consumption and reproduction then you are a burden on others. In small heterogenous polities due to kin preference and selection and due to limited political competition, and in genetically middle class societies, people are more redistributive. DON”T ASK OTHERS TO LIE So when you say ‘racist, sexist, ableist’ you are saying you want others to lie – the point here being you may not be cognitively able to tolerate the truth given the feminine construction of your brain, such that you cannot distinguish between the preferable and the true. PROBLEM ONE Why? For the female her offspring are expensive investments that she must fool herself into continuing to pay the cost of, and her offspring as largely incompetent must be encouraged to continue to persist their genes despite the continuous feedback that they are of lower sexual, social, economic, political, market value to others than their existence, consumption, and reproduction warrants. PROBLEM TWO Worse? Add dunning kruger incompetence to those who have lower intelligence, lower conscientiousness, and a more feminine cognition, and you get those people who disagree with anything I wrote here. SCIENCE: START WITH Sex Differences in the Brain: Simon Baron Cohen. Differences in Moral Intuition: Jonathan Haidt Group differences in Genetics: Robert Reich. And my reading list: propertarianism.com/reading-list/ covers the rest. Which will take a lifetime unless like me your intelligence is far above the normal threshold, your memory is far above the normal threshold, and you are wealthy enough to devote otherwise unreasonable amounts of time to research.