Yes Men Love Women with Masculine Cog Bias.. But https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/yes-men-love-women-with-masculine-cog-bias-but/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 23:03:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265055862466453505
Theme: Agency
-
Yes Men Love Women with Masculine Cog Bias.. But
Jan 13, 2020, 6:11 PM Humans require agency. A masculine cognitive bias favors agency. I am not sure the world would populate very successfully with exclusively male-minded females. My present understanding is that women evolved to carry a very heavy emotional cognitive load necessary for rearing multiple children. Agency appears to develop in women as children increase in number – especially with three or more. I would prefer we understand how to manage both men’s and women’s talents than claim that a single ideal is optimum. Autism is a superpower. Yes. But so is extending the female nervous system to perceive infants, toddlers, children, and young adults. It’s up to men to take over at that point. And that appears to be where we are failing.
-
Yes Men Love Women with Masculine Cog Bias.. But
Jan 13, 2020, 6:11 PM Humans require agency. A masculine cognitive bias favors agency. I am not sure the world would populate very successfully with exclusively male-minded females. My present understanding is that women evolved to carry a very heavy emotional cognitive load necessary for rearing multiple children. Agency appears to develop in women as children increase in number – especially with three or more. I would prefer we understand how to manage both men’s and women’s talents than claim that a single ideal is optimum. Autism is a superpower. Yes. But so is extending the female nervous system to perceive infants, toddlers, children, and young adults. It’s up to men to take over at that point. And that appears to be where we are failing.
-
MEN…
Jan 17, 2020, 2:07 PM Don’t be the idiot in the meeting ‘reminding’ others of the obvious risks – it means you’re a coward and think in cowardly terms, and offer advice as pretense of courage. Instead, be the person looking for, seizing, and assisting on the seizure of opportunities to exploit. We need brave men, not cowardly women. You demonstrate what you are by what you say.
-
MEN…
Jan 17, 2020, 2:07 PM Don’t be the idiot in the meeting ‘reminding’ others of the obvious risks – it means you’re a coward and think in cowardly terms, and offer advice as pretense of courage. Instead, be the person looking for, seizing, and assisting on the seizure of opportunities to exploit. We need brave men, not cowardly women. You demonstrate what you are by what you say.
-
Richmond reset my brain a bit on strategy
Jan 21, 2020, 12:10 PM Richmond reset my brain a bit on strategy so I’m not talking about it yet. But the drive down and back, plus the pure spirituality of ‘all our men’ gave me needed think time. Mostly on european aesthetics and commons and our ‘group-think’ (formation sensitivity?) And how that’s possibly a cognitive european bias. Second was how evident it is that I love our people but that they just … they just need answers. I need understanding but they just need answers. I used some of it to re-listen to Fukuyama on bureaucracy and that gave me a few ideas too – not the least of which is that he doesn’t understand the correlation between anglo adversarial government and sovereignty. He doesn’t grasp that the inefficiency is a trade off for adaptability. But he’s right that the left has destroyed rule of law. He just doesn’t see that it’s fixable. He comes close but doesn’t get there. Sometimes it’s better to re-read these long works a few times because you get fresh ideas out of every read. Edit
-
Richmond reset my brain a bit on strategy
Jan 21, 2020, 12:10 PM Richmond reset my brain a bit on strategy so I’m not talking about it yet. But the drive down and back, plus the pure spirituality of ‘all our men’ gave me needed think time. Mostly on european aesthetics and commons and our ‘group-think’ (formation sensitivity?) And how that’s possibly a cognitive european bias. Second was how evident it is that I love our people but that they just … they just need answers. I need understanding but they just need answers. I used some of it to re-listen to Fukuyama on bureaucracy and that gave me a few ideas too – not the least of which is that he doesn’t understand the correlation between anglo adversarial government and sovereignty. He doesn’t grasp that the inefficiency is a trade off for adaptability. But he’s right that the left has destroyed rule of law. He just doesn’t see that it’s fixable. He comes close but doesn’t get there. Sometimes it’s better to re-read these long works a few times because you get fresh ideas out of every read. Edit
-
You Must Give up Sense of Control to Obtain Control
You Must Give up Sense of Control to Obtain Control https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/you-must-give-up-sense-of-control-to-obtain-control/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 19:23:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265000486656245760
-
You Must Give up Sense of Control to Obtain Control
Jan 22, 2020, 7:39 PM Impatience is not a virtue. Seeking a simple clear solution is not a virtue. Seeking a feeling of control and a plan is not a virtue. The virtue is in seizing every possible opportunity. We now can blame ANTIFA for any violence that occurs. We can now organize a number of 2A rallies. We can add self determination to 2A rallies. We can add guns necessary to preserve our self determination. We can offer a compromise solution We can hold the moral high ground with that solution. And if they resist then we have both created the organization, the militia, the solution, the plan, and the moral high ground. I think sh-t thru. The only thing that screwed us up was C’vill catastrophe. it took us 30 months to recover from that screw up. We just recovered. Now we move forward. (tag: revolution, civil war)
-
You Must Give up Sense of Control to Obtain Control
Jan 22, 2020, 7:39 PM Impatience is not a virtue. Seeking a simple clear solution is not a virtue. Seeking a feeling of control and a plan is not a virtue. The virtue is in seizing every possible opportunity. We now can blame ANTIFA for any violence that occurs. We can now organize a number of 2A rallies. We can add self determination to 2A rallies. We can add guns necessary to preserve our self determination. We can offer a compromise solution We can hold the moral high ground with that solution. And if they resist then we have both created the organization, the militia, the solution, the plan, and the moral high ground. I think sh-t thru. The only thing that screwed us up was C’vill catastrophe. it took us 30 months to recover from that screw up. We just recovered. Now we move forward. (tag: revolution, civil war)