by Anne Summers (98^℅) of Humans are either Canidae (/K and alpha [domesticated]) or Sheep (/r and beta or less [semi-domesticated]) or /r feral and low IQ [wild]) The only type of government we were meant to have is Equals Under The Law flock (or pack; beta-) with differentiation and reference to the Alpha when deliberations or arbitrations are necessary. (LAW-UNIVERSAL) Representative for intrastate confederacies; diplomats for international. (FEDERAL) Democracy should be limited to local laws that affect the Commons. (LOCAL)
Theme: Agency
-
Left to Suffer – for Now
—“”We must once again find something to do with all the men who are not being used for economic resources in exchange for sex.”—CD
This is the great question of the day that is not being asked. Though it is sort of being answered in real time: They are simply left to suffer. At least for now. –Michael Churchill
-
Left to Suffer – for Now
—“”We must once again find something to do with all the men who are not being used for economic resources in exchange for sex.”—CD
This is the great question of the day that is not being asked. Though it is sort of being answered in real time: They are simply left to suffer. At least for now. –Michael Churchill
-
P-Logic
1) Everyone acts to acquire. Life is an expensive means of defeating entropy. Acting improves acquisition – at additional cost. Memory improves acquisition – at additional cost. reason improves acquisition – at additional cost. cooperation improves acquisition – at additional cost. 2) We all act in furtherance of our reproductive strategy. Female (Consume), Neutral(Exchange), and Male (Capitalize) 3) Male and Female reproductive strategies are in conflict. The female seeks to breed impulsively where it benefits her lineage, and then force the cost of her offspring on the tribe, and to further her offspring regardless of merit. The male seeks to breed impulsively wherever it does not harm his lineage, and to create a tribe capable of resisting conquest by other males – and as such males act meritocratic-ally. Men are political and divided into kin and non-kin – the universe is male. For women, men are marginally indifferent herdsmen of women. Women live in a world of women, and both men and the universe are alien. 4) Humans compete for status because status provides discounts on opportunities to acquire – especially mates and allies in cooperation. We can identify at least three horizontal axes of class division: biological (reproductive desirability), social (status desirability), economic (wealth desirability) – as well as their undesirable opposites. 5) There exist only three means of coercing other humans to cooperate with on one means or end vs cooperate with others on different means or ends. These three means of coercion can be used to construct three vertical axes of class specialization: coercion by force(conservatism/masculine), coercion by gossip(progressivism/feminine), coercion by remuneration (libertarianism / neutral masculine). Human elites are formed by those who specialize in one or more of these means of coercion. (gossip: public intellectuals and priests. force: military and political. exchange: voluntary organizations, including the voluntary organization of production. 6) Language is purely justification negotiation in furtherance of our acquisition by these three means. ergo: All ‘belief’ is justification to the self and others in furtherance of acquisition. It is meaningless. Statements of justification only provide us with information necessary to deduce what it is that we wish to acquire. 7) Cooperation is a disproportionately more productive means of acquisition than individual production. 8) We seek discounts on our acquisitions. Some of these discounts are productive and moral and encourage cooperation, and some of them are unproductive and immoral, discourage cooperation, and invite retaliation. 9) The only moral acquisition is one in which one either homesteads something new or obtains it by productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, where external transfers are limited to the same criteria. 10) Aristotle’s ‘golden mean’ is an inarticulate primitive expression of the supply-demand curve. All human acquisition takes place within the pressures of supply and demand. As such all explanations of human action must be produced using supply and demand curves: the golden mean. 11) All human considerations and consequent actions take place in high causal density, choices determined by means of opportunity costs, and any analysis requires we show the choices that an individual or group is considering. (Full Accounting). 12) We cooperate and coerce in large numbers, as classes with common reproductive interests to using narratives at every scale. Science and moral law are the only means of resolving conflicts between these narratives. Propertarian analysis provides means of amoral analysis, argument and decidability between these loaded, framed, and obscured arguments. 13) Groups evolve evolutionary strategies and supporting narratives. While none of these strategies by any given group is fully moral, it is still true that we can compare strategies as more and less objectively moral. We can measure the differences in objective morality by the degree of suppression of free riding in that given society. 14) In all political matters, ultimate decidability is provided by a bias to suicidal, proletarian and dysgenic, or competitive, aristocratic and eugenic reproduction. The myth of equality (the Christian mythos) was let loose by the middle-class takeover of the aristocratic governments, and the eventual enfranchisement of women whose reproductive strategy under industrial production is dysgenic – reversing 7,000 years of indo european genetic pacification (eugenic evolution). This is a very unpleasant and impolitic topic. But it is where we find decidability. THE SIMPLE METHOD: INCENTIVES AS ACQUISITION 1) take any circumstance in which someone is attempting to persuade someone else. 2) identify the reproductive strategy of the speaker (largely by gender, class, and coercive technique.) 3) identify the property-in-toto that the speaker is attempting to acquire. 4) determine if his or her method is advocating a moral transfer(productive) or an immoral transfer (parasitism). 5) Determine which discounts (thefts) he or she is attempting to engage in, or which premiums (payments) he or she is offering in exchange. 6) State the user’s request in amoral propertarian terms free of loading, framing, or overloading. In other words, make a purely logical argument free of sentimental loading.
-
P-Logic
1) Everyone acts to acquire. Life is an expensive means of defeating entropy. Acting improves acquisition – at additional cost. Memory improves acquisition – at additional cost. reason improves acquisition – at additional cost. cooperation improves acquisition – at additional cost. 2) We all act in furtherance of our reproductive strategy. Female (Consume), Neutral(Exchange), and Male (Capitalize) 3) Male and Female reproductive strategies are in conflict. The female seeks to breed impulsively where it benefits her lineage, and then force the cost of her offspring on the tribe, and to further her offspring regardless of merit. The male seeks to breed impulsively wherever it does not harm his lineage, and to create a tribe capable of resisting conquest by other males – and as such males act meritocratic-ally. Men are political and divided into kin and non-kin – the universe is male. For women, men are marginally indifferent herdsmen of women. Women live in a world of women, and both men and the universe are alien. 4) Humans compete for status because status provides discounts on opportunities to acquire – especially mates and allies in cooperation. We can identify at least three horizontal axes of class division: biological (reproductive desirability), social (status desirability), economic (wealth desirability) – as well as their undesirable opposites. 5) There exist only three means of coercing other humans to cooperate with on one means or end vs cooperate with others on different means or ends. These three means of coercion can be used to construct three vertical axes of class specialization: coercion by force(conservatism/masculine), coercion by gossip(progressivism/feminine), coercion by remuneration (libertarianism / neutral masculine). Human elites are formed by those who specialize in one or more of these means of coercion. (gossip: public intellectuals and priests. force: military and political. exchange: voluntary organizations, including the voluntary organization of production. 6) Language is purely justification negotiation in furtherance of our acquisition by these three means. ergo: All ‘belief’ is justification to the self and others in furtherance of acquisition. It is meaningless. Statements of justification only provide us with information necessary to deduce what it is that we wish to acquire. 7) Cooperation is a disproportionately more productive means of acquisition than individual production. 8) We seek discounts on our acquisitions. Some of these discounts are productive and moral and encourage cooperation, and some of them are unproductive and immoral, discourage cooperation, and invite retaliation. 9) The only moral acquisition is one in which one either homesteads something new or obtains it by productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, where external transfers are limited to the same criteria. 10) Aristotle’s ‘golden mean’ is an inarticulate primitive expression of the supply-demand curve. All human acquisition takes place within the pressures of supply and demand. As such all explanations of human action must be produced using supply and demand curves: the golden mean. 11) All human considerations and consequent actions take place in high causal density, choices determined by means of opportunity costs, and any analysis requires we show the choices that an individual or group is considering. (Full Accounting). 12) We cooperate and coerce in large numbers, as classes with common reproductive interests to using narratives at every scale. Science and moral law are the only means of resolving conflicts between these narratives. Propertarian analysis provides means of amoral analysis, argument and decidability between these loaded, framed, and obscured arguments. 13) Groups evolve evolutionary strategies and supporting narratives. While none of these strategies by any given group is fully moral, it is still true that we can compare strategies as more and less objectively moral. We can measure the differences in objective morality by the degree of suppression of free riding in that given society. 14) In all political matters, ultimate decidability is provided by a bias to suicidal, proletarian and dysgenic, or competitive, aristocratic and eugenic reproduction. The myth of equality (the Christian mythos) was let loose by the middle-class takeover of the aristocratic governments, and the eventual enfranchisement of women whose reproductive strategy under industrial production is dysgenic – reversing 7,000 years of indo european genetic pacification (eugenic evolution). This is a very unpleasant and impolitic topic. But it is where we find decidability. THE SIMPLE METHOD: INCENTIVES AS ACQUISITION 1) take any circumstance in which someone is attempting to persuade someone else. 2) identify the reproductive strategy of the speaker (largely by gender, class, and coercive technique.) 3) identify the property-in-toto that the speaker is attempting to acquire. 4) determine if his or her method is advocating a moral transfer(productive) or an immoral transfer (parasitism). 5) Determine which discounts (thefts) he or she is attempting to engage in, or which premiums (payments) he or she is offering in exchange. 6) State the user’s request in amoral propertarian terms free of loading, framing, or overloading. In other words, make a purely logical argument free of sentimental loading.
-
The Argument Is that Women Don’t Love Their Men
Hey so, you know, the argument is that women don’t love their men. That men are disposable. Men are promiscuous by nature out of reproductive necessity but women are not disposable except at the margin (sports, rock stars, etc) where the supply is infinite. The reality is that we love each other within the limits of reciprocity and proportionality, and we stay together even with only habituation within our marketability. So you know, we don’t have enough value to one another in the current order which is showing up in birth rates. And that order is only possible because of a rapidly declining asymmetry of ecnomic possibility.
-
The Argument Is that Women Don’t Love Their Men
Hey so, you know, the argument is that women don’t love their men. That men are disposable. Men are promiscuous by nature out of reproductive necessity but women are not disposable except at the margin (sports, rock stars, etc) where the supply is infinite. The reality is that we love each other within the limits of reciprocity and proportionality, and we stay together even with only habituation within our marketability. So you know, we don’t have enough value to one another in the current order which is showing up in birth rates. And that order is only possible because of a rapidly declining asymmetry of ecnomic possibility.
-
There Are No Better Angels of Our Nature.
Nov 21, 2019, 11:00 AM Man is just a rational actor, and physical crime has become less rewarding because assets are largely intangible, consumption is absurdly cheap – especially foods, there are many more means of entertainment (yes crime is also a form of entertainment).
-
There Are No Better Angels of Our Nature.
Nov 21, 2019, 11:00 AM Man is just a rational actor, and physical crime has become less rewarding because assets are largely intangible, consumption is absurdly cheap – especially foods, there are many more means of entertainment (yes crime is also a form of entertainment).
-
#IfIWereTheOppositeSex
Nov 21, 2019, 11:18 AM I’d personalize everything, think my emotions and impulses were meaningful information, never accept blame or responsibility, hold grudges eternally, gossip, judge everyone especially women by trivialities, be incapable of basic economics and politics. (sarcasm)